Taking Lives
A Handbook for Those Suffering Medical Harm
(and for those who haven’t–yet)
Page 2 of 203
Taking Lives
Elizabeth Eugenia (James) LaBozetta
2017
Page 3 of 203
The truth is like a lion.
You don’t have to defend
it.
Let it loose and it will
defend itself.
Saint Augustine
Page 4 of 203
Dedication
This book is dedicated to every medical malpractice victim–past, present, and future.
It is for the patient’s-rights activists who fight day-and-night for change in the systems that are
wantonly killing us in record numbers.
It is for my four associates who fought long and hard until they just couldn’t fight even one more
day:
Laura Burns
Lucille M. Iacovelli *
Angela Thompson- Heairet
Dayton Smith Jr.
You are all sorely missed and have not been forgotten.
Know, somehow, that I have kept my promise to you with this book.
************************
This is also dedicated to one old-school doctor who hated what his profession has become and
did everything he could to help me after I was injured. He asked me to write this book; I kept my
promise:
George Dixon Clouse, MD
************************
-1-
Page 5 of 203
*My friend Lucille Iacovelli was featured in an HBO documentary film called “Plastic Disasters”
in 2006.
You are missed, Lucy. What those doctors did to you, and worse yet–continued to do to
you–was pure evil. What would it have cost them, really, to be compassionate and kind? What
would it have cost them, really, to just tell you the truth? Why did they have to compound your
suffering with the relentless emotional battery? There were no accidents in what was heaped onto
your shoulders after-the-fact. It was deliberate. Calculated. Unconscionable. Your death is called
a suicide but those of us who know what you were subjected to call it murder, that you were
deliberately tormented to death by unscrupulous people with no boundaries or conscience.
We go back many years. You were a good friend to me. I will never forget you. And although
you will never read this, you will also never know that I will never-ever stop fighting the system
that killed you. It is what brought us together.
-2-
Page 6 of 203
Foreword
I am in very bad condition at the present, do not know if I can live long enough to complete this
project. So time and ability may not be on my side here. But the alternative is to do nothing at all
and I just can’t accept that.
It has been a little over 26 years since I was injured by a botched, unnecessary, dangerous new
surgery in its introductory phase and the deliberate neglect of its terrible consequences after-the- fact is ongoing.
In these years I have accumulated experience I feel compelled to pass on to those who can
benefit from it–the things I came to know the hardest way possible.
Some of the things I am going to pass on may be so outrageous in the detail that it might appear
unbelievable on the face of it. So, where possible, I am going to provide concrete proof–written
by the perpetrators themselves .
Listen. Or not.
Believe. Or not.
Your choice.
But know this: the “program” of cover-up-and-disposal I have been put through was not
created special just for me; it was in place and activated long before I came into the picture.
Most people get the feeling something is not quite right with the care they are receiving but
can’t quite put their finger on what, exactly, is bothering them–and have no name for it. I hope to
clarify as much of that as I can for you. I do know that others being put through the same,
standardized, cover-up program will instantly recognize the “patterns” described
herein–regardless of where they live on the globe. They might not know what to call it but the
patterns are crystal-clear.
People cannot protect themselves if they do not know what is out there laying in wait for them.
My hope is to give you at least the ghost of a chance of protecting yourself from predation, from
stumbling blindly into the traps that are set and are out there waiting for the unsuspecting to
wander blindly into–like I, and thousands just like me, did.
If I knew then what I know now I would not be dying, miserably, deliberately untreated, and
-3-
Page 7 of 203
financially enslaved to the very ones who put me in this terrible place.
All I can do is leave behind what I have learned the hard way. What you do with it is up to you.
Please remember that reality doesn’t change just because we can choose to ignore it. And
understand that writing this will not benefit me one bit: it is too late for me. I am locked into a
death spiral that cannot be reversed at this late date. But it is not too late for many of you–and
that is what I am hoping for: that you will take away something you can use when you need it
most.
Which is more than I got.
Elizabeth Eugenia (James) LaBozetta
November 10th
, 2016
-4-
Page 8 of 203
Promise
EDGE OF DARKNESS (2010 movie)
“There’s a point where anybody can become an activist. You see something happen that is SO
wrong you HAVE to act, I mean, even if it means the end of you.”
As much as I wish it were possible, I, standing alone, cannot fix this mess. It is going to take
something bigger than me. The most I can do is tip you off to what is out there and hope for the
best. We cannot protect ourselves from this level of predation, even a little, if we do not know
what we are really dealing with so we can adequately confront it when it arises. And it will arise,
if not now, later.
What is the best way to hide something? Take it apart and scatter the pieces around in plain
view. My best hope for the effort put into this book is to gather up these scattered pieces and put
enough of them together so that people will be able to recognize it for what it is, identify what
they are seeing, so they can take steps to protect themselves from predation.
There are good doctors out there somewhere. There are good lawyers out there somewhere too.
There are good people in government. And law enforcement. And media. But in my experience
they are few and far between under the current regime and I know it is because this regime will
not tolerate, or support, or keep within its ranks, those who will not follow their rules to the
letter. Even the best of them have a hard line they absolutely will not cross for fear of retaliation.
I have the luxury of being made terminal. I am in the end stages of kidney failure on top of the
other consequences of a botched laparoscopic gallbladder surgery and a hospital-acquired staph
infection that was deliberately ignored and left untreated, was allowed to blow through my body
and damage my heart, spleen, liver, kidneys. There is nothing they can do to me now that hasn’t
already been done. I am very symptomatic, slowly dying. My punishment for standing up to the
corruption I have diligently uncovered is I am not allowed to have relief or treatment, no pain
control. It is all I can do to get through a day now.
There is going to be backlash for writing this book. There has been backlash since I was injured
and left untreated back in 1991–so I am used to it. But this book is going to bring out the industry
-5-
Page 9 of 203
mouthpieces and armchair critics in number and their attacks on the content is going to be harsh.
Saying anything negative about their crimes is like waving a rag across a box of snakes. All I can
say is what I have always said: the ones being put through this will recognize the patterns of
these abuses, will know the truth when they see it because they live it every single day even if
they don’t know what to call it–yet.
There have been many books and articles written by many of the industry mouthpieces and
“club” supporters extolling the virtues and successes of the current medical system. This book is
about the things that their supporters absolutely will not write. There is a dark side, hidden from
public view– a dark side nobody is allowed to talk about in any public forum.
I am not a professional writer, have to work with what I have got. You won’t find perfection
here in spelling, grammar, and all the other things that the professionals have mastered. You will
find citations repeated, and certain statements repeated, because they are relevant to more than
one topic.
But what you will find is what matters most: a truth nobody else will tell you. There are no
other books out there like this one. And maybe there will never be again…but I can hope.
Citations:
“None Dare Call It Conspiracy” (book) By Gary Allen and Larry Abraham
QUOTE:
“Most of us have had the experience, either as parents or youngsters, of trying to discover the
“hidden picture” within another picture in a children’s magazine. Usually you are shown a
landscape with trees, bushes, flowers, and other bits of nature. The caption reads something like
this: “Concealed somewhere in this picture is a donkey pulling a cart with a boy in it Can you
find them?” Try as you might, usually you could not find the hidden picture until you turned to a
page farther back in the magazine which would reveal how cleverly the artist had hidden it from
us. If we study the landscape we realize that the whole picture was painted in such a way as to
conceal the real picture hidden within, and once we see the “real picture” it stands out like the
proverbial sore digit.”
-6-
Page 10 of 203
The Bible
Ezekiel 23:6
Proverbs 24:11-12
John 3:20
-7-
Page 11 of 203
“The Prince And The Pauper”
In author Mark Twain’s story “The Prince And The Pauper” the child Prince Edward has a
whipping boy named Humphrey Marlow. When the Prince misbehaves it is the whipping boy
who takes the punishment for the Prince. When Tom Canty and Prince Edward exchange places
it is the whipping boy who teaches Tom Canty what he needs to know to get by at the palace.
When a surgeon, or a surgeon-in-training, makes a mistake and causes harm their victim
becomes their whipping boy. All the negative assignments that should rightfully go to the one(s)
who caused the harm is wantonly diverted to their injury victim–but unlike the story where once
the whipping is finished the punishment ends, the surgeon’s injury victim is whipped
continuously at every place they turn seeking help. The punishments never end.
This standardized abuse operates from the principle of: a good offense is the best defense.
There is going to be a load of lying, concealing, records tampering, x-ray tampering, false
diagnoses, gaming, gas-lighting, gang-stalking and so on coming in hot-and-heavy from their
side. So, for every wrong they commit, it must be reversed to their victim somehow:
If they are lying, their victim will be called a liar at every opportunity.
If they are concealing the truth, their victim will be accused of hiding something.
If they are manipulating, their victim is called a manipulator.
We are pelted with false accusations of drug-seeking, attention-seeking, Munchausen’s
Syndrome, and so on into infinity.
If a relative stands up for the injury victim against their false accusations they are slammed with a
false accusation of Munchausen’s-Syndrome-By-Proxy.
There is no bottom to this particular abuse. There is nothing they will not falsely accuse their
victims of to divert responsibility onto the people they have injured and obstruct a correct
diagnosis and proper intervention. There is nothing they won’t do to shut down public disclosure
and criticism of their crimes. And by “nothing they won’t do” I DO mean nothing–they will do
-8-
Page 12 of 203
whatever it takes to keep a lid on their dirty-work: even murder outright.
There have been many cases where a persistent, uncontrollable injury victim has been heavily
drugged and locked up on the hospital psychiatric unit–no visitors allowed.
There have been cases where injury victims were set up on false drug charges and imprisoned.
There have been cases where the medical syndicate has tried to kill off its injury victims by
deliberately prescribing a drug on their victim’s allergy alert list. Or reversing the Standard Of
Care. Or improperly performing an invasive procedure without antibiotic protection. Or
prescribing drugs, or treatments, to make the true condition worse, faster. Or combining drugs
that are never to be combined.
By withholding a correct diagnosis their targets do not have even a ghost of a chance to protect
themselves from this level of predation or thwart intentional harm–and that is what the
perpetrators are hoping for.
But the great favorite is simply withholding early, proper intervention of the injury and
deliberately allowing it to pass the point of no return while chanting: “we don’t see anything and
because we can’t see anything we can’t do anything…all your tests are normal.”
“We never forgive them whom we have wronged”
author unknown
-9-
Page 13 of 203
The Education We Never Wanted
The instant we are made a medical malpractice victim life as we have known it is over. This is
where we begin a slow and ugly education we never wanted into how things really are verses
what we have been brainwashed to believe they are. This is also where we begin to leave behind
all the plans we’d made for our own future and the direction we wanted our lives to take.
All those carefully-crafted messages of hope, caring, safety, and integrity that have been
implanted into our heads and hearts through mainstream media are completely reversed and what
we are left with, and made to endure, is so sociopathically inhumane it doesn’t seem possible.
The smiling professionals who were so warm and welcoming in their offices abruptly become
cold, uncaring, accusing, verbally abusive, and even threatening. The primary care doctor we
thought we’d had a good relationship with for many years subtly, or not-so-subtly, indicates we
are not welcome in that office anymore.
The more questions we ask about our symptoms the worse the response we get from them. We
might not yet know what has actually happened to us–but they know and have already dipped
into their war chest and begun pulling out, and utilizing, their array of defenses against exposure
and accountability.
We go on to find that we are met with the same response wherever we go trying to seek help. It
is as if they are all reading from the same dark-and-terrible script: “you are lying about your
symptoms”, “you are a hypochondriac”, “your symptoms are just not possible”, “you must be a
drug-seeker”, “you did this to yourself”, “I have no idea what could be going wrong–let’s do
some tests”…and then all the tests come back “negative” in spite of our increasing and miserable
symptoms. We leave these exchanges stunned, confused, fearing for our safety, and asking
ourselves “whatever did we DO to cause this kind of behavior?” And we leave deliberately
untreated, getting worse, and fearing we will die before getting any real help.
And that is exactly the kind of response the creators of this program are shooting for: that we
will be stunned into confusion and despair and turn to blaming ourselves right out of the starting
gate. What we don’t know, and are not intended to know, is that this IS intentional. That they
ARE “reading from the same dark script”.
-10-
Page 14 of 203
So, what did we DO to cause this response? Absolutely nothing. We were in the wrong place,
at the wrong time, with the wrong people. We entered a world we only thought we knew through
carefully-crafted brainwashing. The dark underbelly, and actual workings, of this hidden world is
closed and concealed to we outsiders. The only way we find out it exists is after something
terrible happens to us and it is their fault. Then it is too late to extract ourselves from the abusive
consequences. Once pulled in there is no real way out.
Then our education begins. The one we never wanted. And we will be made to pay for this
education every step of the way and in every way possible, eventually with everything we have if
we do not take steps to protect ourselves.
I have survived the terrible education I have been put through with a single change in how I
perceive it: I remind myself that “there are no bad experiences, only learning experiences” and
take the abuses that are continually inflicted as opportunities to LEARN–then report what I have
come to learn the hardest way possible. I make sure I come away with something useful every
single time.
“Know your enemy and learn his ways”.
(derived from the Art of War, written in the second century BC by Chinese strategist
Sun-Tzu)
-11-
Page 15 of 203
Commodities
“Life is God’s most precious gift. No principle, however glorious, may justify the taking of
it.” from The Crucible by Arthur Miller
Once we are injured (or are terminal with another disease or injury) we become an extremely
valuable commodity to the New Medicine community and its utilitarian ethic. New Medicine’s
utilitarian ethic has discarded its fiduciary duty to its patients, the patient’s right to self- determination, a right to a full informed consent, and has installed its justifications into the minds
and hearts of its young doctors early, to be at the ready to override and salve whatever conscience
they have left after it has been methodically rubbed out of them in medical training and later by
the health insurance companies they come to work for.
If you listen long and carefully you will sometimes hear these three particular justifications that
they have been programmed with spoken aloud:
* “It is okay to sacrifice a few to benefit many”.
* “We can’t break what is already broken”.
* “Eat what you kill”.
WHO is good enough to select out and sacrifice other human beings? Their overblown sense of
entitlement lies to them and tells them they, and their higher placement in society, endows them
with that right–to take lives away from their rightful owners and use them up to their own
purposes. The criminal elite has always been infected with this specific corruption but in the
hands of people we have placed in positions of public trust, and who have the unity and
collusion, focus and numbers, to coordinate a project and see it all the way through, creates a
dangerous trap for those on the outside. Once lured in, there is no real escape.
-12-
Page 16 of 203
The broken among us are the primary targets for their sacrifices. If we fit one of their
“expendable” categories we had better keep our backs to the wall at every single encounter
because their teaching hospitals have a continuous need to fill their green surgical trainees
credentialing quotas. Experimenters have a continuous need to fill their quotas for experimental
subjects for their experimentation with varying degrees of safety. Both utilize doctors in the
community for referrals to fill these needs and pay them a “referral fee” for each completed
referral. The bulk of the referrals they rely upon come from emergency room doctors and primary
care doctors.
The list of people who they’ve labeled expendable is large and they routinely select from
categories of people who are disenfranchised in one way or another. They like easy targets,
people who can’t fight back, or fight them off, on a level playing field. It is no accident they
choose people whose medical malpractice cases, however meritorious, will be rejected for
prosecution by lawyers because they know something we don’t: lawyers only want cases they can
make a LOT of money on and that is determined by MONETARY damages only–not actual
physical damage done or its natural consequences. A celebrity making millions a year attracts
interest and action; the housewife is passed over no matter what was done to her. The medical
syndicate knows exactly what it is doing when it selects from certain categories of people for its
most dangerous surgery training, drug and device testing, experimentation: these people’s cases
will never see a lawyer or a courtroom no matter what is done to them. They are essentially
FREE KILLS.
So, who is expendable?
* housewives
* the elderly
* the retired
* prisoners
* terminal with another disease or injury
* on public assistance
* single over the age of 25 with no dependents
* the homeless
-13-
Page 17 of 203
* institutionalized
* children
*the handicapped
* people damaged by prior medical harm that is not fixable, or cheaply or easily fixable
* anyone whose monetary worth tolls too low in economic damages as determined by the scale
lawyers use to assess value (to themselves) of a case.
Their “eat what you kill” ethic/ritual is a half-baked, twisted version stolen from the Native
Americans practice of using up every single part of the bodies of the animals they kill for food in
order to honor the life they have taken and give it respect. New Medicine’s version is a tool they
use to salve their own remnant of conscience in case it whispers: “what you did was wrong and
this is why it was wrong” at the same time it justifies what comes next in this ritual:
Once we are injured by one of them the whole medical community indulges itself in “eating the
kill” one of their membership made: they unify tightly to corral and harness up these damaged
people and use up whatever is left of them in further green student surgery training, drug testing,
device testing, or experimentation–the most dangerous is reserved for this category of
expendables “because we can’t break what is already broken”. Those who resist, refuse to
participate in what has been selected for them, are incrementally punished. All manner of
coercions, threats, and abuses are applied but cutting off pain control is a great favorite to force
cooperation because they know pain is a powerful motivator and pain control can be used as a
carrot-on-a-stick: “undergo the surgery we want you to have THEN you can have pain control
back”. They, and only they, have the means and power to relieve the pain they have caused and
they use this as a tool of coercion because it works.
Everything their targets will accept is loaded on in a never ending stream–until there is nothing
left. Can you guess who gets to pay for it? The criminal elite likes to keep the big money
circulating within their own membership. Remember what I said about the health insurers buying
up and owning hospitals? That they get paid to train residents surgery by the government and
have a continual need for warm bodies for their trainees to practice on? And our health insurance
usually has a large deductible, co-pays, and will pay only a percentage of certain things like a
-14-
Page 18 of 203
hospital stay, prescriptions, etc? Guess who has to pick up the rest of the tab?
Many people have had an enormous medical debt run up on them after an iatrogenic injury.
And because they are blocked from relief through the “club”-controlled court system and because
lawyers will not accept their valid cases, they get stuck with the debt–for the injury itself AND
for all the other intrusions coerced by New Medicine in its “eat what you kill” ritual.
To top it off, because their standardized cover-up program dictates nothing incriminating ever
gets acknowledged or recorded outside the only clean record stored in their protected computer
databases, their injury victims cannot produce the truthful medical information necessary to
collect on the disability insurance policies they have purchased nor can they collect Social
Security disability benefits that they are entitled to.
Nice. Real nice–financially enslaving people who can’t work because of their doctor-caused
injuries and methodically plundering whatever assets they have to fill their own pockets, clapping
liens on homes and retirement accounts when they can’t pay up.
Evil has never been so well-rewarded.
Citations:
The Columbus Dispatch 199*
“A son remembers loving moments, lessons learned from Dad” by Kirsten Chapman
QUOTE:
“To kill wantonly is wrong,” the son recalled his father saying, “Eat what you kill.”
The Dallas Morning News May 16, 1999 page 9-A
“Patient Drug Trials Lucrative For Some Doctors, Paper says.” Incentives reportedly given to
those who recruit subjects”
QUOTE:
“Drug companies and their contractors offer large payments to doctors, nurses, and other medical
staff to encourage them to recruit patients quickly. And doctors do not even have to conduct trials
to get paid: There are finder’s fees for those who refer their patients to other doctors conducting
research.”
-15-
Page 19 of 203
The Savvy Patient (out-of-print book) 1990
By David R. Stutz M.D., Bernard Feder Ph.D and the editors of Consumer Reports Books
“There’s another form of experimentation that ostensibly is directed toward clarifying a patient’s
diagnosis or treatment but that may not be as useful for that patient as it might appear to be. Dr.
Robin points out that when a newly devised invasive procedure is introduced into medical
practice, the doctors using it must go through a learning process. Because the doctors must
gradually become proficient in using the procedure, the patients subjected to it at this early point
are subjects in an experimental situation that will help the doctors more than it will help the
patient. During these early stages, the danger to the patient is highest, and it is likely to decrease
as the group—doctors, nurses, technicians gain experience.
“Patients managed early in the learning phase”, writes Robin, “are sacrificed because of relative
inexperience. That the sacrifice is not an inevitable consequence of their disease is usually not
apparent to the patient or the patient’s family.”
The risk to the patient in the experimental use of innovative, noninvasive techniques, such as
magnetic resonance imagery (MRI) and state-of-the-art scanners, is not as obvious, because the
immediate physical risks are not present. However, the technicians who use the machines aren’t
as proficient as they will be after more practice, and the physicians interpreting the images are
not as accurate as they will become with more experience. As a result, the interpretation of
images for the earliest patients using these machines is likely to be far less accurate or useful than
that for later patients. The hidden risk of inexperience lies behind our advice that you ask about
your doctor’s experience with any diagnostic or treatment procedure.”
LIFE WISH (out-of-print book) By: Paula Carroll
Page 179
QUOTE:
“I heard of a doctor who enjoys the dubious privilege of getting all the botched-up garbage
created by other blundering doctors in the state. It then becomes his job to act as custodian for
these patients until they die–a custodian of the doomed and mangled. The original blunderers
apparently trust this ghoul with their most irretrievable mistakes. One wonders what sort of
-16-
Page 20 of 203
explanation is given to the heirs of all this “human garbage,” although knowing as much as I do
about medical cover-ups, I am sure the ultimate records will imply “death by natural causes”.
https://surgerycenterok.com/blog/beware-of-population-health-management/
“Beware Of ‘Population Health Management”
By Surgery Center Of Oklahoma, September 9, 2016
QUOTE:
“If you don’t feel like cattle when you hear the phrase population health management, you
certainly will when you are victimized by it. Population health management ultimately is central
planning in healthcare that doesn’t take the needs of individual into account, but rather the needs
of populations. It also (and this is the really scary part) indicates that the hospitals, some of the
most abusive cronies in the industry, will become the insurance company.”
-17-
Page 21 of 203
Coveting
It comes down to something my grandfather, Eugene Edgar James told me when I was about
three: we were out walking and I saw a discarded toy on the sidewalk and stooped to pick it up.
My grandfather told me not to touch it, that it belonged to someone else who had been playing
with it there and would certainly come back for it later. I didn’t see another child anywhere and
couldn’t envision the concept of ownership at that age and started to argue: “Why did they leave
it? Where did they go? When will they come back? What is their name? Why can’t I play with it
until they come back for it?”
Grandpa said something that stuck in my head forever: “All you need to know is that this toy
doesn’t belong to you. You don’t need to know anything else about it, don’t need to know who it
belongs to, why they left it here, when they will come back and get it. All you need to know is
that it is not yours and walk away unless you have permission of the rightful owner to use it.” My
message today is one I learned easily at age three from my grandfather:
“Doctors, if it isn’t yours, leave it alone unless you have permission from the rightful owner to
use it. All you need to know is that it is not yours…”
-18-
Page 22 of 203
“It’s Not A Conspiracy
Theory if you have
proof.”
Jullian Assange
-19-
Page 23 of 203
High Priority Verses Low Priority
Whether we are aware of it or not, we have all been divided by the medical syndicate into one
of two categories: high priority or low priority.
Those labeled high priority will be offered the best of the best available at the time. They will
get the best doctors, the most effective treatments and prescriptions, and so on.
Those labeled low priority will be offered something very different.
I will begin with those tagged “low priority” because that is my stratification label (and yours
too, most likely) and the one I am most familiar with: people tagged “low priority” are kept like
cattle by the “club” and used for whatever purposes it deems fit. Once the insurance companies
corralled and gained control of the doctors through income, they got control of you—the
policyholder. It took them years and lots of wrangling and planning, but they did it. Now the
insurance companies have wrangled so much control of every aspect of the entire medical block
it doesn’t matter anymore if you are one of their policyholders or not because they have set up
“special programs” for utilizing low-priority non-policyholders too.
The insurance companies bought up every hospital they could grab; the doctors work for the
insurance companies and their hospitals now. Every dollar that was spent on buying/building new
property and paying enormous CEO salaries is a dollar that wasn’t spent on patient care. The
insurance companies own most of the teaching hospitals (and can earn lots of extra income, paid
for by the government with Medicare funds, by training residents surgery and such while using
the residents as cheap labor and overworking them at the same time) and can freely tap into their
policyholder pool to gather “teaching material/training dummies” for whatever surgery needs to
be trained. The hospital controls the medical records; they keep two (or three) sets of files: a
clean one for themselves in the computer database and a sanitized version in the paper file room
for outsiders. Some keep a microfiche file too. There is talk of implementing a paperless system,
which is well underway already, where all medical information on all people is kept in one single
database instead of all these smaller local databases. (like SnoMed, C.H.I.N. which stands for
Community Health Information Network, etcetera) Medical care is no longer a private matter or a
-20-
Page 24 of 203
private exchange of fee for a service between doctor and patient.
You might want to ask yourselves WHY it became so important for the “club” to wedge
themselves so firmly into the middle of this essential PERSONAL service and gain control of
both sides: what doctors can offer and what patients can get. My grandfather had an old saying
that applies here: “if someone does something you just can’t understand no matter how you look
at it ask yourself: WHO does this benefit because the answer lies there—always.” The “club”
understands very well the benefits of grabbing control of a whole medical system and gaining
total control over WHO gets offered what, when, where, and why.
I have heard it said that once the medical profession allowed itself to be taken over by the
insurance industry it became “the medical branch of the seated government”. In the movie
“Damaged Care” (which I highly recommend) one insurance executive says to another: “It’s just
the New World Order!” This is exactly what I am trying to tell you here: this isn’t about medical
care at all—it is about control, getting the “herd” under control and corralled so that it can be
utilized (or disposed of) more efficiently by the New World Order “club members”. It can be
used as a vehicle to harvest the wealth of we outsiders.
There is another saying applicable here: “after the dog is trained, you do not need the leash
anymore”. The insurance monsters have trained their membership “dogs” over a period of years
now; they do not need the leash anymore.
The New World Order sociopaths do not need us, the common man, anymore: the trees are cut
and the forests are cleared, the roads have been built, the buildings are up, the cities are
erected…all the donkey-work has been done. All they need now is a maintenance crew—
something they can get from the foreigners they have been importing. The common man served a
useful purpose when this country was in its early years; we have outlived our usefulness and will
soon expect to collect on the Social Security benefits we have paid into all our working lives that
have been wantonly squandered and frittered away on everything but what it was intended for:
retirement income for the elderly. Currently, billions of dollars a year goes out to the teaching
hospitals to train residents. Why? The elderly are first choice for dangerous resident surgery
training…go figure. The more elderly who are killed off in surgery training is less to be paid out
in Social Security benefits.
-21-
Page 27 of 203
faces. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out what this is used for.
Those tagged “high priority” (the “club members”) get the very best care available: surgery
performed by top-drawer surgeons with the highest level of expertise (not green student-trainees
sneaked in on them after being anesthetized) perfected on those tagged “low priority”, the most
effective prescriptions already tested on those tagged “low priority”, the most effective
treatments regardless of cost, special suites at the hospital very unlike the common patient rooms.
(In the movie “Damaged Care” the main character is being coached by an insurance executive on
what care gets approved for who: “low priority” people with valid needs are being flatly denied
and this one “high priority” society woman is given whatever she wants, however frivolous and
expensive) The insurance companies rob one segment of society to enrich another; the “insiders”
will be paying the same premiums as you but will be getting so much more at your expense.
Have you guessed yet which side of this program YOU are on?
Citations:
The Newark Advocate June 24, 1998 Letters To The Editor “Nurses” by Mary Billy, Debbie
Manifold, Mary Ann Wade, Gayle Coffman, Debbie Baucher, Mendy Magers, Michelle Mettler,
Kathy Gummer
“Our professionalism was insulted when we were told by the administration to take “special
care” when a “VI.P.” was having surgery. We feel all patients should be given the very best of
surgical care, regardless of social status.”
The Savvy Patient (Book) 1990
By David R. Stutz M.D., Bernard Feder Ph.D and the editors of Consumer Reports Books
“There’s another form of experimentation that ostensibly is directed toward clarifying a patient’s
diagnosis or treatment but that may not be as useful for that patient as it might appear to be. Dr.
Robin points out that when a newly devised invasive procedure is introduced into medical
practice, the doctors using it must go through a learning process. Because the doctors must
gradually become proficient in using the procedure, the patients subjected to it at this early point
are subjects in an experimental situation that will help the doctors more than it will help the
-24-
Page 28 of 203
patient. During these early stages, the danger to the patient is highest, and it is likely to decrease
as the group—doctors, nurses, technicians gain experience.
“Patients managed early in the learning phase”, writes Robin, “are sacrificed because of relative
inexperience. That the sacrifice is not an inevitable consequence of their disease is usually not
apparent to the patient or the patient’s family.”
The risk to the patient in the experimental use of innovative, noninvasive techniques, such as
magnetic resonance imagery (MRI) and state-of-the-art scanners, is not as obvious, because the
immediate physical risks are not present. However, the technicians who use the machines aren’t
as proficient as they will be after more practice, and the physicians interpreting the images are
not as accurate as they will become with more experience. As a result, the interpretation of
images for the earliest patients using these machines is likely to be far less accurate or useful than
that for later patients. The hidden risk of inexperience lies behind our advice that you ask about
your doctor’s experience with any diagnostic or treatment procedure.”
Donahue Show (transcript)
“Get Ready For A Turn Of The Century Economic Nightmare”
Airdate: 5-29-1996
Quote:
“Lester Thurow: …I think the thing that’s going to be explosive is not so much the salaries as
health care because if you look at big corporations, they’re pushing everybody into managed
health care, you know, which means you don’t get a choice of doctors. You don’t get some
treatments==you know, very limited health care. And at the same time, a lot of these big
corporations, as reported in The New York Times recently, they’ll have a special health care
system for, let’s say, the top 50 executives and that executive gets kind of old-fashioned, Blue
Cross-Blue Shield, all the money you want, choose the doctor you want, any treatment you
want.”
