{"id":1184,"date":"2018-07-15T12:59:24","date_gmt":"2018-07-15T17:59:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.brycepublications.com\/RCB\/?page_id=1184"},"modified":"2018-07-15T16:39:37","modified_gmt":"2018-07-15T21:39:37","slug":"taking-lives-pt-4","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/taking-lives-pt-4\/","title":{"rendered":"Taking Lives Pt 4"},"content":{"rendered":"

Taking Lives<\/span>
\n(Part Four)<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Law Enforcement<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 This answers a question I am often asked about taking the issues I have raised to the police for investigation: I have done it, more than once. The truth is, they already know about all of it but refuse to take action. Why? because they are part of it! “Club” places its own membership in ALL key positions in law and government to make sure things go their way, always. If a member breaks rank and moves forward with anything that goes against the best-interests of the criminal elite they will be incrementally punished and\/or be evicted\u2013them and their whole families. They will lose their place at the trough and all the perks and benefits they\u2019ve enjoyed following \u201cclub\u201d rules to the letter. \u201cClub\u201d does not tolerate mavericks.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 It is NO accident medical boards will not take action, or that lawyers will not accept our valid cases, or the so-called protection agencies will not step in, and so on down the line. They have ONE “master” and it is NOT us.<\/span><\/p>\n

I went to the police, more than once. Here is the response I got:<\/span><\/p>\n

Me:<\/em><\/strong> “The doctors in our community are tricking people into dangerous surgery they do not need so those training in it can have live subjects to practice on– then they are killing off those they injure by calculated neglect to hide the true death and injury rate, skip out on malpractice liability, and save the health insurers the cost of proper intervention. Sometimes they speed things along by prescribing wrong drugs to kill them off faster or incorrectly perform invasive procedures. Something needs to be done to stop this. I have evidence and witnesses.”<\/span><\/p>\n

Columbus Homicide Detective:<\/em><\/strong> “Ohio has no actual laws–not for anything, not even murder.”<\/span><\/p>\n

Ohio State Highway Patrol Officer: <\/em><\/strong>“You really want your ‘pound of flesh’, don’t you?! You were told to let go of this but you don’t listen! You have taken your case to over 90 lawyers and every one of them has turned you down. When a LAWYER comes to me and tells me to investigate, I will–not you. I don’t care what evidence and witnesses you have!”<\/span><\/p>\n

Me: <\/em><\/strong>“Are you telling me the lawyers are your bosses and not the public? That your job is answering to lawyers and not protecting the public?” <\/span><\/p>\n

State Highway Patrol Officer: <\/em><\/strong>“Yes.”<\/span><\/p>\n

Me: <\/em><\/strong>“The hospital where I was injured just tried to kill me by attempting to feed me a drug, while I was recently hospitalized, that is heavily charted that I am allergic to–will stop breathing when I take it. Here is my red allergy alert bracelet that they put on me themselves. It was prescribed under its alternate label in the hope I wouldn’t recognize it for what it was and take it. I was nagged to accept it. (I didn’t, refused) Upon discharge a prescription was written for it and I was encouraged to fill the prescription; the hospital risk manager even called me at home later in the day asking if I had filled it yet. Here is the written prescription. I found out what it was after looking it up in my drug book at home after discharge then I showed it to my pharmacist: he flatly refused to fill it and told me why.” <\/span><\/p>\n

Columbus Police Officer:<\/em><\/strong> “But they didn’t actually kill you, did they? When they actually kill you, give me a call…”<\/span><\/p>\n

Me:<\/em><\/strong> “Lawyers are getting paid to not accept certain kinds of valid medical malpractice cases. They have a process to follow to collect and launder the money, and rules they have to follow to the letter to collect evidence to turn in for the payola. Isn’t this illegal?” <\/span><\/p>\n

Columbus Police Officer: <\/em><\/strong>“We know all about that; yes, it does go on. It is unethical and immoral–but not illegal. What you need to do is find a lawyer who will accept a retainer, which is usually about $10,000. and stay away from the ones who work on contingency.” <\/span><\/p>\n

Me: <\/em><\/strong>“Are you saying I can buy my life back from criminals for $10,000. if I can find a lawyer to accept a retainer?” <\/span><\/p>\n

Columbus Police Officer:<\/em><\/strong> “Maybe.”<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

What Is A Unilateral Contract?<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Has anyone else noticed that when we are given a paper to sign in the hospital or any other medical setting we are the only one asked to sign? There is usually a place for, at least, a second signature but nobody else signs the paper\u2013ever.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 A contract with just one signature is called a unilateral contract. When we sign any contract \u201cas is\u201d we are agreeing to perform every single word written there, whether we agree with it or not. Conversely, because the entity who provided that contract never signs they have agreed to absolutely nothing written into it and have no legal obligation to provide a single thing even though they are the ones who created it and handed it to us. By our signature we have agreed to everything and by the fact they never sign, they have agreed to absolutely nothing.\u00a0 A signature makes an enforceable contract. In a medical setting, especially, the pitfalls and potential consequences of signing a unilateral contract can be enormous.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Many of these forms have the language of a \u201cpower of attorney\u201d where we sign over our right to self-determination to the hospital under language like \u201c…and whatever additional care we deem necessary\u201d. What if, on that day, what they \u201cdeem necessary\u201d is training residents a dangerous new surgery they have no experience with? Or a salesman wants to demonstrate new equipment using you as the training dummy?<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 The admission form is the first form we are asked to sign and anything else we sign while under their roof is secondary to it.<\/span><\/p>\n

Citation:<\/span> <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

http:\/\/legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com\/Unilateral+contract<\/a> Unilateral Contract (definition)<\/span><\/p>\n

A contract in which only one party makes an express promise, or undertakes a performance without first securing a reciprocal agreement from the other party. In a unilateral, or one-sided, contract, one party, known as the offeror, makes a promise in exchange for an act (or abstention from acting) by another party, known as the offeree. If the offeree acts on the offeror’s promise, the offeror is legally obligated to fulfill the contract, but an offeree cannot be forced to act (or not act), because no return promise has been made to the offeror. After an offeree has performed, only one enforceable promise exists, that of the offeror. A unilateral contract differs from a Bilateral Contract, in which the parties exchange mutual promises. Bilateral contracts are commonly used in business transactions; a sale of goods is a type of bilateral contract. Reward offers are usually unilateral contracts. The offeror (the party offering the reward) cannot impel anyone to fulfill the reward offer. An offeree can sue for breach of contract, however, if the offeror does not provide the reward after the offeree has fulfilled the contract’s requirements. West’s Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Statute Of Repose Law, Three-Strikes Law, And A Certificate Of Merit<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 One of the tools used to oppress and discourage medical malpractice victims from seeking and getting relief through the Courts is something called a “Certificate of Merit” law, which is being challenged in some states as unConstitutional in that it allows the perpetrators themselves the exclusive right to decide which cases are going to be allowed into the Court system, and which are not—even before the cases are filed! If the medical syndicate doesn’t want certain kinds of cases recorded “on the books” and resolved in the Courts all they have to do is filter the most embarrassing or most criminal ones out of the system entirely before they can be filed at all! The “merit” of all cases with a monetary value of over $25 are for JURIES to decide in a Courtroom. That is what our Constitution says.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Another oppression used to discourage and control medical malpractice victims are “Statute of Repose<\/em><\/strong>” laws that say after a set period of time passes no case can be filed. The law incentivizes this widespread, criminal action by the medical syndicate: when an iatrogenic injury occurs the medical community “sees nothing” for the whole time the state’s Statute of Repose<\/em><\/strong> is in effect, which in many states is seven years.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 The injury will be deliberately left untreated for seven whole years, will get no active response and will remain unrecorded no matter what manifests. Nothing will be done to halt progression of the injury. Care is limited to a sociopathically inhumane “symptomatic relief only\/no active intervention” protocol and the doctors will not be moved from this rule no matter what we say or do.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 The victim will be hung in limbo until the very day that Statute of Repose expires. Whatever is left standing on that day gets immediate action: the doctors who “saw nothing” for seven long and painful years “spring to life” suddenly, the “selective blindness” lifts, and the truth is told\u2013occasionally. Whatever care can be offered is offered—if the victim is still alive. Staying alive untreated is the trick, especially if we are not told what our injury is early in their “game” so that we can take proper action in our own behalf through alternative medicine while we “wait” for our Statute of Repose <\/em><\/strong>to expire. People are being deliberately “waited to death” every day, all over this country.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 If, when the Statute of Repose<\/em><\/strong> expires and we have been allowed to deteriorate untreated to the point of no return, and nothing can be done to reverse the damage the doctor-caused injury has created, we will be given a fake cancer diagnosis, allowed palliative care, and fast-tracked to our grave.<\/span><\/p>\n

A law that works hand-in-hand with the Statute Of Repose<\/em><\/strong> and further incentivizes doctors to lie and abuse iatrogenically-injured people is a three-strikes-and-you-are-out law\u2013two strikes in some places. This law dictates that a doctor will automatically lose their license to practice medicine if they get three plaintiff-win cases in court tolled against them. Doctors are incentivized to do anything to keep those strikes from being building up and getting tolled against their names.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 If they also own stock in their own malpractice insurance companies, as many do these days, it adds an additional incentive to oppress and abuse injury victims and keep their valid malpractice cases out of the court and the case detail off the public record.<\/span><\/p>\n

Citations:<\/span> <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

QUOTE (from a lawyer): “There is an ongoing treatment doctrine which dictates that in medical malpractice the Statute Of Limitations would not begin running or would be tolled until the continuous treatment for the condition concludes” (if treatment is never begun, it can\u2019t conclude\u2013if it doesn\u2019t begin or conclude the Statute Of Limitations cannot begin to run or toll…get it?)<\/span><\/p>\n

The New York Times<\/em><\/strong> July 14, 1985 \u201cMalpractice: Doctors Begin Own Insurance\u201d QUOTE: \u201c CONNECTICUT doctors have started their own insurance company, in hopes of reversing the rise in malpractice insurance costs.\u201d \u201cMiss Funk said the rates are as much as 15 percent lower than the rates charged by private companies. She said there should be greater savings as the company grows, because it has no sales people to pay commissions to, and no shareholders to divide its investment income with.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

