{"id":1145,"date":"2018-07-13T14:34:18","date_gmt":"2018-07-13T19:34:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.brycepublications.com\/RCB\/?page_id=1145"},"modified":"2018-07-14T16:31:57","modified_gmt":"2018-07-14T21:31:57","slug":"taking-lives-pt-2","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/taking-lives-pt-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Taking Lives (Pt 2)"},"content":{"rendered":"

Taking Lives
\n<\/span>(Part Two)<\/span><\/p>\n

Teaching Hospitals and Resident Training<\/strong><\/span><\/em><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Most, if not all, hospitals today are teaching hospitals. Some of us believe the only teaching hospitals are directly attached to a university but that is not true. This can be a hard fact to swallow but I tell those who do not believe it to go to the hospital website and dig through their pages because that particular information is usually included in there somewhere. Or just pick up the phone and make a call. This is where the surprise comes: it IS a teaching hospital. Even the hospitals owned and operated by the health insurance companies are teaching hospitals and have no hesitation in using up the lives of their policyholders training residents surgery on the sly. They get paid by the government, from our Medicare funds, to train residents.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 So, what does this mean? It means your surgery is (or was) performed by a green trainee\u2013with all its attendant, and undisclosed, risks because these green trainees make their worst mistakes in the first 20-50 of each procedure they perform. And because they are protected from prosecution by something called \u201csovereign immunity\u201d due to the government funding their training, once the inevitable injuries or deaths occur, their victims will be stuck for the whole tab.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 The teaching hospital has contracted with the government, for pay, to train residents and to provide learning experiences so each resident can meet their credentialing quotas.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Unlike the privately-owned hospitals, the teaching hospitals attached to a university will usually tell us beforehand that resident surgery training will take place when our surgery is performed. Most people assume this will be the case just from the fact the hospital is attached to a university medical school. But the hospitals that are not attached to a university seldom, if ever, disclose that vital information before or after\u2013and that is where the problem lies.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 That already-trained, already-practicing, experienced surgeon we met with in their office who presented his\/her own credentials and certification as inducement to move forward with the recommended surgery? That we were led to believe we had selected from our health insurers booklet of providers, that we were sold when we bought our health insurance policies? That is not who we will get when we are anesthetized on the operating room table and cannot say \u201cno\u201d when the green trainee is sneaked in\u2013a green trainee who may be performing the first one of its kind. A green trainee who is working under the supervision of the surgeon, who might be <\/span>supervising more than one green trainee in more than one operating room\u2013or not be in the area at all, or even in the building. If present at all, we had better hope the surgeon is in our room supervising if-or-when something goes wrong because that green trainee will have to wing it until help arrives, if it arrives.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Their programmed-in argument for doing this is: \u201cwell, doctors have to learn somehow!\u201d Yes, they do have to learn somehow. But this is NOT the way to do it. It is illegal. And immoral. Our right to a full informed consent and our right to self-determination trump their need for warm bodies to train residents\u2019 surgery on. The perpetrators of this crime know that. They know they are committing a crime and that is why they routinely hide it.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 They know it is a breach of the spirit and intent of a full informed consent\u2013which is a legal requirement before proceeding.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 They know substituting any other surgeon than the one we had consented for to do our surgery, without our knowledge or consent, is a slam-dunk battery charge in court. \u201cGhost Surgery\u201d is illegal.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 They know their resident trainees are protected from prosecution for the injuries they cause by secret \u201csovereign immunity\u201d protocols because the government funds their training through Medicare funds and the already-practicing surgeon is ultimately responsible for what the trainee does.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 And they know they are billing at the already-trained, already practicing, experienced surgeon\u2019s rate. We are being sold, and are paying for, a Ferrari and being slipped a bicycle replacement. What other industry would be allowed to get away with this level of fraud and deception?<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Another argument exists when the teaching hospital is owned by a health insurance company that sells policies to the public and promises \u201cquality care\u201d and provides its policyholders a booklet of already-practicing physicians to choose from\u2013when they know the policyholder is going to have that already-practicing surgeon switched for a green trainee in their operating room:\u00a0 <\/span>We were not sold, nor did we buy, the services of a green trainee. We bought the already-practicing surgeon and his\/her credentials and experience.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0Switching the already-practicing surgeon for a green trainee on the sly is classic \u201cbait-and\u00ad-switch\u201d fraud.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0Deceiving policyholders about who is going to be performing their surgery and cheating them of the opportunity to say \u201cno\u201d is a crime: \u201cfraud in the inducement\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0It is also a violation of informed consent laws.<\/span><\/p>\n