“On the other hand, we’re communists when it comes to health care. If your kids get a treatment
that my kids are not going to get and your kids and my kids both need it, I am going to be
irritated, right?”
-25-
Page 29 of 203
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/44723391/ns/health-health_care/t/docs-admit-hospital-vips-get-faste
r-care-er/#.WHYu6lxOnIU
http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/08/27/when-the-patient-is-a-vip/?_r=0
https://www.bostonglobe.com/lifestyle/health-wellness/2016/04/02/hospital-loses-its-way-care-f
or-vip-patient/YNCtmYKxtHQid17M58a9hN/story.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/26/opinion/hospitals-red-blanket-problem.html
http://www.redbookmag.com/body/mental-health/advice/a3803/letting-intuition-guide-you/
QUOTE:
Listening to her gut led to…
A lifesaving mammogram
Linda Lemma, 42, Nutley, NJ
“One hot summer evening four years ago, I decided to take a shower before going to bed. While I
was washing up, something told me to lift my left arm and examine my breast, which was weird
because I had never done a breast self-exam before. Still, I have always felt in tune with my
body; for instance, when I became pregnant with each of my four kids, I had a ‘feeling’ that I had
conceived long before I missed a period.
“This time, as I did the self-exam, I felt a lump. I shifted my body in different directions, but the
lump was still sitting there, right beneath my underarm. I couldn’t believe what I was feeling and
my heart started to race. In that moment, I was sure that something was wrong.
“I went to the ob/gyn a few days later. I had talked to this same doctor six months earlier, when
one of my nipples was cracked and bleeding, and he had said that it was dry skin and told me that
-26-
Page 30 of 203
I should ‘just put cocoa butter on it,’ something that I had never felt quite right about. At this visit,
my nipple was still bleeding and cracked, but it was as if my doctor didn’t even see it or didn’t
want to deal with it. And when I showed him the lump, he insisted that he didn’t feel anything.
But I knew what I felt, so I insisted on a mammogram. My doctor told me that it wasn’t
necessary, and then he actually left the room to see his next patient! I really couldn’t believe the
way he was blowing me off, and I just knew that I could not accept his reaction — I was sure that
something was wrong.”After a few minutes, this doctor came back into the exam room, telling
me that there was nothing more that he could do for me. I told him that I would absolutely not
leave his office until I had a referral from him for a mammogram. The doctor kept leaving and
coming back, and every time, I just refused to leave the room, insisting that I needed the test
because I knew deep down in my gut that something wasn’t right. I had never in my life acted
quite this stubborn before, in any situation, but I was so completely certain I needed that
mammogram that I never once even considered leaving his office without it. I guess the doctor
got tired of me taking up space in his exam room because after about an hour of this back-and- forth, he finally handed me that referral.”I had the mammogram a few days later — it revealed
that there wasn’t just one lump in my breast but a total of three, along with swollen lymph nodes.
I was diagnosed with Stage III breast cancer, and I spent the next two years going through
chemotherapy and radiation treatments. Today, I’m completely cancer-free, but I still get tears in
my eyes every time I think about what could have happened. My children could be motherless.
My husband could be a widower. I am forever thankful that I followed through and acted on
instinct — that weird little feeling saved my life.”
http://www.seeker.com/your-body-part-price-list-youre-worth-more-dead-than-alive-infographic- 1765741389.html
-27-
Page 31 of 203
New Medicine
What is the best way to hide something? Take it apart and scatter the pieces around in plain
sight.
I am old enough to remember what the delivery and practice of medical care was like before the
corrupting influences, and the controls, of the health insurance industry came into the picture and
took over.
The doctors lived in the communities they served, not in walled and gated McMansion
settlements at the edge of the cities where they are removed from, and do not have to witness, the
natural consequences to the problems they create for others.
The doctors provided a direct, uncomplicated service and the only needs considered were those
of the patient right in from of him/her. Patients paid at the front desk on the way out the door and
the cost was affordable. There was no middleman sitting between the doctor- patient relationship
dictating to both sides what could, and couldn’t, be offered based upon cost over necessity while
they vacuumed up the lion’s share of the money involved for themselves.
To build and keep clients the doctors had to perform to community standards of behavior. The
better they treated their clients the more money they made. The medical record stayed in the
office and its content was kept confidential.
There are still a few old-school doctors left but they are leaving this world, and their
profession, fast and they are leaving it in a form they will freely tell us has now become
abhorrent to them. Their humanitarian ethic has been replaced in recent decades by a utilitarian
ethic and the needs of the individual has been drowned in it. We no longer get care based upon
individual need but only receive what is deemed best for the whole of elite society. Much like a
rancher attends to the entire herd to keep it producing for him/her. We get something akin to herd
management to keep us on our feet and producing. Unfortunately, the power-elite is not above
culling the herd they micro-manage or targeting selected groups to use up to their own
enrichment.
Enter organized crime. Nobody knows how to sniff out where the big money is that can be
harvested like organized crime. And nobody is less inclined to do honest work for it than
-28-
Page 32 of 203
organized crime when they can wrangle a way to coerce others to do it for them while they sit
back and collect the lion’s share right off the top. Today the big money is in healthcare, an
essential service everyone needs to utilize sooner or later. All they have to do to get a foothold is
to infiltrate a little at a time, throw lots money at the ones who will be doing the actual work and
guarantee those targeted for parasitization a steady and increasing clientele. When their targets
get used to the perks and benefits they start loading on invasive rules and regulations
incrementally. Once the dog is trained they don’t need the leash anymore. It is an insidious
process, but they know how to install it from centuries of experience: set the traps and install
them slowly–slowly enough to allow their targets to get used to them before loading on the next
layer. By the time the burdens become too heavy to carry comfortably and their targets start to
complain, begin questioning the integrity of it, they are in so deep they can’t easily extract
themselves anymore. The traps snap shut. The lure was money.
When organized crime got their hooks sunk in real tight and the big money started rolling in,
they wanted to keep it rolling in. To ensure this, they installed a system they know works because
it has always worked: punish those who do not do exactly as they are told. So they installed a set
of rewards for those harnessed up to who do their bidding and they installed a set of punishments
for those who go against their dictates.
The old-school doctors saw this coming and tried to warn the young doctors but they wouldn’t
listen, plowed ahead anyhow. Now many are complaining, suffering, even committing suicide in
increasing numbers because they can’t justify, or tolerate, what is being required of them
anymore. What they were led to believe would make the practice of medicine easier has left them
buried under regulations, rules, and paperwork. They are given quotas to meet. Are driven to sell
tests and prescriptions over taking time with patients and responding to their actual needs. And
the patients suffer while they are required to pay whether they get a good service, a bad service,
or no service at all. The doctors working for New Medicine have no incentive to do a good job
anymore because they are going to receive a steady clientele no matter what they do as long as
they please their handlers and follow their dictates; everything comes at a price–and organized
crime sets that price. Why would doctors make the extra effort when the pay is the same for a
good job, a bad job, or no job at all?
-29-
Page 33 of 203
People are put through “what if…” scare tactics to convince them they need health insurance to
avert a financial disaster in case something expensive and prolonged happens, but, ironically, by
having bad health insurance it practically guarantees we’ll get nothing but the response the health
insurer wants us to have, based upon cost..or nothing at all. It isn’t your potential financial
disaster they concern themselves with: it is theirs.
Organized crime never gives anything away for free. And they never reach “enough”, will drive
their targets to produce more and faster for them regardless of consequences. Organized crime
produces nothing itself; they parasitize others and force them to produce.
Citations:
Modern Healthcare magazine
May 19, 1997
“Crime And Healthcare” by Ron Shrinkman and Eric Weissenstein
Pages 32-37
QUOTE:
“As evidence of mob activity in healthcare comes to light, experts debate whether we are seeing
an isolated incident or the beginning of a terrible trend.”
New York Times
8-21-1996
“New Jersey Officials say Mob Infiltrated Health Care Industry” by Selwyn Raab
http://www.nytimes.com/1996/08/21/nyregion/new-jersey-officials-say-mafia-infiltrated-health-c
are-industry.html
QUOTE:
“Law-enforcement officials say that mob families have for decades been secret partners or
controlled companies in many lawful industries, including food distribution, trucking, garbage
removal, garment manufacturing, construction and the entertainment industry. But they said the
mob’s entry into the nation’s rapidly expanding field of group care poses an ominous threat.”
-30-
Page 34 of 203
https://lambschopped.wordpress.com/2013/01/06/insurance-and-the-mafia-on-organized-crime/
Dayton Daily News October 7, 1997 page 8-A
QUOTE:
“Three malpractice settlements involving patients who died could wreck the career of a physician
in private practice, setting off reviews by “peer committees”, and malpractice insurance
underwriters and causing high premiums.”
Columbus Dispatch “Letters To The Editor” by Dr. Ruth Purdy MD
QUOTE:
“We are now being dictated to by the insurance companies, and the good care of the patient
literally has been scrapped for big salaries for the chief executive officers of health maintenance
organizations, much to the disgust not only of patients but also of the physicians.”
“Veterinarians are taking better care of their animals than we are taking of our patients, because
of the restrictions that are imposed upon us by the insurance companies.”
“I am sincere when I say I think that a lot of our representatives and senators in Congress have
been influenced by the insurance companies, or they would not permit this brand of medicine to
be imposed upon the citizens.”
Academy Of Medicine
“Overview Of The Bottom Line” by George Dixon Clouse, M.D.
QUOTE:
“What emerged like bats out of a cave were groups and subgroups determined to get a bite of the
health care dollars. In a feeding frenzy, many groups were formed. Congress eventually realized
it didn’t need to pass a lot of complex laws. It was done for them by insurance carriers,
employers, hospitals and doctors who were afraid of being left behind and squeezed out.
Everybody wanted in on it, and the practice of medicine became a business, intent on the bottom
line.”
“Contracts where drawn up and signed. Then changed. The concept of managed care sounded
-31-
Page 35 of 203
good, but in reality it is an euphemism for manipulated care.”
“…you can bet Congress will continue the debate as long as the dollars keep rolling in.”
“It is a grab of the greedy for power and control.”
“It is for us physicians to remember that the real bottom line of medical care is patient
satisfaction: listening, supporting, and healing—not capitation.”
Hospitals March 26, 1992
“Managed Care In The 1990s: Providers’ New Role For Innovative Health delivery”
QUOTE:
“For hospitals today, the message is clear,” Ellwood says. “Attract a set of very strong primary
care physicians and tie them as closely to the hospital as possible.”
“We’re going to be in a much stronger position to produce reliable outcomes, resource utilization
and quality data because we collect the total care information in one system.”
“Some hospitals are trying to develop stronger relations with physicians by requiring doctors to
invest more equity into physician-hospital organizations…”
“…some hospitals are creating limited partnerships and other equity-driven models to involve
physicians as part owners in these programs,…”
“However, these hybrids require sophisticated management information systems, marketing, and
actuarial expertise to manage risk,…”
“If both sides have unified contracting, we’ll have the same interests in managing care as
economically and as effectively as possible…”
The New York Times
12-27-1999
“Ambitious effort To Cut Mistakes In U.S. Hospitals”
By Peter T, Kilborn
QUOTE:
They also say that some doctors have their own wall of silence, not unlike that of police officers,
and are reluctant to report colleagues who make mistakes. “You don’t tell on each other” said
-32-
Page 36 of 203
Anna Polk, director of the Agency for Healthcare Administration in Florida. Ms. Polk oversees
one of the nation’s oldest and most comprehensive systems to report and prevent errors, yet one
that she said the culture obstructs. “There’s a strong back current that keeps people from being
entirely honest”, Ms. Polk sad. “It is a very old culture. It is a very longstanding culture. And it’s
a very powerful culture.” A physician who discloses another physician’s mistake, she said, faces
“almost certain retribution, like losing referrals. We’ve seen that over and over.”
The Columbus Dispatch
6-30-1993 P. 4-B
“Coroner Charges he Was Pressured To Protect Doctors”
QUOTE:
“A coroner was pressured by hospital colleagues to change autopsy procedures to protect
physicians, his attorney said yesterday. “If he hadn’t been coroner he wouldn’t have been
subjected to pressure” said A. William Zavarello, attorney for Dr. William Cox. The Summit
County Coroner.
Cox’s suit alleges that hospital staff members pressured him to avid critical autopsies to “protect
the physicians at Summa from public disclosure as having caused patient deaths.”
Zanesville Times Recorder
4-29=1993
By Peggy Matthews
QUOTE:
“A former Bethesda Hospital nurse has sued the hospital alleging the hospital fired her when she
refused to falsify medical records.
The complaint states Doyle, who worked for Bethesda a little over a year, was required to report
any incidents which might be considered important to “risk management” Those are cases that
might result later in medical malpractice suits.”
“Doyle said that twice she was asked to either alter reports already written or to include only
certain information to the report. The intent was to minimize risk for malpractice actions, “not to
-33-
Page 37 of 203
accurately reflect the events which had transpired”
“The suit accuses Bethesda of violating Ohio’s Whistleblower statute and the state’s criminal
laws against falsification of evidence that could be used in subsequent criminal or civil
investigations.”
Newsweek
10-23-1995
“Beware Your HMO”
QUOTE:
“People think their worst nightmare is getting a terrible disease, but they are wrong. It’s getting a
terrible disease and not being able to get treated for it.”
“…HMOs were saving money by rationing medical care to their members. Last month the New
York Post ran a week’s worth of stories on ‘managed-care casualties’.
“HMO doctors often make more money by denying you care.”
“HMO doctors stand to lose their livelihood if they provide ‘too much care’.”
“Provide too much expensive care to your patients and you’ll be out of a job. The more patients a
doctor has from a single HMO, the more powerful that message becomes.”
“Three groups of anesthesiologists recently sued Aetna because they say the company strong- armed them into joining its HMO. If they didn’t sign, they said Aetna told them it would refuse
to do business with the doctor’s hospitals.”
The Ohio Observer
April 1994
“Doctors And Healthcare Reform” by Cathy Levine
QUOTE:
“Howison speaks passionately and bitterly about the present system: “It’s impossible to take care
of people based on need–you take care of people based on their insurance coverage.”
“Especially alarming is the spread of “capitated plans,” whereby the physicians receive a set
reimbursement for each patient every month, regardless of service. But the provider receives a
-34-
Page 38 of 203
bonus to reduce patient services. Doctors who perform necessary services are often penalized for
“overutilization.” Howison says most of his patients do not know they are in capitated plans until
he tells them. He describes the system as “perverse, obscene, dangerous, and unhealthy.”
USA TODAY
199*
By Judi Hasson
“Physicians Put Insurance Plans Under The Knife”
QUOTE:
“The American Medical Association on Monday accused insurers and managed-care companies
of trying to “take over the examining room”–denying some medical care to boost profits.”
“They may offer doctors financial incentives to hold down costs.”
“…some doctor are being intimidated “out of their proper role as patient advocates”. The threat of
being dropped “is to keep the doctors in line.” Some physicians have seen incomes fall as
managed-care companies move into an area, limiting how much doctors are paid and in some
regions dominating the market so doctors must sign up with them to stay on business.”
“There are things insurance companies don’t want you to know about their health plans. That’s
why you need the facts. So you can make informed choices and get quality care in spite of their
efforts to keep you in the dark.”
Maury Povich Show (transcript)
“HMO Tragedies”
Airdate: 1-9-1996
QUOTE:
“Mark: Because 180,000 women a year get breast cancer, and when you’re a stage-four breast
cancer patient, the most cost-effective way for the HMO to treat you is to let you die–with most
cancers, with most tragic diseases.”
“Mark: …that’s where the conflict of interest comes in, because he has to sign up 4,000 patients
at $30. A month. And if he doesn’t see any of them, he makes more money. And if he never
-35-
Page 39 of 203
refers them, he makes more money. And that’s one of the greatest, life-threatening secrets of
HMOs that no one knows.”
Donahue Show (transcript)
“Get Ready For A Turn Of The Century Economic Nightmare”
Airdate: 5-29-1996
Quote:
“Lester Thurow: …I think the thing that’s going to be explosive is not so much the salaries as
health care because if you look at big corporations, they’re pushing everybody into managed
health care, you know, which means you don’t get a choice of doctors. You don’t get some
treatments–you know, very limited health care. And at the same time, a lot of these big
corporations, as reported in The New York Times recently, they’ll have a special health care
system for, let’s say, the top 50 executives and that executive gets kind of old-fashioned, Blue
Cross-Blue Shield, all the money you want, choose the doctor you want, any treatment you
want.”
“On the other hand, we’re communists when it comes to health care. If your kids get a treatment
that my kids are not going to get and your kids and my kids both need it, I am going to be
irritated, right?”
Sally Jesse Raphael Show (transcript)
Airdate: 6-14-1995
QUOTE:
“Bruce Silverman: “Nurse changed. She had visits. She changed the records. She made another
set of records.”
Janie Silverman: “Two sets of nurse’s notes. First one, she put in her locker. And the second, put
on the chart and then went on vacation.”
Donahue Show (transcript #3888, excerpt) Airdate: December 23, 1993
“When Medical Procedures Go Wrong”
-36-
Page 40 of 203
QUOTE:
“Mr. Bern: Phil, you–you mentioned getting your records from your doctor.
Donahue: Right
Mr. Bern: You are entitled to your records. But that–you may have had your first surgery, but the
second comes when they look at the records. You only get a copy. Ask them to see the originals.
Then you’ll know.
Donahue: Oh, you mean you think there’s some fooling around between the slip and the lip and
the dip and the–
Mr. Bern: Well, there might have been in the past.
Donahue: Really?
Mr. Bern: Because they’re going to–if you ask for the records, they’re going to send you a copy,
and–
Donahue: And it might be sanitized.
Mr. Bern: And they–oh, might be sanitized?
Donahue: Really.
Mr. Nader: You know, Phil, there are a lot of examples where doctors and hospital personnel
have altered or even forged records–
Donahue: Yeah.
Mr. Nader: –medical records, to escape accountability when something bad went wrong due to
incompetence.
Donahue: Right. Right.
ABC News 20/20 (transcript #1439 excerpt) Airdate: September 30, 1994
“They Know Your Secrets”
DR. TIMOTHY JOHNSON: “…the data stored in a medical file goes beyond doctors’ diagnoses
and hospital laboratory tests. It can also include the drugs you take, your sexual orientation,
genetic test results, and even risky hobbies like skydiving. In short, it can contain anything you
have told your doctor or his office staff. But what you tell your doctor may not stay just between
you and your doctor. It can also go to large companies which do nothing but compile and
-37-
Page 41 of 203
exchange your private medical information on behalf of insurance companies. Inside this
unassuming brick building are millions and millions of facts culled from the medical records of
at least 15 million Americans. Stored here at the Medical Information Bureau is coded
information which can include anything from blood tests to certain psychiatric diagnoses. Based
in Westwood, Massachusetts, MIB is the biggest database used by insurance companies. So how
do they get that information? It’s simple. When you apply for insurance, you authorize your
insurer to collect your medical records and pass on the information to MIB.”
JEFFREY ROTHFEDER: “MIB has become somewhat of a sinister organization, akin to the
credit bureaus in the financial arena, in the sense that they’re very secretive about what they have
and it’s very difficult for individuals—for the person himself, the subject—to get their own
records out of there.”
DR. TIMOTHY JOHNSON: “But medical information does not just come from doctors’ offices
or hospitals or even insurance companies. Employers may also gain access to medical
information, ironically access often technically granted by the employees. First, when you apply
for a job, you may sign authorization forms for background checks that include checking your
medical records. Second, if you ever file a medical claim, many people at the company may have
access to your medical file. And finally, more and more employers are gaining medical
information from employees who use in-house counseling programs known as EAP’s—employee
assistance programs.”
Lancaster Eagle-Gazette August 27, 1993
Letter To The Editor “Doctor’s Letter Gets Immediate Response” by Martha E. Douds, RN, BSN
QUOTE:
“What is particularly frustrating for me is the lack of physicians who have the courage to speak
out when they see that a patient has been seriously injured as a result of medical negligence. It
seems that the path of least resistance prevails and eyes are closed and lips are sealed, instead of
doing what is ethically correct. Thus, they become part of the problem instead of the solution.”
Trauma and Recovery (book) by Judith Lewis Herman, M.D.
-38-
Page 42 of 203
“In order to escape accountability for his crimes, the perpetrator does everything in his power to
promote forgetting. Secrecy and silence are the perpetrator’s first line of defense. If secrecy fails,
the perpetrator attacks the credibility of his victim. If he cannot silence her absolutely, he tried to
make sure no one listens. To this end, he marshals an impressive array of arguments, from the
most blatant denial to the most sophisticated and elegant rationalization. After every atrocity one
can expect to hear the same predictable apologies: it never happened; the victim brought it upon
herself; and in any case it is time to forget the past and move on. The more powerful the
perpetrator, the greater is his prerogative to name and define reality, and the more completely his
arguments prevail.”
The Dallas Morning News May 16, 1999 page 9-A
“Patient Drug Trials Lucrative For Some Doctors, Paper says.” Incentives reportedly given to
those who recruit subjects”
QUOTE:
“Drug companies and their contractors offer large payments to doctors, nurses, and other medical
staff to encourage them to recruit patients quickly. And doctors do not even have to conduct trials
to get paid: There are finder’s fees for those who refer their patients to other doctors conducting
research.”
Kevin MD (blogspot)
http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2016/01/physicians-arent-burned-theyre-abused.html?utm_conten
t=buffere0892&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer
January 2, 2015
“Physicians Aren’t Burned Out. They’re Abused.”
By Pamela Wible, MD
“Physicians are overworked and overwhelmed with bureaucratic bullsh*t during most of their
careers. They are trapped in assembly-line big-box clinics where they are treated like factory
workers and berated for not seeing enough patients per day. These are human rights abuses in our
nation’s hospitals. This doctor worked seven days in a row with almost no sleep!”
-39-
Page 44 of 203
New World Order Medicine
New Medicine, New World ORDER Medicine, has an “eat what you kill” and a “what is useful
is good” utilitarian philosophy they have programmed their new doctors with (the older doctors
are harder to convince because they can still remember when the individual practice of medicine
was independent and provided a service for a fee directly to the patient). It comes from their
“let’s spin a positive out of every negative we create” programming that has since eroded into
“it’s okay to sacrifice a few to benefit many” justification for targeting the lives of others and
using them up.
The criminal elite’s “eat what you kill” ethic has a universal set of standards for “eating” its
“kills.”
“Eating” means “consuming entirely”; it does not mean “taking care of” or “maintaining
comfortably.” Once a person has been injured by a doctor and there is no way to fix it, and in
some cases to cheaply fix it to please the health insurers, the person becomes “scrap” and
immediately goes onto a use-up-completely-then-kill list. New Medicine chants loudly: Quote:
“WE CAN’T BREAK WHAT IS ALREADY BROKEN” to unify their membership into
agreeing to, and performing, their inhumane, self-serving, utilitarian ethic. The offerings
delegated to those on the kill list is a standardized: “symptomatic relief only; no active
intervention”program. Once assigned to that kill list we cannot buy our way off for love nor
money; there is nothing we can say or do from that day forward to get a humane response to our
suffering. The medical syndicate intends to “eat” what it has “killed.” This is presented as a
superior utilitarian ethic where it is considered better to “eat” than to waste their kills. “Yes, we
have indeed killed people with our bungling and selfishness—but we can make it all right again
by changing the words we use to describe what happened and by maximizing the utilization of
our kill, thereby “giving meaning” to it—and by this we redeem ourselves.” Their programming
instructs them to glean and spin off any “positive”, however insignificant and self-serving, out of
the negative situation they have inflicted, and focus only on that, keep other’s attention onto it.
Of course their victims do not enter the picture at all. Did the VICTIM want to be “sacrificed” to
enrich the “club”? No? Well, too bad—it is going to happen anyway because the “club” wants it.
-41-
Page 45 of 203
Does the injured party want to be put through the standardized “eat-what-you-kill” program?
These sociopaths are only interested in getting what they want from us and making themselves
feel better about their inhumane actions and if, in doing so, they have to compound their victim’s
injuries and losses, well, so be it.
“Eat-what-you-kill” is a kind of half-baked justification-and-atonement ritual the “club” goes
through to make themselves “clean” again, by rewording, reinventing, then ritualizing reality,
however self-serving and warped.
“A good offense is the best defense”: attack, and attack, and attack because when the
perpetrators attack hard and fast right after committing a boundary violation it keeps their target
off balance and so busy just trying to ward off the blows to fight back. (called a “scorched earth”
defense) Insurers use a 3-D defense to skirt responsibility for paying out valid claims: Delay,
Deny, Defend. The medical syndicate has its own version of the 3-D defense to neutralize those
they injure: Debility, Dependance, Dread.
Due to the parasitic criminal elite’s overblown sense of entitlement they have presumed
ownership over our lives and assumed ownership over the direction and maintenance of these
lives: we are alive only to serve them and their interests. They refer to us as cattle, think of us and
talk about us as “cows–to be milked dry.” As long as we are well, working, and creating
resources for them, putting money into their pockets and systems, all is well. Once we become
ill or injured, and start taking from their system instead of putting into it we are no longer useful
to them and are to be gotten rid of as fast and as cheaply as possible–then they will methodically
consume us entirely, both physically and financially. With the “club” sitting in complete control
of ALL mainstream governing, enforcing, and regulating agencies they fear no real consequences
coming from their criminal activity, depraved heart crimes, or murders. These technopaths have a
reckless indifference to the suffering they cause and care nothing for the burdens they wantonly
inflict on others. With no consequences, anything goes.
We do not get medical care anymore; it has turned into “herd management.” The whole herd
over the individual cow. Their herd. They cull out the unproductive cattle and utilize the rest as
they see fit. When a kill occurs, it is “eaten” by utilizing all possible parts. Patterned after the
American Indians methodically using every part of the deer they hunt and kill: hoof, horn, bone,
-42-
Page 46 of 203
skin, meat, organs and such because it is considered wrong to take another life away then
dishonor the life taken by wasting even a particle of it after-the-fact.
The most precious gift a person has is life—a gift given by God. Some people are not satisfied
to just live their own lives and let others live theirs, just can’t mind their own business, enjoy
their own life, and allow others to enjoy their own gift of life unencumbered and unburdened.
Piggery dictates they encroach and destroy: one life, one gift of life, is not enough for them—they
want more, feel entitled to more, feel cheated somehow because for all their wanton
accumulation/compulsive acquisitiveness there is ONE thing they cannot acquire more of for
love nor money: life itself. God allotted one life per person. This brings them down to the level
of the common man they parasitize in a way that cannot be changed: all men are equal in death.
For all their compulsive accumulation life is the one thing they can’t get more, more, more of. So
they take away the lives of others—like a spoiled child slapping an ice cream cone from the hand
of another child: “if I can’t have it then I will see to it that you won’t have it either!” Piggery
dictates “me first”. This behavior has a name: it is called “leveling”: if they can’t acquire more
life by any other means then they can create an artificial advantage for themselves and serve their
own twisted egos by taking away the lives of others as the next best thing.
Coveting what others have and lack of self-control is a very bad combination. It never once
enters the “club members” heads that these lives are not theirs for the taking, do not belong to
them, that they have no right to help themselves to the lives of others for ANY reason. Their
pathology doesn’t allow them to see that. It is: see, want, take. All internal controls are absent,
which has released their sadism. With external controls removed anything goes. All hell has
broken loose because these people cannot tell themselves “no”. If you get in their way, they will
kill you. If they want something you have they will kill you to get it.
The interesting part in all of this, from an observation standpoint, is how this freedom to kill in
the workplace has unexpectedly extended into the “club member’s” private lives and is no longer
contained to the workplace anymore: in recent years many stories have been featured in the
mainstream media about doctors and nurses killing off their troublesome, unwanted spouses:
instead of divorcing them they just kill them to get rid of them. In July of 2000 these killings
became such a problem in Massachusetts that the Massachusetts Medical Society sent out
-43-
Page 47 of 203
information packets to the state’s physicians listing resources to help them by offering free,
confidential counseling! The boundary between killing in the workplace and killing at home has
gotten unclear from extensive exposure to it and now certain individuals cannot differentiate as
well between the two: at work they freely kill anyone who irritates them or gets in their way, is
costing too much, etcetera. There are no real consequences to these workplace kills. Their
programming has become so entrenched in their minds and hearts that they are carrying the
resultant attitude home with them and when the spouse begins presenting with the same irritants
and barriers to their instant gratification they automatically respond with what they have been
conditioned with and move forward to correct the irritant just like in the workplace: give the
irritant a nice stiff dose of Pavulon, potassium chloride, or poison of another kind, and kill them
off. Or just shoot or drown them.
If you watch mainstream media carefully you will come across the occasional reference to this
sociopathically inhumane ethic. Little is actually hidden from us; we just don’t recognize what it
is we are seeing. My files are filled with such cases; I study them for patterns and detail.
A word of warning: once injured by a doctor, the standardized cover-up program dictates
referral to a psychiatrist or some other such hand-selected “mental health professional” who has
proven blind obedience and loyalty to the “club” and its rules. If you are so foolish as to accept
such a referral you need to keep your back to the wall at all times because that so-called
professional will never be working for your best-interests. They have one purpose: to ferret out
your weak points then use them to disable you psychologically, dig out as much “dirt” on you as
can be extracted to hold over your head as they see fit, and to advise you to behave along the
lines of the “club member’s” comfort. One victim’s weak point was her appearance; once the
psychiatrist learned this he would masterfully hammer her, viciously, with that topic at every
visit and she would phone me afterward in tears. It never occurred to her that she was being
deliberately abused and to just stop seeing this monster. A custom-tailored abuse program will be
created from the information you trustingly give them and it will be used by every contact you
have with the “club” forever after in the attempt to try to break you down. It’ll be entered into
your computer files and ready for instant reference to all who seek to utilize it against you. (the
-44-
Page 48 of 203
same applies to charted allergens; hospital staff “forgets” you are deathly allergic to a specific
drug…understand?) Disgusting cowards band together in order to gain the ability to commit acts
they’d never have the courage to commit on their own: women, children, the poor, the elderly,
prisoners and such disenfranchised segments of society are easy targets, cannot fight back or
protect themselves from predation on a level playing field.
