{"id":1171,"date":"2018-07-14T15:53:48","date_gmt":"2018-07-14T20:53:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.brycepublications.com\/RCB\/?page_id=1171"},"modified":"2018-07-15T13:22:55","modified_gmt":"2018-07-15T18:22:55","slug":"taking-lives-pt-3","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/taking-lives-pt-3\/","title":{"rendered":"Taking Lives Pt 3"},"content":{"rendered":"

Taking Lives<\/span>
\n(Part Three)<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

Blutkitt<\/span>
\n<\/em><\/strong>Blutkitt is a German word meaning \u201cblood cement\u201d<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cB____ E___\u2019s ilk want power so badly that at some point in their lives they make a conscious choice to embrace evil. It\u2019s not a gradual seduction. They do it without reservation, and that\u2019s when they leave the rest of us. You know it when it happens, too. No amount of cosmetic surgery can mask the psychological deformity in their eyes.\u201d James Lee Burke, page 367, of \u201cA Stained White Radiance\u201d<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n

\u201cWe Never Forgive Them Whom We Have Wronged\u201d by unknown<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\u201cThis planet is run by crazy people. Remember what they have to do to get where they are.\u201d Carl Sagan in his book \u201cCONTACT\u201d<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n

*****************************************<\/span><\/p>\n

http:\/\/www.nizkor.org\/hweb\/people\/e\/eichmann-adolf\/transcripts\/Sessions\/Session-106-05.html<\/a> :<\/span><\/p>\n

From the transcripts of the Adolf Eichmann Trial:<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n

Q: At that time did you ever hear the term Blutkitt – \u2018blood cement’?<\/span><\/p>\n

A: Yes, definitely, Blutkitt became a familiar phrase. I would put it this way – the other words, the other play on words, “blood cements.”<\/span><\/p>\n

Q: What does that mean?<\/span><\/p>\n

A: Having the same blood makes a link between people.<\/span><\/p>\n

Q: I see. Did it also have another meaning?<\/span><\/p>\n

A: It was also used in terms of descent, for example in the Waffen-SS divisions, where the so-called Germanic…it was used… I must just think about this…<\/span><\/p>\n

Q: No, that is not what I mean. Did Blutkitt mean: Blood shed together acts as a cement?<\/span><\/p>\n

A: No, I did not understand it to mean that, but that common blood acts as cement.<\/span><\/p>\n

Q: No, no. What I mean by Blutkitt can be expressed as follows, for example: “We are all in the same boat, and no one is allowed to alight; if anyone wants to turn his back on me, I will force him to become an accomplice, so that there is no turning back for him.”<\/span><\/p>\n

A: Linguistically that is correct, this term would readily fit here, but I have never heard it in this form.<\/span><\/p>\n

Q: Well, I can tell you that at that time this was not a rare occurrence. And I shall read this out here from Wisliceny’s report (T\/84), where he says that your principle (Eichmann’s principle), “that his principle, he once told me to my face in Hungary in the course of a heated discussion.” And then it says: “We are all in the same boat, and no one is allowed to alight; if anyone wants to turn his back on me, I will force him to become an accomplice, so that there is no turning back for him.”<\/span><\/p>\n

A: About this, I have said that in fact…that it is not my way to deal with my people in such a dictatorial and aggressive fashion. I also have no recollection of having said anything like this.<\/span><\/p>\n

Q: Very well, that will do. This sentence I read out to you…<\/span><\/p>\n

A: Yes.<\/span><\/p>\n

Q: …comes at the end of two previous sentences, which read: “Eichmann’s principle in his staff policy was never to release anyone who had once worked in his Section for another job. Even volunteering for the army or the Waffen- SS he refused as a matter of principle.” And then comes this sentence. What do you have to say about this?<\/span><\/p>\n

A: I would like to say about this…<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

http:\/\/www.humanitas-international.org\/showcase\/chronography\/glossary\/glossary.html<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

Blutkitt (Blood Cement): Hitler’s concept of bonding through shared atrocities and horrible experiences. Probably derived from the writings of Michael Prawdin and his two books on Genghis Khan.<\/span><\/p>\n

(Link Broken)<\/span><\/p>\n

“Medical sciences in Nazi Germany<\/span><\/em><\/strong>,” Dr. Alexander writes, “collaborated with this Hegelian trend [“rational utility”] particularly in the following enterprises: the mass extermination of the chronically sick in the interest of saving ‘useless’ expenses to the community as a whole; the mass extermination of those considered socially disturbing or racially and ideologically unwanted; the individual, inconspicuous extermination of those considered disloyal with the ruling group; and the ruthless use of ‘human experimental material’ for medico-military research.”(3)<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0 Organizations with humanitarian-sounding names were immediately set up to execute “health” programs, again, under deceptively, euphemistic terms.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 What these examples illustrate is an age-old method used by inimical elements, in this case the SS, of consciously and methodically making suspects of disloyalty clear themselves by participating in a crime that will definitely and irrevocably link them to the organization. The SS called this process of reinforcement of group cohesion “Blutkitt” (blood cement). It is important to note that Dr. Alexander opined that ideologically conditioned crimes against humanity may be motivated not just by perversity, but by cowardice and fear, especially fear of punishment or of ostracism by the group.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 There can be no doubt that in a subtle way the Hegelian premise of ‘what is useful is right’ has infected society, including the medical portion.<\/span><\/p>\n

http:\/\/www.ninehundred.net\/control\/mc-ch6.html<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 The SS soldiers called this the magic action of the “Blutkitt,” the tie of bloody crime binding them together and preparing them for Valhalla.<\/span><\/p>\n

(Link Broken)<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 1938 The SS Training Office orders a specially revised and expanded, one-volume edition of Michael Prawdin’s two books on Genghis Khan (See 1934, 1935). This book was frequently given as a Christmas present by Himmler and every SS leader received a copy. Hitler is said to have derived his ideas concerning Blutkitt (blood cement) from this source.<\/span><\/p>\n

(Link Broken)<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 He had solidified his relationship to his Auschwitz group by means of what was called ‘blood cement’ (Blutkitt), meaning direct participation in the group’s practice of killing…In that way the Auschwitz self was ‘baptized’ by passing the test for ‘hardness’…Selections also provide a ritual drama. Whether the Auschwitz self entered into that drama with integrated \u00e9lan (as in the case of Mengele) or with hesitation and conflict (as in the case of many others), participation in that ‘cultural performance’ tended to absorb anxieties and doubts and fuse individual actions with prevailing (Nazi) concepts, as does ritual performance in general. Here Auschwitz epitomized the overall Nazi preoccupation with ritual, much of it having to do with healing and killing…The healing-killing paradox so dominated Auschwitz as to create a world of selections.<\/span><\/p>\n

http:\/\/www.whatreallyhappened.com\/RANCHO\/LIE\/prwar.html<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cDeforming Consent: The Public Relation Industry\u2019s Secret War On Activists<\/span><\/strong><\/em>\u201d by John Stauber and Sheldon Rampton<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cActivists, he explained, fall into four categories: radicals, opportunists, idealists, and realists. He follows a three-step strategy to neutralize them: 1) isolate the radicals; 2) “cultivate” the idealists and “educate” them into becoming realists; then 3) co-opt the realists into agreeing with industry.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cOpportunists and realists, says Duchin, are easier to manipulate. Opportunists engage in activism seeking “visibility, power, followers and, perhaps, even employment….The key to dealing with [them] is to provide them with at least the perception of a partial victory.” And realists are able to “live with trade-offs; willing to work within the system; not interested in radical change; pragmatic. [They] should always receive the highest priority in any strategy dealing with a public policy issue…. If your industry can successfully bring about these relationships, the credibility of the radicals will be lost and opportunists can be counted on to share in the final policy solution.”<\/span><\/p>\n

http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/2013\/04\/24\/psychopath-brain-hardwiring-concern-for-others_n_3 149856.html<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

https:\/\/ir.canterbury.ac.nz\/bitstream\/handle\/10092\/5458\/MichaelRichardson-MScThesis.pdf;seque nce=1<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

New England Journal Of Medicine<\/span><\/em><\/strong> http:\/\/www.nejm.org\/doi\/full\/10.1056\/NEJM194907142410201<\/a> \u201cMedicine Under Dictatorship\u201d by Leo Alexander MD<\/span><\/p>\n

http:\/\/www.jpands.org\/hacienda\/article28.html<\/a> \u201cEuthanasia, Medical Science, And The Road To Genocide<\/strong><\/em><\/span>\u201d By: Miguel A, Faria Jr., MD<\/span><\/p>\n

MSNBC<\/strong><\/em><\/span> 2-27-2011 \u201cUgly Past Of U.S. Human Experiments Uncovered\u201d QUOTE:<\/span><\/p>\n