The New York Times<\/em><\/strong> 11-26-2004 By: The Associated Press \u201cFlorida Passes Three-Strikes Malpractice Law\u201d QUOTE: \u201cThe newly approved amendment to the Florida Constitution would automatically revoke the medical license of any doctor hit with three malpractice judgments\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Treatment Doctrine In Law<\/span> <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

QUOTE (from a lawyer): “There is an ongoing treatment doctrine which dictates that in medical malpractice the Statute Of Limitations would not begin running or would be tolled until the continuous treatment for the condition concludes”<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 The “club” response to get around that doctrine? They collude to provide no treatment, no correct diagnosis. If treatment is never begun in the first place it can never meet the “continuous” definition nor can it “conclude”. Ever. Get it?<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Or, as one local doctor snapped at me: “All you are ever going to get from me or any other doctor in this town is symptomatic relief only, no active intervention–until you get well on your own or die. And you will get that only if you shut up, stop fighting, and accept a benign diagnosis that the treatment matches.” He also said: “This is going to have a more painful ‘later’ to it–and even then all you are going to get is symptomatic relief.” He was trying to tell me something…and time, plus experience, has proved it true.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 It is no accident, error, mistake\u2013or \u201csystem failure\u201d that we can never find any clean help after we are injured and get the royal runaround when we try. Lots of tests; no actual care. Testing is NOT treatment. But it keeps us busy, coming back, and fills their pockets while they intentionally wait us to death.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0 But I say, with certainty and conviction, that the system who possesses the native ability to create and police a cover-up program of the current magnitude and detail, and has endowed it with the high level of focus, unity, collusion with intent to work evil to the extent it has deemed necessary to keep its casualties in the dark about the cause of their misery, and so effectively corrals and maintains their casualties deliberately untreated, can also use the same dark skills and expend the same effort creating a new program to work right and good.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 What would it cost them, really, to treat others with kindness, respect, and truthfulness? What would it cost them, really, to just tell the absolute truth\u2013always?<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Unfortunately, dark hearts do not operate from right and good. Or recognize it as an alternative means to an end. Their brains are hard-wired to take what they perceive to be the shortest path to what they want and usually have a long history of kicking, punching, scamming, and lying their way through life, clearing the path between them and what they want the only way they know how.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\u201cBounty Hunter\u201d Medical Malpractice Lawyers\/Law Firms<\/span> <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Their television ads say something like this; the exact wording might vary slightly but the common theme remains the same: \u201cThere\u2019s no fee unless\/until you win!\u201d,\u00a0 \u201cNo fees collected–\u00aduntil we get money for you!\u201d, \u201cWe won\u2019t charge a fee unless we win your case!\u201d, \u201cNo recovery, no fee!\u201d, \u201cNo fees or expenses until\/unless we get money for you!\u201d, \u201cNo fee unless you win!\u201d, \u201cYour lawyer gets paid only if you collect money!\u201d, \u201cYou don\u2019t pay any fees unless you are compensated!\u201d, \u201cYou don\u2019t owe us a penny unless we are successful!\u201d, \u201cIf you don\u2019t get a settlement you don\u2019t owe me anything\u201d, \u201cYou don\u2019t owe us anything unless we\u2019re successful.\u201d \u201cNo fee until you receive benefits\u201d. \u201cThere is no fee unless we recover compensation for you.\u201d And the more revealing: \u201cWe are contingency fee lawyers and do not charge a fee unless we recover money for you.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Sounds good, right? WRONG. It\u2019s a con and if you respond you are going to end up wasting your time and sitting on the losing end of this deal.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 But are the ads lying to we outsiders? Oddly, no they are not. The key words in this slick con-job rest in four small words: \u201cUNTIL\u201d or \u201cUNLESS\u201d and \u201cFOR YOU\u201d. The lawyers do not intend to get any money FOR YOU whatsoever; they are going after money for themselves and they\u2019ve got to lure you into their offices by whatever means necessary because using your case information and wasting your time is the only way they can collect the \u201cbounty\u201d for themselves. \u201cUntil\u201d never comes, is never going to come, \u201cfor you\u201d anyway, and nobody knows that better than the lawyers do. Their disclaimer goes something like this: \u201cPlease note you are not considered a client until you have signed a retainer agreement and we have accepted your case.\u201d What does that statement mean? It means it is open season on you and your case material and that there is no attorney-client privilege formally created with you yet. In short, they owe you nothing; they are not on your side of this exchange. They are working for themselves. Anything goes.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 They are crafty enough to know that offering a \u201cfree consultation\u201d as a lure will bring in lots of valid victim\u2019s cases to use to collect payola on.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 So, WHY do they offer it for free? Because lawyers DO have rules to follow, a code of conduct\u2013and nobody knows how to get around the rules and codes better than the lawyers do: the minute they accept money from an injury victim it automatically creates a formalized lawyer-client relationship–and then they cannot breach client confidentiality or pass along the injury victim\u2019s case material to the third party (for third-party review and as submitted proof the case was presented to them for acceptance and prosecution) that they intend to tap into for payola NOT to accept the case. Get it?<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 I call these lawyers \u201cbounty hunters\u201d. Some firms make their biggest money \u201cbounty-hunting\u201d on and disposing of victim\u2019s valid medical malpractice cases. The medical malpractice insurance companies believe it is cheaper to just pay off the lawyers than to allow all valid injury cases through the system and let the too-revealing case information get recorded \u201con the books\u201d for future reference\/use and set a precedent. This is particularly true for cases where the doctors have performed criminally. Most other cases are settled out of court with \u201cgag clauses\u201d attached–in exchange for settlement money the victim is not allowed to speak any detail of the case. If allowed to run through the traditional court, the case detail would become public record and opens the door to other such cases. (in recent years bounty-hunting lawyers found a new and better hunting ground: the Internet. With a carefully-crafted invitation on their website, the opportunity expands into the infinite to draw in valid cases to do a bounty-hunt on\u2013or to gather valid cases to refer to a larger firm to extract \u201creferral fees\u201d from)<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 I call these lawyers \u201cbounty hunters\u201d. Some firms make their biggest money \u201cbounty-hunting\u201d on and disposing of victim\u2019s valid medical malpractice cases. The medical malpractice insurance companies believe it is cheaper to just pay off the lawyers than to allow all valid injury cases through the system and let the too-revealing case information get recorded \u201con the books\u201d for future reference\/use and set a precedent. This is particularly true for cases where the doctors have performed criminally. Most other cases are settled out of court with \u201cgag clauses\u201d attached–in exchange for settlement money the victim is not allowed to speak any detail of the case. If allowed to run through the traditional court, the case detail would become public record and opens the door to other such cases. (in recent years bounty-hunting lawyers found a new and better hunting ground: the Internet. With a carefully-crafted invitation on their website, the opportunity expands into the infinite to draw in valid cases to do a bounty-hunt on\u2013or to gather valid cases to refer to a larger firm to extract \u201creferral fees\u201d from)<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Paying lawyers instead of injury victims keeps the big money at the top, their top, and within the ranks of the power-elite.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Here is how it works:<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Lawyers and doctors are NOT adversaries, no matter what the mainstream media presents. They are on the same team, but operating in different capacities supportive of\u00a0 all other categories, and there is an established hierarchy. (which includes law, law enforcement, medicine, the insurance industry, government bodies, governmental agencies, mainstream media…) It is ONE big happy \u201cclub\u201d of greed-crazed and power-hungry insiders—and this \u201cclub\u201d has specific roles for its membership and specific rules that must be followed to the letter or specific punishments and benefit reductions (including eviction) will be handed down.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Lawyers are \u201cofficers of the court\u201d and take a loyalty oath in service to the judicial branch of the seated government. They will take your money in fees and such but they will never be working directly for you.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Only content-controlled, carefully screened \u201cshowcases\u201d are allowed into their system and allowed to be recorded on their books. In the current system only the perpetrators themselves are going to decide which cases will and will not be heard. The rest get blocked out entirely.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 In Ohio there is a \u201ctwo-strikes\u201d law (some states have a \u201cthree-strikes\u201d law): if a doctor gets two successful medical malpractice cases tolled against their names they automatically lose their license to practice medicine; this is an effective tool of control and coercion, extremely useful to the medical malpractice insurance companies, to incentivize doctors to aggressively protect themselves (and the other policyholders as part of their enrollment agreement) and keep most valid cases from manifesting as far as the courtroom. The doctors, fearful of losing their licenses to practice medicine, are incentivized to do ANYTHING to keep those \u201cstrikes\u201d from building up\u00ad–even murder.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Many trial lawyers who specialize in medical malpractice extort large sums from the medical syndicate for their complicity and silence; much of the money certain law firms bring in comes from successful \u201cbounty hunts\u201d of injury victim\u2019s cases, NOT from successful \u201cshowcase\u201d lawsuits.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Only certain law firms are allowed to \u201chandle\u201d certain kinds of victim\u2019s cases—these are the larger firms at the top who heavily advertise in the mainstream media as specializing in medical malpractice; the other firms\/lawyers in the community, if such a case wanders into their offices of its own accord, must refer the case to one of the selected larger firms for disposal and accept a \u201creferral fee\u201d after the payola is collected by the larger firm it referred the case to\u2013usually set at 9% of the projected value of the case that has been referred.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Once in a while the larger law firm doesn\u2019t honor the \u201creferral fee\u201d agreement and once it gets paid will deliberately stiff the smaller firm (or media person) who made the case referral; when this happens the smaller firm (or media person) will not refer to the larger firm again and puts the word out to the legal community that the larger firm is not reliable about honoring kick-back agreements so others become reluctant to refer to them too. It is in the larger firm\u2019s best interests to always honor their kick-back agreements with other lawyers (and media) if they want to get richer faster. The saying \u201cthere is honor amongst thieves\u201d applies heavily here.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 A local homicide detective told me, in response to my complaint of the lawyers performing \u201cbounty hunts\u201d on injury victim\u2019s valid cases:\u00a0 \u201cyes, it\u2019s true, these things certainly do go on here\u00ad–and it is unethical and immoral BUT NOT ILLEGAL!\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0Another rule dictates there is one payoff per case per attorney\/firm. Just one. Once that victim\u2019s case has been presented as a \u201cbounty\u201d possibility and has been paid off in graft that law firm will never have another thing to do with that case even if the victim comes back later with more concrete evidence in the hope the firm will reconsider. Collecting more evidence means nothing to the purpose they had you into their offices to begin with: all you were to them was a delivery vehicle for your case material. Once you gave them something, anything, to turn in for graft they were finished with you forever. Well, almost forever: if a law firm splits up and its principals go their separate ways under shiny new firm names they are allowed to have a second helping of graft, EACH, on your case material under their new business names.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Once in a while you will see a content-controlled \u201cshowcase\u201d presented in the mainstream media; the trial lawyers have to keep up appearances, have to toss out the occasional \u201cshowcase\u201d for public viewing to make it appear their system is active and justice is being served. Here is what they will never tell you about the \u201cshowcases\u201d presented: the lawyers get their cut of the whole award right off the top. Then they extract fees, costs, medical expert witness fees, and such from the remainder—which can total tens of thousands of dollars, and which the injury victim has no control over while the case is being prepared for prosecution or settlement. The victim\u2019s health insurance company jumps into the picture with its hand out (remember these health insurers are often owned by the doctors, lawyers, and their cronies) after all is finalized to recover the medical costs they have paid out from the date of occurrence, which can come into thousands of dollars because of the \u201cmilk-the-cow\u201d cover-up games played on the victim before the victim knew enough to consult an attorney…and without contributing a dime of the legal fees, or doing one lick of work on the case, they get their cut too. Whatever is left over, if anything at all, goes to the actual injury victim for losses, damages, and medical bills.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Some injury victims find out an awful, unexpected truth staring them in the face at the end: after everyone else is paid first they can end up OWING money. Yes, OWING money if the pay-outs exceed the monetary award. And if the defendant does not pay what is ordered, or the case is lost, the victim is still responsible for the lawyer\u2019s costs even if nothing is ever actually collected at all on the claim. The judge is not a collection agency; the judge writes an opinion and circulates to both sides for their signatures\u2013which makes an enforceable contract but the judge doesn\u2019t enforce collection of the judgement the defendant is ordered to pay. That is the plaintiff\u2019s problem. If the defendant doesn\u2019t pay up, for whatever reason, the attorneys will still expect payment from the plaintiff as the responsible party.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 A word of warning, something I have witnessed many times since working in the patient\u2019s\u00adrights arena: malpractice cases are traditionally filed in civil court. Only monetary awards are granted. Nobody is sent to prison. No sentences are handed down. The judge does not write sentences, he\/she writes OPINIONS and that is all it is\u2013more like an arbitrator situation. That OPINION is not set in granite UNTIL after it has been circulated to all parties to the case and signed by ALL\u2013the signatures make the enforceable contract. If you sign you are agreeing to perform every single word on that contract whether you agree with it or not. If you don\u2019t agree with every single word, DO NOT SIGN! You don\u2019t have to sign anything, even if it comes from the hand of a judge. I know several injury victims who got taken advantage of, big-time, because they thought they had to sign off on a case they \u201clost\u201d to a crooked system stacked so heavily against them that there was no hope of real relief or justice\u2013without reading what they were asked to sign very carefully or understanding what they were reading even if they did. Not only did they \u201close\u201d their case but also agreed to pay ALL the defendants legal fees and court costs, adding insult to injury.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Now, I am going to say something that is so outrageous that it is going to leave some of you shaking your heads in disbelief\u2013just like I did when I found out: the medical syndicate has learned to utilize a little-known fact in the reality the criminal elite\u201cclub\u201d has created and moves in: LAWYERS WILL NOT ACCEPT CASES OF INTENTIONAL MEDICAL HARM because there<\/span><\/p>\n