I am not so young that I can’t remember “old school” medicine. There are a few “old school”
doctors left practicing still but they are very old and dying off or getting pushed out of the New
World Order’s medical syndicate. I’ve met a few. They are horrified at how low the practice of
medicine has sunk in their time. In the beginning a patient could consult a doctor for a specific ill
and the doctor responded directly to the individual patient’s unique needs based solely on the
patient’s best-interests. Nobody had to answer to, or go through, seek permission from, anyone
else. There was no middleman standing between the completion of the direct transaction and
dictating to both sides, no interference whatsoever. I can remember going in with a problem and
getting a response on the spot, complete with a prescription handed to me while in the office.
Simple, Direct. Personal. After the transaction was complete the patient paid for the services
received at the desk on the way out the door. There wasn’t any of this testing merry-go-round
where intervention (if it comes at all) is days-to-weeks away from the initial office visit. Doctors
lived in the communities they served, participated in the communities they served and co- mingled with the public in the usual ways of all. They did not live in gated communities of
pretentious mansions alongside those of their own “club” kind, gated away like royalty at the
edges of the cities removed from the common people. The “old school” doctors lived in the
communities they served and a solid, thriving practice was built from the ground up on
reputation and behavior within that community. The “old school” doctors children attended
public school alongside everyone else. There was an incentive for the “old school” doctors to
build and maintain an ethical practice of medicine: if he/she did not perform properly word got
out quickly and he/she would be called to account immediately. True errors and mistakes were
forgiven because the community already had a long history with that doctor and a solid
reputation had already been built, as had trust, so the community well-understood perfection is
-45-
Page 49 of 203
just not possible and that the best intentions were present under any circumstances—even under
circumstances that did not turn out so well. Mistakes were inevitable and expected; when they
occurred the truth was told and apologies were made with immediate corrective action taken to
the best-interests of the damaged patient so as not to compound the burden of the injury. It would
have done no good to try to lie or cover-up; in a small community people talk and the truth would
have been all over town by the end of the day anyhow—a cover-up was simply not possible so it
was generally agreed-upon that honesty was the best policy and an ethical performance was
expected—and was received without quibble. Lawsuits were practically non-existent. So it just
plain looked better to tell the truth right out of the starting gate and accept the natural
consequences like any mature adult, make the best of it by behaving properly after-the-fact—
behaving properly after-the-fact is the only damage-control measures that need to be taken. If a
doctor did not conduct his practice or person properly in the community people would simply
seek care elsewhere, across town or in a neighboring town, so, it was in the doctor’s best interest
to perform at the highest possible standard.
One of my uncles, while hospitalized, was accidentally given his roommate’s heart medication
and it nearly killed him. The truth was told immediately, proper intervention was applied with no
quibble, a sincere apology was made—and that was the end of it. A lawsuit was unthinkable
because my uncle was treated ethically and responsibly the second the mistake was identified.
Socially, it would have been frowned upon by the community if my uncle did initiate a lawsuit
because the response he had been given was the right one and everything that could be done to
correct the honest mistake was immediately provided.
The introduction of health insurance and the parasitic “middleman” both sides must now
answer to have turned the doctor-patient relationship adversarial. It has introduced an incentive
to criminal activity and patient abuse, even killing patients to save money for the insurance
companies. The doctor has to bury his/her own judgement and automatically give over to the will
of the health insurer who pays the bills, too often at the detriment of the patient. “He who pays
the piper calls the tune.” The insurance company pays the policyholder’s bills; the doctor answers
to the one who pays the bills. The patient has become a commodity and has been removed from
the direct exchange of services for pay: the contract is now between the doctor and the insurance
-46-
Page 50 of 203
company; the patient is incidental to that exchange. Often I will hear injury victims complain
about the lack of services they have received from their doctors and will say something like: “It
cost $250. for that worthless office visit and I’ve got absolutely nothing to show for it!” What
people don’t seem to understand is that when they signed up for health insurance they signed
away their right to direct their own health care and gave that right over to the health insurance
company. The doctors are no longer accountable to the patients but to the insurance companies,
answer only to them. The doctor is not under contract with the policyholder, the doctor is under
contract with the insurance company—that is who pays the doctor’s bills. The patient is under
contract with the health insurance company. The doctor does the insurance company’s bidding,
not the patient’s bidding. You have NO say in what you will get, or not get, because you are not
the one paying your bills. “He who pays the piper calls the tune” You are not the one paying the
piper…
The goal is to keep all the big money at the top and circulating around and around at the top, in
“club”-only circles. You showing up at the doctor’s office, whether you get anything useful on an
individual basis or not, moves money from the insurer to the doctor. The doctor ordering tests but
providing no actual intervention to the individual patient moves money from the insurer to the
testing lab and to the doctor for the office visits. Nobody seems to notice that everyone gets
something useful but the policyholder who is being run all over the place. The doctors own stock
in the insurers and the testing labs; the insurer owns the testing labs outright or owns stock in
them. It can feel like our presence is needed only to move money around the game board because
the actual response to our true medical needs we receive in real life is just about zero: lots of
tests, no actual intervention. Everything given to us, the outsiders, is one less thing the “club”
gets to keep for itself. (unless they need us for something…like student surgery training or
experimental purposes) Sending us out for testing and referrals “gives” to themselves and keeps
money inside the “club”.
The insurance company doesn’t see patients, the doctors on their plan lists do: it is the doctors
who have been co-opted to perform the dirty-work of the insurance companies: denying
intervention, refusing proper testing, ignoring symptoms, prescribing ineffective
drugs…prescribing the wrong drugs, improperly performing invasive procedures, threatening
-47-
Page 51 of 203
patients to silence,….CRIMINALLY REVERSING THE STANDARD OF CARE. What the
doctors can’t do, the crooked labs will: falsifying test results, hiding injured areas, keeping two
patient files—one clean “for doctors only” and one that’s been tampered with for cover-up
purposes. The insurance companies have funded the campaigns of “club members” they want in
political office, who go on to appoint more “club members” to positions where protection of
their interests is most necessary: Medical Board members, law enforcement, judges, legislators,
etcetera. It is all one big happy family.
Citations:
Modern Healthcare May 19, 1997
“Crime and Healthcare” by Ron Shrinkman and Eric Weissenstein
“As evidence of mob activity in healthcare comes to light, experts debate whether we are seeing
an isolated incident or the beginning of a terrible trend.”
The American Journal Of Surgery
Vol. 161 March 1991
“Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Gateway To The Future”
By Jacques Perissat and Gary C. Vitale MD
QUOTE:
“Laparoscopic cholecystectomy had a semi-clandestine debut in nonacademic settings with the
initial reviews being highly critical, incredulous, and strongly sarcastic. The revolutionary stir
generated by this new procedure and the speed of its adoption by the rank-and-file general
surgeons have left many conservative surgeons uneasy and apprehensive. Although one hears
tales of complications and woe,…”
“Although insurers and government bodies have demonstrated a generous wait-and-see
attitude toward us as we embark, they will be just as quick to close the door and turn off the tap if
complications and rising cost associated with the new laparoscopic approaches to disease.”
Hospitals March 26, 1992
-48-
Page 52 of 203
“Managed Care In The 1990s: Providers’ New Role For Innovative Health delivery”
QUOTES:
“For hospitals today, the message is clear,” Ellwood says. “Attract a set of very strong primary
care physicians and tie them as closely to the hospital as possible.”
“We’re going to be in a much stronger position to produce reliable outcomes, resource utilization
and quality data because we collect the total care information in one system.”
“Some hospitals are trying to develop stronger relations with physicians by requiring doctors to
invest more equity into physician-hospital organizations…”
“…some hospitals are creating limited partnerships and other equity-driven models to involve
physicians as part owners in these programs,…”
“However, these hybrids require sophisticated management information systems, marketing, and
actuarial expertise to manage risk,…”
“If both sides have unified contracting, we’ll have the same interests in managing care as
economically and as effectively as possible…”
Academy Of Medicine
“Overview Of The Bottom Line” by George Dixon Clouse, M.D.
QUOTES:
“What emerged like bats out of a cave were groups and subgroups determined to get a bite of the
health care dollars. In a feeding frenzy, many groups were formed. Congress eventually realized
it didn’t need to pass a lot of complex laws. It was done for them by insurance carriers,
employers, hospitals and doctors who were afraid of being left behind and squeezed out.
Everybody wanted in on it, and the practice of medicine became a business, intent on the bottom
line.”
“Contracts where drawn up and signed. Then changed. The concept of managed care sounded
good, but in reality it is an euphemism for manipulated care.”
“…you can bet Congress will continue the debate as long as the dollars keep rolling in.”
“It is a grab of the greedy for power and control.”
“It is for us physicians to remember that the real bottom line of medical care is patient
-49-
Page 53 of 203
satisfaction” listening, supporting, and healing—not capitation.”
Columbus Dispatch “Letters To The Editor” by Dr. Ruth Purdy
QUOTES:
“We are now being dictated to by the insurance companies, and the good care of the patient
literally has been scrapped for big salaries for the chief executive officers of health maintenance
organizations, much to the disgust not only of patients but also of the physicians.”
“Veterinarians are taking better care of their animals than we are taking of our patients, because
of the restrictions that are imposed upon us by the insurance companies.”
“I am sincere when I say I think that a lot of our representatives and senators in Congress have
been influenced by the insurance companies, or they would not permit this brand of medicine to
be imposed upon the citizens.”
Newsweek October 23, 1995
“Beware Your HMO” by Ellyn E. Spragins
“People think their worst nightmare is getting a terrible disease, but they’re wrong. It’s getting a
terrible disease and not being able to get treated for it.”
The Savvy Patient (Book) 1990
By David R. Stutz M.D., Bernard Feder Ph.D and the editors of Consumer Reports Books
“There’s another form of experimentation that ostensibly is directed toward clarifying a patient’s
diagnosis or treatment but that may not be as useful for that patient as it might appear to be. Dr.
Robin points out that when a newly devised invasive procedure is introduced into medical
practice, the doctors using it must go through a learning process. Because the doctors must
gradually become proficient in using the procedure, the patients subjected to it at this early point
are subjects in an experimental situation that will help the doctors more than it will help the
patient. During these early stages, the danger to the patient is highest, and it is likely to decrease
as the group—doctors, nurses, technicians gain experience.
-50-
Page 54 of 203
“Patients managed early in the learning phase”, writes Robin, “are sacrificed because of relative
inexperience. That the sacrifice is not an inevitable consequence of their disease is usually not
apparent to the patient or the patient’s family.”
The risk to the patient in the experimental use of innovative, noninvasive techniques, such as
magnetic resonance imagery (MRI) and state-of-the-art scanners, is not as obvious, because the
immediate physical risks are not present. However, the technicians who use the machines aren’t
as proficient as they will be after more practice, and the physicians interpreting the images are
not as accurate as they will become with more experience. As a result, the interpretation of
images for the earliest patients using these machines is likely to be far less accurate or useful than
that for later patients. The hidden risk of inexperience lies behind our advice that you ask about
your doctor’s experience with any diagnostic or treatment procedure.”
Donahue (transcript # 4380 excerpt) airdate: November, 13, 1995
“Shortened Hospital Stays Are Dangerous To Newborns”
DR. KAREN BELL: I just wanted to say one thing. If we’re going to be cutting costs, it’s not
going to be with mothers and babies. Eighty percent of the costs are taken up by a very small
percent of the people in this country and they are at the end of their lives. We’re not going to save
big dollars by anything we do—
PHIL DONAHUE: “Well—
DR. KAREN BELL: “—with mothers and babies. And I just want to make that very clear—”
PHIL DONAHUE: “Yeah, but if—”
DR. KAREN BELL: “—up front. That’s not what’s driving this whole particular—”
Donahue (transcript # 4522 excerpt) Airdate: May 29, 1996
“Ready For A Turn Of The Century Economic Nightmare—Survival Tips”
LESTER THUROW:”—I think the thing that’s going to be explosive is not so much the salaries
as health care because if you look at big corporations, they’re pushing everybody into managed
health care, you know, which means you don’t get a choice of doctors. You don’t get some
treatments—you know, very limited health care. And at the same time, a lot of these big
-51-
Page 55 of 203
corporations, as reported in the New York Times recently, they’ll have a special health care
system for, let’s say, the top fifty executives and that executives get kind of old-fashioned, Blue
Cross-Blue Shield, all the money you want, choose the doctor you want, go to the hospital you
want, any treatment you want.”
“On the other hand, we’re communists when it comes to health care. If your kids get a treatment
that my kids are not going to get and your kids and my kids both need it, I am going to be very
irritated, right?”
“And I think things like dual systems for health care are going to be much more explosive than—
big salary increases.”
(SEE: The New York Times March 17, 1996 “A Double Standard In Health Care”)
Donahue (transcript # 3888 excerpt) Airdate: December 23, 1993
“When Medical Procedures Go Wrong”
MR. BERN (attorney in New York State): “You are entitled to your records. But that—you may
have had your first surgery, but the second comes when they look at the records. You only get a
copy. Ask them to see the originals. Then you’ll know…”
DONAHUE: “Oh, you mean you think there’s some fooling around between the slip and the lip
and the dip and the—
MR. BERN: “Well, there might have been in the past.”
DONAHUE: “Is that what you mean? In other words, get the originals because they could be
altered in the copying?”
MR. BERN: “At the very least, take a look at the originals, if you can.”
DONAHUE: “Really?”
MR. BERN: “Because they’re going to—if you ask for the records, they’re going to send a copy
and–
DONAHUE: “And it might be sanitized.”
MR. BERN: “And they—oh, MIGHT be sanitized?!”
DONAHUE: “Really?”
MR. (Ralph) NADER: You know, Phil, there are a lot of examples where doctors and hospital
-52-
Page 56 of 203
personnel have altered or even forged records—”
DONAHUE: “Yeah.”
MR. NADER: “—medical records to escape accountability when something bad went wrong due
to incompetence.”
ABC News 20/20 (transcript #1439 excerpt) Airdate: September 30, 1994
“They Know Your Secrets”
DR. TIMOTHY JOHNSON: “…the data stored in a medical file goes beyond doctors’ diagnoses
and hospital laboratory tests. It can also include the drugs you take, your sexual orientation,
genetic test results, and even risky hobbies like skydiving. In short, it can contain anything you
have told your doctor or his office staff. But what you tell your doctor may not stay just between
you and your doctor. It can also go to large companies which do nothing but compile and
exchange your private medical information on behalf of insurance companies. Inside this
unassuming brick building are millions and millions of facts culled from the medical records of
at least 15 million Americans. Stored here at the Medical Information Bureau is coded
information which can include anything from blood tests to certain psychiatric diagnoses. Based
in Westwood, Massachusetts, MIB is the biggest database used by insurance companies. So how
do they get that information? It’s simple. When you apply for insurance, you authorize your
insurer to collect your medical records and pass on the information to MIB.”
JEFFREY ROTHFEDER: “MIB has become somewhat of a sinister organization, akin to the
credit bureaus in the financial arena, in the sense that they’re very secretive about what they have
and it’s very difficult for individuals—for the person himself, the subject—to get their own
records out of there.”
DR. TIMOTHY JOHNSON: “But medical information does not just come from doctors’ offices
or hospitals or even insurance companies. Employers may also gain access to medical
information, ironically access often technically granted by the employees. First, when you apply
for a job, you may sign authorization forms for background checks that include checking your
medical records. Second, if you ever file a medical claim, many people at the company may have
access to your medical file. And finally, more and more employers are gaining medical
-53-
Page 57 of 203
information from employees who use in-house counseling programs known as EAP’s—employee
assistance programs.”
Lancaster Eagle-Gazette August 27, 1993
Letter To The Editor “Doctor’s Letter Gets Immediate Response” by Martha E. Douds, RN, BSN
QUOTE:
What is particularly frustrating for me is the lack of physicians who have the courage to speak
out when they see that a patient has been seriously injured as a result of medical negligence. It
seems that the path of least resistance prevails and eyes are closed and lips are sealed, instead of
doing what is ethically correct. Thus, they become part of the problem instead of the solution.”
Trauma and Recovery (book) by Judith Lewis Herman, M.D.
“In order to escape accountability for his crimes, the perpetrator does everything in his power to
promote forgetting. Secrecy and silence are the perpetrator’s first line of defense. If secrecy fails,
the perpetrator attacks the credibility of his victim. If he cannot silence her absolutely, he tried to
make sure no one listens. To this end, he marshals an impressive array of arguments, from the
most blatant denial to the most sophisticated and elegant rationalization. After every atrocity one
can expect to hear the same predictable apologies: it never happened; the victim brought it upon
herself; and in any case it is time to forget the past and move on. The more powerful the
perpetrator, the greater is his prerogative to name and define reality, and the more completely his
arguments prevail.”
Dayton Daily News October 7, 1997 page 8-A
“Three malpractice settlements involving patients who died could wreck the career of a physician
in private practice, setting off reviews by “peer committees”, and malpractice insurance
underwriters and causing high premiums.”
The Dallas Morning News May 16, 1999 page 9-A
“Patient Drug Trials Lucrative For Some Doctors, Paper says.” Incentives reportedly given to
-54-
Page 58 of 203
those who recruit subjects”
QUOTE:
“Drug companies and their contractors offer large payments to doctors, nurses, and other medical
staff to encourage them to recruit patients quickly. And doctors do not even have to conduct trials
to get paid: There are finder’s fees for those who refer their patients to other doctors conducting
research.”
The Newark Advocate June 24, 1998 Letters To The Editor “Nurses” by Mary Billy, Debbie
Manifold, Mary Ann Wade, Gayle Coffman, Debbie Baucher, Mendy Magers, Michelle Mettler,
Kathy Gummer
“Our professionalism was insulted when we were told by the administration to take “special
care” when a “VI.P.” was having surgery. We feel all patients should be given the very best of
surgical care, regardless of social status.”
Columbus Dispatch June 30, 1993 page 4-B
“Coroner Charges He Was Pressured To Protect Doctors”
“A coroner was pressured by hospital colleagues to change autopsy procedures to protect
physicians, his attorney said yesterday. If he hadn’t been coroner he wouldn’t have been
subjected to pressure.”
Cox’s suit alleges that hospital staff members pressured him to avoid critical autopsies to
“protect the physicians at Summa from public disclosure as having caused patient deaths”
“Cox was fired in retaliation for refusing to allow his employer to compromise his office as a
public official”
Zanesville Times-Recorder April 29, 1994
“Former Nurse Sues Bethesda” by Peggy Matthews
“A former Bethesda Hospital nurse has sued the hospital alleging the hospital fired her when she
refused to falsify medical records.”
The complaint states Doyle, who worked for Bethesda a little over a year, was required to report
-55-
Page 59 of 203
any incidents which might be considered important to “risk management.”Those are cases that
might result in medical malpractice suits. Doyle said that twice she was asked to either alter
reports already written or to include only certain information in the report. The intention was to
minimize risk for malpractice actions, “not to accurately reflect the events which had transpired”,
according to the complaint. The suit accuses Bethesda of violating Ohio’s Whistleblower statute
and the state’s criminal laws against falsification of evidence that could be used in subsequent
criminal or civil investigations. Falsification of reports with the intent to “prevent discovery of
medical malpractice on the part of Bethesda Hospital is fraud”, the suit alleges. Doyle claims she
was fired in October 1993 for her “hesitance to engage in such illegal behavior.”
“Ambitious Effort To Cut Mistakes In U.S. Hospitals”
by Peter T. Kilborn New York Times 12-27-99
“But for all the momentum, patient advocates and some regulators warn that for most hospitals
and physicians a culture of defensiveness and secretiveness is dug in deep, and will be difficult to
change.” “They also say that some doctors have their own wall of silence, not unlike that of
police officers, and are reluctant to report colleagues who make mistakes. ‘You don’t tell on each
other’ said Anna Polk, director of the Agency for Health Care Administration in Florida. Ms.
Polk oversees one of the nation’s oldest and most comprehensive systems to report and prevent
errors, yet one she said the culture obstructs. ‘There’s a strong back current that keeps people
from being entirely honest’ Ms. Polk said. ‘It’s a very old culture. It’s a longstanding culture.’ A
physician who discloses another physician’s mistake, she said, faces ‘almost certain retribution,
like losing referrals. We’ve seen that over and over.’
“Medication Errors: Nobody’s Watching. Part Four.”
by Steven Twedt October 24-28 Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
“For example, Ennis said, they heard unconfirmed reports that doctors would “sit” on patients
who developed blood clots shortly after surgery, rather than return them to surgery. The reason:
an immediate return to surgery would be a reportable incident under New York state law,
something doctors want to avoid. Ennis said: “what we were hearing from all over the place is,
-56-
Page 60 of 203
‘you know, you guys are preventing people from getting appropriate care.’ Believe it or not, the
doctors were blaming it on us.”
“Damaged Care” airdate: May 26, 2002 Showtime Premiere
Showtime and Paramount Pictures
Dr. Linda Peeno is played by Laura Dern
INSURANCE COMPANY EXECUTIVE: “So, tell me: what do you know about managed care?
DR. LINDA PEENO: “Well, I believe it’s a new kind of medical insurance.”An HMO, a health
maintenance organization, is a group that contracts with medical facilities, physicians,
employers, sometimes even individual patients to provide medical care. Essentially, we insert a
layer of management between the physician and the patient to let them both make more
responsible choices.”
SAM VERBUSH: “Better you than me. I’d hate to go back to private practice. How’s it going?”
AVERY PRINCIPLE: “Great! I finally understand the beauty of the capitation system now that I
have my own practice. With the money the managed care companies allot for each subscriber’s
care all you have to do is find a lot of patients and then keep them healthy.
SAM VERBUSH: “Then you get to keep the money. Just watch out for those damned expensive
procedures that cut into your profit margins.”
AVERY PRINCIPAL: “Sam, if I didn’t know any better I’d say you’re critical of the system.
Don’t you see why capitation is so brilliant? It incentivizes doctors to not order up expensive
procedures.”
LINDA PEENO: “But that’s just another form of control over the physicians, right? I mean, what
if the patient requires an expensive procedure for his or her well-being?”
AVERY PRINCIPLE: “You think twice about it, I’ll tell you that.”
LINDA PEENO: “I think that sounds terrible.”
SAM VERBUSH: It’s just The New World Order, Linda. It’s inevitable that Humana will
-57-
Page 61 of 203
implement capitation as well. You have to get used to it.”
LINDA PEENO: “I hope not. You know what? I think we should go to Scarwood together. I
think we should tell him he’s taken this control of doctors too far.”
DR. GORDON (speaking to a group of residents during hospital rounds): “The patient came in
yesterday complaining of abdominal pain. Who can tell me why we are going to be
recommending a gallbladder operation?
LINDA PEENO (to Doug Peeno): “She needs an operation? There aren’t specific symptoms!”
DOUG PEENO: “Why don’t you go ahead and say something? Go on, raise that hand right up
there!”
FELLOW RESIDENT(to Dr. Gordon): “Dr. Gordon, apart from the abdominal pain, what are the
indications for gallbladder?”
DR. GORDON: “She has no definitive symptoms but the patient is 3F—which makes her a
prime candidate for the operation.”
DOUG PEENO: “3F, Dr. Gordon?”
Dr. Gordon: “Fat, female, and forty. Now, you all may think that’s flippant but there are several
very good reasons to perform this operation. One, it is quite likely the patient will indeed benefit
from it and at the very least it will do her no harm. Two, you’ll all have a chance to observe the
operation and the more operations we do the better educated the next generation of surgeons.
And three, it’s entirely paid for by her insurance. Any questions?”
DOUG PEENO (to Linda Peeno): “He just said that. Greed, boredom, and money.”
Valley News, Lebabon New Hampshire May 12, 2000
“…Hartford Hospital administrators say they did not have to report him to the data bank because
doctors who are interns or residents are exempt from reporting requirements.”
“….I have also noticed the decline in the quality of nursing documentation, and the rise of
computerized checklists and “charting by exception”. (for those of you unfamiliar with this term,
-58-
Page 62 of 203
it is a form of records-keeping which, if there is no exception noted, presumes that patients were
monitored and care was provided and all findings were normal unless specifically noted—so a
nurse could die in the hallway, and her charts would reflect that every patient was receiving
optimal care, and was in perfect health, until either the shift ended or she started to smell bad) I
know that “risk management” is supposed to reduce liability risk. Obviously, this can be done in
two ways: 1.) By focusing on improving the quality of care; or 2.) by trying to hide negligent
errors and reduce the risk of detection. Sadly, the latter approach is cheaper and easier—and
more in keeping with the training of many risk managers. When a physician confirms the nursing
records are less usable to him, I have to question the motive behind changing the form of
recordation is to improve the quality of care.
J.C. (Attorney, Arizona)
The Unkindest Cut (book) by Marcia Millman pages 148-149
For by not admitting the to the patient that he cannot help him and that he is dying, the physician
deprives the patient of the opportunity to seek medical help elsewhere.
Finally, in the account that follows, we may observe the doctor’s assumption that patients are to
be treated somewhat like children:
“Honesty is not always the right thing. It can be cruelty. Doctors must make the determination
about what a patient can be told. Why ruin someone’s last months if they’re dying? I’ve seen a
patient told she has cancer roll over and die of depression. There is no point telling someone
what’s wrong with them if there’s nothing you can do about it. If there’s a treatment, that’s one
thing, but not if there isn’t. And even if patients ask to be told everything, you shouldn’t
necessarily listen to them. You can’t just tell people things because they say they want to know,
because they’re curious. Children are curious—are you going to tell them everything they want to
know? No, you don’t load up a child with the weight of knowledge and you don’t do it to
patients either.”
Forgive and Remember (book) by Charles L. Bosk page 68
-59-
Page 63 of 203
“First, there is failure from disease. Sometimes the best efforts of surgeons cannot cure those in
the more advanced stages of terminal illness. Operative complications always raise questions
about the adequacy of surgery; but deaths, especially when separated from the operation by a
respectable period of time, do not terribly threaten surgeons. These deaths indicate to surgeons
what the limits of their skills are; and they are seen as inevitable. Much disease is irreversible. An
interesting feature of the allocation of effort on a surgery ward is the division of patients into two
classes: salvageable and nonsalvageable. Heroic care goes only to salvageable patients. The
nonsalvageable do not receive emergency cardiac resuscitation or other aggressive, life- prolonging measures. This is not to say that the surgeons at Pacific practice euthanasia; rather
they limit their heroism. Nonsalvageable patients are allowed to die from their diseases and not
saved to suffer from them. These patients are still treated—they are not ignored—but the surgeon
does not play all his cards. Salvageable patients are candidates for heroic measures. These two
classifications of patients help determine the allocation of scarce healing resources.”
Rationing Medicine (book) by Robert H. Blank Columbia University Press 1988
If you want to know what the medical syndicate is up to read this book. I haven’t gone through
the whole book yet but I can tell you I am heartsick at what I have read so far and also feel
validated in my “controversial” position and statements these years passed. Pages 23, 24, and 25
are a real eye-opener. It is about something called “computer rationing” and makes clear what use
computerized medical records in the central databases are really going to be used for. Here is an
interesting statement from page 25 about COMRATS: “This system would have the benefit of
removing from the physicians or authorities the difficulty of personally making a decision not to
treat. If such use of a computer were strongly supported by society, physicians would be able to
point out to their patients their inability to counter or even appeal before a higher authority the
official decision. The computer rationing system (COMRATS) would relieve the physician of
making painful decisions and justifying them to patients for whom the verdict is “no treatment”.
“The computer capacity is already present, and the medical databanks necessary for such a
system are well underway. All that is needed is the motivation to institute the process. A
PERCEIVED uncontrollable crises in medicine, if sufficiently onerous and widespread, might be
-60-
Page 64 of 203
enough.”
Page 81 states: “Meanwhile, the Office of Health Economics questions any use of the term
“rationing” in the health care context and suggests that “triage” or “PRIORITY SELECTION” be
substituted.
“HEART FAILURE Diary of a Third Year Medical Student” (book) by Michael Greger MD
Dr. Mark Sircus
http://drsircus.com/general/medical-sociopaths/
2-11-2016
“Medical Sociopaths”
“Some might think it an exaggeration to put mainstream doctors in the same boat as extremely
sick and dangerous people but modern medicine in the United States is putting people in their
graves in large numbers but before it does, the system is beating them into bankruptcy. It matters
little to them the hundreds of thousands of people each year who suffer and die at their hands.
Most people do not recognize doctors as psychopaths or sociopaths until they are trapped,
suffering or dying at the hands of one.”
MSNBC
2-27-2011
“Ugly Past Of U.S. Human Experiments Uncovered”
QUOTE:
U.S. officials also acknowledged there had been dozens of similar experiments in the United
States–studies that often involved making healthy people sick.” “At best, these were a search for
lifesaving treatments; at worst, some amounted to curiosity-satisfying experiments that hurt
people but provided no useful results.” “These studies were worse in at least one respect–they
-61-
Page 65 of 203
violated the concept of “first do no harm, a fundamental medical principle that stretches back
centuries” “When you give somebody a disease–even by the standards of their time–you really
cross the key ethical norm of the profession, said Arthur Caplan, director of the University Of
Pennsylvania’s Center For Bioethics.”
Newsweek
10-23-1995
“Beware Your HMO”
QUOTE:
“People think their worst nightmare is getting a terrible disease, but they are wrong. It’s getting a
terrible disease and not being able to get treated for it.”