*\u201dGhost Surgery\u201d is a battery charge because we did not give consent for that person to touch us.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Green student training in the teaching hospitals, without adequate supervision and a full informed consent, is the single largest reason for the high rate of deaths and injuries from surgeries performed. One of their \u201ctricks\u201d is to admit a target \u201cfor observation\u201d from their emergency room then coerce whatever surgery is being trained by refusing to write a discharge paper and flagrantly lying about the health insurer\u2019s \u201cpolicy\u201d of refusing payment for the whole stay IF their target leaves without a discharge paper instead of having the suggested surgery, taunting them with getting stuck for the bills out-of-pocket\u2013I know two people this happened to.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Health insurers using up the lives of their policyholders to train their residents surgery and getting paid for it violates the health insurance policy contract they\u2019ve sold us: they owe US the service we have contracted for exactly as written. We owe no service backward to them of any kind especially as \u201ctraining material\/teaching material\u201d for residents to practice on. They have no right to use us to make money on, especially without a full informed consent.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 This practice, in any other venue, is called HUMAN TRAFFICKING. And it is human trafficking in its worst form. They are permanently injuring and killing trusting, innocent people then sticking them, or their family, with the tab.<\/span><\/p>\n

People should not be forced to bankroll their own murder. Yet we are harnessed up and made to do that very thing with no viable way out from under it.<\/span><\/p>\n

Citations:<\/span> <\/strong><\/span><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

The Columbus Dispatch<\/span>,<\/em><\/strong> newspaper (Ohio), Letters To The Editor March 3, 2013 \u201cNation Needs More Doctor-Training Funds\u201d<\/strong><\/em> by Steven G. Grabbe, CEO Wexner Medical Center, Ohio State University QUOTE: \u201cResidency is funded mainly by federal and state government grants to teaching hospitals. Medicare pays the most at about 9.5 billion annually and Medicaid contributes about 2 billion according to the journal Health Affairs.\u201d\u00a0 \u201cEvery teaching hospital in the nation relies on government graduate medical education dollars.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Norfolk Daily News<\/em><\/strong><\/span> (Nebraska), August or September 1997, \u201cMedicare paying Price For The Glut Of Physicians\u201d QUOTE: \u201cDr. Sidney Wolfe, director of the consumer watchdog group Public Citizen\u2019s Health Research Group, said the glut of doctor has translated into \u201cpeople getting operations they don\u2019t need…\u201d\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

The Chicago Tribune<\/span>,<\/em><\/strong> 9-23-2012, By Deborah L. Shelton QUOTE: \u201c…but in some cases, patient advocates say, there can be an actual bait-and-switch, when a prominent surgeon promises to carry out the procedure but does not.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