is no money in it for them. Or you. Why? Because malpractice insurance doesn\u2019t cover intentional acts, therefore there is nothing to collect from. If doctors can contaminate a medical malpractice victim with intentional harm it effectively neutralized their victim\u2019s ability to find a lawyer and sue\u2013inflicting intentional harm is their biggest loophole, their ticket to freedom. Don\u2019t believe me? These sociopaths\/psychopaths know this\u2013and use it. Abundantly. Deliberately. Once a lawyer sees evidence of deliberate harm they know it is a case they can only perform a \u201cbounty hunt\u201d on as their only possible way of making money on it.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 This particular abuse-of-power, coupled with \u201cWarren VS The District Of Columbia\u201d (that dictates no government agency owes any individual a service or protection) effectively removes any clean place someone being abused, enslaved, and trafficked, by the medical syndicate and their cohorts, to turn to for help. If the Medical Boards, or police, etc.\u00a0 refuse to take action it is because they know \u201cthey don\u2019t have to\u201d. See for yourself:<\/span><\/p>\n

Citations:<\/span> <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

“Doctor INTENTIONALLY Caused Har<\/em>m;<\/em> WHY Most NY Medical Malpractice Attorneys Won\u2019t Touch This\u201d<\/em><\/strong> https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=1rJ_pvrEe-s&feature=share<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

Archives Of Surgery<\/em><\/strong> Vol 150 Page 1125 By William C. Meyers, MD, QUOTE: \u201cThe main point of this commentary is that surgeons should face up to the complication of bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A relatively short duration of illness and good results can be expected if the patient is referred promptly to a surgeon who is experienced in the appropriate techniques. We must bite the bullet. We must face up to this complication. This is not an intentional injury so we should quit INTENTIONALLY treating it wrong.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Common Lawyer Tricks (General)<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 The attorneys who aggressively demand payment from others do not hold themselves to the same standard because they know \u201cinsider\u201d tricks we don\u2019t. I found this out the hard way early in my activist adventures when lawyers from all over the country contacted me for copies of my research files on laparoscopic gallbladder surgery.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Back in my early ignorance and trust, I would try to help them thinking I was doing a good thing for the injury victim who was their client. \u201cWe heard you had the best stuff!\u201d they\u2019d tell me and said if I would send them copies they\u2019d reimburse me. I stopped helping lawyers because NOT ONE OF THEM EVER REIMBURSED ME FOR COST. They\u2019d promise to pay just costs of copying and postage, which was all I ever asked for, and every last one of them stiffed me—once they have what they want in their hands the deal is finished as far as they are concerned.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 It took me getting stiffed a few times to catch on to this game and learn how pervasive it is; I did not know then what I know now: a lawyer told me \u201cthe club\u201d operates by a \u201cMAKE THEM CHASE YOU\u201d philosophy: they stiff you where they can get away with it and then responsibility for damage recovery is shifted into YOUR lap; to recover what they have stolen by deception you have to \u201cchase them\u201d. It is usually more trouble than it is worth so the target gives up and walks away with nothing. I was advised to get payment up front, collect-on-delivery, or to get their promises in writing and make an enforceable contract. But even with the promises in writing there is no guarantee we would be able to collect because they know something we don\u2019t think of: it can cost more to get them to do what they are supposed to do than to just let it go.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0 \u00a0\u201cMake them chase you\u201d works; that\u2019s why the lawyers use it on us so often.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 I stopped responding to requests from lawyers altogether. Disgusting parasites. What kind of people act like this? They knew I was injured and didn\u2019t have a job, that it would be a hardship to stand working at a copying machine and taking packages to the post office. They knew I could ill afford the postage. Their behavior is very telling.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 The doctors and lawyers are all part of the same \u201cclub\u201d and have specific functions assigned to them for maintaining the benefits of ALL \u201cclub members\u201d: malpractice insurance companies (often owned by the doctors, lawyers, government officials and their cohorts) pay lawyers not to accept injury victim\u2019s valid claims. One \u201cclub member\u201d branch paying itself, or another \u201cclub member\u201d branch, KEEPS ALL THE BIG MONEY CIRCULATING WITHIN THEIR OWN MEMBERSHIP. In short, every single thing they give to an outsider is one less thing they get to keep for themselves. Providing proper aftercare for an injury a doctor caused or paying out an injury claim to the benefit of the actual injury victim would involve substantial financial losses to the \u201cclub\u201d. This is counterproductive to their goal of enriching themselves at our expense. They want to turn the injuries they cause into money-MAKERS—and that is exactly what they do to us. While the injury victims are suffering, losing spouses, children, jobs, homes, and so on the lawyers are getting filthy-rich by skillfully gaming us, without conscience, siphoning off the money that should rightfully be paid out to injury victims for myriad damages: the lawyers want and get bigger homes, nicer vacations, better cars, private schools for their children, by preying on the injured. The piggery is unbelievable.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 It is all a sham. The whole legal system is rotten and filthy-crooked to the core. They make their biggest money \u201cbounty-hunting\u201d cases, not prosecuting them. \u201cTort Reform\u201d and the current brainwashing attempt in the mainstream media that \u201cfrivolous lawsuits are running up doctor\u2019s medical malpractice premiums\u201d is a self-serving con: the real cause is greed-crazed lawyers \u201cbounty-hunting\u201d the massive increase in valid injury cases and the stock market investments the malpractice insurance company made which did not earn well in recent years. (the stock market returns were not there for many—it wasn\u2019t only the malpractice insurance companies who suffered stock market reversals in recent years; look at what happened to people\u2019s IRA retirement investments!)<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Common Lawyer Tricks<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 If you do not want to listen to me or believe these things at face value, want to learn these nasty lessons the hard way by direct hands-on experience, which I guarantee you will one way or another, go right on ahead–bad experience is an excellent teacher. That is how I learned. At least you were warned in advance, which was more than I got years ago starting out. But at least take some steps to protect yourselves from predation:<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 You should always date every release form you sign no matter what they tell you; you should bring your own ink pen with any color ink in it but black for signatures: blue, red, green. Then get a copy of everything you sign on the spot\u2013don\u2019t leave without it.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Bring in only copies of your case material and leave the originals in a safe place elsewhere. And never, ever let your originals out of your possession or unattended even for a second. The crooks get paid extra for each piece of evidence they can steal from you; the more pieces they steal the more payola they can collect. But they will trick us into leaving our things with them willingly if they can manage it—and we will never see our things again. How do I know this? It happened to me, in my early ignorance, twice. Then when I started interviewing other injury victims (hundreds now) I learned this crooked behavior is routine, done to just about all of us.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 I have had several injury victims violently reject the reality I am laying down here; they have been brainwashed like all of us have been through mainstream media, and hold onto the belief they are special people whose cases are so meritorious lawyers will fight over it to be the ones who get the privilege of representing them in court. They are not experienced enough yet to realize things are not like they are presented on television. \u201cOh, no!\u201d they scream. \u201cMaybe that is what they did to you and some other people but they are not going to treat ME that way—just you wait and see! I am going to march in there and demand the protection I am entitled to and get it!\u201d\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0 I always wish them well and hope for the best each time but it doesn\u2019t take very long before they find out I was telling them the truth. I tell them in about two weeks to expect a rejection letter by certified mail; it takes about two weeks to process the lawyer\u2019s demand for graft, present what they have collected off of us in case material, and get payoff approval. The rejection letter arrives right on schedule, just like I told them it would, and then I get the shocked and disappointed phone call:. \u201cHow did this happen to ME? I have a good case!\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 I already told them how it happened and why. Accepting it takes time to sink in because it is the exact reversal of everything we have been told all our lives about lawyers and the workings of law.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Still think lawyers are our friends? Think again. The ones I have met over the years are some of the lowest forms of human nature walking, people so depraved, heartless, and unevolved that they are best avoided.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Ask yourself this question: \u201cWHY a certified rejection letter when an outright rejection on-the\u00adspot would do, or a regular letter, or a phone call? Why the formality of a certified letter?\u00a0\u00a0 Because it is a requirement of the ones doling out the payola as written proof the case was rejected and that the rejection was received by the potential plaintiff.<\/span><\/p>\n