“…HMOs were saving money by rationing medical care to their members. Last month the New
York Post ran a week’s worth of stories on ‘managed-care casualties’.
“HMO doctors often make more money by denying you care.”
“HMO doctors stand to lose their livelihood if they provide ‘too much care’.”
“Provide too much expensive care to your patients and you’ll be out of a job. The more patients a
doctor has from a single HMO, the more powerful that message becomes.”
“Three groups of anesthesiologists recently sued Aetna because they say the company strong- armed them into joining its HMO. If they didn’t sign, they said Aetna told them it would refuse
to do business with the doctor’s hospitals.”
The Ohio Observer
April 1994
“Doctors And Healthcare Reform” by Cathy Levine
-62-
Page 66 of 203
QUOTE:
“Howison speaks passionately and bitterly about the present system: “It’s impossible to take care
of people based on need–you take care of people based on their insurance coverage.”
“Especially alarming is the spread of “capitated plans,” whereby the physicians receive a set
reimbursement for each patient every month, regardless of service. But the provider receives a
bonus to reduce patient services. Doctors who perform necessary services are often penalized for
“overutilization.” Howison says most of his patients do not know they are in capitated plans until
he tells them. He describes the system as “perverse, obscene, dangerous, and unhealthy.”
USA TODAY
199*
By Judi Hasson
“Physicians Put Insurance Plans Under The Knife”
QUOTE:
“The American Medical Association on Monday accused insurers and managed-care companies
of trying to “take over the examining room”–denying some medical care to boost profits.”
“They may offer doctors financial incentives to hold down costs.”
“…some doctor are being intimidated “out of their proper role as patient advocates”. The threat of
being dropped “is to keep the doctors in line.” Some physicians have seen incomes fall as
managed-care companies move into an area, limiting how much doctors are paid and in some
regions dominating the market so doctors must sign up with them to stay in business.”
“There are things insurance companies don’t want you to know about their health plans. That’s
why you need the facts. So you can make informed choices and get quality care in spite of their
efforts to keep you in the dark.”
-63-
Page 69 of 203
Donahue: And it might be sanitized.
Mr. Bern: And they–oh, might be sanitized?
Donahue: Really.
Mr. Nader: You know, Phil, there are a lot of examples where doctors and hospital personnel
have altered or even forged records–
Donahue: Yeah.
Mr. Nader: –medical records, to escape accountability when something bad went wrong due to
incompetence.
Donahue: Right. Right.
-66-
Page 70 of 203
Teaching Hospitals And Resident Training
Most, if not all, hospitals today are teaching hospitals. Some of us believe the only teaching
hospitals are directly attached to a university but that is not true. This can be a hard fact to
swallow but I tell those who do not believe it to go to the hospital website and dig through their
pages because that particular information is usually included in there somewhere. Or just pick up
the phone and make a call. This is where the surprise comes: it IS a teaching hospital. Even the
hospitals owned and operated by the health insurance companies are teaching hospitals and have
no hesitation in using up the lives of their policyholders training residents surgery on the sly.
They get paid by the government, from our Medicare funds, to train residents.
So, what does this mean? It means your surgery is (or was) performed by a green trainee–with
all its attendant, and undisclosed, risks because these green trainees make their worst mistakes in
the first 20-50 of each procedure they perform. And because they are protected from prosecution
by something called “sovereign immunity” due to the government funding their training, once the
inevitable injuries or deaths occur, their victims will be stuck for the whole tab.
The teaching hospital has contracted with the government, for pay, to train residents and to
provide learning experiences so each resident can meet their credentialing quotas.
Unlike the privately-owned hospitals, the teaching hospitals attached to a university will
usually tell us beforehand that resident surgery training will take place when our surgery is
performed. Most people assume this will be the case just from the fact the hospital is attached to
a university medical school. But the hospitals that are not attached to a university seldom, if ever,
disclose that vital information before or after–and that is where the problem lies.
That already-trained, already-practicing, experienced surgeon we met with in their office who
presented his/her own credentials and certification as inducement to move forward with the
recommended surgery? That we were led to believe we had selected from our health insurers
booklet of providers, that we were sold when we bought our health insurance policies? That is
not who we will get when we are anesthetized on the operating room table and cannot say “no”
when the green trainee is sneaked in–a green trainee who may be performing the first one of its
-67-
Page 72 of 203
* We were not sold, nor did we buy, the services of a green trainee. We bought the already- practicing surgeon and his/her credentials and experience.
* Switching the already-practicing surgeon for a green trainee on the sly is classic “bait-and- switch” fraud.
* Deceiving policyholders about who is going to be performing their surgery and cheating them
of the opportunity to say “no” is a crime: “fraud in the inducement”.
* It is also a violation of informed consent laws.
*”Ghost Surgery” is a battery charge because we did not give consent for that person to touch us.
Green student training in the teaching hospitals, without adequate supervision and a full
informed consent, is the single largest reason for the high rate of deaths and injuries from
surgeries performed. One of their “tricks” is to admit a target “for observation” from their
emergency room then coerce whatever surgery is being trained by refusing to write a discharge
paper and flagrantly lying about the health insurer’s “policy” of refusing payment for the whole
stay IF their target leaves without a discharge paper instead of having the suggested surgery,
taunting them with getting stuck for the bills out-of-pocket–I know two people this happened to.
Health insurers using up the lives of their policyholders to train their residents surgery and
getting paid for it violates the health insurance policy contract they’ve sold us: they owe US the
service we have contracted for exactly as written. We owe no service backward to them of any
kind especially as “training material/teaching material” for residents to practice on. They have no
right to use us to make money on, especially without a full informed consent.
This practice, in any other venue, is called HUMAN TRAFFICKING. And it is human
trafficking in its worst form. They are permanently injuring and killing trusting, innocent people
then sticking them, or their family, with the tab.
People should not be forced to bankroll their own murder. Yet we are harnessed up and made
to do that very thing with no viable way out from under it.
-69-
Page 73 of 203
Citations:
The Columbus Dispatch newspaper (Ohio)
Letters To The Editor
March 3, 2013
“Nation Needs More Doctor-Training Funds” by Steven G. Grabbe, CEO Wexner Medical
Center, Ohio State University
QUOTE:
“Residency is funded mainly by federal and state government grants to teaching hospitals.
Medicare pays the most at about 9.5 billion annually and Medicaid contributes about 2 billion
according to the journal Health Affairs.”
“Every teaching hospital in the nation relies on government graduate medical education dollars.”
Norfolk Daily News (Nebraska)
August or September 1997
“Medicare paying Price For The Glut Of Physicians”
QUOTE:
“Dr. Sidney Wolfe, director of the consumer watchdog group Public Citizen’s Health Research
Group, said the glut of doctor has translated into “people getting operations they don’t need…”
The Chicago Tribune
9-23-2012
By Deborah L. Shelton
QUOTE:
-70-
Page 74 of 203
“…but in some cases, patient advocates say, there can be an actual bait-and-switch, when a
prominent surgeon promises to carry out the procedure but does not.”
New England Journal Of Medicine
2015; 372:2477-2479
By Chryssa McAllister MD
“Breaking The Silence Of The Switch–Increasing Transparency About Trainee Participation In
Surgery”
QUOTE:“And whether the increase in risk is real or potential, fears about patients’ reactions lead
many physicians to wonder whether patients should be informed about it. If they are, will
residents have fewer opportunities to operate? Will patients become unduly anxious? Will “word
get out” and negatively affect referrals?
The literature on patient consent for trainee participation in surgery is conflicting but suggests
that the more realistic the scenario provided to patients, the less likely they are to consent to
trainee participation, especially by junior trainees. Gan et al. highlight the influence of the
surgeon on the informed-consent discussion; they found that a detailed, scripted disclosure of
trainee participation resulted in 95% of 106 patients agreeing to trainee involvement. The authors
admit, however, that they did not disclose the potential increased risk of complications, since
they presumed it to be understood.”
“Patients have clearly stated that they want to be informed, and lack of disclosure regarding
trainee participation in surgeries may already have eroded public trust. U.S. courts agree, and
legal precedents have deemed “ghost surgery” — in which one surgeon is replaced by another
without the patient’s consent — battery on the part of the operating surgeon (in this case, the
trainee) and fraud on the part of the surgeon who was given consent (here, the supervising
surgeon). Physicians have an ethical duty to provide patients with the information they need to
autonomously make medical decisions, including the decision to accept or reject a treating
-71-
Page 75 of 203
physician. Yet we also have a societal and professional obligation to train future surgeons to care
for future patients.
What if we proudly and openly discussed resident participation with our patients instead of
ashamedly hiding our need to train future surgeons?”
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/human%20trafficking
“Definition Of Human Trafficking”:
Organized criminal activity in which human beings are treated as possessions to be
controlled and exploited (as by being forced into prostitution or involuntary labor)
-72-
Page 76 of 203
Errors, Mistakes, And System Failure Verses Intentional Acts
There is no real way to completely eliminate true errors and mistakes. People get distracted,
forget, fail to follow procedure in spite of training, mix-ups occur, equipment fails. Things
happen without intention to do harm but harm happens anyhow.
It is what activates after a true error or mistake that drags the event into a whole other category
because what is done to cover up is 100% preventable–and is 100% intentional. The lying,
records tampering, denial, refusal to give a correct diagnosis, failure to offer proper treatment, the
verbal abuse, false accusations, threats, bullying, runaround, financial enslavement, and so on
into infinity is deliberate, pre-meditated, coldly calculated, and icily delivered.
I judge acts by intention. A true error or mistake is forgivable. What comes after is not. What
comes after is dangerous, inhumane, disrespectful, predatory… and criminal.
And then there are the harmful acts that are intentional right out of the starting gate. Lying to a
patient and tricking them into surgery (or invasive procedure) they absolutely do not need done
solely for dangerous student training purposes, deliberately withholding a correct diagnosis to
protect another doctor from exposure of a medical malpractice event, falsifying lab results,
tampering with x-ray images, verbal abuse designed to emotionally batter a target into despair,
and so on into infinity. These acts, too, are 100% preventible.
There is no real incentive to make changes. The rewards of wrong-doing and dirty-work are too
great for the greed-crazed and morally bankrupt to pass up.
WHY does it always come as a surprise to the medical syndicate that people do not like to be
tortured, robbed, and murdered? When confronted about the damage they’d caused they lay claim
to the notion “the practice of medicine is an art, not a science” at the same time they are trying to
wrangle control and dictate…can’t have it both ways.
Citation:
-73-
Page 77 of 203
The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
10-24 to 28-1993
“Medication Errors” By Steven Twedt (part 4 “Nobody’sWatching)
QUOTE:
“For example, Ennis said, they heard unconfirmed reports that doctors would “sit” on patients
who developed blood clots shortly after surgery, rather than return them to surgery. The reason:
an immediate return to surgery would be a reportable incident under New York state law,
something doctors wanted to avoid. Ennis said: “What we are hearing from all over the place is,
‘You know, you guys are preventing people from getting appropriate care.’ Believe it nor not, the
doctors were blaming it on us.”
-74-
Page 78 of 203
The Two-Visit-Ditch
After an injury occurs, inflicted by a surgeon or a surgeon-in-training more likely, care is
shifted to other doctors in the community–either to primary care doctors and/or to specialists–and
they don’t want it. The doctor who caused the injury is removed from the picture–at least on the
face of it. What we don’t know, and are not intended to know, is that no other doctor is allowed
to actively intervene without a referral, and permission, from the surgeon who caused the injury.
And if any doctor takes it upon himself or herself to break ranks and accept another doctor’s
injury victim as a patient and offers treatment of his or her choosing, without a referral or
permission from the surgeon of record, the State Medical Board will go after them if they find
out about it. It is considered “unethical” for any doctor to interfere in another doctor’s injury
case.
Also, the doctors in the community don’t want to accept surgeons injury victims for another
reason: if they accept one as a patient, without a referral and permission from the original
surgeon, and take it upon themselves to treat that injury, the entire responsibility shifts solely
upon their shoulders and whatever happens after that, whether they were the root cause or not, is
diverted onto them.
After injury we will never again be allowed to find, and utilize the services of, a doctor of our
own choosing. We will be funneled to a specific collection of doctors in the community who the
power-elite has designated, based upon unique personality traits that give them permission to lie
and abuse without conscience, the most reliably heartless sociopaths who can be trusted best to
follow the cover-up protocols to the letter. As a reward for this service to the medical community
these “special” doctors are sent lots of referrals. Every community has this kind of collection and
this collection is made up of primary care doctors and specialists of every kind. This includes lab
technicians, radiologists, and any other medical professional who are the only ones allowed to get
involved in our medical care at every level, forever after.
If we are so bold as to resist this kind of control and micro-managing, try to step out on our
-75-
Page 79 of 203
own and seek the care of a doctor we feel best suits our needs, one who is not on the “appointed
liar” list, this is what will happen:
* Our request for an appointment will not be accepted outright. The doctors who do this are
usually the ones who “don’t want to get involved” with what is going on and are not comfortable
with what they would have to do to us if they accepted us as a patient. Not all agree with the
cover-up-and-abuse program and refuse to participate. Unfortunately, they will also not take a
stand against the willing participants and try to put a stop to it either.
* Our request for an appointment will be accepted but we will be bombarded with verbal abuse
and false accusations so vicious we will not feel comfortable returning.
* Our request will be accepted but the doctor will quickly manufacture an excuse to dump us at
the first opportunity.
*Our request will be accepted and we will be given an appointment so far into the future it hardly
seems worth bothering with, then, right before the appointment date, it will be cancelled and
another far-flung appointment will be offered. This one, too, will be cancelled right before the
appointment date or one of the other methods to get rid of us will be inflicted at the visit.
* We will be given an appointment but when we arrive at the designated day and time the staff
will smirk and announce that there is no appointment for us on their books and send us home.
* Our request will be accepted, the doctor will be very warm, friendly, and welcoming on the
first visit. We will be told that they want very much to help us–but first they have to run some
-76-
Page 80 of 203
tests. Expensive, painful, and dangerous tests. A lot of tests. The wrong tests for the true
condition(s) “because we have to find out what is going on before we can make a correct
diagnosis and offer relief or intervention”. (it is a lie; they already know what is wrong with us
and what the correct intervention is) Or they will order the right tests and the results will be
manipulated to reflect whatever suits the cover-up best and create the paper trail the cover-up
demands.
Full of hope and relief, we undergo their load of prescribed testing. Full of hope that help has
finally arrived we go to a second office appointment never suspecting a second visit is all we are
going to get, per the standardized abuse program: that friendly, warm doctor we saw at the first
visit makes a complete personality reversal. At the second visit the doctor is angry and verbally
abusive in the standardized manner of the cover-up program. We are told our tests were all
“normal” and not to come back.
First office visits traditionally cost more than subsequent visits; all we get is one or two visits.
The goal is to soak us for as much as can be extracted and then dump us. It is a psychological
battery designed to discourage us from trying to find useful care outside their referrals and to
deplete our financial resources–and fill their pockets as a reward in dark service to the medical
syndicate who routinely funnels us to them.
We are lured into this trap by opportunistic doctors comfortable with preying upon our
suffering and our hope to be restored to our original condition. The trap snaps shut at the second
visit.
The core issue is control: the perpetrators want to be in charge of who we seek care from, what
we are told, what we are offered, what we are never offered, what diagnoses are given, which
ones will never be given, which tests we can have, which tests we can’t have, what the medical
record will include, what it can never include.
What we are not supposed to know is that this is one of the many games they pull from their
war chest designed to build hope then knock it down, to knock us down into despair and get us
back under control, immobilize us. And plunder our assets to the limit to which we will allow,
-77-
Page 81 of 203
with the full knowledge, through long experience, that suffering people will go anywhere, do
anything, pay anything, for even the ghost of a chance of getting well again.
This game has a name: “the two-visit-ditch”
Citations:
“Intensive Care” (book) by Echo Heron RN, page 58-59
Quote:
“I’m not quite sure what you are asking me to do. You should know I can’t interfere with another
physician’s treatment of a patient without being consulted.” “No, I’m sorry, I can’t so that. It’s
not ethical,…”
A registered nurse posted this message to one of my associates in response to a question about
WHY she could not get another doctor to take her on as a patient after she was the victim of a
surgeon’s malpractice:
“Most doctors won’t step in when another doctor has done something since they have no way of
knowing exactly what the first doctor had in mind (they’d need your record for that information).
If they do and they mess up what the first doctor did, then they are liable and they’re in a heap of
trouble with the licensing board.”
-78-
Page 83 of 203
When the injury victim begins manifesting the inevitable symptoms of the doctor-caused injury
a standardized set of behaviors kick in no matter who our doctors are or where they are located;
they are all reading from the same “script”. The doctors in North Carolina are abusing injury
victims the exact same ways as the doctors in Ohio—and Kentucky, Missouri, and so on. (and
Canada, England, Australia…) Think about your own case information as you read through this
text and the patterns that emerge are clear:
1.) IGNOR, DENY, CHALLENGE: This is the medical syndicate’s first line of defense: “it
didn’t happen”, “we don’t see anything”, “you’re crazy”, “you’re a hypochondriac”. “there’s
nothing wrong with you”. They will not be moved from this defense no matter what symptoms
manifest or what evidence to the contrary materializes. They will see us dead untreated before
they will move from this unified defense. Malpractice liability is present and the malpractice
insurance company rules dictate certain kinds of injuries never be acknowledged (other injuries
will be acknowledged and responded to only after the Statute Of Repose or Statute Of
Limitations expire: which can take up to seven years in certain states).
It is never to be formally acknowledged if the injury is something expensive-to-treat-properly
that our own health insurance company doesn’t want to pay for. Or if a government- funded/sovereign-immunity-protected green trainee/medical student who was sneaked in to
perform our surgery in a teaching hospital was the one who actually injured us. It is never to be
acknowledged if we are tagged “low priority” and proper intervention is allotted only to those
tagged “high priority”. Our injury will never be acknowledged if we were covertly taken as a
guinea pig to test an experimental device or drug on without our knowledge or consent; once
pulled into such a program it is strictly hands-off and no doctor is allowed to touch us again
without permission: the experiment has to run its course without interference.
Injury at laparoscopic gallbladder surgery meets all of the features above: there is malpractice,
it is nearly impossible to restore the person to his/her original condition, it is expensive-to-treat- properly, our health insurers do not want to pay for proper aftercare because it is lifelong and
expensive, if it was done in a teaching hospital we can bet we had a green trainee performing it
-80-
Page 84 of 203
on the sly, we were used as “teaching material”, and if we were not already tagged “low priority”
we would not have been subjected to this horror in the first place.
If our symptoms are being vigorously denied we can safely assume that our case has at least one
of the criminal features described here. The medical syndicate DOES know what is actually
wrong with us, have always known: the doctors involved “red-flagged” our computer file before
we ever left the hospital. We’ll be getting sick soon after discharge, if it hasn’t started already,
and they have got to be ready for our anticipated arrival, and present that united cover-up, in
doctor’s offices, emergency rooms, laboratories, clinics.
2.) TESTS ARE BEGUN: Tests on common and rare diseases, tests strung out over weeks, then
months, and eventually years–if we live long enough. Tests that are nearly always negative
because they are the WRONG tests for the true condition. (or tests that are routinely falsified
when they are the rights tests and can show something wrong, like bloodwork and x-rays, CT
Scans, MRIs) Ordering lots of tests is a PERFORMANCE designed to make the doctors involved
in our healthcare LOOK good on the surface, makes a presentation that the doctors “care” about
us and that they are “doing something” for us, trying to find the source of our increasing misery.
Nobody could come back on them later and claim the patient was neglected, right? Just look at
all those tests! Too bad the doctors could not find anything wrong or offer a correct diagnosis,
just have no idea what could be wrong… “maybe it is this, maybe it is that. let’s do more tests!”
Then more tests on top of those tests. The targeted patient’s bank account is cleaned out and they
are run into debt; their doctors prey on their trust and ignorance, their desire to get well and be
restored to their original condition–and to erect the facade of due diligence and plunder our
assets.
This testing con serves four purposes and none of it is to the benefit of the injured and sick
patient: perpetual testing makes it look like the medical syndicate is responding to our injury, we
are kept coming back for monitoring of the true condition so they can cause us more damage
faster by applying certain “interventions” at the appropriate times as we deteriorate untreated,
using us to train residents on in the student training mills and testing labs, and conning us out of
-81-
Page 85 of 203
our savings by running up a huge medical debt up on us for all that “care” we never actually got.
We are kept busy and distracted, kept close to the doctors of the local medical syndicate’s choice,
confidence and trust is maintained (but only for a while, which is why they have to act fast and
stack on as much debt as possible, and do as much damage to us as possible, early in the
relationship) in the doctors who “care so much and try so hard”so we keep returning to the very
ones murdering us. Worse is that we PAY them to do it, eventually with everything we have. The
goal is to keep us coming back to them so we can be manipulated and the standardized facade
can be erected without interference–which keeps us busy and quiet, trusting and ignorant, until
they can get us into the ground as fast and as cheaply as possible, with as much of our estates
cleverly extracted and the costs tolled to US as possible. Much easier to accomplish with a
ignorant, trusting, and co-operative victim.
People should not be tricked into, or forced, to bankroll their own murder.
The standard of care is criminally reversed: we get improperly performed invasive procedures
designed to make us worse faster, we are prescribed prescription drugs that accelerate our
damage, are deliberately neglected when infection sets in. How can we know that ERCP is never
to be performed without IV antibiotic protection and that it should never be done during active
cholangitis? How can we know Erythromycin and Seldane should never be combined? How can
we know combining non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with H2 Blockers doubles the risk of
a fatal hemorrhage in normal people and the odds go through the roof in people who already have
liver or kidney damage? We outsiders don’t usually know these kinds of things and cannot
protect ourselves from predation–and that is what these murdering technopaths are banking on.
Without a full, and clean, disclosure and an honest assessment in front of us, there is no way we
can protect ourselves from predation.
Things that could actually help us are deliberately withheld.
Early in our injury the doctors are on hand and available, monitoring, to make sure things go
according to their schedule and to the medical syndicate’s best advantage, are unified to tell the
right lies, in the right order in a consistent fashion, are on hand to mollify dissent in the victim
and the victim’s family. “Trust us!” they say. “Just let us do our jobs without interference!” as if
-82-
Page 86 of 203
we have no real stake in the outcome. Small prescriptions are written to keep us coming back
often so control and dependence can be maintained. Every effort is made to contain us locally;
we might get fed up with the runaround we are getting and wander off to another town, state, or
country and by blind luck get the diagnosis and care that is being deliberately withheld at home.
These are excruciating injuries with many symptoms scattered all over the body. We need to
believe the source of this misery will eventually be identified and treated soon; we need to
believe the people we have entrusted with our lives have placed the same value on them that we
do.
Eventually, however, even the most naive victims start to catch on to the fact that something is
very, very wrong with the response, rather the lack of useful response, we are getting from our
doctors for our increasing symptoms: it slowly dawns on us that perpetual testing is not the same
thing as actually receiving medical intervention for our problems and months later we are in a
worse place than we were than when we started. So we start asking questions the doctors do not
want to answer. This is when the medical mafia viciously turns on us and reveals their true
character and intentions: they want to murder us with our full co-operation on THEIR schedule.
Pain control is deliberately withheld and a lesson in blind obedience is inflicted in an attempt to
coerce cooperation and compliance. If we question or resist, the abuse is heaped on to the point
of insanity. This is when we will get to see, and experience, a very dark side of medicine most do
not know exists. This is when we get that “education” we never wanted.
If we ask too many questions, point out discrepancies in what we are being told, seek care
without referral to a doctor of OUR choice (not all doctors can be relied upon with 100%
certainty to lie, tell the RIGHT lies, and some refuse participation in atrocity and therefore never
get any of us sent to them in referral), if we resist or dissent in any way the next phase in the
cover-up program kicks in: the increasing abuse, the psychological battery, the emotional
erosion, the active discrediting, the mental torture…eventually leading to actual physical torture,
terrorism, and finally execution ahead of schedule for the most troublesome victims.
This is the point where a targeted victim has to ask themselves some tough questions:
If I am not getting anything useful, am not ever going to get anything useful, why co-operate?
-83-
Page 87 of 203
Should I co-operate by digging my own grave so they don’t have to do the work or do I chase
them with the shovel instead? Your choice: you can bow down, grovel, and lick the boots of the
ones killing you and make it as easy on them as possible so they are not inconvenienced in any
way. Or you can fight them every inch to the grave with the hope if enough follow suit it will
become more trouble than it is worth. The end is going to go the same route no matter what we
do…so why make it easy for them?
3.) CALL IN CONSULTANTS: When one opinion is no longer enough to keep the injury victim
quiet, carefully selected consultants are called in by our surgeon or family doctor who also do
tests, the wrong tests, and find out what you DON’T have. These consultants will be chosen by
our surgeon or family doctor; they can’t have us making these kinds of selections because we
might happen onto an honest doctor outside their circle-of-power who hasn’t been properly
trained in patient abuse or one who has no interest or talent in it–or outright refuses to do it.
There is hope an unrelated condition will be found that everything can be blamed on. Testing is
done in that consultant’s own area of expertise that even one symptom matches. No correct
diagnosis is offered. Once in a while a diagnosis is offered of a benign nature like “lactose
intolerance” or some such thing that means nothing, is used as a distraction/diversion.
The surgeon who caused our injury is stacking the deck in his/her favor at our expense by
sending us out to these “special” consultants: pre-selected, carefully-chosen, specifically-trained
abusers we refer to as “the appointed liars”. The doctors selected for this service to the medical
syndicate are chosen because they possess certain personality/psychological deficits that act to
make them enjoy abusing people who they know cannot fight back on a level playing field. Each
area has a complete “set” of these monsters in all specialties; their job is to lie to and abuse
malpractice victims. They are heavily rewarded for this service to the medical syndicate in lots of
referrals and the opportunity to get rich performing unnecessary tests.
Once in a while their system breaks down, however, and something incriminating slips out (or
is slipped to us by a doctor, nurse or technician who still has a conscience and hates what they
see going on around them, hates what they are forced to do to people to be able to keep a job in
-84-
Page 88 of 203
this town, any town.) Never reveal the identity of the person who has stuck their neck out for
you; they will be punished and reprogrammed. And they will not tell you anything again. Also,
word will get out that you cannot be trusted and other honest people will shun you too.
“It’s all in your head, dear”, “Your perception is off”, “You need a psychiatrist”, “You need to
be locked up” are standardized BUZZ-PHRASES the doctors have been programmed with to
knock injury victims down: they are operating from the premise that “a good offense is the best
defense” and if they call us “crazy” first then they don’t have to look any further into themselves
and find out who the REAL crazies actually are.
While we are seeing their crooked consultants we are not getting the help WE need but the
surgeon who injured us is getting something: he/she is getting one more confirmation on the
record that he/she did nothing wrong, that there is nothing wrong with us, and our health
insurance company is getting something too: nothing seen is nothing offered in proper care;
nothing offered is nothing spent. Precious time passes and eventually our injuries erode past the
point of no return and nothing can be done to save us. Bile duct injury has a one-month window
of opportunity for a proper surgical repair by a specialist at a center equipped to handle an injury
of this magnitude. We are deliberately stalled past that one-month window. After that
opportunity is deliberately spoiled, all the health insurers have to provide us is a cheap
“symptomatic relief only” and wait until we drop dead untreated–something that can take up to
fifteen years, usually one to six years. It’s called rationing. This evil is used heavily against
cancer patients too: instead of following the standard of care when a woman presents with a lump
in her breast the crooked doctor will not respond appropriately–on purpose, will not order a
biopsy, but instead will take advantage of her trust and tell her: “let’s watch this for a year and
see what happens” knowing full-well in a year the cancer will be all over her body and, (what
people aren’t told) is if the cancer hasn’t spread the health insurers are obligated to offer full
intervention BUT if the cancer has spread, or been deliberately ignored and ALLOWED to
spread through calculated neglect, all the insurer is obligated to provide is cheapo symptomatic
relief. Ditto for kidney failure. If a correct diagnosis is deliberately withheld and the patient’s
increasing symptoms are ignored and/or lied about the health insurer gets to skip out on
providing expensive intervention. And that means more money for the stockholders. And more
-85-
Page 89 of 203
money available to pay those enormous CEO salaries. And to provide those tagged “high
priority” with the level of intervention none of us tagged “low priority” will ever be allowed to
receive. I’ll bet our health insurance policies did not mention anything about rationing: that we’d
be killed by deliberate, calculated neglect if we came down with something expensive-to-treat
and lifelong. That we’d get nothing if we were tagged “low priority” and proper care would only
be doled out to people on the “high priority” list. No, we weren’t told that. If we had been told
first we would not have been so quick to jump onto their operating tables and then the students
the teaching hospitals get paid to train would not be able to meet their credentialing quotas in
order to get certified.
It is women who have surgery most, women who are traditionally targeted with this kind of
abuse, discrediting, and oppression when the perpetrators are confronted with dissent. Women
make easy targets as a whole, are easily bullied into silence, too afraid to “make waves”, too
afraid to challenge “authority figures”. The climate changes dramatically when we show we are
NOT going to be one of the “good ones” who do exactly as we are told, pay the debts run up on
us without question, and die on schedule, ignorant, with our mouths shut tight.
4.) THE PSYCHOLOGICAL BATTERING BEGINS: If we can’t be manipulated to co-operate
fully then we must be broken down. The doctors want easy victims. They want to orchestrate the
facade of their choosing without interference. They do not want questions or accountability, don’t
want their goals thwarted. It is ALL about them. The victims are in their way and have to be
neutralized somehow or another.In medical school they are programmed to flip responsibility for
the injuries they’ve caused off onto their victims: “YOU are the liar, YOU are crazy, YOU are
deficient…” Labeling YOU first, loudly, let’s them off the hook and deflects attention elsewhere
rather than where it truly belongs. If someone has to be “the crazy one” then they are going to
make sure that label gets stuck onto YOU, not them. So begins the loud character assassinations,
labeling, victim shaming, and so on.