U.S. officials also acknowledged there had been dozens of similar experiments in the United States\u2013studies that often involved making healthy people sick.\u201d \u201cAt best, these were a search for lifesaving treatments; at worst, some amounted to curiosity-satisfying experiments that hurt people but provided no useful results.\u201d \u201cThese studies were worse in at least one respect\u2013they violated the concept of \u201cfirst do no harm, a fundamental medical principle that stretches back centuries\u201d \u201cWhen you give somebody a disease\u2013even by the standards of their time\u2013you really cross the key ethical norm of the profession, said Arthur Caplan, director of the University Of Pennsylvania\u2019s Center For Bioethics.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Club<\/span> <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Shakespeare\u2019s KING LEAR Act 3 Scene 4 \u201cThe Prince Of Darkness is a gentleman.\u201d
\n<\/strong><\/em><\/span>\u201cEveryone to whom much was given, much will be demanded…\u201d Luke 12:48<\/span> <\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Here is what we do not know and we are not supposed to know: <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Like I said before, the lawyers are \u201cofficers of the court\u201d and have taken a loyalty oath to the judicial branch of the seated fiat government; they will never be working for you because their first loyalty lies elsewhere. Their job is to protect the other \u201cclub members\u201d FROM US and from the consequences of their \u201cclub\u2019s\u201d criminal activity and misbehavior inflicted upon US, protect each other and themselves from the \u201coutsiders\u201d they parasitize: WE ARE THE OUTSIDERS. Get it? Their job is to make sure ALL \u201cclub member\u201d dirty-work goes unpunished and their victims continue to be forced to carry the whole burden for all—unchallenged and unrelieved.\u00a0 This has nothing to do with truth, merit, or justice—it is all about creating and maintaining control. It has to do with the parasitic, criminal, power-elite keeping its host-body under control and producing for their collective benefit and enrichment. If you are an \u201coutsider\u201d to this seated, fiat, government and its self-serving systems, and have been tagged \u201clow priority\u201d in its databases, you will not be able to get real justice of any kind anywhere when going up against its membership—not for love nor money.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 The \u201cclub\u201d protects itself and its membership; the lawyers are in this \u201cclub\u201d, are seated in the topmost positions, and we are not and never will be. They have their job serving the whole club-\u00adand the doctors, government officials, agencies, law enforcement, and such have their particular jobs working to protect and maintain the best-interests of the whole. All work seamlessly together to serve just one segment of society: theirs. And only theirs. That is the way it is.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Once we understand this we will see the lawyers (and their cohorts) for what they really are.<\/span><\/p>\n

The doctors themselves often own stock in our health insurance companies (who often own the hospitals too) and they can own outright, or own stock in, or own the controlling stock in, their own malpractice insurance company. At one time the Ohio State Medical Association owned the controlling stock in PICO, the second-largest medical malpractice insurance company in Ohio. (it is now the largest with the demise of PIE.) There is a new malpractice insurance company in Ohio owned by doctors. When the doctors own stock in our health insurance companies and own stock in, or own outright,\u00a0 their malpractice insurance companies the financial incentives to hide\/bury victim\u2019s injury cases are clear. (and remember: the doctors have to keep the \u201cthree strikes\u201d from building against their names too) And what if the principals of the law firms who specialize in medical malpractice also own stock in the doctors malpractice insurance companies and our health insurance companies? WHO will always come up on the short end of a deal like that when money is the motivator? (HINT: it is not them) Everyone in the \u201cclub\u201d has their hands in each other\u2019s pockets, have more than one incentive to do whatever necessary to protect each other\u2019s interests.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 What kind of access to justice, relief, protection, or ethical health care can we realistically expect from people who own the companies responsible for paying out their own victim\u2019s claims? When the same people who injure us are the same people who are expected to pay out claims for the injuries they have created, the conflict-of-interest is overwhelming. Get it?<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Doctors and lawyers (tagged \u201chigh priority\u201d patients) have a hidden agreement that goes something like this: the doctors will not use the lawyers and their family members (or any \u201cclub member\u201d whatever their area of specialization—also tagged \u201chigh priority\u201d in their centralized computer databases) for dangerous student surgery training, covert medical experimentation, drug testing, device testing, student training and other such violations foisted upon those tagged \u201clow priority\u201d outsiders. The lawyers and their families will get the very best care possible at the highest levels of excellence available. In exchange for this consideration, the lawyers will protect the medical community from the natural consequences of its vast array of institutionalized criminal activity and human rights violations, will aggressively help hide its most heinous secrets.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 What are the medical syndicate\u2019s\u00a0 most heinous secrets? Covert medical experimentation and device testing without informed consent. Pelvic and rectal exam practice by groups of green students on anesthetized men and women in the operating room without informed consent.<\/span><\/p>\n

Dangerous surgery performed solely for student training or experimental purposes and all the criminal activity that goes with hiding this kind of crime and subduing those injured by it, deliberately infecting people to sicken them then skimming off a targeted population to use up training unneeded surgery on, getting consent for one surgery then performing another surgery instead (or concurrently) simply for experimental or training purposes (people going in for another surgery often wake up to find their gallbladder has been removed without prior permission: the teaching hospital has students to train and just help themselves), hiding medical records, falsifying medical records, denying necessary medical intervention injury victims need to halt progression of their doctor-caused injury because the cover-up protocols come first, running injury victims through a gauntlet of expensive, painful, and dangerous medical testing done solely to stall\/stonewall and plunder the targeted victim\u2019s assets,\u00a0 the murder of the victims who become inconvenient embarrassments or whose injury will cost too much money to fix and\/or maintain.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Those who do not follow \u201cclub rules\u201d to the letter are incrementally punished by the \u201cclub\u201d: the doctors who step out of line are routinely punished with all referrals being cut off. In a city like this one, without referrals from other doctors, a thriving practice can quickly die out. On the other hand, the most reliable \u201cteam-player club members\u201d get rewarded with the most referrals and get the opportunity to become filthy rich. The lawyers who do not follow \u201cclub rules\u201d to the letter are cut off receiving preferential treatment by the medical profession and cut off the perks and benefits particular to the legal profession. Any \u201cclub member\u201d who breaks \u201cclub\u201d rules is demoted from \u201chigh priority\u201d status down to \u201clow priority\u201d status; them and their whole families are removed from all the perks and benefits associated with that \u201chigh priority\u201d label.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 In short, these pigs and their piglets will lose their place at the trough. Each community has a selection of first-rate doctors who care for the \u201chigh priority\u201d criminal elite and their families. By contrast, each community also has a selection of doctors who are first-line referrals for all the injury victims created, crossing all areas of specialization: radiologists (who can be trusted to tamper with x-ray films and written reports), gastroenterologists (who will lie, withhold intervention, and verbally abuse without conscience), testing laboratories who have policy and procedure to support \u201cfinding nothing but normal values\u201d when results are anything but normal, psychiatrists who will dig out injury victim\u2019s weaknesses and attack those areas hoping to break the uncontrollable victim down and render them less of a threat to the \u201cclub members\u201d parasite\u2019s paradise, and so on.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 The doctors who are selected by their peers to perform this dirty-work in service to the medical syndicate are especially low-grade sociopaths with a mental pathology that revels in the suffering they can inflict on others: in short, they enjoy abusing people, get off on it. They really like their work in a way that just isn\u2019t human. That is why they have been singled out and recruited for the job. It takes a particular kind of person to perform this nasty service to the medical syndicate because normal people recoil from, and are emotionally damaged by, those particular behaviors.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

But not the doctors selected for this service; they enjoy the work—some so much so that they can hardly contain themselves. (one of the local gastroenterologists injury victims are routinely referred to after injury at gallbladder surgery is bent in that direction: this sadistic monster, when abusing patients for profit, lights up like a child on Christmas morning, can hardly contain his joy, grins like an idiot and is very cartoonish in his whole demeanor when in the middle of a patient-abuse session: his specialty is abusing women. His senior partner is the same. I used to wonder what kept them from jumping up and down and clapping with glee at times…disgusting, vicious, pig-men) Could it get any better for them than being actually encouraged to freely practice their perversion and getting paid for it too? The doctors recruited for this dirty-work are the very worst of the worst. Unlike normal people, who recoil from abusing and deliberately damaging others, these sadistic monsters thrive on it, have deficient, depraved personality flaws that allow them to cross boundaries with no conscience whatsoever—they are extremely dangerous and best avoided. If they feel they have to kill you to get their way, they will do it. Without hesitation. They WILL criminally reverse the standard of care, will not hesitate to improperly perform dangerous invasive procedures, have no qualms prescribing the wrong drugs, or two drugs in deadly combination, deliberately prescribe drugs known and charted as allergy-alerts, will wantonly withhold antibiotics…<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 It is useless to plead with them, cry, or any number of common victim behaviors reflexively done in response to the abuses heaped on by these sadistic monsters: it only feeds their sickness and rewards them.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 There is a saying that goes something like this: \u201cthe strong take from the weak but the smart take from the strong.\u201d Why is it always about \u201ctaking from\u201d? That is how a parasite\u2019s mind works: take. Not produce. Not earn. Not work for. Just take. Let others do the donkey-work then conspire to wiggle away the fruits of their labors by whatever means possible. Whatever happened to evolving into mature, responsible, self-sufficient, ethical adults who earn their own way in life and working for what they want, doing for themselves and \u201ctaking\u201d from NO ONE, standing on their own two feet like mature adults and keeping their hooks to themselves and off others? Our biggest mistake in dealing with these parasites is that we are applying normal values to people who are anything but normal.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 One thing \u201cclub\u201d absolutely will not tolerate is one segment stealing from another segment. Most of the cases that actually get prosecuted in their courts, and are put up for display to the public in their content-controlled media outlets, have one thing in common: someone committed an unauthorized theft of some kind, usually from Medicare or Medicaid\u2013or some other such coffer under \u201cclub\u201d control. The interesting feature in all of these cases where people suffered actual harm is that NOTHING is done for, or given back to, the ones actually harmed! Fines are imposed, sometimes the thieves are sent to prison…but that does nothing for the PEOPLE who suffered the actual harm and losses.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Citation:<\/span> <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