New England Journal Of Medicine<\/span>, <\/em><\/strong>2015; 372:2477-2479, By Chryssa McAllister MD \u201cBreaking The Silence Of The Switch\u2013Increasing Transparency About Trainee Participation In Surgery\u201d\u00a0 QUOTE:\u201cAnd whether the increase in risk is real or potential, fears about patients’ reactions lead many physicians to wonder whether patients should be informed about it. If they are, will residents have fewer opportunities to operate? Will patients become unduly anxious? Will \u201cword get out\u201d and negatively affect referrals? The literature on patient consent for trainee participation in surgery is conflicting but suggests that the more realistic the scenario provided to patients, the less likely they are to consent to trainee participation, especially by junior trainees. Gan et al. highlight the influence of the surgeon on the informed-consent discussion; they found that a detailed, scripted disclosure of trainee participation resulted in 95% of 106 patients agreeing to trainee involvement. The authors admit, however, that they did not disclose the potential increased risk of complications, since they presumed it to be understood.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cPatients have clearly stated that they want to be informed, and lack of disclosure regarding trainee participation in surgeries may already have eroded public trust. U.S. courts agree, and legal precedents have deemed \u201cghost surgery\u201d \u2014 in which one surgeon is replaced by another without the patient’s consent \u2014 battery on the part of the operating surgeon (in this case, the trainee) and fraud on the part of the surgeon who was given consent (here, the supervising surgeon). Physicians have an ethical duty to provide patients with the information they need to autonomously make medical decisions, including the decision to accept or reject a treating physician. Yet we also have a societal and professional obligation to train future surgeons to care for future patients. What if we proudly and openly discussed resident participation with our patients instead of ashamedly hiding our need to train future surgeons?\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

https:\/\/www.merriam-webster.com\/dictionary\/human%20trafficking<\/a> \u201cDefinition Of Human Trafficking\u201d: Organized criminal activity in which human beings are treated as possessions to be controlled and exploited (as by being forced into prostitution or involuntary labor)<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Errors, Mistakes, And System Failure Verses Intentional<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 There is no real way to completely eliminate true errors and mistakes. People get distracted, forget, fail to follow procedure in spite of training, mix-ups occur, equipment fails. Things happen without intention to do harm but harm happens anyhow.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 It is what activates after a true error or mistake that drags the event into a whole other category because what is done to cover up is 100% preventable\u2013and is 100% intentional. The lying, records tampering, denial, refusal to give a correct diagnosis, failure to offer proper treatment, the verbal abuse, false accusations, threats, bullying, runaround, financial enslavement, and so on into infinity is deliberate, premeditated, coldly calculated, and icily delivered.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 I judge acts by intention. A true error or mistake is forgivable. What comes after is not. What comes after is dangerous, inhumane, disrespectful, predatory… and criminal.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 And then there are the harmful acts that are intentional right out of the starting gate. Lying to a patient and tricking them into surgery (or invasive procedure) they absolutely do not need done solely for dangerous student training purposes, deliberately withholding a correct diagnosis to protect another doctor from exposure of a medical malpractice event, falsifying lab results, tampering with x-ray images, verbal abuse designed to emotionally batter a target into despair, and so on into infinity. These acts, too, are 100% preventable.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 There is no real incentive to make changes. The rewards of wrong-doing and dirty-work are too great for the greed-crazed and morally bankrupt to pass up.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 WHY does it always come as a surprise to the medical syndicate that people do not like to be tortured, robbed, and murdered? When confronted about the damage they\u2019d caused they lay claim to the notion \u201cthe practice of medicine is an art, not a science\u201d at the same time they are trying to wrangle control and dictate…can\u2019t have it both ways.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Citation:<\/span> <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette<\/span><\/strong><\/em>, \u00a010-24 to 28-1993, \u201cMedication Errors\u201d<\/strong><\/em> By Steven Twedt (part 4 \u201cNobody\u2019s Watching), QUOTE: \u201cFor example, Ennis said, they heard unconfirmed reports that doctors would \u201csit\u201d on patients who developed blood clots shortly after surgery, rather than return them to surgery. The reason: an immediate return to surgery would be a reportable incident under New York state law, something doctors wanted to avoid. Ennis said: \u201cWhat we are hearing from all over the place is, \u2018You know, you guys are preventing people from getting appropriate care.\u2019 Believe it nor not, the doctors were blaming it on us.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The Two-Visit-Ditch<\/strong><\/span><\/em><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 After an injury occurs, inflicted by a surgeon or a surgeon-in-training more likely, care is shifted to other doctors in the community\u2013either to primary care doctors and\/or to specialists\u2013and they don\u2019t want it. The doctor who caused the injury is removed from the picture\u2013at least on the face of it. What we don\u2019t know, and are not intended to know, is that no other doctor is allowed to actively intervene without a referral, and permission, from the surgeon who caused the injury. And if any doctor takes it upon himself or herself to break ranks and accept another doctor\u2019s injury victim as a patient and offers treatment of his or her choosing, without a referral or permission from the surgeon of record, the State Medical Board will go after them if they find out about it. It is considered \u201cunethical\u201d for any doctor to interfere in another doctor\u2019s injury case.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Also, the doctors in the community don\u2019t want to accept surgeons injury victims for another reason: if they accept one as a patient, without a referral and permission from the original surgeon, and take it upon themselves to treat that injury, the entire responsibility shifts solely upon their shoulders and whatever happens after that, whether they were the root cause or not, is diverted onto them.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 After injury we will never again be allowed to find, and utilize the services of, a doctor of our own choosing. We will be funneled to a specific collection of doctors in the community who the power-elite has designated, based upon unique personality traits that give them permission to lie and abuse without conscience, the most reliably heartless sociopaths who can be trusted best to follow the cover-up protocols to the letter. As a reward for this service to the medical community these \u201cspecial\u201d doctors are sent lots of referrals. Every community has this kind of collection and this collection is made up of primary care doctors and specialists of every kind. This includes lab technicians, radiologists, and any other medical professional who are the only ones allowed to get involved in our medical care at every level, forever after.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 If we are so bold as to resist this kind of control and micro-managing, try to step out on our own and seek the care of a doctor we feel best suits our needs, one who is not on the \u201cappointed liar\u201d list, this is what will happen:<\/span><\/p>\n