We are called: hypochondriacs, malingerers, liars, attention-seekers, drug-seekers, laxative- abusers, and so on into infinity. And they will make a record of it to support their cause.
-86-
Page 90 of 203
Doctor Games
This is a tough one. Who wants to believe the people we trust with our very lives when we are
at our lowest point are not always at the pinnacle of honesty and integrity? That, once we become
ill or injured, regardless of whether it is related to a malpractice event or not, we will be
systematically mined for all that can be extracted?
Milk The Cow
A predatory game where the doctor already knows what the actual problem is, or at least suspects
it, but feigns ignorance and layers on expensive, painful, and dangerous testing that starts at the
far end of the possible causes and works s-l-o-w-l-y forward. It can be extended almost
indefinitely by adding on a series of referrals to other doctors to spread the wealth around as far
as possible, ensuring an equal reward returned from those doctors for the consideration. This
game’s purpose is to extract as much money from the health insurer and/or the target as possible
before offering a correct diagnosis and treatment–if it ever comes at all. Won’t sick and suffering
people do just about anything, go anywhere, pay anything for even a ghost of a chance for relief?
Especially if deliberately left untreated? This unconscionable behavior is a virtual gold mine for
those indulging in it. The medical syndicate has access to “asset tracking” services, know exactly
what, and how much, we are “worth”, financially, and can be plundered for.
Selective Blindness
Usually reserved for victims of medical malpractice to stonewall past the Statute Of Limitations
and/or Statute Of Repose or for a chronic, progressive disease or injury that is expensive to treat
properly that the health insurer doesn’t want acknowledged in order to skip out on paying for it.
“We don’t SEE anything, and without a diagnosis we can’t offer treatment.” “We just have no
idea what could be wrong.” Doctors are programmed to say “we” instead of “I”.
Nothing seen is nothing offered; nothing offered is nothing spent on care.
-87-
Page 91 of 203
If they went to medical school and were allowed to graduate, they DO know.
Gaslighting
“Your symptoms don’t fit any pain pattern I know of, your perception is off, nobody else is
having the problems you claim you are having, maybe you are a hypochondriac or a drug-seeker
or an attention seeker? In any case, your symptoms are not even possible. You just think your
symptoms are happening; it is all in your head”. And so on into infinity. You could come in
holding your head in your hands and they’d tell you it wasn’t happening. This game is designed
to make us doubt ourselves to the point we give in and accept their false version of the truth
about what happened to us. This term comes from a vintage movie called “Gaslight”.
Threatening
“If you want to keep your only child you will stop talking about this issue–now!” “Your husband
has XXX illness and is seeing my friend Dr. X, right? I suppose he would like to continue to
receive care from Dr. X…?”
Character Assassination
This is where friends, spouses, relatives and even neighbors are contacted and told lies about the
target’s medical situation with the intent, and hope, of sowing strife and causing them to question
what the target is saying.
New Best Friends
This comes from the adage “keep your friends close and your enemies closer”. All of a sudden the
person targeted becomes very sought after by people in the immediate environment who never
once made an attempt at closer contact before. The nurse who lives across the street starts visiting
often and pelts the target with questions at every contact, flips through the calendar on the wall,
picks up mail from to table to see who the sender is, races to the house when company arrives and
-88-
Page 92 of 203
pelts them with questions, questions absences…then rockets the information gathered to their
handler(s).
False Evidence/Erect A Facade
The wrong tests for the true and known condition are ordered and performed–and all naturally
come back negative. They present this as “proof” the target is malingering or use it to stonewall
for time. Then on to the next wrong test.
Or worse, they order the right tests for the true condition then present a false result stating the
opposite as “proof” the actual condition they have chosen not to respond to for whatever reason
doesn’t exist. And what doesn’t exist cannot be treated. This will be dragged out to the length of
their intended purpose for the target, which can include death, deliberately untreated.
The “Prove It” Game
This game is particularly difficult to deal with because the medical syndicate holds all the cards.
They write and hold the medical record. They control care offerings and diagnosis information.
They decide which tests and interventions to offer and perform. They also layer on a set of abuses
of a kind and in a manner that are difficult, if not impossible, to document–especially when we
don’t see it coming and cannot prepare for it. We’ll be given an appointment for a day the staff
knows the doctor is never in then turn us away, giggling behind their hands. How can we prove it
wasn’t a mistake and not an abuse designed to insult us and waste our time?
The Truth OR “The Right Answer”
This game is also particularly difficult to navigate because no matter how we answer their
questions about our medical condition that we are asked–pertaining to the malpractice event that
has caused it–it is going to put us in a place we don’t want to be. We answer truthfully because
we know without full information the symptoms we describe cannot be addressed properly and
the source considered correctly. The problem is, we are not allowed to talk about our malpractice
-89-
Page 93 of 203
event and are expected to parrot the false information the system has tried to program us with that
better fits their cover-up needs. Some of us refuse to do that. And that ignites anger–how dare we
disobey? They don’t want the truth, they want “the right answer”.
Gang-Stalking
Gang-stalking is reserved for their persistent injury victims who refuse to be programmed and
bullied into compliance. The goal is to make themselves appear omnipresent, layer on a veil of
potential menacing that could turn into action at any time, and try to make us believe we are
losing touch with reality–with the two additional bonuses of making ourselves appear unbalanced
to the ones around us when we talk about it and putting us in a position where we destroy our own
credibility. These attacks are subtle. They will do things, or hire people to do things, to us that
border on the ridiculous–so ridiculous that in the telling we will make ourselves appear
unbalanced.
It will be nearly always be things clearly noticeable only to the person targeted, things that go right
up to the edge of criminal assault but stop before crossing that line so that we cannot justify
involving the police–which wouldn’t do any good anyhow because there is seldom, if ever, any
concrete evidence. And the events can easily be, and nearly always are, written off to alternative
causes by the police and those around us–thus fulfilling their agenda for them. We can’t win this
game in any satisfying way: if we don’t talk about what is going on we suffer the attacks alone. If
we do talk about it we help their cause by making ourselves look like lunatics and destroy our
own credibility. Rather than go into the workings of typical gang-stalking here I’ll post citations to
study.
Accusations Of Non-Compliance
This is a relatively new tool the medical syndicate has added to its war chest: prescribe a
dangerous drug, an invasive procedure, or something too expensive for the target to accept then
when the target refused to purchase or cooperate, they claim “non-compliance”. It is a doctor’s
place to advise, not dictate. But New Medicine has other ideas.
-90-
Page 94 of 203
There is a blogspot on the internet where doctors were actually talking about the possibility of
health insurers SUING policyholders for non-compliance as a breach of contract, because, buried
in some contracts is an ugly secret that could become a lucrative goldmine if the ones who wrote
it into these contracts dared to apply it to its full potential: the wording might vary but the gist is:
“the policyholder agrees to do whatever one of their plan doctors tell them to do, without
quibble”. If we don’t want to take the risks of the possible side-effects of a particular drug, or
undergo the pain of an invasive procedure, or accept a surgery we question the value of, or if we
just can’t accept our portion of the cost–too bad. The doctor has made his/her decision and
compliance is expected. The theory is if a policyholder doesn’t comply with blind obedience and
his/her condition worsens, whether it can be attributed to the non-compliance issue or not, the
contract has been breached–and costs for care from the point of the non-compliance incident is
considered a recoverable expenses for the insurance company. Our signature made a contract.
When we signed we agreed to every word in that contract, even if we didn’t read it before signing
or understand what it all meant in real life.
The Affordable Care Act put into place by President Obama, trapped us all into that potential
financial risk: we had to buy health insurance or be fined. At whatever their self-serving, one- sided contracts offered and at the cost, and terms they’ve set–by people we already know can’t be
trusted to look out for our best-interests, and why not.
Create False Hope Then Dash It
When we present more than one symptom, instead of putting them altogether and offering
treatment based upon a correct diagnosis, they’ll isolate each symptom as if it stood alone and ask
us to choose ONE symptom and say they will focus intervention on that one only–and then don’t.
Substitute An Alternative (false) “Diagnosis” That The Symptoms And Treatment Matches
Replace the truth with anything that even kind-of matches up and offer treatment for that.
-91-
Page 95 of 203
Citations:
http://www.stopgangstalking.org/
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=gang+stalking
https://gangstalkingworld.wordpress.com/2008/01/03/gang-stalking-techniques/
https://targetedindividuals.wordpress.com/2008/08/28/gang-stalking-techniques/
Dayton Daily News October 7, 1997 page 8-A
“Three malpractice settlements involving patients who died could wreck the career of a physician
in private practice, setting off reviews by “peer committees”, and malpractice insurance
underwriters and causing high premiums.”
Trauma and Recovery (book) by Judith Lewis Herman, M.D.
“In order to escape accountability for his crimes, the perpetrator does everything in his power to
promote forgetting. Secrecy and silence are the perpetrator’s first line of defense. If secrecy fails,
the perpetrator attacks the credibility of his victim. If he cannot silence her absolutely, he tried to
make sure no one listens. To this end, he marshals an impressive array of arguments, from the
most blatant denial to the most sophisticated and elegant rationalization. After every atrocity one
can expect to hear the same predictable apologies: it never happened; the victim brought it upon
herself; and in any case it is time to forget the past and move on. The more powerful the
perpetrator, the greater is his prerogative to name and define reality, and the more completely his
arguments prevail.”
Lancaster Eagle-Gazette August 27, 1993
Letter To The Editor “Doctor’s Letter Gets Immediate Response” by Martha E. Douds, RN, BSN
QUOTE:
What is particularly frustrating for me is the lack of physicians who have the courage to speak out
-92-
Page 97 of 203
will become unemployable…”
“This system pressures doctors to exploit patients’ trust for financial gain. We can influence
patients choices among health plans, and we know their health status and care-seeking
behavior–the optimal data for risk selection.”
“We can already glimpse the next phase. As fee-for-service medicine withers, risk selection by –
HMOs become a zero-sum game, presaging fierce competition among doctors to avoid sick
patients. Already the chief of a university hospital reportedly has admonished faculty”
“[We can] no longer tolerate patients with complicated and expensive-to-treat conditions being
encouraged to transfer to our group.”
https://www.psychopathfree.com/articles/why-do-psychopaths-put-us-on-the-defense.146/
-94-
Page 98 of 203
Medical Record Tampering
“The best con artists never leave anyone feeling taken. None of their victims ever knows
there’s been a crime.” page 357 of “You Came Back” by Christopher Coake
It became clear who, and what, I was really dealing with the day I asked to borrow my x-ray file
from the hospital where my injury(s) occurred so I could hand-carry it to an appointment out of
town. The staff was very interested in where I was going, who I was going to see, and I wouldn’t
tell them–not that it would have made any difference if I did because what I didn’t know back
then was there is a country-wide dictate that it was strictly hands-off injury cases like mine and
nobody would be allowed to intervene unless I was referred there by the surgeon of record. I had
wrongly assumed, in my early trust and ignorance, that since the locals “just had no idea what
could be wrong” and/or “didn’t want to get involved” I could possibly get a clean and ethical
response out of town, out of state, maybe out of the country if necessary.
I have a college-level education in photography. At home, when I took the films out to examine
them what I saw horrified me: I had two sets of CT Scans sheets. Both sets had runs of
manipulated images at the same set-points then picked up clean again when it got past the area of
liability: the damaged area inside my body. I didn’t know yet what was being concealed, only that
it was. But I wanted to get other opinions–so I consulted people I knew socially who were
educated in photography…and then asked two FBI agents to look at my films. All saw the same
tampering I saw; the FBI agents told me not to return these films to the hospital, to keep them and
put them in a safe place–and to tell others with my particular iatrogenic injury to do the same
“because they are solid evidence of a crime”. (but what good is solid evidence if there is no clean
place to take it for prosecution?)
That was when I understood I was in bigger trouble than I had first thought. What does one DO
with a betrayal of this magnitude?
Later, an out-of-town x-ray technician, who had been injured at the same surgery I was, told me
-95-
Page 99 of 203
hospitals (at that time) kept two sets of x-ray films–one set is the manipulated ones with the areas
of liability concealed through under or over exposure, masking or dodging and has the patient’s
name on the envelope. This is the only set patients would be allowed to access, look at, and
borrow. The other set is the clean set. This clean set doesn’t have the patient’s name on its
envelope, however, it only has the patient’s assigned number on it and “For Doctors Only”
written in big letters. When a doctor wanted to look at a patient’s x-ray file it had to be done by
using the assigned patient number. This is the file we will never be given access to.
Film is film.
Masking was the tampering method of choice. When developing the runs of CT scan films the
technician will expose the whole sheet for just a few seconds to lay down a faint image then turns
off the light source. A ready-made, cut-to-fit, strip of cardboard is placed across the length of the
run of images to be tampered with, then the light source is turned back on and the sheet of film is
exposed for the rest of the correct time under the light to lay down clean images in the rest of the
run. The finished product will read clearly in the other images but will be too faint to read across
the ones that have been masked. That is only half of the con; the second half comes with the
written report. The one writing the report will state something like this: “normal in the
VISUALIZED portions” Are they lying? No. It is the manipulated images that contain the
damaged areas–the ones too light, or too dark to “visualize” clearly. Get it?
Flat films are usually over-exposed for the manipulated file, will be too dark to see anything
clearly.
This is how it was back when I was injured in 1991.
Today, however, x-ray imaging has gone digital and is stored in their computers. Good luck
getting access to those clean images. Digital images can be “photo-shopped” to present anything
the medical syndicate wishes them to present. The clean written reports can be “edited” before
printing out, or being uploaded to the patient’s on-line/internet file.
If you scroll down to the bottom of a lab report or a radiology report you will find the word
“Edited–Final” if it has been scrutinized and the incriminating portions removed or changed.
An ultrasound technician can adjust the angle of the hand-held portion to contaminate the actual
-96-
Page 100 of 203
image and make it look like something else, something the syndicate dictates and prefers.
Written reports, back when I was first injured and hospitals kept a paper file on patients (in
addition to a microfiche and a computer file that was contained within its own system only) the
written reports for the paper files were carefully worded in a “special language” whereby medical
professionals could relay vital information to one another about what actually appeared in the x- ray films or lab specimens, etc. while at the same time concealing it from the patient of record.
This is going to be a tough one to get across but I am going to try; once you understand how it
works you can use it to decipher your own written reports:
This tampering method has a name: Hegelian Dialectic Antithesis. In this method, no equals yes
and yes equals no. Plus, those writing the dirty reports for the paper file are very SPECIFIC about
what they “didn’t see/note/identify” and EXACTLY where they “didn’t see/note/identify it”. The
perpetrators of this dirty-work bank on the hope that most people are not familiar with Hegel and
would not recognize the clear patterns of this “special language” for what it really is and just pass
over it–just like I did until I knew better.
Examples (from my own medical record):
“No thrombus seen in the left ventricle”
TRANSLATION: there is a blood clot in the heart’s left ventricle.
“No abnormal calcifications noted in the left lobe”
TRANSLATION: there are abnormal calcifications in the left lobe of the liver.
“No free air seen under either hemidiaphragm”
TRANSLATION: there is free air under both hemidiaphragms.
I have examined other people’s paper files and saw the same tampering methodology. I saw it in
one person’s military medical record.
-97-
Page 101 of 203
Today, with the medical record stored in the computer databases, they simply edit before
presenting it in any form to the patient, edit out the information the medical syndicate wants to
conceal. The separate healthcare systems have an agreement to help conceal each other’s criminal
activity and patient harm so it makes no difference where we go trying to get a clean service.
One local hospital with a church/religious affiliation is no more honest and clean in its dealings
with the public than the others. Its doctors and staff perform all the same cover-up protocols,
verbal abuses, records-tampering methodologies and so on with the same cold lack of respect for
the law and the people it sells its services to.
The tampering method it uses on specific components of lab results the medical syndicate wants
to conceal is called “transposing”–the staff scrambles the blood and/or urine values for specific
lab results for a particular patient in a standardized pattern only they have the key to. Or they will
simply eliminate the value for a particular result in the hope the patient will pass over it as
insignificant.
One of my associates had this experience: in the ER, late at night when it was virtually empty,
an honest doctor came up to her and said: “follow me–I want to show you something” and took
her to the desk area, called up her CLEAN computer-stored medical file and let her read it. It read
NOTHING like the sanitized paper file copies she had been given by that hospital.
I have an example in my medical record where the emergency room staff cut apart my lab sheet
and substituted someone else’s normal results–then ran it through their copier instead of giving
me the clean computer printout. But the one who patched this paper together did a very poor job
of lining things up. Words were cut off by half, the patch was laid onto the sheet crooked.
A nurse, who was injured at laparoscopic gallbladder surgery back when it was new, showed me
her surgery consent form, said it was NOT the form she had signed; this one allowed a trainee to
perform her surgery. She said she would never sign a paper like that. I looked at her signature and
it was crooked, floating well above the signature line. They had clearly transferred her signature
from the form she had actually signed to a different one of their choosing, that allowed something
she didn’t agree to nor want. She and I had two FBI agents inspect the form and they told us how
the transfer was performed: the one doing the tampering cuts a window in a blank sheet of paper
-98-
Page 102 of 203
that exposes only the signature on the original form then runs it through the copy machine to align
with the signature area on the form it is to be transferred to–which doesn’t always come out in
perfect alignment–like what appeared on this nurse’s form. This is why I advise people to sign in
any color but black and get a copy on the spot, don’t leave without it, don’t take “no” for an
answer..
If someone is going to try to run a scam they should at least take the time to do it right, make it
look believable.
My experience with the video of my botched surgery went like this: I was given a copy that had
been edited; it takes up after surgery is well underway and doesn’t reflect the detail noted in the
written operative report. The Medical Board, after I had made a complaint, also asked for, and was
given, a copy of the surgery video–unedited, the staff claimed. They showed it to me, just the
VHS cassette itself, not the actual video–it was labeled “Bird Watching In North America”.
Apparently, to thwart their injury victims from somehow getting hold of the unedited version,
decided a good way to keep that from happening is to label these videos with anything but their
victim’s name or other identifying information and keep the “key” of what video belongs to which
victim separate. Clever monsters…
Citations:
Journal Of Endodontics
May 2008
Vol. 34, Issue 5, Pages 530-536
http://www.jendodon.com/article/S0099-2399(08)00088-5/abstract
Abstract
Digital radiography has become an indispensable diagnostic tool in dentistry today. To improve
vision and diagnosis, dental x-ray software allows image enhancement (eg, adjusting color,
density, sharpness, brightness, or contrast). Exporting digital radiographs to a file format
-99-
Page 103 of 203
compatible with commercial graphic software increases chances that information can be altered,
added, or removed in an unethical manner. Dental radiographs are easily duplicated, stored, or
distributed in digital format. It is difficult to guarantee the authenticity of digital images, which is
especially important in insurance or juridic cases. Image-enhancement features applied to digital
radiographs allow mishandling or potential abuse. This has been illustrated by several recently
published studies. A standard authentication procedure for digital radiographs is needed. A
number of manipulated radiographic images are presented to show concerns about security,
reliability, and the potential for fraud. Anti-tampering techniques and methods of detecting
manipulations in digital medical images are discussed.
https://ampedsoftware.com/authenticate.html
PMC
March 28, 2007
By:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3043827/
By Wu, Chang, Chen, Wang, Kuo, Moon, and Chen
“Tamper Detection And Recovery For Medical Images Using Near Loss-Less Information Hiding
Technique”
QUOTE:
“Digital medical images are very easy to be modified for illegal purposes. For example,
microcalcification in mammography is an important diagnostic clue, and it can be wiped off
intentionally for insurance purposes or added intentionally into a normal mammography. In this
paper, we proposed two methods to tamper detection and recovery for a medical image.”
-100-
Page 104 of 203
ABC News
PrimeTime Live (transcript)
1-14-1998
“Sound Advice”
QUOTE:
Diane Sawyer (voice over): “And it’s not just obstetrical ultrasound. Every year, millions of
ultrasound scans are performed on other organs like hearts and arteries. To show you how much
skill matters, we asked this well-trained ultrasound sonographer to take an image of an artery, a
clear one, with no blockage that could cause stroke. But it’s very sensitive technology. Look what
happens when one knob is turned incorrectly or the probe is held at slightly the wrong angle.
Suddenly, that clear artery looks completely blocked when it’s not–a mistake which could lead to
unnecessary and risky testing or surgery. Look again. The correct image and the incorrect one.
And compare this good image of a liver and kidney with this murky one which could cause the
doctors who review the scans to miss disease. (on camera) So since the skill of the sonographer is
crucial, you probably think that all the tens of thousands of people doing ultrasounds are highly
trained and certified. But you’d be wrong…”
http://hmohardball.com/HMO%20Rigs%20Patients.pdf
From A Lawyer (gotten for me through from one of their on-line subscription services)
Author Unknown
QUOTE:
“A Note pf caution on video documentation: “Do not give a copy to your patient. If you make
videos for teaching, avoid identifying information other than the subject of interest, e.g.
“Laparoscopic Splenectomy”. Do not write the date of the procedure or the patient’s gender, race,
-101-
Page 105 of 203
name, address, or hospital identification number. Remember, an unedited tape of a procedure
shown before a jury may make you appear as though you are shaky, awkward, and tenuous as a
surgeon no matter how good a technical endoscopist you are.”
PRARIELAW
Subject: Re: Doctoring Of Medical Records
Dear Dr. Kennedy,
With all due respect, I am sure that you believe your statements regarding records. But, in fact
the experiences of medical professionals who are not physicians would prove you wrong. Most
nurses are requested to change their documentation after “an untoward event”. I have personal
experience with just such an event with a highly reputable university medical center. The
radiology dept. where I worked for several years indeed shredded films when “lawsuits” were
pending. Please try to listen to what the facts are that are being presented on this forum. You need
to have some perspective of what plaintiffs actually are up against as you face them from the
witness box. The power of the hospital, insurer, and you far exceeds their weapons in their search
for justice.
XXXX R.N. LNCC
-102-
Page 106 of 203
Electronic Medical Records
When electronic medical record storage was being sold to the public back in the 1990s it was
framed like this: “if you live in one state and have an accident in another state any doctor
anywhere can access your compete medical file and lab results, x-rays, etc. from any location you
happen to be in order to provide the best care possible.” Sounds great, right? And for that single
use, it IS great. But it also has another use: tracking people, particularly medical malpractice
victims.
It used to be possible for a person injured by a doctor in his/her own community to travel out of
town or out of state to get a correct diagnosis and access the care being wantonly withheld at
home. Not anymore. We could come in with a clean slate before the widespread use of electronic
medical records but the electronic medical record follows us everywhere now.
New Medicine’s “eat what you kill” protocol works best when medical records are stored in a
centralized computer database–it prevents patient escape and thwarts strays wandering, enables
unity in the presentation.
And don’t think for a minute that different medical systems won’t unify to help each other when
it comes to concealing each others’ malpractice events. If one system does it for another system
they can count on the favor returned for help concealing the malpractice events their doctors have
caused.
Hospitals have had electronic medical records for a long time already but they were kept within
their own system. Or linked within a community, called a C.H.I.N. (Community Health
Information Network) Government and other vested interests wanted all these individual networks
linked into one huge database–and they got it. (called: H.I.E.– Health Information Exchange)
Life insurance companies always kept a database on health records. One large company is the
Medical Information Bureau located in Braintree, Massachusetts.
http://www.mib.com/facts_about_mib.html
-103-
Page 107 of 203
Citations:
20/20
9-30-94
“They Know Your Secrets” (transcript #1439)
QUOTE:
“With the advent of computer technology, more and more medical information is being
transferred from doctor and hospital files into centralized computer data bases. The centralization
of data does help to hold down costs and it does make it easier for health professionals to treat
patients, but it also makes it easier for outsiders to tap into that very same data.”
https://www.healthit.gov/providers-professionals/health-information-exchange/what-hie
-104-
Page 108 of 203
Referral To Psychiatrists Or Psychologists
A word of warning: once injured by a doctor and we begin questioning the “care” we are (or
most likely aren’t) receiving, the standardized cover-up program dictates referral to a
psychiatrist or some other such hand-selected “mental health professional” who has proven blind
obedience and loyalty to the “club” and its rules. If we are so foolish as to accept such a referral
we need to keep our back to the wall at all times because that so-called professional will never
be working for our best-interests. They have one purpose: to ferret out our weak points then
use them to disable us psychologically, dig out as much “dirt” on us as can be extracted for the
medical syndicate to hold over our heads as they see fit, and to advise us to blindly obey and
behave along the lines of the medical syndicate’s comfort.
They will also offer to prescribe anti-depressants, tranquilizers, and other such drugs to reduce
or neutralize our natural, normal (and unwelcome) response to being abused by the medical
syndicate.
These drugs can be harmful to certain disease processes, especially since a correct diagnosis is
being deliberately withheld. There is no way any outsider can have enough information to protect
themselves from wrong drugs and contraindicated treatments.
There is also the diabolical intention to make a permanent, false-and-insulting, record of our
having“mental health issues” to be utilized to discredit us if, in the unlikely event, that our
medical malpractice case ever makes it into a courtroom.
It will also be utilized to advantage by every medical professional we seek care from forever
after. An example is being asked “what could I do to make you really angry?” and if we answer
truthfully “call me a liar about my medical issues” we will be purposefully, and viciously, called
a liar every time we raise a specific complaint about a symptom directly related to our doctor-
-105-
Page 109 of 203
caused injury. We don’t have to answer every question we are asked. Especially when asked by
people with questionable intent.
One injury victim’s weak point was her appearance; once the psychiatrist learned this he would
masterfully hammer her, viciously, with that topic at every visit and she would phone me
afterward in tears. It never occurred to her that she was being deliberately abused and to just stop
seeing this monster.
A custom-tailored abuse program will be created from the information we trustingly give them
and it will be used by every contact we have with the “club” forever after in the attempt to try to
break us down. It’ll be entered into our computer files and at the ready for instant reference to all
who seek to utilize it against us. (the same applies to charted allergens; hospital staff “forgets”
we are deathly allergic to a specific drug…understand?)
One, seemingly innocent, question we are routinely asked is: “what can I do to make you really
angry?” Do not answer this question, or instead answer with something that isn’t true and doesn’t
matter, because if we tell them the truth that answer will be spread across the whole system and
will be used as a tool to abuse us with every place we go forever after.
Disgusting cowards band together in order to gain the ability to commit acts they’d never have
the courage to commit on their own: women, children, the poor, the elderly, prisoners and such
disenfranchised segments of society are easy targets, cannot fight back or protect themselves
from predation on a level playing field.
-106-
Page 110 of 203
Blutkitt
Blutkitt is a German word meaning “blood cement”.
“Everyone to whom much was given, much will be demanded…” Luke 12:48
“B____ E___’s ilk want power so badly that at some point in their lives they make a
conscious choice to embrace evil. It’s not a gradual seduction. They do it without
reservation, and that’s when they leave the rest of us. You know it when it happens, too. No
amount of cosmetic surgery can mask the psychological deformity in their eyes.”
James Lee Burke, page 367, of “A Stained White Radiance”
“We Never Forgive Them Whom We Have Wronged” by unknown
“This planet is run by crazy people. Remember what they have to do to get where they are.” Carl
Sagan in his book “CONTACT”
*****************************************
http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/e/eichmann-adolf/transcripts/Sessions/Session-106-05.html
Q. At that time did you ever hear the term Blutkitt – ‘blood cement’?
A. Yes, definitely, Blutkitt became a familiar phrase. I would put it this way – the other words, the
other play on words, “blood cements.”
-107-
Page 111 of 203
Q. What does that mean?
A. Having the same blood makes a link between people.
Q. I see. Did it also have another meaning?
A. It was also used in terms of descent, for example in the Waffen-SS divisions, where the so- called Germanic…it was used… I must just think about this…
Q. No, that is not what I mean. Did Blutkitt mean: Blood shed together acts as a cement?
A. No, I did not understand it to mean that, but that common blood acts as cement.
Q. No, no. What I mean by Blutkitt can be expressed as follows, for example: “We are all in the
same boat, and no one is allowed to alight; if anyone wants to turn his back on me, I will force
him to become an accomplice, so that there is no turning back for him.”
A. Linguistically that is correct, this term would readily fit here, but I have never heard it in this
form.
Q. Well, I can tell you that at that time this was not a rare occurrence. And I shall read this out
here from Wisliceny’s report (T/84), where he says that your principle (Eichmann’s principle),
“that his principle, he once told me to my face in Hungary in the course of a heated discussion.”
And then it says: “We are all in the same boat, and no one is allowed to alight; if anyone wants to
turn his back on me, I will force him to become an accomplice, so that there is no turning back for
him.”
A. About this, I have said that in fact…that it is not my way to deal with my people in such a
dictatorial and aggressive fashion. I also have no recollection of having said anything like this.
Q. Very well, that will do. This sentence I read out to you…
A. Yes.
Q. …comes at the end of two previous sentences, which read: “Eichmann’s principle in his staff
policy was never to release anyone who had once worked in his Section for another job. Even
volunteering for the army or the Waffen- SS he refused as a matter of principle.” And then comes
this sentence. What do you have to say about this?
-108-
Page 112 of 203
A. I would like to say about this…
http://www.humanitas-international.org/showcase/chronography/glossary/glossary.html
Blutkitt (Blood Cement): Hitler’s concept of bonding through shared atrocities and horrible
experiences. Probably derived from the writings of Michael Prawdin and his two books on
Genghis Khan.