United States Department Of Justice<\/strong><\/em><\/span> 5-21-2010 \u201cThe Health Alliance of Greater Cincinnati and the Christ Hospital to Pay $108 Million for Violating Anti-Kickback Statute and Defrauding Medicare and Medicaid\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

https:\/\/www.justice.gov\/opa\/pr\/health-alliance-greater-cincinnati-and-christ-hospital-pay-108-million-violating-anti<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

“10 Big Anti-Kickback Cases Involving Hospitals in 2010,” <\/span><\/em><\/strong>Written by Jaimie Oh | January 26, 2011 http:\/\/www.beckersasc.com\/stark-act-and-fraud-abuse-issues\/10-big-anti-kickback-cases-involvin g-hospitals-in-2010.html<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

United States Department Of Justice<\/em><\/strong><\/span> 3-1-2016 \u201cMedical Device Company Will Pay $646 Million For Making Illegal Payments To Doctors And Hospitals In United States And Latin America\u201d https:\/\/www.justice.gov\/usao-nj\/pr\/medical-device-company-will-pay-646-million-making-illegal\u00adpayments-doctors-and-hospital<\/a>s<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cHospitals to pay $118 million on accusations of paying doctors for referring patients\u201d<\/strong><\/em><\/span> By: Carrie Teegardin 9-22- 2015 http:\/\/investigations.blog.ajc.com\/2015\/09\/21\/adventist-health-to-pay-118-7-million-to-settle-whis tleblower-suits\/<\/a> QUOTE: \u201c\u201cPatients are entitled to be sure that the care they receive is based on their actual medical needs rather than the financial interests of their physician.\u201d <\/span>http:\/\/www.democraticunderground.com\/1002747716 <\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\u201cThe best apology is changed behavior\u201d <\/span><\/strong><\/em>Author Unknown<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Suicides and Murders<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 I have a large file of cases I have collected about doctors, and other medical professionals, killing their annoying, or unwanted, spouses or domestic partners.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 The interesting part in all of this, from an observation standpoint, is how this freedom to kill in the workplace has unexpectedly extended into the \u201cclub member\u2019s\u201d private lives and is no longer contained to the workplace anymore: in recent years many stories have been featured in the mainstream media about doctors and nurses killing off their troublesome, unwanted spouses: instead of divorcing them they just kill them to get rid of them. In July of 2000 these killings became such a problem in Massachusetts that it caught the attention of the Massachusetts Medical Society and inspired them to sent out information packets to the state\u2019s physicians listing resources to help them by offering free, confidential counseling!<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 The boundary between killing in the workplace (and being allowed to get away with it) and killing at home has gotten unclear from extensive exposure to it and now certain individuals cannot differentiate as well between the two: at work they freely kill anyone who irritates them or gets in their way, is costing the health insurer too much, etcetera. There are no real consequences to these workplace kills anyway\u2013their colleagues help hide their crimes and protect them from consequences.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Their programming and protected experiences have become so entrenched in their minds and hearts that they are carrying the resultant attitude home with them–and when the spouse begins presenting with the same irritants and barriers to the instant gratification and blind obedience\u00a0 they have come to expect they automatically respond, knee-jerk, with what they have been conditioned with and move forward to correct the irritant just like in the workplace: give the irritant a nice stiff dose of Pavulon, potassium chloride, or poison of another kind, drown them, etc. and simply kill them off. Problem solved, irritant removed.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 But, unlike the freedoms and protections granted to kill in the workplace, these freedoms and protections do not always extend to the home life and many are shocked and surprised to find themselves called to account and are arrested, charged, and prosecuted for the crime they have committed outside the work environment.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Citation: <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

The Columbus Dispatch<\/span><\/strong><\/em> July 21, 2000 \u201c3 Killings Spur Group To Send Counseling Advice To Doctors\u201d By Lisa Lipman, Associated Press<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 There has also been an upswing in the number of medical students and doctors committing suicide. Not everyone has the native capacity to witness and endure the constant exposure to the horrors, abuses, and terrible insider knowledge New Medicine and its utilitarian ethic has imposed in recent decades. Not everyone can perform to the inhumane cost-saving demands of the insurance industry. Only the ones who can turn off thinking for themselves, feeling for others, and can be bent to perform to the dictates and will of the criminal elite already established can, and will, be allowed to prosper and flourish under the current regime.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 The pressure to conform is overwhelming to the ones who can\u2019t let go of their own conscience and give themselves over to programming, rote-response conditioning, and micro-managing by corrupt others. They see too much, hear too much, know too much—and can\u2019t live with what they have come to see, hear, and know.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Citations: <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

http:\/\/www.thedailybeast.com\/articles\/2015\/03\/23\/american-doctors-are-killing-themselves-and-n o-one-is-talking-about-it.html<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

Why Doctors Kill Themselves<\/a>
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

While there are many articles written about physician suicide and the presented reasons for it, almost nothing is written about medical harm victims being deliberately driven to suicide by the medical syndicate.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Four of my associates were methodically driven to suicide after suffering a medical malpractice event. All four were psychologically battered to death by the medical syndicate and its brutal, sociopathically inhumane, cover-up program\u2013as outlined in this book. Their death certificates say \u201csuicide\u201d but in reality they were murdered by a concentrated, unified effort to break them down. And it worked. Some people cannot withstand that level, and intensity, of psychological abuse.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 One woman\u2019s story, my friend Lucille Iacovelli, was (is) featured in an HBO documentary called \u201cPlastic Disasters\u201d. She sent me a copy for review.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 What stood out to me is how she went from doctor to doctor trying to find help and was turned away without treatment or answers every single place she went\u2013and they all knew what her real problem was and didn\u2019t tell her: nerve damage. Not fixable. The last doctor she saw strongly hinted at it, on camera, after she left his office so discouraged at yet another wasted hope. What caught my attention, while this doctor was speaking to the camera out of her presence, was the smirk on his face. That particular expression, under that particular kind of circumstance, has a name: DUPING DELIGHT.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0 Medical malpractice victims become all too familiar with this physical phenomenon, that tell-take smirk; the ones delivering the programmed-in lies absolutely cannot control it. We would all do well to study this phenomenon so we can recognize, and correctly respond to, it and the person inflicting it. We can save ourselves a load of angst and self-blame when we know what kind of people we are really dealing with.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 In my many years of exposure, I came to notice something very, very interesting\u2013and telling-\u00adabout these people: their eyes. They ALL had the same expression in their eyes: cold, hard, flat. Predatory. These people can control what they say and do with their intent to deceive but they cannot control the expression in their eyes.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 My friend Lucille committed suicide August 2, 2010, not long after the documentary was made. If she was told the truth she might have found the strength to cope and focus effort on learning as much as possible about her true condition in order to seek appropriate relief.<\/span><\/p>\n

Citations: (duping delight examples) https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=P_6vDLq64gE https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=pni_kDv9BsU<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