–<\/strong><\/span> \u00a0Our request for an appointment will not be accepted outright. The doctors who do this are usually the ones who \u201cdon\u2019t want to get involved\u201d with what is going on and are not comfortable with what they would have to do to us if they accepted us as a patient. Not all agree with the cover-up-and-abuse program and refuse to participate. Unfortunately, they will also not take a stand against the willing participants and try to put a stop to it either.<\/span><\/p>\n

–<\/strong><\/span> Our request for an appointment will be accepted but we will be bombarded with verbal abuse and false accusations so vicious we will not feel comfortable returning.<\/span><\/p>\n

–<\/strong><\/span> Our request will be accepted but the doctor will quickly manufacture an excuse to dump us at the first opportunity.<\/span><\/p>\n

– <\/strong><\/span>Our request will be accepted and we will be given an appointment so far into the future it hardly seems worth bothering with, then, right before the appointment date, it will be cancelled and another far-flung appointment will be offered. This one, too, will be cancelled right before the appointment date or one of the other methods to get rid of us will be inflicted at the visit.<\/span><\/p>\n

–<\/strong><\/span> We will be given an appointment but when we arrive at the designated day and time the staff will smirk and announce that there is no appointment for us on their books and send us home.<\/span><\/p>\n

–<\/strong><\/span> Our request will be accepted, the doctor will be very warm, friendly, and welcoming on the first visit. We will be told that they want very much to help us\u2013but first they have to run some tests. Expensive, painful, and dangerous tests. A lot of tests. The wrong tests for the true condition(s) \u201cbecause we have to find out what is going on before we can make a correct diagnosis and offer relief or intervention\u201d. (it is a lie; they already know what is wrong with us and what the correct intervention is) Or they will order the right tests and the results will be manipulated to reflect whatever suits the cover-up best and create the paper trail the cover-up demands.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Full of hope and relief, we undergo their load of prescribed testing. Full of hope that help has finally arrived we go to a second office appointment never suspecting a second visit is all we are going to get, per the standardized abuse program: that friendly, warm doctor we saw at the first visit makes a complete personality reversal. At the second visit the doctor is angry and verbally abusive in the standardized manner of the cover-up program. We are told our tests were all \u201cnormal\u201d and not to come back.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 First office visits traditionally cost more than subsequent visits; all we get is one or two visits.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 The goal is to soak us for as much as can be extracted and then dump us. It is a psychological battery designed to discourage us from trying to find useful care outside their referrals and to deplete our financial resources–and fill their pockets as a reward in dark service to the medical syndicate who routinely funnels us to them.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 We are lured into this trap by opportunistic doctors comfortable with preying upon our suffering and our hope to be restored to our original condition. The trap snaps shut at the second visit.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 The core issue is control: the perpetrators want to be in charge of who we seek care from, what we are told, what we are offered, what we are never offered, what diagnoses are given, which ones will never be given, which tests we can have, which tests we can\u2019t have, what the medical record will include, what it can never include.