(Link Broken)
“Medical sciences in Nazi Germany,” Dr. Alexander writes, “collaborated with this Hegelian
trend [“rational utility”] particularly in the following enterprises: the mass extermination of the
chronically sick in the interest of saving ‘useless’ expenses to the community as a whole; the mass
extermination of those considered socially disturbing or racially and ideologically unwanted; the
individual, inconspicuous extermination of those considered disloyal with the ruling group; and
the ruthless use of ‘human experimental material’ for medico-military research.”(3)
Organizations with humanitarian-sounding names were immediately set up to execute “health”
programs, again, under deceptively, euphemistic terms.
What these examples illustrate is an age-old method used by inimical elements, in this case the
SS, of consciously and methodically making suspects of disloyalty clear themselves by
participating in a crime that will definitely and irrevocably link them to the organization. The SS
called this process of reinforcement of group cohesion “Blutkitt” (blood cement). It is important to
note that Dr. Alexander opined that ideologically conditioned crimes against humanity may be
motivated not just by perversity, but by cowardice and fear, especially fear of punishment or of
ostracism by the group.
There can be no doubt that in a subtle way the Hegelian premise of ‘what is useful is right’ has
infected society, including the medical portion.
http://www.ninehundred.net/control/mc-ch6.html
-109-
Page 113 of 203
The SS soldiers called this the magic action of the “Blutkitt,” the tie of bloody crime binding
them together and preparing them for Valhalla.
(Link Broken)
1938 The SS Training Office orders a specially revised and expanded, one-volume edition of
Michael Prawdin’s two books on Genghis Khan (See 1934, 1935). This book was frequently given
as a Christmas present by Himmler and every SS leader received a copy. Hitler is said to have
derived his ideas concerning Blutkitt (blood cement) from this source.
(Link Broken)
He had solidified his relationship to his Auschwitz group by means of what was called ‘blood
cement’ (Blutkitt), meaning direct participation in the group’s practice of killing…In that way the
Auschwitz self was ‘baptized’ by passing the test for ‘hardness’…Selections also provide a ritual
drama. Whether the Auschwitz self entered into that drama with integrated élan (as in the case of
Mengele) or with hesitation and conflict (as in the case of many others), participation in that
‘cultural performance’ tended to absorb anxieties and doubts and fuse individual actions with
prevailing (Nazi) concepts, as does ritual performance in general. Here Auschwitz epitomized the
overall Nazi preoccupation with ritual, much of it having to do with healing and killing…The
healing-killing paradox so dominated Auschwitz as to create a world of selections.
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/LIE/prwar.html
“Deforming Consent: The Public Relation Industry’s Secret War On Activists” by John Stauber
and Sheldon Rampton
“Activists, he explained, fall into four categories: radicals, opportunists, idealists, and realists. He
follows a three-step strategy to neutralize them: 1) isolate the radicals; 2) “cultivate” the idealists
and “educate” them into becoming realists; then 3) co-opt the realists into agreeing with industry.”
-110-
Page 114 of 203
“Opportunists and realists, says Duchin, are easier to manipulate. Opportunists engage in activism
seeking “visibility, power, followers and, perhaps, even employment….The key to dealing with
[them] is to provide them with at least the perception of a partial victory.” And realists are able to
“live with trade-offs; willing to work within the system; not interested in radical change;
pragmatic. [They] should always receive the highest priority in any strategy dealing with a public
policy issue…. If your industry can successfully bring about these relationships, the credibility of
the radicals will be lost and opportunists can be counted on to share in the final policy solution.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/24/psychopath-brain-hardwiring-concern-for-others_n_3
149856.html
https://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10092/5458/MichaelRichardson-MScThesis.pdf;seque
nce=1
New England Journal Of Medicine
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM194907142410201
“Medicine Under Dictatorship” by Leo Alexander MD
http://www.jpands.org/hacienda/article28.html
“Euthanasia, Medical Science, And The Road To Genocide”
By: Miguel A, Faria Jr., MD
MSNBC
2-27-2011
“Ugly Past Of U.S. Human Experiments Uncovered”
QUOTE:
U.S. officials also acknowledged there had been dozens of similar experiments in the United
States–studies that often involved making healthy people sick.” “At best, these were a search for
lifesaving treatments; at worst, some amounted to curiosity-satisfying experiments that hurt
-111-
Page 115 of 203
people but provided no useful results.” “These studies were worse in at least one respect–they
violated the concept of “first do no harm, a fundamental medical principle that stretches back
centuries” “When you give somebody a disease–even by the standards of their time–you really
cross the key ethical norm of the profession, said Arthur Caplan, director of the University Of
Pennsylvania’s Center For Bioethics.”
-112-
Page 116 of 203
Club
Shakespeare’s KING LEAR
Act 3 Scene 4
“The Prince Of Darkness is a gentleman.”
Here is what we do not know and are not supposed to know:
Like I said before, the lawyers are “officers of the court” and have taken a loyalty oath to the
judicial branch of the seated fiat government; they will never be working for you because their
first loyalty lies elsewhere. Their job is to protect the other “club members” FROM US and from
the consequences of their “club’s” criminal activity and misbehavior inflicted upon US, protect
each other and themselves from the “outsiders” they parasitize: WE ARE THE OUTSIDERS. Get
it? Their job is to make sure ALL “club member” dirty-work goes unpunished and their victims
continue to be forced to carry the whole burden for all—unchallenged and unrelieved. This has
nothing to do with truth, merit, or justice—it is all about creating and maintaining control. It has
to do with the parasitic, criminal, power-elite keeping its host-body under control and producing
for their collective benefit and enrichment. If you are an “outsider” to this seated, fiat, government
and its self-serving systems, and have been tagged “low priority” in its databases, you will not be
able to get real justice of any kind anywhere when going up against its membership—not for love
nor money.
The “club” protects itself and its membership; the lawyers are in this “club”, are seated in the
topmost positions, and we are not and never will be. They have their job serving the whole club–
and the doctors, government officials, agencies, law enforcement, and such have their particular
jobs working to protect and maintain the best-interests of the whole. All work seamlessly together
to serve just one segment of society: theirs. And only theirs. That is the way it is.
Once we understand this we will see the lawyers (and their cohorts) for what they really are.
The doctors themselves often own stock in our health insurance companies (who often own the
-113-
Page 119 of 203
psychiatrists who will dig out injury victim’s weaknesses and attack those areas hoping to break
the uncontrollable victim down and render them less of a threat to the “club members” parasite’s
paradise, and so on.
The doctors who are selected by their peers to perform this dirty-work in service to the medical
syndicate are especially low-grade sociopaths with a mental pathology that revels in the suffering
they can inflict on others: in short, they enjoy abusing people, get off on it. They really like their
work in a way that just isn’t human. That is why they have been singled out and recruited for the
job. It takes a particular kind of person to perform this nasty service to the medical syndicate
because normal people recoil from, and are emotionally damaged by, those particular behaviors.
But not the doctors selected for this service; they enjoy the work—some so much so that they can
hardly contain themselves. (one of the local gastroenterologists injury victims are routinely
referred to after injury at gallbladder surgery is bent in that direction: this sadistic monster, when
abusing patients for profit, lights up like a child on Christmas morning, can hardly contain his joy,
grins like an idiot and is very cartoonish in his whole demeanor when in the middle of a patient- abuse session: his specialty is abusing women. His senior partner is the same. I used to wonder
what kept them from jumping up and down and clapping with glee at times…disgusting, vicious,
pig-men) Could it get any better for them than being actually encouraged to freely practice their
perversion and getting paid for it too? The doctors recruited for this dirty-work are the very worst
of the worst. Unlike normal people, who recoil from abusing and deliberately damaging others,
these sadistic monsters thrive on it, have deficient, depraved personality flaws that allow them to
cross boundaries with no conscience whatsoever—they are extremely dangerous and best avoided.
If they feel they have to kill you to get their way, they will do it. Without hesitation. They WILL
criminally reverse the standard of care, will not hesitate to improperly perform dangerous invasive
procedures, have no qualms prescribing the wrong drugs, or two drugs in deadly combination,
deliberately prescribe drugs known and charted as allergy-alerts, will wantonly withhold
antibiotics…
It is useless to plead with them, cry, or any number of common victim behaviors reflexively
done in response to the abuses heaped on by these sadistic monsters: it only feeds their sickness
and rewards them.
-116-
Page 120 of 203
There is a saying that goes something like this: “the strong take from the weak but the smart
take from the strong.” Why is it always about “taking from”? That is how a parasite’s mind
works: take. Not produce. Not earn. Not work for. Just take. Let others do the donkey-work then
conspire to wiggle away the fruits of their labors by whatever means possible. Whatever happened
to evolving into mature, responsible, self-sufficient, ethical adults who earn their own way in life
and working for what they want, doing for themselves and “taking” from NO ONE, standing on
their own two feet like mature adults and keeping their hooks to themselves and off others? Our
biggest mistake in dealing with these parasites is that we are applying normal values to people
who are anything but normal.
One thing “club” absolutely will not tolerate is one segment stealing from another segment.
Most of the cases that actually get prosecuted in their courts, and are put up for display to the
public in their content-controlled media outlets, have one thing in common: someone committed
an unauthorized theft of some kind, usually from Medicare or Medicaid–or some other such coffer
under “club” control. The interesting feature in all of these cases where people suffered actual
harm is that NOTHING is done for, or given back to, the ones actually harmed! Fines are
imposed, sometimes the thieves are sent to prison…but that does nothing for the PEOPLE who
suffered the actual harm and losses.
Citation:
United States Department Of Justice
5-21-2010
“The Health Alliance of Greater Cincinnati and the Christ Hospital to Pay $108 Million for
Violating Anti-Kickback Statute and Defrauding Medicare and Medicaid”
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/health-alliance-greater-cincinnati-and-christ-hospital-pay-108-mill
ion-violating-anti
10 Big Anti-Kickback Cases Involving Hospitals in 2010
-117-
Page 121 of 203
Written by Jaimie Oh | January 26, 2011
http://www.beckersasc.com/stark-act-and-fraud-abuse-issues/10-big-anti-kickback-cases-involvin
g-hospitals-in-2010.html
United States Department Of Justice
3-1-2016
“Medical Device Company Will Pay $646 Million For Making Illegal Payments To Doctors And
Hospitals In United States And Latin America”
https://www.justice.gov/usao-nj/pr/medical-device-company-will-pay-646-million-making-illegal- payments-doctors-and-hospitals
“Hospitals to pay $118 million on accusations of paying doctors for referring patients”
By: Carrie Teegardin
9-22- 2015
http://investigations.blog.ajc.com/2015/09/21/adventist-health-to-pay-118-7-million-to-settle-whis
tleblower-suits/
QUOTE:
““Patients are entitled to be sure that the care they receive is based on their actual medical needs
rather than the financial interests of their physician.”
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002747716
”
.
-118-
Page 122 of 203
The best apology is
changed behavior.
Author Unknown
-119-
Page 123 of 203
Suicides and Murders
I have a large file of cases I have collected about doctors, and other medical professionals,
killing their annoying, or unwanted, spouses or domestic partners.
The interesting part in all of this, from an observation standpoint, is how this freedom to kill in
the workplace has unexpectedly extended into the “club member’s” private lives and is no longer
contained to the workplace anymore: in recent years many stories have been featured in the
mainstream media about doctors and nurses killing off their troublesome, unwanted spouses:
instead of divorcing them they just kill them to get rid of them. In July of 2000 these killings
became such a problem in Massachusetts that it caught the attention of the Massachusetts Medical
Society and inspired them to sent out information packets to the state’s physicians listing
resources to help them by offering free, confidential counseling!
The boundary between killing in the workplace (and being allowed to get away with it) and
killing at home has gotten unclear from extensive exposure to it and now certain individuals
cannot differentiate as well between the two: at work they freely kill anyone who irritates them or
gets in their way, is costing the health insurer too much, etcetera. There are no real consequences
to these workplace kills anyway–their colleagues help hide their crimes and protect them from
consequences.
Their programming and protected experiences have become so entrenched in their minds and
hearts that they are carrying the resultant attitude home with them–and when the spouse begins
presenting with the same irritants and barriers to the instant gratification and blind obedience they
have come to expect they automatically respond, knee-jerk, with what they have been conditioned
with and move forward to correct the irritant just like in the workplace: give the irritant a nice stiff
dose of Pavulon, potassium chloride, or poison of another kind, drown them, etc. and simply kill
them off. Problem solved, irritant removed.
But, unlike the freedoms and protections granted to kill in the workplace, these freedoms and
protections do not always extend to the home life and many are shocked and surprised to find
themselves called to account and are arrested, charged, and prosecuted for the crime they have
committed outside the work environment.
-120-
Page 124 of 203
Citation:
The Columbus Dispatch
July 21, 2000
“3 Killings Spur Group To Send Counseling Advice To Doctors”
By Lisa Lipman, Associated Press
There has also been an upswing in the number of medical students and doctors committing
suicide. Not everyone has the native capacity to witness and endure the constant exposure to the
horrors, abuses, and terrible insider knowledge New Medicine and its utilitarian ethic has imposed
in recent decades. Not everyone can perform to the inhumane cost-saving demands of the
insurance industry. Only the ones who can turn off thinking for themselves, feeling for others, and
can be bent to perform to the dictates and will of the criminal elite already established can, and
will, be allowed to prosper and flourish under the current regime.
The pressure to conform is overwhelming to the ones who can’t let go of their own conscience
and give themselves over to programming, rote-response conditioning, and micro-managing by
corrupt others. They see too much, hear too much, know too much—and can’t live with what they
have come to see, hear, and know.
Citations:
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/03/23/american-doctors-are-killing-themselves-and-n
o-one-is-talking-about-it.html
http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2014/02/doctors-commit-suicide.html
While there are many articles written about physician suicide and the presented reasons for it,
almost nothing is written about medical harm victims being deliberately driven to suicide by the
medical syndicate.
Four of my associates were methodically driven to suicide after suffering a medical malpractice
event. All four were psychologically battered to death by the medical syndicate and its brutal,
-121-
Page 128 of 203
Medical Boards
The Medical Boards are NOT what we have been led to believe they are and can inflict their
own form of punishments to doctors who will not follow “club” rules. Trumped-up drug charges
are a huge favorite here and elsewhere. (sex charges are second to that.) Why? Because drug
charges have federal implications. As “club member insiders”, the doctors just know too much
and know local or state charges cannot hold them—and exactly why not. (the detail is too
complicated to get into here) Ever notice how the Medical Boards take little-to-no interest in
doctors abusing and killing patients? How the only cases they will actively respond to are drug
and sex cases? You might want to consider why…
In my early trust and ignorance I was uneducated enough to believe I could go to the State
Medical Board for resolution of my surgeon’s very obvious, heavily recorded, criminal activity
and myriad abuses. (we can trust the Medical Board, right?) Boy was I wrong! I was given an
appointment with a top-level staff member and she asked me to sit down and discuss my case
detail with her. I had brought in medical records for “show-and-tell”, of course, not knowing any
better at this early stage of my ordeal.
The things that were the most incriminating pieces of evidence, the things that corrupt woman
took the most interest in, “disappeared” after she asked to take my material into another room for
copying: out of my sight she had carefully picked through the stack I had given her “to copy for
their files” and each piece she had remarked on as concrete evidence in my presence earlier was
removed/stolen. I did not notice this theft until after I arrived back home and was unloading the
box for re-filing. Good thing I had brought in only copies of the originals, eh? That crooked
monster did not get what she believed she had stolen! Ha! And I phoned her immediately to tell
her so. She was really angry. Too bad, huh? Nice try though; better luck next time! But there isn’t
going to be a next time now that I know the truth about the crooked Medical Board staff.
Can we trust the Medical Boards? Absolutely not! They are not working for us. We are
outsiders, not “club members”. Their job, just like that of the lawyers, is to protect the other “club
members” from US. It is one huge set-up and con-game. Like the lawyers, they will steal evidence
if they can and the only reason they are allowing you into their offices at all is to see with their
-125-
Page 129 of 203
own eyes exactly what evidence you have on the “club member” doctors so they can pass that
information along to the most interested parties. And if they can manage to steal our evidence
while we are there, well, they will. They are not interested in the misbehavior or criminal activity
of the doctors and never will be; we are wasting our time. And, if asked, they will freely tell us,
point-blank, that they do not, ever, pursue cases brought to them by anyone but doctors or law
enforcement! So WHY do they bother to give the common person appointments at all? To collect
information from us, that’s why! NOT to see what harm the doctors are doing to us (because they
already know) but rather to see what WE are up to and what concrete material we have collected
on the doctors! Get it?! Nobody seems to notice that however many complaints they get the
crooked Medical Boards NEVER actually act on the cases presented no matter what happens.
They will, however, go after the doctors who do not follow the “club rules”.
What interests me most about this is the methods used by both entities are the same. That would
indicate to me that this cover-up and protection “program” is taught to ALL “club members” in a
standardized fashion at a central point.
Here’s their excuse:
When I asked why they would not pursue my case against my surgeon in spite of the concrete
evidence of criminal activity I had provided, I was told something I did not understand at the
time–but do now:
“We do not have to pursue anything we don’t want to. We do not owe any duty to any
individual.”
On the face of it, this appears to be a facetious remark–but this person was telling the truth,
albeit a truth without explanation. So, what is the explanation?
The case of Warren Verses The District Of Columbia:
Warren v. District of Columbia is an oft-quoted District of Columbia Court of Appeals case that
held that the police do not owe a specific duty to provide police services to individual citizens
based upon the public duty doctrine.
The public duty doctrine extends to agencies such as the state medical boards. They really
-126-
Page 132 of 203
By: John Stauber and Sheldon Rampton
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/LIE/prwar.html
QUOTE:
DIVIDE AND CONQUER
Ronald Duchin, senior vice-president of another PR spy firm Mongoven, Biscoe, and Duchin
would probably have labeled Steinman and Tylczak radicals. A graduate of the US Army War
College, Duchin worked as a special assistant to the secretary of defense and director of public
affairs for the Veterans of Foreign Wars before becoming a flack. Activists, he explained, fall into
four categories: radicals, opportunists, idealists, and realists. He follows a three-step strategy to
neutralize them: 1) isolate the radicals; 2) cultivate the idealists and educate them into becoming
realists; then 3) co-opt the realists into agreeing with industry.
According to Duchin, radical activists:
“want to change the system; have underlying socio/political motives and see multinational
corporations as inherently evil. These organizations do not trust the federal, state and local
governments to protect them and to safeguard the environment. They believe, rather, that
individuals and local groups should have direct power over industry. I would categorize their
principal aims right now as social justice and political empowerment.”
Idealists are also hard to deal with. They want a perfect world and find it easy to brand any
product or practice which can be shown to mar that perfection as evil. Because of their intrinsic
altruism, however, and because they have nothing perceptible to be gained by holding their
position, they are easily believed by both the media and the public, and sometimes even
politicians. However, idealists have a vulnerable point. If they can be shown that their position in
opposition to an industry or its products causes harm to others and cannot be ethically justified,
they are forced to change their position. Thus, while a realist must be negotiated with, an idealist
must be educated. Generally this education process requires great sensitivity and understanding on
the part of the educator.
Opportunists and realists, says Duchin, are easier to manipulate. Opportunists engage in activism
seeking visibility, power, followers and, perhaps, even employment. … The key to dealing with
them is to provide them with at least the perception of a partial victory. And realists are able to
-129-
Page 135 of 203
RED FLAG #2: The leadership of these groups are the only ones allowed mainstream media
access.
The leadership of these groups are NOT actual medical malpractice injury victims themselves;
they are the child, spouse, parent, friend, grandchild, etcetera of a direct injury victim but they are
NEVER a direct victim themselves. Why? The “club” cannot allow direct victims in leadership
positions and expose the direct victim’s personal ordeal/experience to public view: the direct
injury victim could deteriorate and die right in front of lots of people who’d be watching carefully
and the detail of their ordeal would be exposed every step of the way. Other victims would be
exposed to the suffering and the pain, the standardized abuses, and the details of the criminal
activity and catch onto their own reality quicker. When the “club” goal is to squelch dissent and
prevent active response it would be disastrous to their cause to allow direct victims leadership
positions.
The leadership, never being direct injury victims themselves, trade on the information of their
loved one’s case material—someone who is usually dead from the malpractice event and cannot
speak for themselves. (But not always dead, sometimes permanently injured.) Direct injury
victims are usually ill and poor, not in the best physical or financially-stable condition to work a
leadership role.
The leadership of these groups, whose loved one was the actual injury victim, usually has another
feature in common: the cases have already been finalized as one of the content-controlled
“showcases” in the legal system and has been settled or gone to trial accordingly: there is nothing
more the “club” can offer them through legal channels.
RED FLAG #3: The leadership are NOT direct injury victims, do not have the same level of
urgency, motivation, intensity and focus direct victims would have.
The leadership of these groups push the AMAs standardized propaganda message of: “errors,
mistakes, and system failure” at every turn, chant it over and over in response to just about
everything that comes up. “No INDIVIDUAL is responsible for anything that has happened to a
patient; it is a failure of the whole medical system!” and “doctors do not commit deliberate acts
-132-
Page 136 of 203
that damage patients; they make mistakes, commit errors!” The buzzword “ERROR” is a huge
“red flag”; if someone is sticking exclusively to the word “error” we will know who they are
really working for and whose best-interests they are actually protecting. The “club” goal is to
implant into the public mind the notion that the responsibility for anything that goes wrong
actually covers such a vast area (the WHOLE system) that accountability is impossible to assign
or determine under such circumstances. Who can we hold accountable when a whole community
has colluded to commit a crime? They have to inflate our opponent so large as to be impenetrable.
Otherwise, we’d focus and move forward with purpose. If a single doctor or hospital is not
responsible for whatever went wrong in our case, then WHO is? The whole system. The whole
system does not have a name or a face so WHO can we be upset with? WHO can we expect
restoration from? Nobody. That is how the “club” wants us to see things. And the leadership who
has been placed at the top of the patient’s-rights groups will push the “club” message into infinity.
We will recognize them by the words they have been given: “error”, “mistake”, and “system
failure”. If we say “crime”, “deliberate”, or “pre-meditated” we will be quickly corrected and
silenced.
RED FLAG #4: The leadership of these groups chant the AMAs “errors”, “mistakes” and
“system failure” propaganda in response to all victim concerns.
The leadership actively discourages, or shuts down entirely, any discussion of medical crime and
the details of the criminal activity. If an injury victim persists in talking about it the leadership
becomes incrementally aggressive about shutting the talk down. Victim’s rightful expressions of
anger are shamed, ridiculed, and dismissed, vehemently discouraged, treated as a major social
violation. Anger is normal under certain circumstances—don’t let anyone tell you different.
RED FLAG #5: The leadership will not allow free discussion of medical crime or normal
expression of anger. The incremental aggression applied to victims who refuse to be controlled
and complete intolerance of discussion of topics off the “politically-correct” list is key here.
If we approach the leadership to talk about current, active cases of concrete patient abuse that
requires an immediate, direct response to save a person’s life, prevent financial ruin, or stop
-133-
Page 137 of 203
specific acts of patient abuse and you ask the leadership of these groups to take action THEY
WILL NOT MOVE for any reason. When attempting to interest them in cases such as this and
trying to get them to commit to any useful action at all it is routinely deflected by the leadership
by changing the subject over to the detail of their OWN case information and going on and on
about it as long as it takes to stop our discussion entirely (they are not direct victims themselves,
can only speak about another person), will not let us get another word in edgewise about the
issues brought to them for active response. They are strangely cold toward and disinterested in the
actual victims themselves, stick exclusively to things (like gathering media attention and fund- raising) which require no direct hands-on activity with real injury victims. They are oddly
unaffected and unmoved by actual victim’s current suffering and losses.
When pressed for taking useful action they will offer distractions instead of solutions: “she needs
to take up an absorbing hobby to get her mind off her troubles”, “he should get counseling to learn
how to handle his anger”, “we are a support organization and not here to work solutions”. The
goal is to keep the membership distracted, controlled, and off exposing the “club”.
RED FLAG #6: The leadership has no real interest in victim’s current cases and will not take
useful action in anyone else’s behalf for any reason. They will not embarrass the “club”; “club”
interests come first.
The leadership makes statements like: “let’s focus on the future and upon prevention of these
errors and mistakes” with the idea in mind that if they can convince the others in the group to
forget about what is going on RIGHT NOW the “club” will NEVER have to be accountable or
deal with anything they do not want to deal with, no changes in the present will have to be made,
and no VICTIMS in the present will have to be addressed. Of course, “today is yesterdays
tomorrow” so this golden future they are trying to get us all focused on never actually arrives—it
doesn’t have to. Nothing changes because we have let every TODAY slip past us without action.
Distraction, not action, is the key focus. They will say things like: “there is no point wasting time
on today’s injury victims: there is nothing we can do for them because they are already injured
and doomed anyhow; what we need to focus on instead is seeing that the causes of their injuries
stop so that people in the future will not have to endure it.” There is plenty that can be done for
-134-
Page 138 of 203
today’s injury victims: the standardized program of denying necessary medical intervention to
prevent progression of the damages, the routine financial enslavement, the verbal and physical
abuse episodes, the psychological battery, the threats, the myriad other violations routinely heaped
onto injury victims unfairly. This needs to stop TODAY. NOW.
RED FLAG #7: Today’s needs are not responded to; talk is always spent on future goals of
prevention, never a direct response to what is happening today.
The leadership keeps the group members busy with pointless, time-wasting, manufactured busy- work activities designed to make a big public “show” but which have no useful substance in
reality. One example is getting a “patient safety week” on the calendar. If the group can be led off
taking useful action in their own behalf and can be convinced to allow their energy and
momentum be redirected and replaced with pointless, time-wasting activities that go nowhere (but
makes people feel like they are “doing something”) the “club” is protected. Because their OWN
necks are not on any chopping block, because THEY are not being tortured, or robbed, or getting
their injuries compounded by the medical syndicate, or being murdered, there is no real urgency in
the leadership’s incentive to get anything done. Time is not nipping at THEIR heels—they have
all the time in the world to waste, stall, and fool around. They don’t mind wasting our time too.
RED FLAG #8: Nothing truly useful ever gets accomplished. The group is kept very busy but
nothing truly useful in real life ever actually materializes to show for all that work. Distraction,
not action, is the goal.
The leadership does “damage control” and is very aggressive about discouraging talk within the
group pertaining to “politically-incorrect” topics such as medical crime. They assess the content
and character of the group members and cozy up to the uncontrollable ones to find out as much as
they can about them as individuals in order to better determine how to control and/or redirect
them. If the injury victim proves uncontrollable a character assassination campaign begins,
instigated by the leadership, and the others in the group are turned against the uncontrollable
person by whatever means possible. Example: every time the “club” thinks people are listening to
me too much for their comfort one of their large patient’s-rights group’s leadership will start
-135-
Page 139 of 203
circulating a story about me being attached to the KKK/Clan or say I belong to a gun-toting militia
(as characterized by the mainstream media) and am extremely dangerous— “best to stay away
from that kind of person if you know what’s good for you because when they get into trouble with
the law everyone they associate with is going to go down with them.”
RED FLAG #9: If the leadership rigidly refuses to acknowledge ALL patient’s-rights concerns,
and refuses to allow free discussion of ALL patient’s-rights concerns, actively shuts down free
speech on specific topics, then we can bet they have a reason for it—and that reason will never
serve the true patient’s-rights cause. If they ridicule or character-assassinate the most vocal
members within the group, whose information presented makes the most sense, and try to evict
those people from the group to keep them from talking further it is because that uncontrollable
person is working AGAINST the “club” who placed and pays the leadership.
The leadership uses all the standardized “buzzwords” and “buzzphrases”, standardized thought- terminating cliches they have been programmed with, to gain and keep control over the group
members and to keep activity and conversation flowing in the direction they choose.
(Interestingly, these buzzwords, buzzphrases, and thought-terminating cliches are the SAME ones
used routinely by the medical and legal syndicates and all their attached “industry mouthpieces”. It
is as if they have all been given the same manual to study and work from) They make pompous
references to uncontrollable member’s grammar and spelling mistakes, loudly accuse people of
watching the most insubstantial television programs and reading the most vapid magazines as
evidence of “where that person got their information from”. I’ve heard them refer to “Buffy The
Vampire Slayer” and “Ladies Home Journal” often. They take pot-shots wherever they can fit
them in. “WHO told you THAT?!” they bellow, when a victim discloses any particularly
controversial piece of information that cannot be acknowledged or discussed freely with outsiders.
One favorite is: “methinks the lady doth protest too much”, delivered with a smirking grin. My
defense to these standardized pot-shots is: “YOUR PROGRAMMING IS SHOWING!” They do
not like this response.
The leadership demands every single project and action go through them and insists everything
has to meet their personal approval to go forward with their blessing—even projects they have no
-136-
Page 140 of 203
hand in.
(Example: individuals, who have a right to take independent action as they see fit, putting up
personal websites containing information damaging to the “club”) The message given out to the
members is the leadership sits in the driver’s seat and everyone else has to answer to them and
justify to their satisfaction, then get approval for every move made. When victims do not blindly
comply the leadership’s complete control is threatened and the resulting hissy-fit thrown is all out
of proportion to what the leadership is due in real life: “How dare you put up that website without
asking ME first!?” they scream—as if we have to beg permission first! What nerve! The
leadership assigns offices and duties to the other members, clearly dispensed from the top of
things.
RED FLAG #10: The leadership sets themselves above the other group members and takes on
the role of tyrant “superior”, someone we HAVE to answer to and justify ourselves to.
Independent action is discouraged and punished.
The groups goal’s are pointless and questionable. These groups link up with other questionable
organizations in the mainstream: organizations who have expressed an interest in involuntary
euthanasia, groups who have said only the young, healthy, and well-born should be allowed to live
undisturbed, and so on. Too much interest is paid toward fund-raising.