The Bible: Isaiah 3:9<\/strong><\/em> and John 3:20<\/strong><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The Painful Truth: <\/em><\/strong><\/span>The ORDER FOLLOWER always bears more moral culpability than the order-giver, because the order-follower is the one who actually performed the action, and in taking such action, actually brought the resultant harm into physical manifestation. Order-following is the pathway to every form of evil and chaos in our world. It should never be seen as a \u201cvirtue\u201d by anyone who considers themselves a moral human being. Order followers have ultimately been personally responsible for every form of slavery and every single totalitarian regime that has ever existed on the face of the earth.<\/strong><\/em><\/span> \u00a0Author Unknown<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Medical Boards<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 The Medical Boards are NOT what we have been led to believe they are and can inflict their own form of punishments to doctors who will not follow \u201cclub\u201d rules. Trumped-up drug charges are a huge favorite here and elsewhere. (sex charges are second to that.) Why? Because drug charges have federal implications. As \u201cclub member insiders\u201d, the doctors just know too much and know local or state charges cannot hold them—and exactly why not. (the detail is too complicated to get into here) Ever notice how the Medical Boards take little-to-no interest in doctors abusing and killing patients? How the only cases they will actively respond to are drug and sex cases? You might want to consider why…<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 In my early trust and ignorance I was uneducated enough to believe I could go to the State Medical Board for resolution of my surgeon\u2019s very obvious, heavily recorded, criminal activity and myriad abuses. (we can trust the Medical Board, right?) Boy was I wrong! I was given an appointment with a top-level staff member and she asked me to sit down and discuss my case detail with her. I had\u00a0 brought in medical records for \u201cshow-and-tell\u201d, of course, not knowing any better at this early stage of my ordeal.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 The things that were the most incriminating pieces of evidence, the things that corrupt woman took the most interest in, \u201cdisappeared\u201d after she asked to take my material into another room for copying: out of my sight she had carefully picked through the stack I had given her \u201cto copy for their files\u201d and each piece she had remarked on as concrete evidence in my presence earlier was removed\/stolen. I did not notice this theft until after I arrived back home and was unloading the box for re-filing. Good thing I had brought in only copies of the originals, eh? That crooked monster did not get what she believed she had stolen! Ha! And I phoned her immediately to tell her so. She was really angry. Too bad, huh? Nice try though; better luck next time! But there isn\u2019t going to be a next time now that I know the truth about the crooked Medical Board staff.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Can we trust the Medical Boards? Absolutely not! They are not working for us. We are outsiders, not \u201cclub members\u201d. Their job, just like that of the lawyers, is to protect the other \u201cclub members\u201d from US. It is one huge set-up and con-game. Like the lawyers, they will steal evidence if they can and the only reason they are allowing you into their offices at all is to see with their own eyes exactly what evidence you have on the \u201cclub member\u201d doctors so they can pass that information along to the most interested parties. And if they can manage to steal our evidence while we are there, well, they will. They are not interested in the misbehavior or criminal activity of the doctors and never will be; we are wasting our time. And, if asked, they will freely tell us, point-blank, that they do not, ever, pursue cases brought to them by anyone but doctors or law enforcement! So WHY do they bother to give the common person appointments at all? To collect information from us, that\u2019s why! NOT to see what harm the doctors are doing to us (because they already know) but rather to see what WE are up to and what concrete material we have collected on the doctors! Get it?! Nobody seems to notice that however many complaints they get the crooked Medical Boards NEVER actually act on the cases presented no matter what happens. They will, however, go after the doctors who do not follow the \u201cclub rules\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 What interests me most about this is the methods used by both entities are the same. That would indicate to me that this cover-up and protection \u201cprogram\u201d is taught to ALL \u201cclub members\u201d in a standardized fashion at a central point.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Here\u2019s their excuse:<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 When I asked why they would not pursue my case against my surgeon in spite of the concrete evidence of criminal activity I had provided, I was told something I did not understand at the time\u2013but do now:<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 \u201cWe do not have to pursue anything we don\u2019t want to. We do not owe any duty to any individual.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 On the face of it, this appears to be a facetious remark\u2013but this person was telling the truth, albeit a truth without explanation. So, what is the explanation?<\/span><\/p>\n

The case of Warren Verses The District Of Columbia:<\/span><\/p>\n

Warren v. District of Columbia is an oft-quoted District of Columbia Court of Appeals case that held that the police do not owe a specific duty to provide police services to individual citizens based upon the public duty doctrine.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 The public duty doctrine extends to agencies such as the state medical boards. They really DON\u2019T \u201chave to\u201d investigate or call to account ANY case any outsider brings to them no matter the content, however criminal or meritorious. Get it?<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The Law And The Greater Good,\u00a0<\/em><\/strong> https:\/\/thereasonablelady.wordpress.com\/2014\/06\/29\/the-law-and-the-greater-good\/<\/a> QUOTE: The Law and Utilitarianism There are various cases in which the law and the theory of utilitarianism seem to go hand in hand. Take for example, tort cases with the police such as Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [1989]. The Police do not owe a general duty of care to the individual but to society as a whole. The policy reasons for this decision was clear: the argument that if the police owed a duty of care to the individual then they would not be flooded with claims and therefore not be able to do their duty to society, and therefore they would not be able to do their job for \u201cthe greater good\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n

Columbus Dispatch<\/em><\/strong><\/span> 12-6-1992 \u201cFew Patient Complaints Result In Formal Action\u201d By: Laurie Loscocco QUOTE: \u201cPatient complaints about doctors are much less likely to result in disciplinary action than are complaints from professional sources, an Ohio State University study says.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Controlled-Opposition Camps<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Most, if not all, of the so-called patient\u2019s-rights groups are controlled-opposition camps. The leadership (not the members who usually don\u2019t have a clue about what\/who they are really dealing with) have been courted and groomed by the criminal elite and placed in a leadership position and then funded heavily to keep them there.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 The members come in trusting and naive, looking for affirmation and help. They are not going to get it, not from these people. Their job is to keep the members busy with do-nothing, time-wasting projects and away from activities that would embarrass or expose their handlers and\/or the people their handlers work to protect.<\/span><\/p>\n

One of their jobs is to put out fires. And to quell dissent. Or discredit, character assassinate, or evict the ones they can\u2019t control\u2013the ones who persist in telling the truths nobody is allowed to talk about.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 The leadership of these groups are not direct victims themselves but the parent, child, spouse, or sibling of someone who had been killed by medical malpractice, or has been permanently injured and was granted monetary relief through the \u201cclub\u201d courts as one of the rare, few showcases that are allowed through each year\u2013or was settled out of court. You will never see a direct victim in a leadership position in any patient\u2019s-rights group that is allowed to have media access or is funded by outside sources.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 It is no accident none of the other mainstream \u201chelp agencies\u201d will lift a finger to help or intervene. Those who contact one after another get the same icy response no matter where they go. There is a good reason for that but rather than go into detail here, below I will recommend a book, and an article, that does justice to that topic in the detail it requires.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Citations:<\/span> <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Book: \u201cThe Committee Of 300″<\/span><\/strong><\/em> by John Coleman<\/span><\/p>\n

Article:<\/span> \u201cDeforming Consent: The PR Industry\u2019s Secret War On Activists\u201d<\/strong><\/em><\/span> By: John Stauber and Sheldon Rampton http:\/\/www.whatreallyhappened.com\/RANCHO\/LIE\/prwar.html<\/a> QUOTE: DIVIDE AND CONQUER Ronald Duchin, senior vice-president of another PR spy firm Mongoven, Biscoe, and Duchin would probably have labeled Steinman and Tylczak radicals. A graduate of the US Army War College, Duchin worked as a special assistant to the secretary of defense and director of public affairs for the Veterans of Foreign Wars before becoming a flack. Activists, he explained, fall into four categories: radicals, opportunists, idealists, and realists. He follows a three-step strategy to neutralize them: 1) isolate the radicals; 2) cultivate the idealists and educate them into becoming realists; then 3) co-opt the realists into agreeing with industry. According to Duchin, radical activists:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 “want to change the system; have underlying socio\/political motives and see multinational corporations as inherently evil. These organizations do not trust the\u00a0 federal, state and local governments to protect them and to safeguard the environment. They believe, rather, that individuals and local groups should have direct power over industry. I would categorize their principal aims right now as social justice and political empowerment.” Idealists are also hard to deal with. They want a perfect world and find it easy to brand any product or practice which can be shown to mar that perfection as evil. Because of their intrinsic altruism, however, and because they have nothing perceptible to be gained by holding their position, they are easily believed by both the media and the public, and sometimes even politicians. However, idealists have a vulnerable point. If they can be shown that their position in opposition to an industry or its products causes harm to others and cannot be ethically justified, they are forced to change their position. Thus, while a realist must be negotiated with, an idealist must be educated. Generally this education process requires great sensitivity and understanding on the part of the educator. Opportunists and realists, says Duchin, are easier to manipulate. Opportunists engage in activism seeking visibility, power, followers and, perhaps, even employment. … The key to dealing with them is to provide them with at least the perception of a partial victory. And realists are able to live with trade-offs; willing to work within the system; not interested in radical change; pragmatic. They should always receive the highest priority in any strategy dealing with a public policy issue. … If your industry can successfully bring about these relationships, the credibility of the radicals will be lost and opportunists can be counted on to share in the final policy solution.\u201c \u201cBEST FRIENDS MONEY CAN\u00a0 BUY\u201d Another crude but effective way to derail potentially meddlesome activists is simply to hire them.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

How To Identify Controlled-Opposition Camps and Individual Infiltrators<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

One unexpected detail I never considered when I began my activist work back in the early 1990s (in response to my own injury and the subsequent abuses heaped on me by the medical syndicate and their cohorts) was the intensity with which the \u201cbad guys\u201d would attempt to silence activists and shut down any potentially-effective gathering. They do not want their parasite\u2019s paradise exposed or interfered with; in the current set-up the getting is just too good, is a real gold-mine. I guess I did not expect infiltrators and such because, in my early ignorance, it was difficult to imagine people so depraved and uncaring they\u2019d do ANYTHING for money, position, or power. I received quite an education on human nature real fast. I also learned a person doing my kind of patient\u2019s-rights work will find out who their real friends are and how their coworkers, neighbors, and even family members truly feel about them when money, position, or power has been introduced into the picture to corrupt it.<\/span><\/p>\n

Controlled-Opposition Camps The largest patient\u2019s-rights groups are ALL controlled-opposition camps. Maybe they started out clean but eventually they\u2019ve ALL succumbed to infiltration and takeover by the \u201cclub\u201d. These particular so-called patient\u2019s-rights groups are funded by the ones who need to maintain the status quo to serve their own purposes: trial lawyers, the AMA, etcetera. RED FLAG #1: they get their funding from the ones we should be working against.<\/span><\/p>\n

These groups are the ONLY ones allowed to have mainstream media access of any kind (television, radio, print) and their top-level leadership (hand-selected and placed at the top by the \u201cclub\u201d) are the only ones allowed to speak; we will see and hear the same representatives speaking in the mainstream media over and over again. Why? Because these people can be trusted to speak only the words approved by the \u201cclub\u201d and will discuss only the topics the \u201cclub\u201d will allow in the controlled depth of detail necessary to spark interest in the\u00a0 public mind—but not enough to do any real damage to the \u201cclub\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n