Citation:<\/span> <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

The Columbus Dispatch<\/span><\/strong><\/em> March 22, 1996 You And The law \u201cContingency Fee Contract Could Backfire On Client QUOTE: \u201cUnder a recent decision by an Ohio Court Of Appeals, though, continency fee agreements now can be dangerous to your financial health. The decision involved a case in which a lawyer and his client agreed that the lawyer would receive 40% of any money or assets which are obtained. The lawyer then won a judgement for $507,439. Unfortunately, they were not able to collect from the wrong-doer. But the lawyer demanded his client pay him 40% of the award, totaling $233,321. The client refused, but the court sided with the lawyer.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Buzz Words And Buzz Phrases<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 After years of enduring this particular abuse, certain patterns emerged in the speeches inflicted by the \u201cclub\u201d membership in medicine, law, law enforcement, the so-called protection agencies and government, it became apparent these rote-responses have been programmed in, scripted. This is a sure-fire way to identify who\/what we are really dealing with right out of the starting gate. The thought-terminating cliches, the rote-response conditioning…call it whatever you want but its purpose is the same: to divert, dismiss, neutralize the people they have harmed and collude to skip out on accountability: \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cYou need to see a psychiatrist\/psychologist. It\u2019s just stress.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cYour perception is off.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cYou did this to yourself\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cWe just have no idea what could be wrong. (even after loads of tests)\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cWhere did you hear THAT?! Ladies Home Journal? Buffy The Vampire Slayer?\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cYou are probably an attention-seeker. Drug seeker. A hypochondriac. A liar. Munchausen\u2019s Syndrome.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cThere are no guarantees in life.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cWe all have to die sometime.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cLet\u2019s focus on prevention so future victims won\u2019t have to suffer.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cIt is okay to sacrifice a few to benefit many.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cLet\u2019s use this as a learning experience.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cMethinks the lady doeth protest too much.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cWhere did you get YOUR medical degree?\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cYou can\u2019t believe what you read on the Internet.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cLet\u2019s leave emotion out of this!\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cConspiracy, conspiracy theorist.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cMedicine is an art, not a science.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cThis runs in your family.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Money Laundering Of The Payola<\/span> <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Payola<\/em><\/strong> (definition): a secret or private payment in return for the promotion of a product, service, etc., through the abuse of one’s position, influence, or facilities.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 These carefully-selected, content-controlled \u201cshowcases\u201d are used as props in an elaborate performance to make it appear to the public that the courts are active and protecting us all on the same level. Yes, the profession has rules against this kind of predatory behavior but it also has myriad ways of getting around it and, after all, someone has to step forward and play their \u201cprove it\u201d game in their own arena\u2013something no outsider can effectively penetrate.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 This facade has another purpose too: the payola is paid out through the \u201cshowcases\u201d and cases slated for settlement. Once a \u201cshowcase\u201d has been selected for prosecution or settlement one of the OTHER valid cases the lawyers have lured into their offices and want to use to turn in for payola is attached to it; the \u201cshowcase\u201d, or case to be settled, is overpaid to the amount agreed upon. This process has a name; it is called \u201cpiggy-backing\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 A lawyer from North Carolina told me it goes like this: \u201csay I have a case in my office already agreed to be settled for, say, $100,000. And say I have a real good case like yours come into my office that I can only do a \u201cbounty hunt\u201d on, and your surgeon is insured by the same insurer as the \u201cshowcase\u201d or case to be settled. We will attach your case to the \u201cshowcase\u201d, or the case to be settled, and jack up the final, agreed upon, amount on the first case to, say, $300,000. We get our cut, plus fees and costs deducted also, right off the top.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 The reason this particular lawyer told me this is because he asked me if he could do a \u201cbounty hunt\u201d on my case material afterward, wanted his share of profiting from my tragedy:\u00a0 his partner was licensed in Ohio and his partner had just gotten one Ohio case in the office that was already agreed upon to settle—so he needed another qualified Ohio case like mine to attach to it in order to make more money for himself. Could he use mine? I said \u201cyes\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 I said \u201cyes\u201d to over 100 lawyers, although I came to despise the malpractice lawyers I came into contact with. Pigs. They disgust me to the core. So why would I want to reward them with allowing them the opportunity, times 100+, to collect payola on my case material? I did it to financially punish my surgeon\u2019s malpractice insurance company. I turned their game around backward onto them and simply played their own game by their own rules—how could they complain about it? If the filthy crooked sociopaths want to pay lawyers not to take injury victims valid cases thinking it is just plain cheaper for them to pay the lawyers off instead of allowing a certain kind of victims\u2019 case into their \u201cclub\u201d-controlled courtrooms for prosecution and relief then why not make them pay it off A LOT–over and over and over? You can do the math here: just imagine the standard percentage paid out over 100 times.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 If a case is referred to a larger firm the lawyer making the referral is paid a \u201creferral fee\u201d that is measured and meted out as a percentage of the projected value; I believe the standard percentage paid to the referring lawyer to be nine percent.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 When word got out about what I was doing lawyers started contacting me, although they are not supposed to, for their chance to \u201creview\u201d my case file. It became a repulsive \u201cfeeding frenzy\u201d and the greed was difficult to witness and endure. But I did it anyhow, went through the necessary motions, regardless of the cost to me and the toll it took.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 The lawyers did not care about me, wasn\u2019t the least interested in my losses or pain, the fact that my injury(s) is terminal and I suffer miserably every day. After a while I started wondering if there was anything human left in them.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 A prominent lawyer at one of the largest medical malpractice firms in Columbus, Ohio asked me if I could bring my case material into his office, NOT so he could do a \u201cbounty hunt\u201d on my case material himself but because he wanted to set something up for a young woman, a recent graduate who had just passed the bar exam, who was just starting out and needed the extra money (and the experience) the \u201cbounty-hunt\u201d would give her to get set up in her own practice. I did it. (and, no, I never made a penny myself; these ordeals usually ended up costing me money with parking fees, copying, and such)<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Sometimes the lawyers\u00a0 will pretend to accept a valid case then will \u201csit on\u201d it, doing absolutely nothing, then just before the trial date will suddenly drop it and leave the victim standing alone without time to find a replacement. The crooked sneaks get paid to do this; this con is used for the cases where a victim has been going from lawyer-to-lawyer trying to find someone to accept and prosecute their valid case and no one will.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 What is supposed to happen is the injury victim goes to one or two lawyers and is rejected, gets discouraged or is convinced they do not really have a valid case, then quits. Once in a while, though, a victim doesn\u2019t blindly accept this con and persists, will go to many lawyers. What the persistent injury victim does not know is that each time they go into a lawyer\u2019s office with their case material the crafty lawyers are turning it in for payola– and the more lawyers the injury victim consults with the more payola demands that have to be paid out–so the ones paying this will attempt to stop this cycle by paying one law firm MORE for pretending to accept a case by filing then sitting on it, deliberately running the statute of limitations out, and suddenly dropping it and becoming unavailable just before the trial date–the law firm cuts the injury victim off abruptly, will accept no phone calls, will not respond to any letters, blocks office visits.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 The lawyers are doing what they were paid to do and are performing to the letter of the agreement between themselves and the ones doling out the payola–it is cheaper for them to do this than to continue to pay huge \u201cbounties\u201d to each lawyer the victim contacts; the \u201cclub\u201d can absorb the cost of and justify paying out only a couple of \u201cbounties\u201d per injury victim. It is certainly cheaper than allowing every valid victim\u2019s case their day in court and the perpetrators certainly don\u2019t want the potential exposures of their criminal activity.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 A wrench gets thrown into their machinery when a persistent victim enters the picture and is not put off by rejection after rejection, keeps going.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Citations:<\/span> <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Ethics Opinion 286 Contingent Referral Fees<\/em><\/strong> https:\/\/www.dcbar.org\/bar-resources\/legal-ethics\/opinions\/opinion286.cfm<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