RED FLAG#11: Can’t pin the leadership down on goals, plans.
Groups having just one or two of the features listed, that can be explained away to believable
causes, should be given the benefit of the doubt until more experience with them is gained and a
clearer picture can be gotten. If the group’s leadership is dirty it will manifest soon enough. And
there is always the possibility that a group can start out clean but succumb to infiltration and
takeover later.
How can we identify the “clean” groups then? What measure can we use to sort the dirty from the
clean? Well, the clean groups have these particular features:
1.) The clean groups fund themselves, out of their own pockets. The clean groups are generally
-137-
Page 141 of 203
poor, without flash and glitz, just do not have the resources to spend on presentation that the dirty
groups have received from their dirty funding sources. The clean groups owe no favors to anyone.
2.) The members of the clean groups are not allowed to have mainstream media access and
nobody is ever asked to be a spokesperson representative of their particular clean group.
3.) The founding members of the clean groups are direct victims themselves and struggle daily
with the limitations and losses their injuries (often terminal) have created in addition to donating
activist work.
4.) The words “errors”, “mistakes”, and “system failure” is used only where it is truly applicable.
Falsifying medical records, denying necessary aftercare, referral to lying and abusive specialists
and such with the intention to cover up doctor-caused injuries is not a mistake/error and no clean
activist will try to brainwash you into believing it is. The dividing line between a true “error” and
crime is the presence of premeditation and intention.
5.) The clean groups will not discourage expressions of anger; anger is a normal response to being
abused and violated and anyone who tries to tell you different is working their own program that
has nothing good in it for you. Nothing corrodes slave chains faster than anger. Anger can provide
the energy necessary for doing what needs to be done. The clean groups will not limit or
discourage discussion of medical crime details or expressions of anger.
6.) The clean groups have no problem sticking their necks out when necessary, on an individual’s
behalf, where possible and warranted. The clean group’s focus is planted firmly on TODAY and
NOW with the idea in mind that when TODAY’s problems are addressed and solved the dirty
groups’ nebulous “tomorrow” will take care of itself, will follow suit. We have to start
somewhere; TODAY is the most effective place.
7.) Clean groups have no interest in warm-and-fuzzy, contrived, media/public displays or content-
-138-
Page 142 of 203
controlled meetings. Clean groups do not censor what is presented for public inspection with the
intention to sanitize or package anything: the clean groups lay the factual and provable truth out
flat “as is” and let the recipients deal with it directly, or not, as they see fit. The understanding is
the truth is not going to change for any individual and if people are not made aware of what is out
there waiting on them they cannot possibly protect themselves from predation, even a little. In the
current “club” system, with the way things are set up NOW and TODAY, PREVENTION IS
THE CURE. That is ALL we have going for us right now: prevention of preventable predation.
There are no real outside protections in place. We have to protect ourselves. Knowledge is power.
First comes education; when enough are educated the system abusing us will be forced to find its
own cure eventually.
8.) Clean groups do not attempt to evict anyone because they persist in talking about topics other
than “errors”, “mistakes” and “system failure”. Clean groups do not refuse admission to people
known to speak freely about medical crime.
9.) The clean groups aren’t into hierarchy or assigning offices, all work according to their
individual gifts and talents, donate as much or as little as they feel they can. The word “donate” is
key here: activism is a gift. The giver has the exclusive right to decide who, what, how much,
when, and where based on their individual determination of comfort level. Nobody stands over
anyone else demanding performance or expecting production; nobody sits higher than anyone else
dictating choices and workload from above. Nobody is expected to “answer to” or “get approval
from” anyone else before beginning any project: if someone wants to take up a project and work
on it, alone or with agreeable others, they just do it. Nobody is expected to “get permission”.
10.) The clean groups goals are crystal clear: they want the myriad criminal activity, human rights
abuses, and patient abuses to STOP. TODAY. NOW. There is no time for stalling and fooling
around with pointless “feel-good” projects that go nowhere, do nothing. The most-serious and
most-disruptive issues need to be addressed, directly and persistently, until change is forced
through exposure: the records-tampering, withholding correct diagnoses, denying proper aftercare
-139-
Page 143 of 203
of iatrogenic injuries, covert medical experimentation, lack of informed consent, and so on needs
to stop immediately; it never should have been allowed to become institutionalized to begin with!
However it got started, and whatever entity keeps training it to new doctors and other “club”
members to keep it alive and growing, it is time to get rid of it and start over with something
better. There is no place for these low-grade behaviors in a decent society and we should expect
much better than “gutter ethics” from educated people placed in positions of trust: doctors,
lawyers, legislators, medical staff of all specialties, and so on. Educated people should know
better ways of dealing with the problems they have created than to lie, cheat, steal, sneak, oppress,
coerce, threaten. What kind of depraved minds and hearts would create such a monster and
continue to feed it year after year?! These behaviors are beneath educated people in a decent
society. The foundation of trust has to be rebuilt from the ground up. Earned.
THERE IS NO EXCUSE FOR THE CRIMINAL, ABUSIVE WORKINGS OF THE CURRENT
SYSTEM. The same twisted left-brained geniuses who thought the current “program” up and set
it into place, activated it, perpetually teach and enforce it, could just as easily and with less total
effort manufacture a better system that gives dignity and respect back to patients and doctors both.
It would cost less too; the current system incentivizes medical crime and rewards “bounty- hunters” in law and media.
Doctors (and other “club” members): The solution is a very simple one: tell the factual truth,
always. Just tell the truth and take the natural consequences like mature adults. Respond ethically.
Hide nothing. If you always tell the truth you never have to remember what you’ve said. Yes,
patients are not always going to like what you have to tell them but I can guarantee when the truth
is told and responded to ethically both sides will come away from the exchange with their dignity
and respect intact. Injury victims will be able to say: “I didn’t like what I just heard…but at least
the doctor did not lie to me!”
And that is still respectable under ANY circumstances. Grow up! There’s no time like the
present…
-140-
Page 147 of 203
informant will fire off question after question in a manner normal conversation between regular
people just doesn’t follow. We are being recorded. Want to test this? Start talking about someone
else’s criminal activity: the informant will jump in and attempt to change the subject real fast. If
we persist they get more aggressive. (ignore them and keep talking anyhow, see what happens
next…) They do not want their tape “contaminated” for all time with controversial information
about other people—people not under “club” investigation at the present. Now, our “brother
John, the cocaine dealer” or “uncle Ned, the career house burglar” doesn’t have to be a real person
at all (and shouldn’t be)—what we are shooting for is the over-reaction of the informant jumping
in to shut the conversation down as quickly as possible and refusing to allow it to go any further.
(one of my “new best friends” used to come to my home with a large, drawstring-closure purse.
Instead of sitting it on the floor beside her like normal people do she kept it in her lap and aimed
the wide opening at me, kept fussing with it. I ping-ponged from the fireplace hearth to the bench
as we were speaking and she could hardly keep up with aiming that thing at me and keeping the
top open just right. Once she phoned me, started grilling me with questions as usual, gasped as she
remembered she had forgotten to turn her recorder on, and I heard the click.) Don’t worry about
giving them false information and deliberately sending them off on wild goose chases; this low- grade person doesn’t deserve the truth and isn’t going to use the truth for anything good to our
benefit. Tell them whatever you want to, but it is best not to speak to them at all or allow them
access.
I had three immediate neighbors who worked for the local healthcare syndicate at my previous
home; two worked for the medical system who targeted and butchered me, and abuses me still.
(and countless others) I wasn’t interesting enough to bother with for the whole thirteen years I had
lived in that house before I was injured by a doctor; all of a sudden I became the most interesting
person on the street. All of a sudden these particular neighbors started showing up on my
doorstep—a LOT. Excessive, sudden interest is a huge “red flag”.(so is appearing immediately
following a personal crises) One was more aggressive than the other two, was shameless in her
pursuit. It got so bad I stopped answering the door when I looked out and saw who was knocking.
She did whatever she could think of to overcome this obstacle: if I was in the yard working, or
talking to someone else, and she saw it from her window, she would fly across the street and try to
-144-
Page 148 of 203
engage me before I could go into the house to avoid her. If I had company with me she would
latch onto my company real quick hoping I would not make a scene in front of them and chase her
away—it is too hard to explain the reasons to visitors who don’t know the history involved, and
she shamelessly took full advantage of that. Whenever I had visitors and she saw their car pull up
to my house from her window, she would fly across the street and just walk into my house
uninvited, at the rear of the invited group, hoping that once inside it would be much more difficult
to get her back outside the house again. She was extremely shameless and persistent. Some people
will do anything to anyone for money, even “good Christians” like this greed-crazed neighbor.
Another neighbor, whose wife worked for the same hospital system and is close friends with the
first neighbor mentioned, would shamelessly creep around behind the tall hedges that separate his
backyard from my driveway and eaves-drop on conversations. What he couldn’t see from his yard
he would climb up on his roof for a better look over our privacy fence on the other side of the
driveway. He would intercept our company going from their cars to our house and question them.
He’d grab workmen we had hired and question them too. The “last straw” was the day I caught
him on a ladder in my driveway peering into my dining room window–we locked eyes and he
retreated. When my husband came home from work that day I told him we need to move–to a
place with no neighbors, and what is what we did. I seldom spoke to these neighbors and had cut
off all access possible–and it wasn’t enough; they shamelessly did whatever they could do to get
the information they wanted through the only channels left to them–to the point of the ridiculous.
My mail would arrive pre-opened and taped shut. My phone calls were intercepted at a remote
location–diverted to a nearby hospital switchboard, I found out later.
This collection of incidents has a name: GANG-STALKING. It took me a long time to find this
out but once I did, and studied the subject, I came to the understanding that what I was being put
through followed the patterns of that particular abuse to the letter.
https://gangstalkingworld.wordpress.com/2008/01/03/gang-stalking-techniques/
https://targetedindividuals.wordpress.com/2008/08/28/gang-stalking-techniques/
Just like the infiltrators seated in the leadership positions in the largest patient’s-rights groups,
-145-
Page 149 of 203
these individual informants are unnaturally cold and unfeeling about the injury victim’s suffering
and losses, unresponsive in a way that isn’t normal. If symptoms arise that they can see they will
immediately jump in and fire off benign, dismissive “reasons” for the symptoms that are as far
away from the true cause as possible—to the point of the ridiculous at times: “everyone urinates
blood like that!”, “you are twitching because you ate that pie at lunch!”, “you’ve turned yellow
because you eat too many yellow vegetables!”
Informants are not limited to working on just the injury victim or activist; they can also be
clapped onto the victim’s spouse, child, or another close family member. The “club” is not above
sending our parents, siblings, or children “new best friends” too. Or sending people to question
others closest to us. But it can get worse sometimes:
Injury victims who become activists, single or married, often get sent a “love interest”. The
reasons are obvious; these “love interests” can be selected from the targets own environment and
be pressed into service by the “club” or it can appear and start the chase as an interesting stranger.
I know of several cases where the informant was clapped onto the spouse in the form of a “love
interest” who aggressively and skillfully pursued its target until it got close enough to extract the
information it wanted and gain the influence it desired—by whatever means necessary. If that
meant the informant had to suggest and supply all manner of sexual services to inspire the level of
trust and incentive for the spouse to talk freely and/or do its bidding then that is what happened.
These kinds of informants will appear out of nowhere (as a stranger who takes a sudden,
unexplainable interest or a person the target already knows who takes a sudden, unexplainable
interest), will initiate the relationship and will aggressively chase their target right out of the
starting gate with the full knowledge their target is married. They will make no promises,
however, and will not be pinned down on “planning a future together” as is normal to a genuine
romantic interest as it progresses. They rush their target into a sexual relationship immediately,
will say and do all the “right” things to get things going—whatever it takes, as long as it takes.
One of the first things they do is start giving gifts and they nearly always make a custom-cut,
personalized, “romance” music and/or talking audio-tape/CD, usually adding in their own voice,
so that their target can listen to it whenever they are not around to keep the inspiration going and
the fake “fire” burning. The ones who fall for this con gets burned badly because the informant
-146-
Page 150 of 203
has no real interest in their target, isn’t creating anything real or lasting—it is all a contrived
performance. And when the informant gets everything they are after they will drop their target like
a hot rock, become as cold as ice for no apparent reason; the personality reversal is so abrupt it
can be as if the informant split into two people. This tactic is called “Divide And Conquer” and it
has several nasty purposes: sending in an aggressive informant to turn interest away from the
targeted spouse causes the targeted spouse to lose their main support-and-protect system; the
spouse who was sent the fake “love interest” can even be manipulated into hostility against the
targeted spouse when under the spell and influence of the informant.
If someone is trying to get close to us or our spouse, is acting pushy and interested out of
proportion to what the situation warrants as appropriate, is saying all the “right” things, well, we’d
better keep our backs to the wall…the thing chasing us might not be genuine. (remember the
movie “The Verdict” with Paul Newman playing a malpractice lawyer? How the opposing law
firm sent a woman to cozy up to him real quick and stick by his side so she’d be there at all the
“right” times…and how she turned on him and attacked when he hit a low point? Just doing her
job…)
Informants disgust me to the core. If I ever become so greed-crazed I will sell a life away I hope
someone will shoot me because I’d not consider myself fit to live any longer.
The Internet hosts its own kind of informant: the “club members” troll certain Internet hot-spots
where topics not on their approved list might be freely discussed by outsiders wandering in, like
chat rooms or discussion boards, and their job is to monitor and control. If an outsider wanders in
and initiates a discussion on medical crime and starts listing detail they quickly jump in with their
standardized attack routine. I call them “barking watchdogs”. If you want to lure them out, find
out who they are, just toss out a medical crime scene for discussion and see what jumps out at
you: I call it “waving a rag over a box of snakes”— they can’t help but strike. I have done this
deliberately, many times, on many boards. I then collected whole conversations that ensued and
captured their standardized programmed-in responses for study. What a bunch of brain-dead
automatons! Talk about your cult-conditioning!
-147-
Page 151 of 203
Barking Watchdogs And Internet Trolls
Our national and international patient’s-rights alliance of activists have a team who posts here
and there on the Internet, individuals posting in one place or many places at once.
Over the years, and through many experiences, we have come to acknowledge and expect
“sniper attacks” from the “industry mouthpieces/watchdogs” scattered here and there, who lurk
and watch our dialogs progress and when it reaches the point where people express interest in
what we have to say or too much sensitive information is being disclosed, these
“watchdog-mouthpieces” jump in quickly and aggressively attempt to change the direction of the
dialog to more “politically correct” exchanges.
Failing that, these snipers will dig deep into their insider programming and drag out all of their
well-worn and easily identifiable “thought-terminating cliches” and games, ridicule and satire,
victim shaming.
The more we talk, the louder they “bark” to try to shut us down.
One such game is “ego attack”. “Ego attack games” are designed to place the target,
psychologically, into an inferior position with vicious personal insults, demands, task
assignments…the old, tired “you must answer to ME” posturing. This game is a favorite of the
internet trolls/industry mouthpieces who roam the internet discussion boards for practice
sessions–gotta keep those teeth nice and sharp.
Citations:
Mind Wars (out-of-print book) By Ron Dalrymple
“The seven deadly forms of mind games:
intimidation games, ego attack games, emotional withholding games, denial of responsibility
games, emotional button-pushing games, sex games, and reality distortion games, all of which
seek to undermine and destroy.”
THE 25 RULES OF PROPAGANDA
https://www.sott.net/article/319148-The-25-rules-of-disinformation-and-propaganda
-148-
Page 152 of 203
“When the law no longer
protects you from the
corrupt, but protects the
corrupt from you, you
know your nation is
doomed.”
Ayn Rand
-149-
Page 153 of 203
Law Enforcement
This answers a question I am often asked about taking the issues I have raised to the police for
investigation: I have done it, more than once. The truth is, they already know about all of it but
refuse to take action. Why? because they are part of it! “Club” places its own membership in ALL
key positions in law and government to make sure things go their way, always. If a member
breaks rank and moves forward with anything that goes against the best-interests of the criminal
elite they will be incrementally punished and/or be evicted–them and their whole families. They
will lose their place at the trough and all the perks and benefits they’ve enjoyed following “club”
rules to the letter. “Club” does not tolerate mavericks.
It is NO accident medical boards will not take action, or that lawyers will not accept our valid
cases, or the so-called protection agencies will not step in, and so on down the line. They have
ONE “master” and it is NOT us.
I went to the police, more than once. Here is the response I got:
Me: “The doctors in our community are tricking people into dangerous surgery they do not need
so those training in it can have live subjects to practice on– then they are killing off those they
injure by calculated neglect to hide the true death and injury rate, skip out on malpractice liability,
and save the health insurers the cost of proper intervention. Sometimes they speed things along by
prescribing wrong drugs to kill them off faster or incorrectly perform invasive procedures.
Something needs to be done to stop this. I have evidence and witnesses.”
Columbus Homicide Detective: “Ohio has no actual laws–not for anything, not even murder.”
Ohio State Highway Patrol Officer: “You really want your ‘pound of flesh’, don’t you?! You
were told to let go of this but you don’t listen! You have taken your case to over 90 lawyers and
every one of them has turned you down. When a LAWYER comes to me and tells me to
investigate, I will–not you. I don’t care what evidence and witnesses you have!”
-150-
Page 154 of 203
Me: “Are you telling me the lawyers are your bosses and not the public? That your job is
answering to lawyers and not protecting the public?”
State Highway Patrol Officer: “Yes.”
Me: “The hospital where I was injured just tried to kill me by attempting to feed me a drug, while
I was recently hospitalized, that is heavily charted that I am allergic to–will stop breathing when I
take it. Here is my red allergy alert bracelet that they put on me themselves. It was prescribed
under its alternate label in the hope I wouldn’t recognize it for what it was and take it. I was
nagged to accept it. (I didn’t, refused) Upon discharge a prescription was written for it and I was
encouraged to fill the prescription; the hospital risk manager even called me at home later in the
day asking if I had filled it yet. Here is the written prescription. I found out what it was after
looking it up in my drug book at home after discharge then I showed it to my pharmacist: he flatly
refused to fill it and told me why.”
Columbus Police Officer: “But they didn’t actually kill you, did they? When they actually kill
you, give me a call…”
Me: “Lawyers are getting paid to not accept certain kinds of valid medical malpractice cases.
They have a process to follow to collect and launder the money, and rules they have to follow to
the letter to collect evidence to turn in for the payola. Isn’t this illegal?”
Columbus Police Officer: “We know all about that; yes, it does go on. It is unethical and
immoral–but not illegal. What you need to do is find a lawyer who will accept a retainer, which is
usually about $10,000. and stay away from the ones who work on contingency.”
Me: “Are you saying I can buy my life back from criminals for $10,000. if I can find a lawyer to
accept a retainer?”
Columbus Police Officer: “Maybe.”
-151-
Page 155 of 203
What Is A Unilateral Contract?
Has anyone else noticed that when we are given a paper to sign in the hospital or any other
medical setting we are the only one asked to sign? There is usually a place for, at least, a second
signature but nobody else signs the paper–ever.
A contract with just one signature is called a unilateral contract. When we sign any contract “as
is” we are agreeing to perform every single word written there, whether we agree with it or not.
Conversely, because the entity who provided that contract never signs they have agreed to
absolutely nothing written into it and have no legal obligation to provide a single thing even
though they are the ones who created it and handed it to us. By our signature we have agreed to
everything and by the fact they never sign, they have agreed to absolutely nothing.
A signature makes an enforceable contract.
In a medical setting, especially, the pitfalls and potential consequences of signing a unilateral
contract can be enormous.
Many of these forms have the language of a “power of attorney” where we sign over our right to
self-determination to the hospital under language like “…and whatever additional care we deem
necessary”. What if, on that day, what they “deem necessary” is training residents a dangerous
new surgery they have no experience with? Or a salesman wants to demonstrate new equipment
using you as the training dummy?
The admission form is the first form we are asked to sign and anything else we sign while under
their roof is secondary to it.
Citation:
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Unilateral+contract
Unilateral Contract (definition)
A contract in which only one party makes an express promise, or undertakes a performance
without first securing a reciprocal agreement from the other party.
In a unilateral, or one-sided, contract, one party, known as the offeror, makes a promise in
-152-
Page 156 of 203
exchange for an act (or abstention from acting) by another party, known as the offeree. If the
offeree acts on the offeror’s promise, the offeror is legally obligated to fulfill the contract, but an
offeree cannot be forced to act (or not act), because no return promise has been made to the
offeror. After an offeree has performed, only one enforceable promise exists, that of the offeror.
A unilateral contract differs from a Bilateral Contract, in which the parties exchange mutual
promises. Bilateral contracts are commonly used in business transactions; a sale of goods is a type
of bilateral contract.
Reward offers are usually unilateral contracts. The offeror (the party offering the reward) cannot
impel anyone to fulfill the reward offer. An offeree can sue for breach of contract, however, if the
offeror does not provide the reward after the offeree has fulfilled the contract’s requirements.
West’s Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights
reserved.
-153-
Page 158 of 203
our Statute of Repose to expire. People are being deliberately “waited to death” every day, all over
this country.
If, when the Statute of Repose expires and we have been allowed to deteriorate untreated to the
point of no return, and nothing can be done to reverse the damage the doctor-caused injury has
created, we will be given a fake cancer diagnosis, allowed palliative care, and fast-tracked to our
grave.
A law that works hand-in-hand with the Statute Of Repose and further incentivizes doctors to lie
and abuse iatrogenically-injured people is a three-strikes-and-you-are-out law–two strikes in some
places. This law dictates that a doctor will automatically lose their license to practice medicine if
they get three plaintiff-win cases in court tolled against them. Doctors are incentivized to do
anything to keep those strikes from being building up and getting tolled against their names.
If they also own stock in their own malpractice insurance companies, as many do these days, it
adds an additional incentive to oppress and abuse injury victims and keep their valid malpractice
cases out of the court and the case detail off the public record.
Citations:
QUOTE (from a lawyer):
“There is an ongoing treatment doctrine which dictates that in medical malpractice the Statute Of
Limitations would not begin running or would be tolled until the continuous treatment for the
condition concludes”
(if treatment is never begun, it can’t conclude–if it doesn’t begin or conclude the Statute Of
Limitations cannot begin to run or toll…get it?)
The New York Times
July 14, 1985
“Malpractice: Doctors Begin Own Insurance”
QUOTE:
“ CONNECTICUT doctors have started their own insurance company, in hopes of reversing the
-155-
Page 159 of 203
rise in malpractice insurance costs.” “Miss Funk said the rates are as much as 15 percent lower
than the rates charged by private companies. She said there should be greater savings as the
company grows, because it has no sales people to pay commissions to, and no shareholders to
divide its investment income with.”
The New York Times
11-26-2004
By: The Associated Press
“Florida Passes Three-Strikes Malpractice Law”
QUOTE:
“The newly approved amendment to the Florida Constitution would automatically revoke the
medical license of any doctor hit with three malpractice judgments”
-156-
Page 160 of 203
Treatment Doctrine In Law
QUOTE (from a lawyer):
“There is an ongoing treatment doctrine which dictates that in medical malpractice the
Statute Of Limitations would not begin running or would be tolled until the continuous
treatment for the condition concludes”
The “club” response to get around that doctrine? They collude to provide no treatment, no
correct diagnosis. If treatment is never begun in the first place it can never meet the “continuous”
definition nor can it “conclude”. Ever. Get it?
Or, as one local doctor snapped at me: “All you are ever going to get from me or any other
doctor in this town is symptomatic relief only, no active intervention–until you get well on your
own or die. And you will get that only if you shut up, stop fighting, and accept a benign diagnosis
that the treatment matches.” He also said: “This is going to have a more painful ‘later’ to it–and
even then all you are going to get is symptomatic relief.” He was trying to tell me something…and
time, plus experience, has proved it true.
It is no accident, error, mistake–or “system failure” that we can never find any clean help after
we are injured and get the royal runaround when we try. Lots of tests; no actual care. Testing is
NOT treatment. But it keeps us busy, coming back, and fills their pockets while they intentionally
wait us to death.
But I say, with certainty and conviction, that the system who possesses the native ability to create
and police a cover-up program of the current magnitude and detail, and has endowed it with the
high level of focus, unity, collusion with intent to work evil to the extent it has deemed necessary
to keep its casualties in the dark about the cause of their misery, and so effectively corrals and
maintains their casualties deliberately untreated, can also use the same dark skills and expend the
same effort creating a new program to work right and good.
What would it cost them, really, to treat others with kindness, respect, and truthfulness? What
would it cost them, really, to just tell the absolute truth–always?
Unfortunately, dark hearts do not operate from right and good. Or recognize it as an alternative
-157-
Page 161 of 203
means to an end. Their brains are hard-wired to take what they perceive to be the shortest path to
what they want and usually have a long history of kicking, punching, scamming, and lying their
way through life, clearing the path between them and what they want the only way they know
how.
-158-
Page 162 of 203
“Bounty Hunter” Medical Malpractice Lawyers/Law Firms
Their television ads say something like this; the exact wording might vary slightly but the
common theme remains the same: “There’s no fee unless/until you win!”, “No fees collected—
until we get money for you!”, “We won’t charge a fee unless we win your case!”, “No recovery,
no fee!”, “No fees or expenses until/unless we get money for you!”, “No fee unless you win!”,
“Your lawyer gets paid only if you collect money!”, “You don’t pay any fees unless you are
compensated!”, “You don’t owe us a penny unless we are successful!”, “If you don’t get a
settlement you don’t owe me anything”, “You don’t owe us anything unless we’re successful.”
“No fee until you receive benefits”. “There is no fee unless we recover compensation for you.”
And the more revealing: “We are contingency fee lawyers and do not charge a fee unless we
recover money for you.”
Sounds good, right? WRONG. It’s a con and if you respond you are going to end up wasting
your time and sitting on the losing end of this deal.
But are the ads lying to we outsiders? Oddly, no they are not. The key words in this slick con- job rest in four small words: “UNTIL” or “UNLESS” and “FOR YOU”. The lawyers do not
intend to get any money FOR YOU whatsoever; they are going after money for themselves and
they’ve got to lure you into their offices by whatever means necessary because using your case
information and wasting your time is the only way they can collect the “bounty” for themselves.
“Until” never comes, is never going to come, “for you” anyway, and nobody knows that better
than the lawyers do. Their disclaimer goes something like this: “Please note you are not
considered a client until you have signed a retainer agreement and we have accepted your case.”
What does that statement mean? It means it is open season on you and your case material and that
there is no attorney-client privilege formally created with you yet. In short, they owe you nothing;
they are not on your side of this exchange. They are working for themselves. Anything goes.
They are crafty enough to know that offering a “free consultation” as a lure will bring in lots of
valid victim’s cases to use to collect payola on.
So, WHY do they offer it for free? Because lawyers DO have rules to follow, a code of
conduct–and nobody knows how to get around the rules and codes better than the lawyers do: the
-159-
Page 165 of 203
word out to the legal community that the larger firm is not reliable about honoring kick-back
agreements so others become reluctant to refer to them too. It is in the larger firm’s best interests
to always honor their kick-back agreements with other lawyers (and media) if they want to get
richer faster. The saying “there is honor amongst thieves” applies heavily here.
A local homicide detective told me, in response to my complaint of the lawyers performing
“bounty hunts” on injury victim’s valid cases: “yes, it’s true, these things certainly do go on here-
–and it is unethical and immoral BUT NOT ILLEGAL!”
Another rule dictates there is one payoff per case per attorney/firm. Just one. Once that victim’s
case has been presented as a “bounty” possibility and has been paid off in graft that law firm will
never have another thing to do with that case even if the victim comes back later with more
concrete evidence in the hope the firm will reconsider. Collecting more evidence means nothing
to the purpose they had you into their offices to begin with: all you were to them was a delivery
vehicle for your case material. Once you gave them something, anything, to turn in for graft they
were finished with you forever. Well, almost forever: if a law firm splits up and its principals go
their separate ways under shiny new firm names they are allowed to have a second helping of
graft, EACH, on your case material under their new business names.
Once in a while you will see a content-controlled “showcase” presented in the mainstream
media; the trial lawyers have to keep up appearances, have to toss out the occasional “showcase”
for public viewing to make it appear their system is active and justice is being served. Here is
what they will never tell you about the “showcases” presented: the lawyers get their cut of the
whole award right off the top. Then they extract fees, costs, medical expert witness fees, and such
from the remainder—which can total tens of thousands of dollars, and which the injury victim has
no control over while the case is being prepared for prosecution or settlement. The victim’s health
insurance company jumps into the picture with its hand out (remember these health insurers are
often owned by the doctors, lawyers, and their cronies) after all is finalized to recover the medical
costs they have paid out from the date of occurrence, which can come into thousands of dollars
because of the “milk-the-cow” cover-up games played on the victim before the victim knew
enough to consult an attorney…and without contributing a dime of the legal fees, or doing one lick
of work on the case, they get their cut too. Whatever is left over, if anything at all, goes to the
-162-
Page 169 of 203
(often owned by the doctors, lawyers, government officials and their cohorts) pay lawyers not to
accept injury victim’s valid claims. One “club member” branch paying itself, or another “club
member” branch, KEEPS ALL THE BIG MONEY CIRCULATING WITHIN THEIR OWN
MEMBERSHIP. In short, every single thing they give to an outsider is one less thing they get to
keep for themselves. Providing proper aftercare for an injury a doctor caused or paying out an
injury claim to the benefit of the actual injury victim would involve substantial financial losses to
the “club”. This is counterproductive to their goal of enriching themselves at our expense. They
want to turn the injuries they cause into money-MAKERS—and that is exactly what they do to us.