RED FLAG #2: The leadership of these groups are the only ones allowed mainstream media access.<\/span><\/p>\n

The leadership of these groups are NOT actual medical malpractice injury victims themselves; they are the child, spouse, parent, friend, grandchild, etcetera of a direct injury victim but they are NEVER a direct victim themselves. Why? The \u201cclub\u201d cannot allow direct victims in leadership positions and expose the direct victim\u2019s personal ordeal\/experience to public view: the direct injury victim could deteriorate and die right in front of lots of people who\u2019d be watching carefully and the detail of their ordeal would be exposed every step of the way. Other victims would be exposed to the suffering and the pain, the standardized abuses, and the details of the criminal activity and catch onto their own reality quicker. When the \u201cclub\u201d goal is to squelch dissent and prevent active response it would be disastrous to their cause to allow direct victims leadership positions. The leadership, never being direct injury victims themselves, trade on the information of their loved one\u2019s case material—someone who is usually dead from the malpractice event and cannot speak for themselves. (But not always dead, sometimes permanently injured.) Direct injury victims are usually ill and poor, not in the best physical or financially-stable condition to work a leadership role. The leadership of these groups, whose loved one was the actual injury victim, usually has another feature in common: the cases have already been finalized as one of the content-controlled \u201cshowcases\u201d in the legal system and has been settled or gone to trial accordingly: there is nothing more the \u201cclub\u201d can offer them through legal channels. RED FLAG #3: The leadership are NOT direct injury victims, do not have the same level of urgency, motivation, intensity and focus direct victims would have.<\/span><\/p>\n

The leadership of these groups push the AMA’s standardized propaganda message of: \u201cerrors, mistakes, and system failure\u201d at every turn, chant it over and over in response to just about everything that comes up. \u201cNo INDIVIDUAL is responsible for anything that has happened to a patient; it is a failure of the whole medical system!\u201d and \u201cdoctors do not commit deliberate acts that damage patients; they make mistakes, commit errors!\u201d The buzzword \u201cERROR\u201d is a huge \u201cred flag\u201d; if someone is sticking exclusively to the word \u201cerror\u201d we will know who they are really working for and whose best-interests they are actually protecting. The \u201cclub\u201d goal is to implant into the public mind the notion that the responsibility for anything that goes wrong actually covers such a vast area (the WHOLE system) that accountability is impossible to assign or determine under such circumstances. Who can we hold accountable when a whole community has colluded to commit a crime? They have to inflate our opponent so large as to be impenetrable. Otherwise, we\u2019d focus and move forward with purpose. If a single doctor or hospital is not responsible for whatever went wrong in our case, then WHO is? The whole system. The whole system does not have a name or a face so WHO can we be upset with? WHO can we expect restoration from? Nobody. That is how the \u201cclub\u201d wants us to see things. And the leadership who has been placed at the top of the patient\u2019s-rights groups will push the \u201cclub\u201d message into infinity. We will recognize them by the words they have been given: \u201cerror\u201d, \u201cmistake\u201d, and \u201csystem failure\u201d. If we say \u201ccrime\u201d, \u201cdeliberate\u201d, or \u201cpremeditated\u201d we will be quickly corrected and silenced. RED FLAG #4: The leadership of these groups chant the AMA’s \u201cerrors\u201d, \u201cmistakes\u201d and \u201csystem failure\u201d propaganda in response to all victim concerns.<\/span><\/p>\n

The leadership actively discourages, or shuts down entirely, any discussion of medical crime and the details of the criminal activity. If an injury victim persists in talking about it the leadership becomes incrementally aggressive about shutting the talk down. Victim\u2019s rightful expressions of anger are shamed, ridiculed, and dismissed, vehemently discouraged, treated as a major social violation. Anger is normal under certain circumstances—don\u2019t let anyone tell you different. RED FLAG #5: The leadership will not allow free discussion of medical crime or normal expression of anger. The incremental aggression applied to victims who refuse to be controlled and complete intolerance of discussion of topics off the \u201cpolitically-correct\u201d list is key here.<\/span><\/p>\n

If we approach the leadership to talk about current, active cases of concrete patient abuse that requires an immediate, direct response to save a person\u2019s life, prevent financial ruin, or stop specific acts of patient abuse and you ask the leadership of these groups to take action THEY WILL NOT MOVE for any reason. When attempting to interest them in cases such as this and trying to get them to commit to any useful action at all it is routinely deflected by the leadership by changing the subject over to the detail of their OWN case information and going on and on about it as long as it takes to stop our discussion entirely (they are not direct victims themselves, can only speak about another person), will not let us get another word in edgewise about the issues brought to them for active response. They are strangely cold toward and disinterested in the actual victims themselves, stick exclusively to things (like gathering media attention and fund-raising) which require no direct hands-on activity with real injury victims. They are oddly unaffected and unmoved by actual victim\u2019s current suffering and losses. When pressed for taking useful action they will offer distractions instead of solutions: \u201cshe needs to take up an absorbing hobby to get her mind off her troubles\u201d, \u201che should get counseling to learn how to handle his anger\u201d, \u201cwe are a support organization and not here to work solutions\u201d. The goal is to keep the membership distracted, controlled, and off exposing the \u201cclub\u201d. RED FLAG #6: The leadership has no real interest in victim\u2019s current cases and will not take useful action in anyone else\u2019s behalf for any reason. They will not embarrass the \u201cclub\u201d; \u201cclub\u201d interests come first.<\/span><\/p>\n

The leadership makes statements like: \u201clet\u2019s focus on the future and upon prevention of these errors and mistakes\u201d with the idea in mind that if they can convince the others in the group to forget about what is going on RIGHT NOW the \u201cclub\u201d will NEVER have to be accountable or deal with anything they do not want to deal with, no changes in the present will have to be made, and no VICTIMS in the present will have to be addressed. Of course, \u201ctoday is yesterdays tomorrow\u201d so this golden future they are trying to get us all focused on never actually arrives—it doesn\u2019t have to. Nothing changes because we have let every TODAY slip past us without action. Distraction, not action, is the key focus. They will say things like: \u201cthere is no point wasting time on today\u2019s injury victims: there is nothing we can do for them because they are already injured and doomed anyhow; what we need to focus on instead is seeing that the causes of their injuries stop so that people in the future will not have to endure it.\u201d There is plenty that can be done for today\u2019s injury victims: the standardized program of denying necessary medical intervention to prevent progression of the damages, the routine financial enslavement, the verbal and physical abuse episodes, the psychological battery, the threats, the myriad other violations routinely heaped onto injury victims unfairly. This needs to stop TODAY. NOW. RED FLAG #7: Today\u2019s needs are not responded to; talk is always spent on future goals of prevention, never a direct response to what is happening today.<\/span><\/p>\n

The leadership keeps the group members busy with pointless, time-wasting, manufactured busy\u00adwork activities designed to make a big public \u201cshow\u201d but which have no useful substance in reality. One example is getting a \u201cpatient safety week\u201d on the calendar. If the group can be led off taking useful action in their own behalf and can be convinced to allow their energy and momentum be redirected and replaced with pointless, time-wasting activities that go nowhere (but makes people feel like they are \u201cdoing something\u201d) the \u201cclub\u201d is protected. Because their OWN necks are not on any chopping block, because THEY are not being tortured, or robbed, or getting their injuries compounded by the medical syndicate, or being murdered, there is no real urgency in the leadership\u2019s incentive to get anything done. Time is not nipping at THEIR heels—they have all the time in the world to waste, stall, and fool around. They don\u2019t mind wasting our time too. RED FLAG #8: Nothing truly useful ever gets accomplished. The group is kept very busy but nothing truly useful in real life ever actually materializes to show for all that work. Distraction, not action, is the goal.<\/span><\/p>\n

The leadership does \u201cdamage control\u201d and is very aggressive about discouraging talk within the group pertaining to \u201cpolitically-incorrect\u201d topics such as medical crime. They assess the content and character of the group members and cozy up to the uncontrollable ones to find out as much as they can about them as individuals in order to better determine how to control and\/or redirect them. If the injury victim proves uncontrollable a character assassination campaign begins, instigated by the leadership, and the others in the group are turned against the uncontrollable person by whatever means possible. Example: every time the \u201cclub\u201d thinks people are listening to me too much for their comfort one of their large patient\u2019s-rights group\u2019s leadership will start circulating a story about me being attached to the KKK\/Clan or say I belong to a gun-toting militia (as characterized by the mainstream media) and am extremely dangerous— \u201cbest to stay away from that kind of person if you know what\u2019s good for you because when they get into trouble with the law everyone they associate with is going to go down with them.\u201d RED FLAG #9: If the leadership rigidly refuses to acknowledge ALL patient\u2019s-rights concerns, and refuses to allow free discussion of ALL patient\u2019s-rights concerns, actively shuts down free speech on specific topics, then we can bet they have a reason for it—and that reason will never serve the true patient\u2019s-rights cause. If they ridicule or character-assassinate the most vocal members within the group, whose information presented makes the most sense, and try to evict those people from the group to keep them from talking further it is because that uncontrollable person is working AGAINST the \u201cclub\u201d who placed and pays the leadership.<\/span><\/p>\n