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 What we are not supposed to know is that this is one of the many games they pull from their war chest designed to build hope then knock it down, to knock us down into despair and get us back under control, immobilize us. And plunder our assets to the limit to which we will allow, with the full knowledge, through long experience, that suffering people will go anywhere, do anything, pay anything, for even the ghost of a chance of getting well again. This game has a name: \u201cthe two-visit-ditch\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Citations:<\/span> <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cIntensive Care\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/span> (book) by Echo Heron RN, page 58-59, Quote: \u201cI\u2019m not quite sure what you are asking me to do. You should know I can\u2019t interfere with another physician\u2019s treatment of a patient without being consulted.\u201d \u201cNo, I\u2019m sorry, I can\u2019t so that. It\u2019s not ethical,…\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 A registered nurse posted this message to one of my associates in response to a question about WHY she could not get another doctor to take her on as a patient after she was the victim of a surgeon’s malpractice: “Most doctors won’t step in when another doctor has done something since they have no way of knowing exactly what the first doctor had in mind (they’d need your record for that information). If they do and they mess up what the first doctor did, then they are liable and they’re in a heap of trouble with the licensing board.”<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Cover-Up Program Standard<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 This \u201cprogram\u201d is written with particular attention paid to the injury victims created at a botched laparoscopic cholecystectomy; the overall program applies to all injury victims however. This cover-up-and-abuse program is standardized coast-to-coast. (And unfortunately, from country to country) I have come to know it is also being used in Canada, England, and Australia. If you are an injury victim I am certain you will recognize some, if not all, of the features described here.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 We have all been secretly divided into one of two categories based on our social, educational, and economic status and attachments: \u201chigh priority\u201d or \u201clow priority\u201d. Each category has a set list of healthcare offerings allotted to it and the medical syndicate will not be moved from the dictates of that list no matter how \u201cspecial\u201d we think we are. Only those tagged \u201chigh priority\u201d get the most and best; \u201clow priority\u201d gets the very least the medical syndicate can get away with and is first in line for drug and device testing, student surgery training, and we are organ donors, never recipients. Most of us are tagged \u201clow priority\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Once injured, we are tagged \u201cscrap\u201d and additional burdens are applied to us: drug testing, device testing, additional student surgery training, new surgical procedures. The \u201cclub\u2019s\u201d justification for imposing this brand of slavery is: \u201cWE CAN\u2019T BREAK WHAT IS ALREADY BROKEN.\u201d We cannot get what we actually need; we will only get what they want us to have based on their needs and desires, not ours. New Medicine has a sociopathically inhumane \u201ceat what you kill\u201d ethic that dictates when one of their membership creates an injury of the magnitude of a bile duct injury, one that can\u2019t be easily or cheaply repaired, the victim will be claimed as \u201cscrap\u201d and utilized to the maximum until everything that can be extracted from them has been taken away.<\/span><\/p>\n

THIS IS \u201cHUMAN TRAFFICKING IN ITS WORST FORM.<\/span><\/p>\n

The Standardized Cover-Up Program:<\/span> <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 When the injury victim begins manifesting the inevitable symptoms of the doctor-caused injury a standardized set of behaviors kick in no matter who our doctors are or where they are located; they are all reading from the same \u201cscript\u201d. The doctors in North Carolina are abusing injury victims the exact same ways as the doctors in Ohio—and Kentucky, Missouri, and so on. (and Canada, England, Australia…) Think about your own case information as you read through this text and the patterns that emerge are clear: \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