While the injury victims are suffering, losing spouses, children, jobs, homes, and so on the
lawyers are getting filthy-rich by skillfully gaming us, without conscience, siphoning off the
money that should rightfully be paid out to injury victims for myriad damages: the lawyers want
and get bigger homes, nicer vacations, better cars, private schools for their children, by preying on
the injured. The piggery is unbelievable.
It is all a sham. The whole legal system is rotten and filthy-crooked to the core. They make their
biggest money “bounty-hunting” cases, not prosecuting them. “Tort Reform” and the current
brainwashing attempt in the mainstream media that “frivolous lawsuits are running up doctor’s
medical malpractice premiums” is a self-serving con: the real cause is greed-crazed lawyers
“bounty-hunting” the massive increase in valid injury cases and the stock market investments the
malpractice insurance company made which did not earn well in recent years. (the stock market
returns were not there for many—it wasn’t only the malpractice insurance companies who
suffered stock market reversals in recent years; look at what happened to people’s IRA retirement
investments!)
-166-
Page 170 of 203
Common Lawyer Tricks
If you do not want to listen to me or believe these things at face value, want to learn these nasty
lessons the hard way by direct hands-on experience, which I guarantee you will one way or
another, go right on ahead–bad experience is an excellent teacher. That is how I learned. At least
you were warned in advance, which was more than I got years ago starting out. But at least take
some steps to protect yourselves from predation:
You should always date every release form you sign no matter what they tell you; you should
bring your own ink pen with any color ink in it but black for signatures: blue, red, green. Then get
a copy of everything you sign on the spot–don’t leave without it.
Bring in only copies of your case material and leave the originals in a safe place elsewhere. And
never, ever let your originals out of your possession or unattended even for a second. The crooks
get paid extra for each piece of evidence they can steal from you; the more pieces they steal the
more payola they can collect. But they will trick us into leaving our things with them willingly if
they can manage it—and we will never see our things again. How do I know this? It happened to
me, in my early ignorance, twice. Then when I started interviewing other injury victims (hundreds
now) I learned this crooked behavior is routine, done to just about all of us.
I have had several injury victims violently reject the reality I am laying down here; they have
been brainwashed like all of us have been through mainstream media, and hold onto the belief
they are special people whose cases are so meritorious lawyers will fight over it to be the ones
who get the privilege of representing them in court. They are not experienced enough yet to
realize things are not like they are presented on television. “Oh, no!” they scream. “Maybe that is
what they did to you and some other people but they are not going to treat ME that way—just you
wait and see! I am going to march in there and demand the protection I am entitled to and get it!”
I always wish them well and hope for the best each time but it doesn’t take very long before they
find out I was telling them the truth. I tell them in about two weeks to expect a rejection letter by
certified mail; it takes about two weeks to process the lawyer’s demand for graft, present what
they have collected off of us in case material, and get payoff approval. The rejection letter arrives
right on schedule, just like I told them it would, and then I get the shocked and disappointed
-167-
Page 171 of 203
phone call:. “How did this happen to ME? I have a good case!”
I already told them how it happened and why. Accepting it takes time to sink in because it is the
exact reversal of everything we have been told all our lives about lawyers and the workings of
law.
Still think lawyers are our friends? Think again. The ones I have met over the years are some of
the lowest forms of human nature walking, people so depraved, heartless, and unevolved that they
are best avoided.
Ask yourself this question: “WHY a certified rejection letter when an outright rejection on-the- spot would do, or a regular letter, or a phone call? Why the formality of a certified letter?
Because it is a requirement of the ones doling out the payola as written proof the case was
rejected and that the rejection was received by the potential plaintiff.
Citation:
The Columbus Dispatch
March 22, 1996
You And The law
“Contingency Fee Contract Could Backfire On Client
QUOTE:
“Under a recent decision by an Ohio Court Of Appeals, though, continency fee agreements now
can be dangerous to your financial health. The decision involved a case in which a lawyer and his
client agreed that the lawyer would receive 40% of any money or assets which are obtained. The
lawyer then won a judgement for $507,439. Unfortunately, they were not able to collect from the
wrong-doer. But the lawyer demanded his client pay him 40% of the award, totaling $233,321.
The client refused, but the court sided with the lawyer.
-168-
Page 172 of 203
Buzz Words And Buzz Phrases
After years of enduring this particular abuse, certain patterns emerged in the speeches inflicted
by the “club” membership in medicine, law, law enforcement, the so-called protection agencies
and government, it became apparent these rote-responses have been programmed in, scripted. This
is a sure-fire way to identify who/what we are really dealing with right out of the starting gate.
The thought-terminating cliches, the rote-response conditioning…call it whatever you want but its
purpose is the same: to divert, dismiss, neutralize the people they have harmed and collude to skip
out on accountability:
You need to see a psychiatrist/psychologist. It’s just stress.
Your perception is off.
You did this to yourself.
We just have no idea what could be wrong. (even after loads of tests)
Where did you hear THAT?! Ladies Home Journal? Buffy The Vampire Slayer?
You are probably an attention-seeker. Drug seeker. A hypochondriac. A liar.
Munchausen’s Syndrome.
There are no guarantees in life.
We all have to die sometime.
Let’s focus on prevention so future victims won’t have to suffer.
It is okay to sacrifice a few to benefit many.
Let’s use this as a learning experience.
Methinks the lady doeth protest too much.
Where did you get YOUR medical degree?
You can’t believe what you read on the Internet.
Let’s leave emotion out of this!
Conspiracy, conspiracy theorist.
Medicine is an art, not a science.
This runs in your family.
-169-
Page 173 of 203
Money Laundering Of The Payola
Payola (definition): a secret or private payment in return for the promotion of a product, service,
etc., through the abuse of one’s position, influence, or facilities.
These carefully-selected, content-controlled “showcases” are used as props in an elaborate
performance to make it appear to the public that the courts are active and protecting us all on the
same level. Yes, the profession has rules against this kind of predatory behavior but it also has
myriad ways of getting around it and, after all, someone has to step forward and play their “prove
it” game in their own arena–something no outsider can effectively penetrate.
This facade has another purpose too: the payola is paid out through the “showcases” and cases
slated for settlement. Once a “showcase” has been selected for prosecution or settlement one of
the OTHER valid cases the lawyers have lured into their offices and want to use to turn in for
payola is attached to it; the “showcase”, or case to be settled, is overpaid to the amount agreed
upon. This process has a name; it is called “piggy-backing”.
A lawyer from North Carolina told me it goes like this: “say I have a case in my office already
agreed to be settled for, say, $100,000. And say I have a real good case like yours come into my
office that I can only do a “bounty hunt” on, and your surgeon is insured by the same insurer as
the “showcase” or case to be settled. We will attach your case to the “showcase”, or the case to be
settled, and jack up the final, agreed upon, amount on the first case to, say, $300,000. We get our
cut, plus fees and costs deducted also, right off the top.”
The reason this particular lawyer told me this is because he asked me if he could do a “bounty
hunt” on my case material afterward, wanted his share of profiting from my tragedy: his partner
was licensed in Ohio and his partner had just gotten one Ohio case in the office that was already
agreed upon to settle—so he needed another qualified Ohio case like mine to attach to it in order
to make more money for himself. Could he use mine? I said “yes”.
I said “yes” to over 100 lawyers, although I came to despise the malpractice lawyers I came into
contact with. Pigs. They disgust me to the core. So why would I want to reward them with
allowing them the opportunity, times 100+, to collect payola on my case material? I did it to
-170-
Page 174 of 203
financially punish my surgeon’s malpractice insurance company. I turned their game around
backward onto them and simply played their own game by their own rules—how could they
complain about it? If the filthy crooked sociopaths want to pay lawyers not to take injury victims
valid cases thinking it is just plain cheaper for them to pay the lawyers off instead of allowing a
certain kind of victims’ case into their “club”-controlled courtrooms for prosecution and relief
then why not make them pay it off A LOT–over and over and over? You can do the math here:
just imagine the standard percentage paid out over 100 times.
If a case is referred to a larger firm the lawyer making the referral is paid a “referral fee” that is
measured and meted out as a percentage of the projected value; I believe the standard percentage
paid to the referring lawyer to be nine percent.
When word got out about what I was doing lawyers started contacting me, although they are not
supposed to, for their chance to “review” my case file. It became a repulsive “feeding frenzy” and
the greed was difficult to witness and endure. But I did it anyhow, went through the necessary
motions, regardless of the cost to me and the toll it took.
The lawyers did not care about me, wasn’t the least interested in my losses or pain, the fact that
my injury(s) is terminal and I suffer miserably every day. After a while I started wondering if there
was anything human left in them.
A prominent lawyer at one of the largest medical malpractice firms in Columbus, Ohio asked
me if I could bring my case material into his office, NOT so he could do a “bounty hunt” on my
case material himself but because he wanted to set something up for a young woman, a recent
graduate who had just passed the bar exam, who was just starting out and needed the extra money
(and the experience) the “bounty-hunt” would give her to get set up in her own practice. I did it.
(and, no, I never made a penny myself; these ordeals usually ended up costing me money with
parking fees, copying, and such)
Sometimes the lawyers will pretend to accept a valid case then will “sit on” it, doing absolutely
nothing, then just before the trial date will suddenly drop it and leave the victim standing alone
without time to find a replacement. The crooked sneaks get paid to do this; this con is used for the
cases where a victim has been going from lawyer-to-lawyer trying to find someone to accept and
-171-
Page 175 of 203
prosecute their valid case and no one will.
What is supposed to happen is the injury victim goes to one or two lawyers and is rejected, gets
discouraged or is convinced they do not really have a valid case, then quits. Once in a while,
though, a victim doesn’t blindly accept this con and persists, will go to many lawyers. What the
persistent injury victim does not know is that each time they go into a lawyer’s office with their
case material the crafty lawyers are turning it in for payola– and the more lawyers the injury
victim consults with the more payola demands that have to be paid out–so the ones paying this
will attempt to stop this cycle by paying one law firm MORE for pretending to accept a case by
filing then sitting on it, deliberately running the statute of limitations out, and suddenly dropping
it and becoming unavailable just before the trial date–the law firm cuts the injury victim off
abruptly, will accept no phone calls, will not respond to any letters, blocks office visits.
The lawyers are doing what they were paid to do and are performing to the letter of the
agreement between themselves and the ones doling out the payola–it is cheaper for them to do
this than to continue to pay huge “bounties” to each lawyer the victim contacts; the “club” can
absorb the cost of and justify paying out only a couple of “bounties” per injury victim. It is
certainly cheaper than allowing every valid victim’s case their day in court and the perpetrators
certainly don’t want the potential exposures of their criminal activity.
A wrench gets thrown into their machinery when a persistent victim enters the picture and is not
put off by rejection after rejection, keeps going.
Citations:
Ethics Opinion 286
Contingent Referral Fees
https://www.dcbar.org/bar-resources/legal-ethics/opinions/opinion286.cfm
American Bar Association
Vol. 28 #5
By Wendy Wen Yun Chang
-172-
Page 178 of 203
“I’ll never forget graduating, uh, law school when I was told by a good friend of mine: your
skills mean nothing; every case is a fix!” states Attorney Burton N. Pugach in 2007 film
“Crazy Love” by Shoot The Moon Productions.
-175-
Page 179 of 203
Medical Expert Witnesses
Not just anyone is allowed to become a medical expert witness; they have set rules to follow too
and those rules include what they can, and cannot, “see” and record in their findings. Anyone who
doesn’t agree to follow the guidelines they are given, or can’t be trusted to perform them to the
letter, is not allowed into that business or to remain in the business once in.
The medical experts are given just the perpetrator-generated-and-controlled sanitized paper file
to review and write their report on, do not examine or interview the injury victim themselves or
run new tests, rely only on the old self-serving creations of the perpetrators of the victim’s injury
and its standardized cover-up protocols! Any fool can see the clear limitations of this process!
The only clean patient medical file is kept in the computer, in a centralized computer database
only the criminal power-elite can access. It is password-protected in layers for levels of trust
(example: doctors get deeper access than people who just draw blood), is under code, with
restricted access. (when my previous family doctor told me he needed to view mine he had to go
over to the hospital to do it because they had the closest terminal he could use; he did not have
such a terminal in his own office like many doctors do nowadays.)
The medical expert witnesses never use any of the clean material kept in the ONLY clean
patient record: the computer file! The process is skewed right out of the starting gate; if the
medical experts are given only garbage to review and make reports on what kind of results can
come of it?! This can only go one way. And that way has no benefit whatsoever to the injury
victim and does no real justice to the victim’s actual injury and its true consequences. Garbage
in=garbage out.
A well-known, top-drawer doctor who also worked as a medical expert witness told me the truth
about his medical expert profession. He was elderly, in ill health and about to die so I guess he
figured he had nothing to lose by taking me aside and telling me the truth behind the facade of the
medical expert witness sham. He told me the only way he’d really be able to help certain kinds of
injury victims is going after only the findings on the “approved” list they all have to work within–
-he said he would not be allowed to write a brutally honest report. None of them are.
Doctors called in to testify in support of their peers cannot tell the truth, are not allowed
-176-
Page 183 of 203
“Evil is an insidious thing:
presents attractively,
justifies neatly…and soon
a good and decent man is
doing the unthinkable
routinely”
Elizabeth Eugenia (James) LaBozetta
-180-
Page 185 of 203
us coming back to them so they can monitor our evidence-collecting, learn more about us and
what our intentions are, and give them the opportunity to discourage us with the increasing
understanding of the futility of our actions against the brick wall they have erected to protect their
membership against us, the “club” outsiders.
Some injury victims never learn, cannot break through their lifetime of
programming/brainwashing and will run that gauntlet over and over and over again due to the
implanted notion they have just not reached “the right person” yet. Some nebulous, imagined
“rescuer” who is going to reach out and pull them out of the mess they are mired in even if they
have reached the proverbial “eleventh hour” and are looking into the jaws of death.
It doesn’t exist. There is no such person. There is no silver bullet. There is no “open sesame”
combination of the right words that will grant us access to the relief and active response we have
been hoodwinked into believing we are entitled to and will receive in the name of justice.
We have to learn how to be our own rescuers–and with the current system/regime like it has
become, prevention is the cure. We have to learn how to protect ourselves from predation so that
we do not stumble blindly into the traps they have set for us and are waiting for us to stumble
blindly into. Once lured in there is no real way out. Not now. Not today. Not until real change
comes. Not until we can meet them on their own level and make it too uncomfortable to continue
their abuses–which will only increase over time because they have gotten away with so much
already.
It does no good to go to the mob bosses and complain that we do not like the shake-down we’d
received. Likewise, it does no good to approach the predatory, self-serving criminal elite and
complain either. The things they have over on us is focus, unity, and the means to train and police
its membership. Until we can match them in focus and unity we do not stand even a ghost of a
chance to get out from under their myriad abuses.
Citations:
“The Committee Of 300″ (book) by John Coleman
“None Dare Call It Conspiracy” by Gary Allen
-182-
Page 187 of 203
the lying, verbal abuse, stalling games, and such that make people hate their doctors and
eventually turns them against the whole profession—loudly spoken to anyone who will listen
forever after. It is unconscionable to injure someone then deliberately compound the damages by
hiding it; hiding injuries interferes with the injury victim getting the intervention he/she needs
early when it would do the most good.
Can just telling the absolute truth and responding ethically be any more complicated and difficult
than remembering and performing all of the detail of the current cover-up protocols? I don’t think
so.
Look again at the current system: an elaborate maze of lies, verbal abuse, “milk-the-cow” games,
crooked referrals, records tampering, fakery…lots of work involved, lots to remember. And
patients subjected to this abuse come to fear and hate you for your corruption in the end no matter
how well you perform these abusive protocols. Is it good business to chase your clients away from
you with behavior so extreme they’d be fools to return?
And what KIND of people create protocols like these to begin with then teach and enforce them?
What KIND of people blindly and obediently perform them? In any other situation these are
considered the low-grade, street-value, “gutter ethics” used by the most depraved and corrupt at
the very bottom level of decent society. How did your profession sink so low so fast? I think many
issues caused the turnaround but at the top of the list is managed care health insurance.
There is a bigger picture here. Yes, using low-grade thug tactics gets the results you want on the
short-term. But you can’t control the long-term effects and this current system has changed you
and will continue changing you: I liken the internal changes to how serial killers start out small,
killing animals and abusing people smaller and weaker than themselves. But the disease is
progressive/corrosive, once allowed to settle in, and soon the serial killer is moving on to bigger
things and cannot stop.
The disease that has overtaken the medical profession is also progressive. If the dirty-work is not
stopped now it is going to move on to bigger things. Mark my words…
The solution is simpler than all of that: tell the absolute truth, always. People who do not lie do
not have to remember what they’d said. It is that simple. People who do not lie keep their self- respect even in the most difficult circumstances and keep the respect of others—others who will
-184-
Page 189 of 203
the incentive for their portion of the criminal activity and cover-up abuses routinely inflicted on
victims.
If you tell the absolute truth, always, and act responsibly after-the-fact to offer proper aftercare the
costs of doing business, I believe, would be greatly reduced. The truth WILL “set you free”.
STOP: Lying
REPLACE WITH: Tell the absolute truth. All of it. Leave nothing out. You only have to tell the
truth once; if you lie you’ll have to lie over and over and over again to keep it going.
STOP: Violating the intention and spirit of a true informed consent.
REPLACE WITH: Provide all detail. Do not perform any procedures the patient has not given
informed consent for.
STOP: Ghost Surgery.
REPLACE WITH: If green trainees are going to be performing the surgery, say so in advance. The
patient has a right to know who will be touching them and what their skill level is.
STOP: Verbal abuse.
REPLACE WITH: Talk to patients the way you’d like to be spoken to.
STOP: Psychological battery.
REPLACE WITH: Tell the truth, respond ethically, respond promptly.
STOP: Records’ tampering. X-ray tampering. Keeping separate paper, microfiche, computer files.
REPLACE WITH: There should be just one file for all and it should be squeaky-clean.
STOP: Denying patients access to their own clean medical records.
REPLACE WITH: Allow patients access to their own medical records any time they ask to see
them—including the “clean” computer files, not just the sanitized paper version.
-186-
Page 190 of 203
People who have nothing to hide, hide nothing.
STOP: Threatening. Coercing. Terrorizing. Bullying.
REPLACE WITH: Remember patients have a right to self-determination. They have a right to do
with their own bodies as they see fit. Patients are not your property to do with as YOU see fit. You
are there to advise and consult with; the patient makes the final determination—not you.
STOP: Withholding a truthful diagnosis.
REPLACE WITH: Just tell the truth, no matter what it is. Cheating patients out of a truthful
diagnosis also cheats them out of the opportunity to apply alternative medicine’s offerings for the
conditions they suffer—a diagnosis is necessary as a foundation. If the medical syndicate doesn’t
want to treat us, don’t just assume there are no other effective treatments out there that, if not
cures, then for symptomatic relief.
For those outside the current regime? Starve evil and feed good. It is all we have open to us.
-187-
Page 191 of 203
Useful Websites, Webpages, Books, Articles, Etc.
Involuntary Euthanasia
http://www.hospicepatients.org/this-thing-called-hospice.html
http://www.kaiserpapers.org/
http://thevickietravisshow.com/
Medical Experimentation
http://archives.politicususa.com/2011/12/12/dark-secrets-foster-care-chil
dren-as-medical-lab-rats.html
http://ahrp.org/
http://www.nj.com/healthfit/index.ssf/2016/11/doctors_group_calls_out_morristown_hospital_for
_an.html
Medical Crimes Against The Elderly
http://euthanasia.kaiserpapers.org/gmurder.html
http://www.naturalnews.com/034013_hospital_profits_Medicare.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-terri-kennedy/is-elder-guardianship-a-n_b_11970144.html
http://ctwatchdog.com/health/granny-snatching-ron-winters-new-weekly-blog
Victim Stories
http://tucson.com/news/medical-misdiagnoses-put-pressure-on-patients-to-stay-engaged/article_f0
0153ec-b7e9-5680-aba8-42569b862d9d.html?utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook&utm_
campaign=user-share
-188-
Page 192 of 203
Organ Donation Reality
http://m.truthaboutorgandonation.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.truthaboutorgandonation.com
%2F#2918
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOjiYudTKu0&feature=youtu.be
http://www.lifeissues.net/writers/kat/org_01bodybrokerspart1.html
http://www.lifeissues.net/writers/kat/org_01bodybrokerspart2.html
http://www.lifeissues.net/writers/kat/org_01bodybrokerspart3.html
http://www.lifeissues.net/writers/kat/org_01bodybrokerspart4.html
http://www.lifeissues.net/writers/kat/org_01bodybrokerspart5.html
http://www.seeker.com/your-body-part-price-list-youre-worth-more-dead-than-alive-infographic-1
765741389.html
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/money/graphics/body_parts/flash.htm
Medical Boards
http://m.truthaboutorgandonation.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.truthaboutorgandonation.com
%2F#2918
http://patient-safety.com/state-patients-boards.html
Activist Groups(International)
http://www.medicalerroraustralia.com/
Medical Crime
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1rJ_pvrEe-s&feature=share
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/22/opinion/doctors-should-stand-against-trump-reviving-tortur
e.html?_r=1
-189-
Page 193 of 203
http://www.theunnecesarean.com/blog/2010/1/29/yes-its-true-med-students-perform-pelvic-exams
-on-anesthetiz.html#sthash.SSlA7Hrw.HYmFqWew.dpbs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1rJ_pvrEe-s&feature=share
Books
LIFE WISH By: paula Carroll (pay particular attention to pages 22, 24,34, 86, 87, 88, 89,
93,94,95,95,112, 113, 174, 179,191–VERY educational material there)
http://www.publishersweekly.com/978-0-399-15150-7
Medical Professionals Killing Spouses, Etc.
http://www.publishersweekly.com/978-0-399-15150-7
Whistleblower’s Retaliation Experiences
http://thestarphoenix.com/news/local-news/nurse-who-wrote-about-grandfathers-care-on-faceboo
k-found-guilty-of-professional-misconduct
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2007-08-27/doctor-pays-high-price-after-whistleblowing/652254
Miscellaneous
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/17/health/hospitals-profit-from-surgical-errors-study-finds.html
?smid=fb-share
https://thinkprogress.org/how-hospitals-actually-reap-greater-profits-for-making-surgical-mistakes
-52c689865161#.1snav2jke
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/surgical-complications-and-errors-bring-in-more-money-for-hospi
tals/
http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/22279-william-rivers-pitt-worse-than-the-mob-the-insuran
ce-industry-is-organized-crime
http://www.michiganautolaw.com/blog/2011/08/02/delay-deny-defend-how-insurance-companies- abuse-customers/
-190-
Page 195 of 203
Biography
“Oncoming death is terrible enough, but worse still is oncoming death with time to spare, time in
which all the happiness that was yours and all the happiness that might have been yours becomes
clear to you. You see with utter lucidity all that you are losing. The sight brings on an oppressive
sadness that no car about to hit you or water about to drown you can match. The feeling is truly
unbearable.” pages 147-148 “The Life Of Pi” by Yann Martel
I am a 62-year old housewife, who lives in Columbus, Ohio–the organized crime capital of the
mid-west, who did not get to finish her college degree in Advertizing Design at the Columbus
College Of Art And Design due to a botched, unnecessary laparoscopic gallbladder surgery back in
its introductory phase and a deliberately ignored, hospital-acquired staph infection.
When I was injured I was a 37-year-old stay-at-home wife and mother to three children and a
part-time college student working slowly on my degree. Life was good. I had plans and a bright
future ahead of me–until someone(s) else wanted something from me they were not entitled to and
hijacked my life in service to their own enrichment–done to me, and thousands just like me.
There was a whole community of surgeons to be trained at once, in the introductory phase of
laparoscopic gallbladder surgery, and too few valid gallbladder disease cases to go around for all to
train on–so they made some–and were grabbing up every warm body they could con onto the
teaching hospital/training mill’s operating room tables.
I fit two of their “expendable” profiles: housewife and “club” outsider.
After the inevitable injuries occurred, and I was infected with hospital-acquired coaglase- negative staph (that was deliberately ignored and allowed to blow through my body and
permanently damage my liver, heart, spleen, and kidneys) I received that special “education I never
wanted” about the secret, hidden, dark side of medicine, law, law enforcement, and government.
My husband and I ended up financially enslaved to the very ones who put me here and keeps me
here.
I knew something was terribly wrong with the strange lack of interest and intervention when
symptoms began to appear immediately after surgery and no doctor would accept me as a patient.
-192-
Page 196 of 203
Emergency rooms routinely turned me away–even the ones out of town. But I couldn’t quite put
my finger on it. The doctors kept saying: “I don’t want to get involved” but would never say
involved in what, exactly.
Because I couldn’t get a response to my increasing symptoms I decided I’d have to help myself
and began researching at the public library and medical libraries.
About two years after my injury I placed an ad in our local newspaper hoping to find others
suffering after gallbladder surgery and got a response I never could have imagined: hundreds
poured out, even people from other states whose Ohio friends or relatives saw my ad and contacted
them. Then came thousands. We exchanged detail of our experiences–and then I knew. Some of us
started researching and exchanged what we’d uncovered–and what we uncovered is an atrocity of
holocaust proportions and unfathomable viciousness.
The “devil” truly IS in the detail.
We were all getting the same strange lack of interest and response to our miserable and
increasing symptoms. We had all been sent in referral to the same local gastroenterologists who
told each one of us the same SCRIPTED lies and inflicted the same vicious verbal abuse and
psychological battery:
“You are the ONLY ONE complaining after that surgery! NOBODY else is claiming to have the
problems you say you are having! I think you are just a hypochondriac, attention-seeker, drug- seeker, liar…! You probably did this to yourself. In any case, your symptoms just aren’t possible
and don’t make sense.” All carefully scripted lies–designed to stonewall us past the point of no
return and allow us to die off deliberately untreated. Monsters…
And then the news program PrimeTime Live did a piece on this new surgery about how surgeons
were botching it so badly they were creating an enormous load of injury victims in their wake that
nobody knew how to fix…and that is when we realized we were in deep trouble: “hundreds dead;
thousands injured” And what happened to those “thousands injured” in this initial training frenzy?
Nobody wants to talk about that. Why? Because the answer is horrifying, shocking in its
magnitude: the criminal elite decided it was in their best-interests all around to kill us off by
calculated neglect. Only one segment of injury victim would receive an early, proper response: the
ones whose cases collapsed while still under the hospital roof and could not be ignored or
-193-
Page 198 of 203
Citation;
PrimeTime Live (transcript) Airdate: 12-16-1993
“Too Good To Be True?”
QUOTE:
“But tonight ABCs Dr. Timothy Johnson is going to tell you something you probably haven’t heard
about this technique that hasn’t made the headlines–until now.”
“But there is a darker side to this revolution: surgeons who were inadequately trained, instrument
companies who hyped it to the public, and an estimated hundreds who died and thousands who
were injured by complications that many believe might have been avoided.”
“The way it was presented was that this was a surgery that offered few complications”
“Suddenly surgeons were scrambling to learn this new technique.”
“I didn’t know how people were going to screw this up until some people screwed it up”
“But many patients never heard about the potential problems. They only hear about the benefits.”
“…how little they say the hospital told them about the risks.”
“They didn’t talk about any complications for this surgery.”
“…this brochure, which was offered by the hospital’s public relations department. It says nothing
about complications.”
“It’s an illusion created by the company. It is a public demand that has been artificially created. It is
a scheme to use the mass media. It is, in fact, advertising.”
“…that she had injured my bile duct and that she did not know anyone who could correct it.”
“The problem is that if a hospital doesn’t exert control, there is virtually no other controls over the
introduction of new surgery in this country. The FDA does not regulate surgery and we could find
just one state that even kept track of complications from this new operation. That leaves very little
protection for the patient.”
“And the patients get perhaps one side of the story.”
“What I want people to hear is the story of how economic pressures, I think, mainly, contaminated
a process, a decision-making process, and because of that safety was compromised.”
“US Surgical decided to use doctor and hospitals to sell its operation to the media.”
“Now you can benefit from this public relations effort in your own territory.”
-195-
Page 200 of 203
Index
–The Truth Is Like A Lion–
Dedication……….1
Foreword……….3
Promise……….5
The Prince And The Pauper……….8
The Education We Never Wanted……….10
Commodities……….12
Coveting……….18
–It’s Not A Conspiracy Theory If You Have Proof–……….19
High Priority Verses Low Priority……….20
New Medicine……….28
New World Order Medicine……….41
Teaching Hospitals And Resident Training……….67
Errors, Mistakes, And System Failure Verses Intentional Acts……….73
-197-
Page 201 of 203
The Two-Visit-Ditch……….75
Cover-Up Program Standard……….79
Doctor Games……….87
Medical Records Tampering……….95
Electronic Medical Records……….106
Referral To Psychiatrists Or Psychologists……….105
Blutkitt……….107
Club……….113
The Best Apology Is Changed Behavior……….119
Suicides And Murders……….120
–The Painful Truth–……….124
Medical Boards……….125
Controlled-Opposition Camps……….128
How To Identify Controlled-Opposition Camps And Individual Infiltrators……….131
Barking Watchdogs And Internet Trolls……….148
-198-
Page 202 of 203
–When The Law No Longer Protects You–……….149
Law Enforcement……….150
What Is A Unilateral Contract?……….152
Statute Of Repose Law, Three-Strikes Law, And A Certificate Of Merit……….154
Treatment Doctrine In Law……….157
Bounty Hunters And Medical Malpractice Lawyers……….159
Common Lawyer Tricks (General)……….165
Common Lawyer Tricks……….167
Buzz Words and Buzz Phrases……….169
Money-Laundering Of The Payola……….170
Prosecuting Your Own Case Without A Lawyer……….174
Medical Expert Witnesses……….176
Mainstream Media……….178
–Evil Is An Insidious Thing–……….180
Running The Gauntlet……….181
-199-