The leadership uses all the standardized \u201cbuzzwords\u201d and \u201cbuzzphrases\u201d, standardized thought-terminating cliches they have been programmed with, to gain and keep control over the group members and to keep activity and conversation flowing in the direction they choose. (Interestingly, these buzzwords, buzzphrases, and thought-terminating cliches are the SAME ones used routinely by the medical and legal syndicates and all their attached \u201cindustry mouthpieces\u201d. It is as if they have all been given the same manual to study and work from) They make pompous references to uncontrollable member\u2019s grammar and spelling mistakes, loudly accuse people of watching the most insubstantial television programs and reading the most vapid magazines as evidence of \u201cwhere that person got their information from\u201d. I\u2019ve heard them refer to \u201cBuffy The Vampire Slayer\u201d and \u201cLadies Home Journal\u201d often. They take pot-shots wherever they can fit them in. \u201cWHO told you THAT?!\u201d they bellow, when a victim discloses any particularly controversial piece of information that cannot be acknowledged or discussed freely with outsiders. One favorite is: \u201cmethinks the lady doth protest too much\u201d, delivered with a smirking grin. My defense to these standardized pot-shots is: \u201cYOUR PROGRAMMING IS SHOWING!\u201d They do not like this response. The leadership demands every single project and action go through them and insists everything has to meet their personal approval to go forward with their blessing—even projects they have no hand in.<\/span><\/p>\n

(Example: individuals, who have a right to take independent action as they see fit, putting up personal websites containing information damaging to the \u201cclub\u201d)\u00a0 The message given out to the members is the leadership sits in the driver\u2019s seat and everyone else has to answer to them and justify to their satisfaction, then get approval for every move made. When victims do not blindly comply the leadership\u2019s complete control is threatened and the resulting hissy-fit thrown is all out of proportion to what the leadership is due in real life: \u201cHow dare you put up that website without asking ME first!?\u201d they scream—as if we have to beg permission first! What nerve! The leadership assigns offices and duties to the other members, clearly dispensed from the top of things. RED FLAG #10: The leadership sets themselves above the other group members\u00a0 and takes on the role of tyrant \u201csuperior\u201d, someone we HAVE to answer to and justify ourselves to. Independent action is discouraged and punished.<\/span><\/p>\n

The groups goal\u2019s are pointless and questionable. These groups link up with other questionable organizations in the mainstream: organizations who have expressed an interest in involuntary euthanasia, groups who have said only the young, healthy, and well-born should be allowed to live undisturbed, and so on. Too much interest is paid toward fund-raising. RED FLAG#11: Can\u2019t pin the leadership down on goals, plans.<\/span><\/p>\n

Groups having just one or two of the features listed, that can be explained away to believable causes, should be given the benefit of the doubt until more experience with them is gained and a clearer picture can be gotten. If the group\u2019s leadership is dirty it will manifest soon enough. And there is always the possibility that a group can start out clean but succumb to infiltration and takeover later. How can we identify the \u201cclean\u201d groups then? What measure can we use to sort the dirty from the clean? Well, the clean groups have these particular features:<\/span><\/p>\n

1.) The clean groups fund themselves, out of their own pockets. The clean groups are generally poor, without flash and glitz, just do not have the resources to spend on presentation that the dirty groups have received from their dirty funding sources. The clean groups owe no favors to anyone.<\/span><\/p>\n

2.) The members of the clean groups are not allowed to have mainstream media access and nobody is ever asked to be a spokesperson representative of their particular clean group.<\/span><\/p>\n

3.) The founding members of the clean groups are direct victims themselves and struggle daily with the limitations and losses their injuries (often terminal) have created in addition to donating activist work.<\/span><\/p>\n

4.) The words \u201cerrors\u201d, \u201cmistakes\u201d, and \u201csystem failure\u201d is used only where it is truly applicable. Falsifying medical records, denying necessary aftercare, referral to lying and abusive specialists and such with the intention to cover up doctor-caused injuries is not a mistake\/error and no clean activist will try to brainwash you into believing it is. The dividing line between a true \u201cerror\u201d and crime is the presence of premeditation and intention.<\/span><\/p>\n

5.) The clean groups will not discourage expressions of anger; anger is a normal response to being abused and violated and anyone who tries to tell you different is working their own program that has nothing good in it for you. Nothing corrodes slave chains faster than anger. Anger can provide the energy necessary for doing what needs to be done. The clean groups will not limit or discourage discussion of medical crime details or expressions of anger.<\/span><\/p>\n

6.) The clean groups have no problem sticking their necks out when necessary, on an individual\u2019s behalf, where possible and warranted. The clean group\u2019s focus is planted firmly on TODAY and NOW with the idea in mind that when TODAY\u2019s problems are addressed and solved the dirty groups\u2019 nebulous \u201ctomorrow\u201d will take care of itself, will follow suit. We have to start somewhere; TODAY is the most effective place.<\/span><\/p>\n

7.) Clean groups have no interest in warm-and-fuzzy, contrived, media\/public displays or content\u00ad controlled meetings. Clean groups do not censor what is presented for public inspection with the intention to sanitize or package anything: the clean groups lay the factual and provable truth out flat \u201cas is\u201d and let the recipients deal with it directly, or not, as they see fit. The understanding is the truth is not going to change for any individual and if people are not made aware of what is out there waiting on them they cannot possibly protect themselves from predation, even a little. In the current \u201cclub\u201d system, with the way things are set up NOW and TODAY,\u00a0 PREVENTION IS THE CURE. That is ALL we have going for us right now: prevention of preventable predation. There are no real outside protections in place. We have to protect ourselves. Knowledge is power. First comes education; when enough are educated the system abusing us will be forced to find its own cure eventually.<\/span><\/p>\n

8.) Clean groups do not attempt to evict anyone because they persist in talking about topics other than \u201cerrors\u201d, \u201cmistakes\u201d and \u201csystem failure\u201d. Clean groups do not refuse admission to people known to speak freely about medical crime.<\/span><\/p>\n

9.) The clean groups aren\u2019t into hierarchy or assigning offices, all work according to their individual gifts and talents, donate as much or as little as they feel they can. The word \u201cdonate\u201d is key here: activism is a gift. The giver has the exclusive right to decide who, what, how much, when, and where based on their individual determination of comfort level. Nobody stands over anyone else demanding performance or expecting production; nobody sits higher than anyone else dictating choices and workload from above. Nobody is expected to \u201canswer to\u201d or \u201cget approval from\u201d anyone else before beginning any project: if someone wants to take up a project and work on it, alone or with agreeable others, they just do it. Nobody is expected to \u201cget permission\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n