1) IGNOR, DENY, CHALLENGE:<\/em><\/strong><\/span> This is the medical syndicate\u2019s first line of defense: \u201cit didn\u2019t happen\u201d, \u201cwe don\u2019t see anything\u201d, \u201cyou\u2019re crazy\u201d, \u201cyou\u2019re a hypochondriac\u201d. \u201cthere\u2019s nothing wrong with you\u201d. They will not be moved from this defense no matter what symptoms manifest or what evidence to the contrary materializes. They will see us dead untreated before they will move from this unified defense. Malpractice liability is present and the malpractice insurance company rules dictate certain kinds of injuries never be acknowledged (other injuries will be acknowledged and responded to only after the Statute Of Repose or Statute Of Limitations expire: which can take up to seven years in certain states).<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 It is never to be formally acknowledged if the injury is something expensive-to-treat-properly that our own health insurance company doesn\u2019t want to pay for. Or if a government funded\/sovereign-immunity-protected green trainee\/medical student who was sneaked in to perform our surgery in a teaching hospital was the one who actually injured us. It is never to be acknowledged if we are tagged \u201clow priority\u201d and proper intervention is allotted only to those tagged \u201chigh priority\u201d. Our injury will never be acknowledged if we were covertly taken as a guinea pig to test an experimental device or drug on without our knowledge or consent; once pulled into such a program it is strictly hands-off and no doctor is allowed to touch us again without permission: the experiment has to run its course without interference.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Injury at laparoscopic gallbladder surgery meets all of the features above: there is malpractice, it is nearly impossible to restore the person to his\/her original condition, it is expensive to treat properly, our health insurers do not want to pay for proper aftercare because it is lifelong and expensive, if it was done in a teaching hospital we can bet we had a green trainee performing it on the sly, we were used as \u201cteaching material\u201d, and if we were not already tagged \u201clow priority\u201d we would not have been subjected to this horror in the first place.<\/span><\/p>\n

2) TESTS ARE BEGUN: <\/em><\/strong><\/span>Tests on common and rare diseases, tests strung out over weeks, then months, and eventually years–if we live long enough. Tests that are nearly always negative because they are the WRONG tests for the true condition. (or tests that are routinely falsified when they are the rights tests and can show something wrong, like bloodwork and x-rays, CT Scans, MRIs) Ordering lots of tests is a PERFORMANCE designed to make the doctors involved in our healthcare LOOK good on the surface, makes a presentation that the doctors \u201ccare\u201d about us and that they are \u201cdoing something\u201d for us, trying to find the source of our increasing misery. Nobody could come back on them later and claim the patient was neglected, right? Just look at all those tests! Too bad the doctors could not find anything wrong or offer a correct diagnosis, just have no idea what could be wrong… \u201cmaybe it is this, maybe it is that. let\u2019s do more tests!\u201d Then more tests on top of those tests. The targeted patient\u2019s bank account is cleaned out and they are run into debt; their doctors prey on their trust and ignorance, their desire to get well and be restored to their original condition–and to erect the facade of due diligence and plunder our assets.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 This testing con serves four purposes and none of it is to the benefit of the injured and sick patient: perpetual testing makes it look like the medical syndicate is responding to our injury, we are kept coming back for monitoring of the true condition so they can cause us more damage faster by applying certain \u201cinterventions\u201d at the appropriate times as we deteriorate untreated, using us to train residents on in the student training mills and testing labs, and conning us out of our savings by running up a huge medical debt up on us for all that \u201ccare\u201d we never actually got. We are kept busy and distracted, kept close to the doctors of the local medical syndicate\u2019s choice, confidence and trust is maintained (but only for a while, which is why they have to act fast and stack on as much debt as possible, and do as much damage to us as possible, early in the relationship) in the doctors who \u201ccare so much and try so hard\u201dso we keep returning to the very ones murdering us. Worse is that we PAY them to do it, eventually with everything we have. The goal is to keep us coming back to them so we can be manipulated and the standardized facade can be erected without interference–which keeps us busy and quiet, trusting and ignorant, until they can get us into the ground as fast and as cheaply as possible, with as much of our estates cleverly extracted and the costs tolled to US as possible. Much easier to accomplish with a ignorant, trusting, and co-operative victim.<\/span><\/p>\n