American Bar Association Vol. 28<\/em><\/strong> #5 By Wendy Wen Yun Chang <\/span>\u201cMust I Really Turn Down That Referral Fee?\u201d<\/strong><\/em> http:\/\/www.americanbar.org\/publications\/gp_solo\/2011\/july_august\/referral_fee_ethics.html<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

OUTLAWYERED https:\/\/www.overlawyered.com\/2008\/12\/from-comments-lawyer-referral-fees\/<\/a> QUOTES: \u201cIn the sort of mass tort lawsuits that this company is dealing in, it is extremely common for \u2018clients\u2019 to be bought and sold, sometimes multiple times, with a typical referral fee being around a third of the contingency fee. The general public doesn\u2019t realize that the lawyer advertising on TV or out on the Internet for mass tort clients is usually just a marketer, selling all the clients he collects to other lawyers. It is actually more lucrative to advertise for clients and then sell them to other lawyers than to do the actual work of representing clients.\u201d \u201cBut beyond the bulk advertisements of the mass marketers of lawsuits, many individual lawyers, who are not practicing trial lawyers, but make their income in other ways, such as employees of corporations, supplement their incomes, often substantially, by referring relatives, friends, and coworkers to personal injury lawyers in exchange for referral fees (which they keep secret from those being referred as you can understand).\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Prosecuting Your Own Case Without A Lawyer<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u201cI\u2019ll never forget graduating, uh, law school when I was told by a good friend of mine: your skills mean nothing; every case is a fix!\u201d state’s Attorney Burton N. Pugach in 2007 film \u201cCrazy Love\u201d by Shoot The Moon Productions.\u201d <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Some injury victims try to work their own cases without a lawyer. This creates a whole other set of problems. I know because I did it myself and wasted about six years on it (for educational purposes only; I knew from the outset my case material would be allowed to go nowhere due to the concrete evidence of criminal activity it contained): a \u201cspeedy trial\u201d is a myth. So is a fair trial. The \u201cclub\u201d hates in propia persona or pro se cases because they cannot control them.\u00a0\u00a0 Maintaining their crooked system depends on their self-serving rules being followed to the letter by people positioned and incentivized to perform perfectly—and it IS a performance: theirs, not ours. The \u201cclub\u201d insiders simply cannot count on we outsiders to perform to their self-serving cover-up rules. We outsiders care nothing for hiding the criminal elements of a malpractice case, aren\u2019t interested in burying embarrassing evidence, won\u2019t limit discussion and exposure of records-tampering technologies, won\u2019t be dictated to about case content.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 The crooked courts can run these pro se\/in propia persona cases in circles forever, going absolutely nowhere—eventually the victim gives up and drops out, or dies of the untreated injuries. The \u201cclub\u201d can\u2019t allow uncontrollable mavericks into their system…not in the current crooked system where the only goal is to protect (and enrich) \u201cclub members\u201d from exposure and consequences. (I was told by a lawyer once that I certainly have a valid case and would be allowed to have an attorney on one condition: I was to keep my mouth shut about records-tampering methodologies and abuse incidents. I would not agree to that, and well, the rest is history…)<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 A lawyer from another state phoned me one day out of the blue, said he would be in Ohio with business in another city nearby, and when he was finished there could he drive over to my home and have the afternoon?—he wanted to talk to me. I said \u201cyes.\u201d He told me two organized crime factions control Ohio; one controls from Columbus upward and the other controls from Columbus downward. I am considered an enemy to both.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Our so-called \u201claws\u201d are only as good as the ones enforcing them; that being the case we have less than nothing set in place to protect us.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Medical Expert Witnesses<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Not just anyone is allowed to become a medical expert witness; they have set rules to follow too and those rules include what they can, and cannot, \u201csee\u201d and record in their findings. Anyone who doesn\u2019t agree to follow the guidelines they are given, or can\u2019t be trusted to perform them to the letter, is not allowed into that business or to remain in the business once in.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 The medical experts are given just the perpetrator-generated-and-controlled sanitized paper file to review and write their report on, do not examine or interview the injury victim themselves or run new tests, rely only on the old self-serving creations of the perpetrators of the victim\u2019s injury and its standardized cover-up protocols! Any fool can see the clear limitations of this process!\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 The only clean patient medical file is kept in the computer, in a centralized computer database only the criminal power-elite can access. It is password-protected in layers for levels of trust (example: doctors get deeper access than people who just draw blood), is under code, with restricted access. (when my previous family doctor told me he needed to view mine he had to go over to the hospital to do it because they had the closest terminal he could use; he did not have such a terminal in his own office like many doctors do nowadays.)<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 The medical expert witnesses never use any of the clean material kept in the ONLY clean patient record: the computer file! The process is skewed right out of the starting gate; if the medical experts are given only garbage to review and make reports on what kind of results can come of it?! This can only go one way. And that way has no benefit whatsoever to the injury victim and does no real justice to the victim\u2019s actual injury and its true consequences. Garbage in=garbage out.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 A well-known, top-drawer doctor who also worked as a medical expert witness told me the truth about his medical expert profession. He was elderly, in ill health and about to die so I guess he figured he had nothing to lose by taking me aside and telling me the truth behind the facade of the medical expert witness sham. He told me the only way he\u2019d really be able to help certain kinds of injury victims is going after only the findings on the \u201capproved\u201d list they all have to work within-\u00ad-he said he would not be allowed to write a brutally honest report. None of them are.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Doctors called in to testify in support of their peers cannot tell the truth, are not allowed<\/span><\/p>\n

to\u2013especially if they are insured by the same medical malpractice insurance company. Nowadays, the doctors themselves can own stock in, or own outright, their own medical malpractice insurance company. Sometimes the local medical societies own the controlling stock in specific medical malpractice insurance companies.<\/span><\/p>\n

Citation:<\/span><\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

ProPublica<\/em><\/strong> 9-23-2016 \u201cDoctor Confesses: I lied To Protect Colleague In Malpractice Suit\u201d By: Marshall Allen, QUOTE: \u201c…Aanning understood why his partner\u2019s attorney had called him as a witness: Doctors don\u2019t squeal on doctors.\u201d \u201cI lied.\u201d \u201cFrom that very moment I knew I had lied\u2013lied under oath\u2013and violated all my pledges of professionalism that came with the Doctor Of Medicine degree and membership in the American Medical Association,\u201d \u201cThere\u2019s no way to tell how often doctors lie to protect their colleagues, but ProPublica has found that patients are frequently not told the truth when they are harmed. Studies also show that many physicians do not have a favorable view of informing patients about mistakes and that health care workers are afraid to speak up if things don\u2019t seem right. Many doctors and nurses have told ProPublica that they fear retaliation of they speak out about patient safety problems.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Mainstream Media<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 This program doesn\u2019t end with the legal system: the media \u201cbounty-hunts\u201d victim\u2019s cases too using the same overall methodology. This comes as a shock to we outsiders when it happens to us because we have all been brainwashed to believe that the media is the last champion of truth and justice for the common man.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Well, in the real world the CEOs of the television, radio, newspaper, magazine outlets are usually \u201cclub members\u201d, who hire other \u201cclub members\u201d as key staff, and sit on the hospital boards and such. The media outlet earns its biggest money from advertising and it is not to their best advantage to write and print unflattering stories about the people paying their bills by buying advertising. It is even less to their advantage to break \u201cclub\u201d rules and accept the inevitable punishments and demotions that will come from such defiance. \u201cClub\u201d rule number one is: SILENCE.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 The reporters work the same racket as the lawyers: they will do an interview, write relevant facts down, steal evidence if we allow them the opportunity (using the same programmed-in techniques as the lawyers: \u201cour copier is broken today but if you leave your material here with us we will copy it when it is fixed and mail it back to you\u201d or will just pocket it when we are not looking, etcetera) because they can make extra money selling it backward to the perpetrators.\u00a0 Their goal is to tape-record interviews and get something directly from our hand that is uniquely ours and directly tied to our individual case because, just like the lawyers, they have to acquire something to turn in for the graft\/payoff NOT to write and publish certain stories, have to prove a valid story opportunity was presented to them: a story immediately recognized as detrimental to the \u201cclub members\u201d criminal activity and human-rights abuses.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 In my experience I have had lawyers send me to selected media reporters to be bounty-hunted on and had reporters send me to selected lawyers to be bounty-hunted on. Why? They wanted their \u201cqualified friend\u201d to share in the feeding frenzy: just like between lawyers, media and lawyers have a kick-back\/finder\u2019s fee arrangement too and the person making the referral gets a cut of the final payoff\u2013usually set at 9% of the payola after it is collected.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 The crooked leader of a well-funded controlled-opposition camp patient\u2019s-rights group located on the west coast (whose co-founder is a published lawyer) sent every crooked media pal he had available to me wanting their turn to do a \u201cbounty-hunt\u201d on my case material—to the point of the ridiculous. The only good that came out of it is I got the opportunity to write all their names down in the register I keep on all the known\/identified crooks in law, media, government (I keep such a register on bad doctors too) so I can warn other victims away from them when asked if those people are \u201cclean\u201d or not. In the present system, prevention is the cure.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Our place in all of this is simply delivery of our case material; we will always come away with nothing and our time and effort will always be wasted. These people are stone-hard ruthless and have tunnel-vision about the \u201cprize\u201d at the end of their game; they do not care about us, our suffering, or our losses; none of that registers on their radar-screen unless they can use it to make money for themselves.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Don\u2019t think for a minute that all of the patriot or alternative media is clean: some of their reporters do \u201cbounty-hunts\u201d too. Some are even \u201cclub members\u201d in a controlled-opposition camp posing as clean by doing stories that only look like they are contrary to the mainstream; if we\u2019d take a closer look we\u2019d see the censoring and brainwashing there too.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Citation:<\/span><\/strong><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