10.) The clean groups goals are crystal clear: they want the myriad criminal activity, human rights abuses, and patient abuses to STOP. TODAY. NOW. There is no time for stalling and fooling around with pointless \u201cfeel-good\u201d projects that go nowhere, do nothing. The most-serious and most-disruptive issues need to be addressed, directly and persistently, until change is forced through exposure: the records-tampering, withholding correct diagnoses, denying proper aftercare of iatrogenic injuries, covert medical experimentation, lack of informed consent, and so on needs to stop immediately; it never should have been allowed to become institutionalized to begin with! However it got started, and whatever entity keeps training it to new doctors and other \u201cclub\u201d members to keep it alive and growing, it is time to get rid of it and start over with something better. There is no place for these low-grade behaviors in a decent society and we should expect much better than \u201cgutter ethics\u201d from educated people placed in positions of trust: doctors, lawyers, legislators, medical staff of all specialties, and so on. Educated people should know better ways of dealing with the problems they have created than to lie, cheat, steal, sneak, oppress, coerce, threaten. What kind of depraved minds and hearts would create such a monster and continue to feed it year after year?! These behaviors are beneath educated people in a decent society. The foundation of trust has to be rebuilt from the ground up. Earned. THERE IS NO EXCUSE FOR THE CRIMINAL, ABUSIVE WORKINGS OF THE CURRENT SYSTEM. The same twisted left-brained geniuses who thought the current \u201cprogram\u201d up and set it into place, activated it, perpetually teach and enforce it, could just as easily and with less total effort manufacture a better system that gives dignity and respect back to patients and doctors both. It would cost less too; the current system incentivizes medical crime and rewards \u201cbounty\u00ad hunters\u201d in law and media.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Doctors (and other \u201cclub\u201d members): The solution is a very simple one: tell the factual truth, always. Just tell the truth and take the natural consequences like mature adults. Respond ethically. Hide nothing. If you always tell the truth you never have to remember what you\u2019ve said. Yes, patients are not always going to like what you have to tell them but I can guarantee when the truth is told and responded to ethically both sides will come away from the exchange with their dignity and respect intact. Injury victims will be able to say: \u201cI didn\u2019t like what I just heard…but at least the doctor did not lie to me!\u201d And that is still respectable under ANY circumstances. Grow up! There\u2019s no time like the present…<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Individual Infiltrators<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Over the years I have had many individual informants clapped on me; there were times I would no sooner identify and get rid of one than another would be clapped on. In all the years of exposure I have had with this nasty \u201cclub\u201d protocol some good came out of it. It is an ill wind that doesn\u2019t blow someone some good so I am going to take those experiences and use them for what good can come out of it all:<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 The individual infiltrator often works for money, position, or power but they can also work for other benefits under the control of the \u201cclub\u201d: some work a deal to get a loved one released from prison, others work to get pending criminal charges dropped for themselves or someone else. Some want to keep a home threatened by back taxes or divorce; others want to be granted custody of minor children in a divorce situation.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Or it can be as simple as what my former neighbor told me about why she did it to me: she gets Target store gift certificates in $25. increments, depending upon the kind and volume of information she carries back to the local hospital administration she works for.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 I would like to believe that my life and well-being are worth more than that but in the real world other people don\u2019t often care about you as much as they care about themselves and it is a sad day when we find out how little we are actually worth to certain ones.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Family members will sell us out in exchange for being allowed to win a pending lawsuit or the lottery. Co-workers will sell us out for advancement on the job. Neighbors will sell us out for cash and all of a sudden luxury items they were never able to afford before appears: swimming pools, new cars, satellite television, pedigree dogs.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 All of a sudden we will have a steady stream of \u201cnew best friends\u201d and we will wonder where they all came from. The feeding frenzy is ignited by outside sources and the \u201cnew-best-friend\u00adwannabees\u201d can get very aggressive in their pursuit, very persistent, and intrusive.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 The informants\/infiltrators are usually selected from our own environment. It is more likely we will accept and trust people we recognize as our own kind and already know, however slightly. There is no point sending in \u201cnew best friends\u201d from the white-collar crowd when we live a blue-collar life so the \u201cclub\u201d takes a look around and sorts through the ones they think they can recruit who are most like us. If we like gardening, sewing, and antiques then the first-choice informants sent in will match those interests; if we have nothing in common it is unlikely the match will be successful or last long enough to bring a good return to the \u201cclub\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 The informant(s) selected will have to move quickly because they cannot know how long it will take before we identify them and kick them out. So they will try to get in and grab as much vital information on us as fast as possible right out of the starting gate. This starts with non-stop questioning. Some are more subtle than others, will try to slip a question into the middle of a conversation and hope it goes unnoticed for what it actually is. Others are more clumsy and just blurt out anything in their heads. I have had to deal with both kinds.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 These informants can be very aggressive and pushy. They will call us and ask if they can come over for a visit; when we say \u201cno, I am too busy today\u201d they will show up on our doorstep anyhow and scream to be let in. (I had this happen once) They will show up on our doorstep uninvited and unannounced, barge in and take up our whole day if we let them, will fire question after question at us, walk around the room picking up and looking at private mail, examine our calendar for appointments, snoop through the postings on our bulletin board or refrigerator front. They will ask inappropriate, personal questions without batting an eye and will channel conversation in the direction that best suits their own purposes. If we wander off-topic they will quickly bring us back because they can\u2019t afford to waste time talking about what we want to talk about; time is money: \u201cI don\u2019t want to talk about that; let\u2019s talk about this instead…\u201d and we are set back onto their selected path again.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 They adopt a superior demeanor and place themselves above us, take on an authority role and try to make us feel that we have to answer to them and do their bidding—and will not accept \u201cno\u201d for an answer. If the \u201cclub\u201d wants us out of the house on a specific day they will do whatever it takes to get us out of the house on that day. If the \u201cclub\u201d makes a suggestion to us that we do not want to follow our \u201cnew best friend\u201d will be right in there pitching for them, trying to convince us to comply. (one of my \u201cnew best friends\u201d thought I should comply with the suggestion my health insurer\u2019s medical director and staff attorney made that I should be sent out of state and locked up in a mental institution \u201cfor an attitude adjustment\u201d because I would not bend to their bullying and threats–and they don\u2019t like people who refuse to do what we are told: I was ordered to shut up about my doctor-caused injury and wouldn\u2019t do it. My \u201cnew best friend\u201d thought I should just go to the mental institution the \u201cclub\u201d selected for me \u201cif only to see what they want\u201d. \u201cWhy don\u2019t you just go and see what they want?\u201d she said, smiling. My family doctor of the time told me if I had gone \u201cthey\u2019d have pickled your brain\u201d—his exact words.) The informant will support and extend any work-in-progress by the \u201cclub\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 There is a measure of bullying in this intrusive behavior; they can\u2019t know how far we can be pushed before we catch on and ditch them so they have to set themselves up where they can grab as much as they can get—quickly.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 They will want to know what we like and dislike, want and don\u2019t want. They will want to know all our friends names and where they live—the exact address and city, what they do for a living, what our family member\u2019s names are and where they are located. They will ask us if we abuse drugs or alcohol in the present, if we have ever abused drugs or alcohol in the past. There will be NO quid pro quo: we are not allowed to ask them any questions of the same kind\u2013and this is a big \u201cred flag\u201d that should tip us off. The informant is there to ask all the questions, not answer them. If someone will not answer the same kinds of questions they are asking us, it might be wise to consider the possible reasons why.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 The informant will want to dig up some dirt on us; if they can\u2019t find any skeletons in our closet through the usual channels, that the \u201cclub\u201d can hold over our head, they will try to create some, are not above encouraging us to commit petty crimes or setting us up in a situation where we can be arrested under the guise of something else. (one of my \u201cnew best friends\u201d nagged me relentlessly to sneak into someone\u2019s yard and steal a rose bush I had admired in passing; I refused to do it) If someone else present makes a comment about us that is even slightly negative they will dash across the room to question that person further: \u201cOoh, oooh, ooh—wait! Stop! I want to talk more about THAT!\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 If we do not keep an eye on them, give them an opportunity, they will steal from us: manuscripts, personal mail with interesting return addresses, and such that they feel their handlers would want to acquire—for a price.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 They will come to our home armed with large, open-topped purses or bags that they keep in their laps and fuss over the openings—which are aimed at us as we speak like microphones. The informant will fire off question after question in a manner normal conversation between regular people just doesn\u2019t follow. We are being recorded. Want to test this? Start talking about someone else\u2019s criminal activity: the informant will jump in and attempt to change the subject real fast. If we persist they get more aggressive. (ignore them and keep talking anyhow, see what happens next…) They do not want their tape \u201ccontaminated\u201d for all time with controversial information about other people—people not under \u201cclub\u201d investigation at the present. Now, our \u201cbrother John, the cocaine dealer\u201d or \u201cuncle Ned, the career house burglar\u201d doesn\u2019t have to be a real person at all (and shouldn\u2019t be)—what we are shooting for is the over-reaction of the informant jumping in to shut the conversation down as quickly as possible and refusing to allow it to go any further. (one of my \u201cnew best friends\u201d used to come to my home with a large, drawstring-closure purse. Instead of sitting it on the floor beside her like normal people do she kept it in her lap and aimed the wide opening at me, kept fussing with it. I ping-ponged from the fireplace hearth to the bench as we were speaking and she could hardly keep up with aiming that thing at me and keeping the top open just right. Once she phoned me, started grilling me with questions as usual, gasped as she remembered she had forgotten to turn her recorder on, and I heard the click.) Don\u2019t worry about giving them false information and deliberately sending them off on wild goose chases; this low-grade person doesn\u2019t deserve the truth and isn\u2019t going to use the truth for anything good to our benefit. Tell them whatever you want to, but it is best not to speak to them at all or allow them access.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 I had three immediate neighbors who worked for the local healthcare syndicate at my previous home; two worked for the medical system who targeted and butchered me, and abuses me still. (and countless others) I wasn\u2019t interesting enough to bother with for the whole thirteen years I had lived in that house before I was injured by a doctor; all of a sudden I became the most interesting person on the street. All of a sudden these particular neighbors started showing up on my doorstep—a LOT. Excessive, sudden interest is a huge \u201cred flag\u201d.(so is appearing immediately following a personal crises) One was more aggressive than the other two, was shameless in her pursuit. It got so bad I stopped answering the door when I looked out and saw who was knocking. She did whatever she could think of to overcome this obstacle: if I was in the yard working, or talking to someone else, and she saw it from her window, she would fly across the street and try to engage me before I could go into the house to avoid her. If I had company with me she would latch onto my company real quick hoping I would not make a scene in front of them and chase her away—it is too hard to explain the reasons to visitors who don\u2019t know the history involved, and she shamelessly took full advantage of that. Whenever I had visitors and she saw their car pull up to my house from her window, she would fly across the street and just walk into my house uninvited, at the rear of the invited group, hoping that once inside it would be much more difficult to get her back outside the house again. She was extremely shameless and persistent. Some people will do anything to anyone for money, even \u201cgood Christians\u201d like this greed-crazed neighbor.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Another neighbor, whose wife worked for the same hospital system and is close friends with the first neighbor mentioned, would shamelessly creep around behind the tall hedges that separate his backyard from my driveway and eaves-drop on conversations. What he couldn\u2019t see from his yard he would climb up on his roof for a better look over our privacy fence on the other side of the driveway. He would intercept our company going from their cars to our house and question them. He\u2019d grab workmen we had hired and question them too. The \u201clast straw\u201d was the day I caught him on a ladder in my driveway peering into my dining room window\u2013we locked eyes and he retreated. When my husband came home from work that day I told him we need to move\u2013to a place with no neighbors, and what is what we did. I seldom spoke to these neighbors and had cut off all access possible\u2013and it wasn\u2019t enough; they shamelessly did whatever they could do to get the information they wanted through the only channels left to them\u2013to the point of the ridiculous.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 My mail would arrive pre-opened and taped shut. My phone calls were intercepted at a remote location\u2013diverted to a nearby hospital switchboard, I found out later.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 This collection of incidents has a name: GANG-STALKING. It took me a long time to find this out but once I did, and studied the subject, I came to the understanding that what I was being put through followed the patterns of that particular abuse to the letter.<\/span><\/p>\n