People should not be tricked into, or forced, to bankroll their own murder.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 The standard of care is criminally reversed:<\/span><\/strong><\/em> we get improperly performed invasive procedures designed to make us worse faster, we are prescribed prescription drugs that accelerate our damage, are deliberately neglected when infection sets in. How can we know that ERCP is never to be performed without IV antibiotic protection and that it should never be done during active cholangitis? How can we know Erythromycin and Seldane should never be combined? How can we know combining non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with H2 Blockers doubles the risk of a fatal hemorrhage in normal people and the odds go through the roof in people who already have liver or kidney damage? We outsiders don\u2019t usually know these kinds of things and cannot protect ourselves from predation–and that is what these murdering technopaths are banking on. Without a full, and clean, disclosure and an honest assessment in front of us, there is no way we can protect ourselves from predation.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Things that could actually help us are deliberately withheld.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Early in our injury the doctors are on hand and available, monitoring, to make sure things go according to their schedule and to the medical syndicate\u2019s best advantage, are unified to tell the right lies, in the right order in a consistent fashion, are on hand to mollify dissent in the victim and the victim\u2019s family. \u201cTrust us!\u201d they say. \u201cJust let us do our jobs without interference!\u201d as if we have no real stake in the outcome. Small prescriptions are written to keep us coming back often so control and dependence can be maintained. Every effort is made to contain us locally; we might get fed up with the runaround we are getting and wander off to another town, state, or country and by blind luck get the diagnosis and care that is being deliberately withheld at home. These are excruciating injuries with many symptoms scattered all over the body. We need to believe the source of this misery will eventually be identified and treated soon; we need to believe the people we have entrusted with our lives have placed the same value on them that we do.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Eventually, however, even the most naive victims start to catch on to the fact that something is very, very wrong with the response, rather the lack of useful response, we are getting from our doctors for our increasing symptoms: it slowly dawns on us that perpetual testing is not the same thing as actually receiving medical intervention for our problems and months later we are in a worse place than we were than when we started. So we start asking questions the doctors do not want to answer. This is when the medical mafia viciously turns on us and reveals their true character and intentions: they want to murder us with our full co-operation on THEIR schedule. Pain control is deliberately withheld and a lesson in blind obedience is inflicted in an attempt to coerce cooperation and compliance. If we question or resist, the abuse is heaped on to the point of insanity. This is when we will get to see, and experience, a very dark side of medicine most do not know exists. This is when we get that \u201ceducation\u201d we never wanted.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 If we ask too many questions, point out discrepancies in what we are being told, seek care without referral to a doctor of OUR choice (not all doctors can be relied upon with 100% certainty to lie, tell the RIGHT lies, and some refuse participation in atrocity and therefore never get any of us sent to them in referral), if we resist or dissent in any way the next phase in the cover-up program kicks in: the increasing abuse, the psychological battery, the emotional erosion, the active discrediting, the mental torture…eventually leading to actual physical torture, terrorism, and finally execution ahead of schedule for the most troublesome victims.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 This is the point where a targeted victim has to ask themselves some tough questions: If I am not getting anything useful, am not ever going to get anything useful, why co-operate?<\/span><\/p>\n

Should I co-operate by digging my own grave so they don\u2019t have to do the work or do I chase them with the shovel instead? Your choice: you can bow down, grovel, and lick the boots of the ones killing you and make it as easy on them as possible so they are not inconvenienced in any way. Or you can fight them every inch to the grave with the hope if enough follow suit it will become more trouble than it is worth. The end is going to go the same route no matter what we do…so why make it easy for them?<\/span><\/p>\n