The Ohio Observer<\/strong><\/em> January 1994 Vol. 1, Issue 1 By Walt Bogdanich QUOTE:\u00a0\u00a0 \u201cI wanted to work in the biggest cesspool I could find. I ended up in Ohio, and that ought to tell you something.\u201d \u201cOhio was home to pervasive organized crime and systemic political corruption. And the state turned out to be all that and more,\u201d \u201cOhio may be the home of presidents but it is also the home of institutional misbehavior that ought to shame and anger us all.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cEvil is an insidious thing: presents attractively, justifies neatly…and soon a good and decent man is doing the unthinkable routinely\u201d <\/span><\/em><\/strong><\/span>Elizabeth Eugenia (James) LaBozetta<\/span> <\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Running The Gauntlet<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Our natural inclination, because we have all been brainwashed to do it, is to take our complaints to the so-called protection agencies for relief and resolution. We don\u2019t really want to go through the ordeal of a lawsuit\u2013we just want the standardized abuses and the financial enslavement to stop. We think of a lawsuit as a last resort, not knowing, yet, that the possibility of finding a lawyer to represent us is near impossible too.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Our first inclination is to take our complaint to the state Medical Board. They\u2019ll take our complaint, often try to steal our most incriminating evidence, and then do nothing no matter the concrete evidence we present, the severity of our injuries, or the viciousness of the abuses inflicted. Everything goes back to the doctor(s) we\u2019d complained about for his\/her lawyers to review in preparation for a potential lawsuit filing upon the horizon.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Then we contact law enforcement, legislators at various levels, mainstream media, various special interest groups, even draw up petitions for others to sign because it makes us feel like we are \u201cdoing something\u201d however ineffective and time-wasting, etcetera…and, again, no response at all or no useful response.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Is this lack of response merely an oversight of some unknown kind, on their part or ours? Or is something else at work here and stacked so heavily against us we cannot break through it?<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 In my early trust and ignorance, I did all of that too, have a big box of their \u201cblow-off letters\u201d in my files. Most of us do this. It is what we have been programmed to do. We do it until we learn the sad truth that we are being gamed\u2013big time; most of us learn this lesson the hard way. And after we run their full gauntlet, and there is no other place to take our complaints hoping for an active response, we are funneled right back to the starting gate, the state Medical Board,\u00a0 and encouraged to run the whole gauntlet all over again.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 And again.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 And again.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 And again.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 The criminal elite will wantonly, and without a shred of conscience, run us through THEIR gauntlet as many times as we are willing to do it. They do it to us because it keeps us busy, keeps us coming back to them so they can monitor our evidence-collecting, learn more about us and what our intentions are, and give them the opportunity to discourage us with the increasing understanding of the futility of our actions against the brick wall they have erected to protect their membership against us, the \u201cclub\u201d outsiders.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Some injury victims never learn, cannot break through their lifetime of programming\/brainwashing and will run that gauntlet over and over and over again due to the implanted notion they have just not reached \u201cthe right person\u201d yet. Some nebulous, imagined \u201crescuer\u201d who is going to reach out and pull them out of the mess they are mired in even if they have reached the proverbial \u201celeventh hour\u201d and are looking into the jaws of death.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 It doesn\u2019t exist. There is no such person. There is no silver bullet. There is no \u201copen sesame\u201d combination of the right words that will grant us access to the relief and active response we have been hoodwinked into believing we are entitled to and will receive in the name of justice.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 We have to learn how to be our own rescuers\u2013and with the current system\/regime like it has become, prevention is the cure. We have to learn how to protect ourselves from predation so that we do not stumble blindly into the traps they have set for us and are waiting for us to stumble blindly into. Once lured in there is no real way out. Not now. Not today. Not until real change comes. Not until we can meet them on their own level and make it too uncomfortable to continue their abuses\u2013which will only increase over time because they have gotten away with so much already.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 It does no good to go to the mob bosses and complain that we do not like the shake-down we\u2019d received. Likewise, it does no good to approach the predatory, self-serving criminal elite and complain either. The things they have over on us is focus, unity, and the means to train and police its membership. Until we can match them in focus and unity we do not stand even a ghost of a chance to get out from under their myriad abuses.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Citations:<\/span> <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cThe Committee Of 300″ (book) by John Coleman \u201cNone Dare Call It Conspiracy\u201d by Gary Allen<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Solution Suggestion<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0 One of the standardized responses we are given by the perpetrators of these crimes, whenever we confront them with irrefutable evidence of their dirty-work, criminal activity, and human-rights abuses (rather a non-response-tool used to deflect responsibility backward onto their victims) is: \u201cyou have listed the problems…so what are the solutions?!\u201d and ends with a blanket dismissal statement of \u201cWE have the finest medical care system in the world!\u201d as if there were no room for improvements (No we don\u2019t, Switzerland and Singapore do). This technique is diversionary and quickly gets them out of the hot seat with attention turned elsewhere, is said with no intention whatsoever to put into action any solution their victims come up with: in the current program the getting is just too good.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 But I am going to offer a solution anyway: Just stop cold. Just stop. Stop the lying, cheating, fraud, theft, con-games, verbal abuse, physical abuse, financial abuse and everything else going on that you already know full-well is wrong. If you know enough to try to hide something you are doing then you also know it is wrong. Period. Don\u2019t do it anymore. Just stop cold. Tell the absolute truth always and just accept the knocks that might go along with it—like mature, responsible adults. If you injure a patient, tell the truth immediately and do whatever you can to quickly remedy the situation as best as possible. You, and the patient, can then come away from this experience, whatever the outcome, with dignity and respect.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Grow up! You have allowed the insidious, corrupting influence of the insurance industry to prey on your greed and arrogance and turn you into liars, cheats, thieves, patient-abusers in myriad ways, and now–murderers. Do you think nobody has noticed this change?<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 In all my years of patient\u2019s-rights activism and doing hundreds of interviews of people injured by doctors, one common theme emerged: ALL said they could accept their devastating injury and endure its many losses better if their doctors had only told them the truth up front and then tried to fix the problem right away instead of lying about it and deliberately leaving them untreated. It is the lying, verbal abuse, stalling games, and such that make people hate their doctors and eventually turns them against the whole profession—loudly spoken to anyone who will listen forever after.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 It is unconscionable to injure someone then deliberately compound the damages by hiding it; hiding injuries interferes with the injury victim getting the intervention he\/she needs early when it would do the most good. Can just telling the absolute truth and responding ethically be any more complicated and difficult than remembering and performing all of the detail of the current cover-up protocols? I don\u2019t think so. Look again at the current system: an elaborate maze of lies, verbal abuse, \u201cmilk-the-cow\u201d games, crooked referrals, records tampering, fakery…lots of work involved, lots to remember. And patients subjected to this abuse come to fear and hate you for your corruption in the end no matter how well you perform these abusive protocols. Is it good business to chase your clients away from you with behavior so extreme they\u2019d be fools to return?<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 And what KIND of people create protocols like these to begin with then teach and enforce them? What KIND of people blindly and obediently\u00a0 perform them? In any other situation these are considered the low-grade, street-value, \u201cgutter ethics\u201d used by the most depraved and corrupt at the very bottom level of decent society. How did your profession sink so low so fast? I think many issues caused the turnaround but at the top of the list is managed care health insurance.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 There is a bigger picture here. Yes, using low-grade thug tactics gets the results you want on the short-term. But you can\u2019t control the long-term effects and this current system has changed you and will continue changing you: I liken the internal changes to how serial killers start out small, killing animals and abusing people smaller and weaker than themselves. But the disease is progressive\/corrosive, once allowed to settle in, and soon the serial killer is moving on to bigger things and cannot stop.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 The disease that has overtaken the medical profession is also progressive. If the dirty-work is not stopped now it is going to move on to bigger things. Mark my words… The solution is simpler than all of that: tell the absolute truth, always. People who do not lie do not have to remember what they\u2019d said. It is that simple. People who do not lie keep their self-respect even in the most difficult circumstances and keep the respect of others—others who will then come away from the exchange saying, regardless of outcome, \u201cwell, at least he did not LIE to me!\u201d and they will return with no reservations, will not feel they have to keep their backs to the wall or scrutinize everything you say to them forever after. Ever hear the old saying \u201cyou can\u2019t un\u00adring a bell?\u201d Well, once trust has been broken it is nearly impossible to win it back again. You know right from wrong, should not have to be told this. Mature adults accept the consequences of their acts directly and ethically regardless of consequences.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 As educated professionals placed in positions of trust, we expect a higher standard of behavior from our doctors than the \u201cgutter ethics\u201d being practiced today. Has the profession gotten so corrupted and do you have so much to hide that you can\u2019t just \u201cgo straight\u201d now? The current \u201cprogram\u201d is beneath you—and it is hurting the image of your profession and making people turn away in disgust and fear.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 I am told the driving force behind the corruption that has settled in is a \u201cfear of lawsuits\u201d idea that has been implanted by the legal profession and malpractice insurance companies. You doctors know who is responsible for the current mess and deep down I believe you know how to fix it. My advice is: shake the parasite loose, get rid of them completely, cut them off, block them out. Ever heard the saying: \u201cI am going to give you a taste of your own medicine!\u201d So, give them a taste of their own medicine! Use the same means against them that they have taught you to perform against the injury victims you create: you know exactly what I am talking about here…turn their own abusive cover-up program around backwards onto them and use it to subdue them. Instead of paying heavily into the malpractice insurance company coffers and making those greed-crazed sociopaths filthy-rich at the expense of the injury victims (who should rightfully have those funds made available to cover the costs of their doctor-caused injuries) why not set up your own direct-dispersal fund for the injury victims you create? Add all of the graft money paid out to \u201cbounty-hunting\u201d lawyers in the current system NOT to accept valid cases, or to sit on and sink cases; it could be better used where it is most needed—then the health insurers would have no cause to complain about the high cost of covering all the doctor-caused injuries and thus reduce the incentive for their portion of the criminal activity and cover-up abuses routinely inflicted on victims. If you tell the absolute truth, always, and act responsibly after-the-fact to offer proper aftercare the costs of doing business, I believe, would be greatly reduced. The truth WILL \u201cset you free\u201d:<\/span><\/p>\n