https:\/\/gangstalkingworld.wordpress.com\/2008\/01\/03\/gang-stalking-techniques\/<\/a> https:\/\/targetedindividuals.wordpress.com\/2008\/08\/28\/gang-stalking-techniques\/<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Just like the infiltrators seated in the leadership positions in the largest patient\u2019s-rights groups, these individual informants are unnaturally cold and unfeeling about the injury victim\u2019s suffering and losses, unresponsive in a way that isn\u2019t normal. If symptoms arise that they can see they will immediately jump in and fire off benign, dismissive \u201creasons\u201d for the symptoms that are as far away from the true cause as possible—to the point of the ridiculous at times: \u201ceveryone urinates blood like that!\u201d, \u201cyou are twitching because you ate that pie at lunch!\u201d, \u201cyou\u2019ve turned yellow because you eat too many yellow vegetables!\u201d\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Informants are not limited to working on just the injury victim or activist; they can also be clapped onto the victim\u2019s spouse, child, or another close family member. The \u201cclub\u201d is not above sending our parents, siblings, or children \u201cnew best friends\u201d too. Or sending people to question others closest to us. But it can get worse sometimes:<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Injury victims who become activists, single or married, often get sent a \u201clove interest\u201d. The reasons are obvious; these \u201clove interests\u201d can be selected from the targets own environment and be pressed into service by the \u201cclub\u201d or it can appear and start the chase as an interesting stranger. I know of several cases where the informant was clapped onto the spouse in the form of a \u201clove interest\u201d who aggressively and skillfully pursued its target until it got close enough to extract the information it wanted and gain the influence it desired—by whatever means necessary. If that meant the informant had to suggest and supply all manner of sexual services to inspire the level of trust and incentive for the spouse to talk freely and\/or do its bidding then that is what happened. These kinds of informants will appear out of nowhere (as a stranger who takes a sudden, unexplainable interest or a person the target already knows who takes a sudden, unexplainable interest), will initiate the relationship and will aggressively chase their target right out of the starting gate with the full knowledge their target is married. They will make no promises, however, and will not be pinned down on \u201cplanning a future together\u201d as is normal to a genuine romantic interest as it progresses. They rush their target into a sexual relationship immediately, will say and do all the \u201cright\u201d things to get things going—whatever it takes, as long as it takes. One of the first things they do is start giving gifts and they nearly always make a custom-cut, personalized,\u00a0 \u201cromance\u201d music and\/or talking audio-tape\/CD, usually adding in\u00a0 their own voice, so that their target can listen to it whenever they are not around to keep the inspiration going and the fake \u201cfire\u201d burning. The ones who fall for this con gets burned badly because the informant has no real interest in their target, isn\u2019t creating anything real or lasting—it is all a contrived performance. And when the informant gets everything they are after they will drop their target like a hot rock, become as cold as ice for no apparent reason; the personality reversal is so abrupt it can be as if the informant split into two people. This tactic is called \u201cDivide And Conquer\u201d and it has several nasty purposes: sending in an aggressive informant to turn interest away from the targeted spouse causes the targeted spouse to lose their main support-and-protect system; the spouse who was sent the fake \u201clove interest\u201d can even be manipulated into hostility against the targeted spouse when under the spell and influence of the informant.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 If someone is trying to get close to us or our spouse, is acting pushy and interested out of proportion to what the situation warrants as appropriate, is saying all the \u201cright\u201d things, well, we\u2019d better keep our backs to the wall…the thing chasing us might not be genuine. (remember the movie \u201cThe Verdict\u201d with Paul Newman playing a malpractice lawyer? How the opposing law firm sent a woman to cozy up to him real quick and stick by his side so she\u2019d be there at all the \u201cright\u201d times…and how she turned on him and attacked when he hit a low point? Just doing her job…)<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Informants disgust me to the core. If I ever become so greed-crazed I will sell a life away I hope someone will shoot me because I\u2019d not consider myself fit to live any longer.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 The Internet hosts its own kind of informant: the \u201cclub members\u201d troll certain Internet hot-spots where topics not on their approved list might be freely discussed by outsiders wandering in, like chat rooms or discussion boards, and their job is to monitor and control. If an outsider wanders in and initiates a discussion on medical crime and starts listing detail they quickly jump in with their standardized attack routine. I call them \u201cbarking watchdogs\u201d. If you want to lure them out, find out who they are, just toss out a medical crime scene for discussion and see what jumps out at you: I call it \u201cwaving a rag over a box of snakes\u201d— they can\u2019t help but strike. I have done this deliberately, many times, on many boards. I then collected whole conversations that ensued and captured their standardized programmed-in responses for study. What a bunch of brain-dead automatons! Talk about your cult-conditioning!<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Barking Watchdogs And Internet Trolls<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Our national and international patient’s-rights alliance of activists have a team who posts here and there on the Internet, individuals posting in one place or many places at once.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Over the years, and through many experiences, we have come to acknowledge and expect “sniper attacks” from the “industry mouthpieces\/watchdogs” scattered here and there, who lurk and watch our dialogs progress and when it reaches the point where people express interest in what we have to say or too much sensitive information is being disclosed, these “watchdog-mouthpieces” jump in quickly and aggressively attempt to change the direction of the dialog to more “politically correct” exchanges.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Failing that, these snipers will dig deep into their insider programming and drag out all of their well-worn and easily identifiable “thought-terminating cliches” and games, ridicule and satire, victim shaming. The more we talk, the louder they “bark” to try to shut us down.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 One such game is “ego attack”. “Ego attack games” are designed to place the target, psychologically, into an inferior position with vicious personal insults, demands, task assignments…the old, tired “you must answer to ME” posturing. This game is a favorite of the internet trolls\/industry mouthpieces who roam the internet discussion boards for practice sessions\u2013gotta keep those teeth nice and sharp.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Citations:<\/span> <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

“Mind Wars”<\/strong><\/em><\/span> (out-of-print book) By Ron Dalrymple “The seven deadly forms of mind games: intimidation games, ego attack games, emotional withholding games, denial of responsibility games, emotional button-pushing games, sex games, and reality distortion games, all of which seek to undermine and destroy.”<\/span><\/p>\n

THE 25 RULES OF PROPAGANDA<\/strong><\/em> https:\/\/www.sott.net\/article\/319148-The-25-rules-of-disinformation-and-propaganda<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cWhen the law no longer protects you from the corrupt, but protects the corrupt from you, you know your nation is doomed.\u201d<\/span> Ayn Rand <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Law Enforcement\u00a0\u00a0 <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

(Click here to continue on to Part Four<\/a>)<\/em><\/span>
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Taking Lives (Part Three) Blutkitt Blutkitt is a German word meaning \u201cblood cement\u201d \u201cB____ E___\u2019s ilk want power so badly […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-1171","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"yoast_head":"\nTaking Lives Pt 3 - R. Cameron Bryce<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/taking-lives-pt-3\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Taking Lives Pt 3 - R. Cameron Bryce\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Taking Lives (Part Three) Blutkitt Blutkitt is a German word meaning \u201cblood cement\u201d \u201cB____ E___\u2019s ilk want power so badly […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/taking-lives-pt-3\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"R. Cameron Bryce\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-07-15T18:22:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"68 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/taking-lives-pt-3\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/taking-lives-pt-3\/\",\"name\":\"Taking Lives Pt 3 - R. Cameron Bryce\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-07-14T20:53:48+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-15T18:22:55+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/taking-lives-pt-3\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/taking-lives-pt-3\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/taking-lives-pt-3\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Taking Lives Pt 3\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/\",\"name\":\"R. Cameron Bryce\",\"description\":\"Official Author Site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Taking Lives Pt 3 - R. Cameron Bryce","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/taking-lives-pt-3\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Taking Lives Pt 3 - R. Cameron Bryce","og_description":"Taking Lives (Part Three) Blutkitt Blutkitt is a German word meaning \u201cblood cement\u201d \u201cB____ E___\u2019s ilk want power so badly […]","og_url":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/taking-lives-pt-3\/","og_site_name":"R. Cameron Bryce","article_modified_time":"2018-07-15T18:22:55+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"68 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/taking-lives-pt-3\/","url":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/taking-lives-pt-3\/","name":"Taking Lives Pt 3 - R. Cameron Bryce","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-07-14T20:53:48+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-15T18:22:55+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/taking-lives-pt-3\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/taking-lives-pt-3\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/taking-lives-pt-3\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Taking Lives Pt 3"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/","name":"R. Cameron Bryce","description":"Official Author Site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1171","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1171"}],"version-history":[{"count":12,"href":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1171\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1187,"href":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1171\/revisions\/1187"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1171"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}