STOP:<\/em><\/strong> Lying REPLACE WITH: Tell the absolute truth. All of it. Leave nothing out. You only have to tell the truth once; if you lie you\u2019ll have to lie over and over and over again to keep it going.<\/span><\/p>\n

STOP:<\/em><\/strong> Violating the intention and spirit of a true informed consent. REPLACE WITH: Provide all detail. Do not perform any procedures the patient has not given informed consent for.<\/span><\/p>\n

STOP: <\/em><\/strong>Ghost Surgery. REPLACE WITH: If green trainees are going to be performing the surgery, say so in advance. The patient has a right to know who will be touching them and what their skill level is.<\/span><\/p>\n

STOP: <\/em><\/strong>Verbal abuse. REPLACE WITH: Talk to patients the way you\u2019d like to be spoken to.<\/span><\/p>\n

STOP:<\/em><\/strong> Psychological battery. REPLACE WITH: Tell the truth, respond ethically, respond promptly.<\/span><\/p>\n

STOP:<\/em><\/strong> Records\u2019 tampering. X-ray tampering. Keeping separate paper, microfiche, computer files. REPLACE WITH: There should be just one file for all and it should be squeaky-clean.<\/span><\/p>\n

STOP:<\/em><\/strong> Denying patients access to their own clean medical records. REPLACE WITH: Allow patients access to their own medical records any time they ask to see them—including the \u201cclean\u201d computer files, not just the sanitized paper version. People who have nothing to hide, hide nothing.<\/span><\/p>\n

STOP: <\/em><\/strong>Threatening. Coercing. Terrorizing. Bullying. REPLACE WITH: Remember patients have a right to self-determination. They have a right to do with their own bodies as they see fit. Patients are not your property to do with as YOU see fit. You are there to advise and consult with; the patient makes the final determination—not you.<\/span><\/p>\n

STOP:<\/em><\/strong> Withholding a truthful diagnosis. REPLACE WITH: Just tell the truth, no matter what it is. Cheating patients out of a truthful diagnosis also cheats them out of the opportunity to apply alternative medicine\u2019s offerings for the conditions they suffer—a diagnosis is necessary as a foundation. If the medical syndicate doesn\u2019t want to treat us, don\u2019t just assume there are no other effective treatments out there that, if not cures, then for symptomatic relief.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 For those outside the current regime? Starve evil and feed good. It is all we have open to us.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Useful Websites, Webpages, Books, Articles, Etc.<\/span> <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Involuntary Euthanasia<\/span> <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

http:\/\/www.hospicepatients.org\/this-thing-called-hospice.html <\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

http:\/\/www.kaiserpapers.org\/ http:\/\/thevickietravisshow.com\/<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Medical Experimentation<\/span> <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

http:\/\/archives.politicususa.com\/2011\/12\/12\/dark-secrets-foster-care-chil dren-as-medical-lab-rats.html http:\/\/ahrp.org\/ http:\/\/www.nj.com\/healthfit\/index.ssf\/2016\/11\/doctors_group_calls_out_morristown_hospital_for _an.html<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Medical Crimes Against The Elderly<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

http:\/\/euthanasia.kaiserpapers.org\/gmurder.html <\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

http:\/\/www.naturalnews.com\/034013_hospital_profits_Medicare.html http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/dr-terri-kennedy\/is-elder-guardianship-a-n_b_11970144.html http:\/\/ctwatchdog.com\/health\/granny-snatching-ron-winters-new-weekly-blog<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Victim Stories<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

http:\/\/tucson.com\/news\/medical-misdiagnoses-put-pressure-on-patients-to-stay-engaged\/article_f0 0153ec-b7e9-5680-aba8-42569b862d9d.html?utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook&utm_ campaign=user-share<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Organ Donation Reality<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

http:\/\/m.truthaboutorgandonation.com\/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.truthaboutorgandonation.com %2F#2918<\/span><\/p>\n

https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=VOjiYudTKu0&feature=youtu.be <\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

http:\/\/www.lifeissues.net\/writers\/kat\/org_01bodybrokerspart1.html http:\/\/www.lifeissues.net\/writers\/kat\/org_01bodybrokerspart2.html http:\/\/www.lifeissues.net\/writers\/kat\/org_01bodybrokerspart3.html http:\/\/www.lifeissues.net\/writers\/kat\/org_01bodybrokerspart4.html http:\/\/www.lifeissues.net\/writers\/kat\/org_01bodybrokerspart5.html<\/span><\/p>\n

http:\/\/www.seeker.com\/your-body-part-price-list-youre-worth-more-dead-than-alive-infographic-1 765741389.html http:\/\/usatoday30.usatoday.com\/money\/graphics\/body_parts\/flash.htm<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Medical Boards<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

http:\/\/m.truthaboutorgandonation.com\/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.truthaboutorgandonation.com %2F#2918<\/span><\/p>\n

http:\/\/patient-safety.com\/state-patients-boards.html <\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Activist Groups <\/em><\/strong>(International)<\/span><\/p>\n

http:\/\/www.medicalerroraustralia.com\/<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Medical Crime<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=1rJ_pvrEe-s&feature=share https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2016\/11\/22\/opinion\/doctors-should-stand-against-trump-reviving-tortur e.html?_r=1<\/span><\/p>\n

http:\/\/www.theunnecesarean.com\/blog\/2010\/1\/29\/yes-its-true-med-students-perform-pelvic-exams -on-anesthetiz.html#sthash.SSlA7Hrw.HYmFqWew.dpbs https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=1rJ_pvrEe-s&feature=share<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Books<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

LIFE WISH<\/em><\/strong> By: paula Carroll (pay particular attention to pages 22, 24,34, 86, 87, 88, 89, 93,94,95,95,112, 113, 174, 179,191\u2013VERY educational material there) http:\/\/www.publishersweekly.com\/978-0-399-15150-7<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Medical Professionals Killing Spouses, Etc.<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

http:\/\/www.publishersweekly.com\/978-0-399-15150-7<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Whistleblower\u2019s Retaliation Experiences<\/span> <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

http:\/\/thestarphoenix.com\/news\/local-news\/nurse-who-wrote-about-grandfathers-care-on-faceboo k-found-guilty-of-professional-misconduct http:\/\/www.abc.net.au\/news\/2007-08-27\/doctor-pays-high-price-after-whistleblowing\/652254<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Miscellaneous<\/span> <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2013\/04\/17\/health\/hospitals-profit-from-surgical-errors-study-finds.html ?smid=fb-share https:\/\/thinkprogress.org\/how-hospitals-actually-reap-greater-profits-for-making-surgical-mistakes -52c689865161#.1snav2jke http:\/\/www.cbsnews.com\/news\/surgical-complications-and-errors-bring-in-more-money-for-hospi tals\/ http:\/\/www.truth-out.org\/opinion\/item\/22279-william-rivers-pitt-worse-than-the-mob-the-insuran ce-industry-is-organized-crime http:\/\/www.michiganautolaw.com\/blog\/2011\/08\/02\/delay-deny-defend-how-insurance-companies\u00adabuse-customers\/<\/span><\/p>\n

https:\/\/www.propublica.org\/article\/how-denmark-dumped-medical-malpractice-and-improved-pat ient-safety<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Suppression Of Dissent<\/span> <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

https:\/\/www.uow.edu.au\/~bmartin\/dissent\/intro\/DNAleaflet.html<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Blutkitt<\/span> <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Journal Of Law And Criminality<\/em><\/strong> \u201cWar Crimes And Their Motivation\u201d By Leo Alexander Page 300 http:\/\/scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?article=3586&context=jclc&s ei-redir=1&referer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bing.com%2Fsearch%3FFORM%3DINCOH2%26PC %3DIC04%26PTAG%3DICO-a0a9f9e4%26q%3DBlutkitt#search=%22Blutkitt%22<\/span><\/p>\n

http:\/\/www.haciendapub.com\/medicalsentinel\/euthanasia-medical-science-and-road-genocide<\/span><\/p>\n

http:\/\/www.nejm.org\/doi\/full\/10.1056\/NEJM194907142410201<\/span><\/p>\n

Human Subject Experimentation<\/em><\/strong> \u00a0\u00a0http:\/\/slideplayer.com\/slide\/7709112\/ <\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

My Internet Articles<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

http:\/\/www.sepsis.org\/faces\/elizabeth-labozetta\/ http:\/\/lifewithnogallbladder.com\/article\/is-laparoscopic-cholecystectomy-lc-the-largest-health-con sumer-medical-fraud-a-lc-injury-findings\/ http:\/\/www.curezone.org\/forums\/fm.asp?i=67192<\/span><\/p>\n

http:\/\/www.sweetliberty.org\/issues\/hate\/managed_healthcare.htm <\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Biography<\/span> <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cOncoming death is terrible enough, but worse still is oncoming death with time to spare, time in which all the happiness that was yours and all the happiness that might have been yours becomes clear to you. You see with utter lucidity all that you are losing. The sight brings on an oppressive sadness that no car about to hit you or water about to drown you can match. The feeling is truly unbearable.\u201d pages 147-148 \u201cThe Life Of Pi\u201d by Yann Martel<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 I am a 62-year old housewife, who lives in Columbus, Ohio\u2013the organized crime capital of the mid-west, who did not get to finish her college degree in Advertizing Design at the Columbus College Of Art And Design due to a botched, unnecessary laparoscopic gallbladder surgery back in its introductory phase and a deliberately ignored, hospital-acquired staph infection.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 When I was injured I was a 37-year-old stay-at-home wife and mother to three children and\u00a0 a part-time college student working slowly on my degree. Life was good. I had plans and a bright future ahead of me\u2013until someone(s) else wanted something from me they were not entitled to and hijacked my life in service to their own enrichment\u2013done to me, and thousands just like me.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 There was a whole community of surgeons to be trained at once, in the introductory phase of laparoscopic gallbladder surgery, and too few valid gallbladder disease cases to go around for all to train on\u2013so they made some–and were grabbing up every warm body they could con onto the teaching hospital\/training mill\u2019s operating room tables.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 I fit two of their \u201cexpendable\u201d profiles: housewife and \u201cclub\u201d outsider.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 After the inevitable injuries occurred, and I was infected with hospital-acquired coaglase\u00adnegative staph (that was deliberately ignored and allowed to blow through my body and permanently damage my liver, heart, spleen, and kidneys) I received that special \u201ceducation I never wanted\u201d about the secret, hidden, dark side of medicine, law, law enforcement, and government. My husband and I ended up financially enslaved to the very ones who put me here and keeps me here.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 I knew something was terribly wrong with the strange lack of interest and intervention when symptoms began to appear immediately after surgery and no doctor would accept me as a patient.<\/span><\/p>\n

Emergency rooms routinely turned me away\u2013even the ones out of town. But I couldn\u2019t quite put my finger on it. The doctors kept saying: \u201cI don\u2019t want to get involved\u201d but would never say involved in what, exactly.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Because I couldn\u2019t get a response to my increasing symptoms I decided I\u2019d have to help myself and began researching at the public library and medical libraries.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 About two years after my injury I placed an ad in our local newspaper hoping to find others suffering after gallbladder surgery and got a response I never could have imagined: hundreds poured out, even people from other states whose Ohio friends or relatives saw my ad and contacted them. Then came thousands. We exchanged detail of our experiences\u2013and then I knew. Some of us started researching and exchanged what we\u2019d uncovered\u2013and what we uncovered is an atrocity of holocaust proportions and unfathomable viciousness.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 The \u201cdevil\u201d truly IS in the detail.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 We were all getting the same strange lack of interest and response to our miserable and increasing symptoms. We had all been sent in referral to the same local gastroenterologists who told each one of us the same SCRIPTED lies and inflicted the same vicious verbal abuse and psychological battery: \u201cYou are the ONLY ONE complaining after that surgery! NOBODY else is claiming to have the problems you say you are having! I think you are just a hypochondriac, attention-seeker, drug-seeker, liar…! You probably did this to yourself. In any case, your symptoms just aren\u2019t possible and don\u2019t make sense.\u201d All carefully scripted lies\u2013designed to stonewall us past the point of no return and allow us to die off deliberately untreated. Monsters…<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 And then the news program PrimeTime Live did a piece on this new surgery about how surgeons were botching it so badly they were creating an enormous load of injury victims in their wake that nobody knew how to fix…and that is when we realized we were in deep trouble: \u201chundreds dead; thousands injured\u201d And what happened to those \u201cthousands injured\u201d in this initial training frenzy? Nobody wants to talk about that. Why? Because the answer is horrifying, shocking in its magnitude: the criminal elite decided it was in their best-interests all around to kill us off by calculated neglect. Only one segment of injury victim would receive an early, proper response: the ones whose cases collapsed while still under the hospital roof and could not be ignored or masqueraded to another cause. With the one-day hospital stay most cases collapse after discharge and would be disposed of by the natural progression of the injury(s) deliberately untreated. That is what happened to me. And to thousands of others.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 There is abundant literature about this atrocity, and its many features, in the medical syndicate\u2019s own trade literature; little was actually hidden.\u00a0 The medical syndicate banked upon the fact most people will not research, or even know where to look to ferret out the necessary\/relevant information\u2013most likely we\u2019d all be dead before we ever knew what hit us anyhow. Their intent was to get rid of us, deliberately untreated, as fast and as cheaply as possible, by calculated neglect. And it almost worked….<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 I am dying, am very ill with all the classic and miserable symptoms of kidney failure and don\u2019t expect to last much longer. My heart and liver are also permanently damaged and the wanton neglect of these injuries has sealed my fate\u2013even if the perpetrators of this crime wanted to reverse what they have done to me at this late date, it can\u2019t be undone. I am locked into a death spiral that cannot be reversed. Their abuses never end…never.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 I recently caught the locals in yet another conspiracy: they were concealing Stage 4 kidney failure that was allowed to progress deliberately untreated past the point of no return, gotten from the kidney damage the deliberately-untreated, hospital-acquired, staph infection caused when I had my botched gallbladder surgery\u2013and the ongoing inflammatory response in my immune system.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0 The bunglers couldn\u2019t even get their own cover-up straight. It was obviously intended that I never find out…one day I\u2019d just drop dead of a heart attack or stroke from toxin buildup and solve their problem for them\u2013but that is going to happen anyhow, whether I know about the cause or not. Providence intervened in my behalf and I managed to acquire proof. Little good it does me now though, at this late date. It only lets me know how depraved the medical syndicate has truly become and how low they have sank in their slavery to greed and corruption. At any point along the way someone, anyone, could have told me the truth and given me the information I needed to slow, halt, or reverse this particular disease with the standard dietary restrictions. But they CHOSE not to…and that choice tells me all I need to know about the ones who did this.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cWe never forgive them whom we have wronged\u201d <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

http:\/\/www.sepsis.org\/faces\/elizabeth-labozetta\/<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Citation:<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

PrimeTime Live<\/strong><\/em><\/span> (transcript) Airdate: 12-16-1993 \u201cToo Good To Be True?\u201d<\/strong><\/em> QUOTE: \u201cBut tonight ABCs Dr. Timothy Johnson is going to tell you something you probably haven\u2019t heard about this technique that hasn\u2019t made the headlines\u2013until now.\u201d \u201cBut there is a darker side to this revolution: surgeons who were inadequately trained, instrument companies who hyped it to the public, and an estimated hundreds who died and thousands who were injured by complications that many believe might have been avoided.\u201d \u201cThe way it was presented was that this was a surgery that offered few complications\u201d \u201cSuddenly surgeons were scrambling to learn this new technique.\u201d \u201cI didn\u2019t know how people were going to screw this up until some people screwed it up\u201d \u201cBut many patients never heard about the potential problems. They only hear about the benefits.\u201d \u201c…how little they say the hospital told them about the risks.\u201d \u201cThey didn\u2019t talk about any complications for this surgery.\u201d \u201c…this brochure, which was offered by the hospital\u2019s public relations department. It says nothing about complications.\u201d \u201cIt\u2019s an illusion created by the company. It is a public demand that has been artificially created. It is a scheme to use the mass media. It is, in fact, advertising.\u201d \u201c…that she had injured my bile duct and that she did not know anyone who could correct it.\u201d \u201cThe problem is that if a hospital doesn\u2019t exert control, there is virtually no other controls over the introduction of new surgery in this country. The FDA does not regulate surgery and we could find just one state that even kept track of complications from this new operation. That leaves very little protection for the patient.\u201d \u201cAnd the patients get perhaps one side of the story.\u201d \u201cWhat I want people to hear is the story of how economic pressures, I think, mainly, contaminated a process, a decision-making process, and because of that safety was compromised.\u201d \u201cUS Surgical decided to use doctor and hospitals to sell its operation to the media.\u201d \u201cNow you can benefit from this public relations effort in your own territory.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

One More Thing…<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 It is hard to end this kind of book. There seems to always be \u201cone more thing\u201d. My last comment is a reminder that these professionals are not in the business of doing favors. It IS a business. They are offering a service for pay just like any other business\u2013and it is pay at top-dollar.\u00a0 They should be held to the same standards that every other business is held to in the areas of regulation and the law.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 What OTHER business\/industry would be allowed to get away with this level of corruption, collusion, abusive behaviors, and depravity right up to the point of wantonly taking lives to use up for their own enrichment?<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 And then go so far as to BILL their targets for the \u201cservice\u201d?<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 And after-the-fact go so far as to clap liens on their targets if they can\u2019t, or won\u2019t, pay up? And collude to block their victim\u2019s access to relief through their legal system at the same time they, themselves, maintain full access, unencumbered, keeping their ability to sue US, and even punish us, through their \u201cJust-US\u201d system–for whatever they choose?<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 And sue, or threaten to sue, their victims for speaking out against the abuses that have been inflicted?<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 The system isn\u2019t broken; it was built this way.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 People should not be forced to bankroll their own murder. Nor be penalized if they don\u2019t or won\u2019t.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Taking Lives (Part Four)   Law Enforcement \u00a0\u00a0 This answers a question I am often asked about taking the issues […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-1184","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"yoast_head":"\nTaking Lives Pt 4 - R. Cameron Bryce<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/taking-lives-pt-4\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Taking Lives Pt 4 - R. Cameron Bryce\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Taking Lives (Part Four)   Law Enforcement \u00a0\u00a0 This answers a question I am often asked about taking the issues […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/taking-lives-pt-4\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"R. Cameron Bryce\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-07-15T21:39:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"73 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/taking-lives-pt-4\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/taking-lives-pt-4\/\",\"name\":\"Taking Lives Pt 4 - R. Cameron Bryce\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-07-15T17:59:24+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-15T21:39:37+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/taking-lives-pt-4\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/taking-lives-pt-4\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/taking-lives-pt-4\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Taking Lives Pt 4\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/\",\"name\":\"R. Cameron Bryce\",\"description\":\"Official Author Site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Taking Lives Pt 4 - R. Cameron Bryce","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/taking-lives-pt-4\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Taking Lives Pt 4 - R. Cameron Bryce","og_description":"Taking Lives (Part Four)   Law Enforcement \u00a0\u00a0 This answers a question I am often asked about taking the issues […]","og_url":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/taking-lives-pt-4\/","og_site_name":"R. Cameron Bryce","article_modified_time":"2018-07-15T21:39:37+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"73 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/taking-lives-pt-4\/","url":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/taking-lives-pt-4\/","name":"Taking Lives Pt 4 - R. Cameron Bryce","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-07-15T17:59:24+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-15T21:39:37+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/taking-lives-pt-4\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/taking-lives-pt-4\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/taking-lives-pt-4\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Taking Lives Pt 4"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/","name":"R. Cameron Bryce","description":"Official Author Site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1184","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1184"}],"version-history":[{"count":17,"href":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1184\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1207,"href":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1184\/revisions\/1207"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1184"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}