3) CALL IN CONSULTANTS:<\/em><\/strong><\/span> When one opinion is no longer enough to keep the injury victim quiet, carefully selected consultants are called in by our surgeon or family doctor who also do tests, the wrong tests, and find out what you DON\u2019T have. These consultants will be chosen by our surgeon or family doctor; they can\u2019t have us making these kinds of selections because we might happen onto an honest doctor outside their circle-of-power who hasn\u2019t been properly trained in patient abuse or one who has no interest or talent in it\u2013or outright refuses to do it. There is hope an unrelated condition will be found that everything can be blamed on. Testing is done in that consultant\u2019s own area of expertise that even one symptom matches. No correct diagnosis is offered. Once in a while a diagnosis is offered of a benign nature like \u201clactose intolerance\u201d or some such thing that means nothing, is used as a distraction\/diversion.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 The surgeon who caused our injury is stacking the deck in his\/her favor at our expense by sending us out to these \u201cspecial\u201d consultants: pre-selected, carefully-chosen, specifically-trained abusers we refer to as \u201cthe appointed liars\u201d. The doctors selected for this service to the medical syndicate are chosen because they possess certain personality\/psychological deficits that act to make them enjoy abusing people who they know cannot fight back on a level playing field. Each area has a complete \u201cset\u201d of these monsters in all specialties; their job is to lie to and abuse malpractice victims. They are heavily rewarded for this service to the medical syndicate in lots of referrals and the opportunity to get rich performing unnecessary tests.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Once in a while their system breaks down, however, and something incriminating slips out (or is slipped to us by a doctor, nurse or technician who still has a conscience and hates what they see going on around them, hates what they are forced to do to people to be able to keep a job in this town, any town.) Never reveal the identity of the person who has stuck their neck out for you; they will be punished and reprogrammed. And they will not tell you anything again. Also, word will get out that you cannot be trusted and other honest people will shun you too.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 \u201cIt\u2019s all in your head, dear\u201d, \u201cYour perception is off\u201d, \u201cYou need a psychiatrist\u201d, \u201cYou need to be locked up\u201d are standardized BUZZ-PHRASES the doctors have been programmed with to knock injury victims down: they are operating from the premise that \u201ca good offense is the best defense\u201d and if they call us \u201ccrazy\u201d first then they don\u2019t have to look any further into themselves and find out who the REAL crazies actually are.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 While we are seeing their crooked consultants we are not getting the help WE need but the surgeon who injured us is getting something: he\/she is getting one more confirmation on the record that he\/she did nothing wrong, that there is nothing wrong with us, and our health insurance company is getting something too: nothing seen is nothing offered in proper care; nothing offered is nothing spent. Precious time passes and eventually our injuries erode past the point of no return and nothing can be done to save us. Bile duct injury has a one-month window of opportunity for a proper surgical repair by a specialist at a center equipped to handle an injury of this magnitude. We are deliberately stalled past that one-month window. After that opportunity is deliberately spoiled, all the health insurers have to provide us is a cheap \u201csymptomatic relief only\u201d and wait until we drop dead untreated–something that can take up to fifteen years, usually one to six years. It\u2019s called rationing. This evil is used heavily against cancer patients too: instead of following the standard of care when a woman presents with a lump in her breast the crooked doctor will not respond appropriately\u2013on purpose, will not order a biopsy, but instead will take advantage of her trust and tell her: \u201clet\u2019s watch this for a year and see what happens\u201d knowing full-well in a year the cancer will be all over her body and, (what people aren\u2019t told) is if the cancer hasn\u2019t spread the health insurers are obligated to offer full intervention BUT if the cancer has spread, or been deliberately ignored and ALLOWED to spread through calculated neglect, all the insurer is obligated to provide is cheapo symptomatic relief. Ditto for kidney failure. If a correct diagnosis is deliberately withheld and the patient\u2019s increasing symptoms are ignored and\/or lied about the health insurer gets to skip out on providing expensive intervention. And that means more money for the stockholders. And more money available to pay those enormous CEO salaries. And to provide those tagged \u201chigh priority\u201d with the level of intervention none of us tagged \u201clow priority\u201d will ever be allowed to receive. I\u2019ll bet our health insurance policies did not mention anything about rationing: that we\u2019d be killed by deliberate, calculated neglect if we came down with something expensive-to-treat and lifelong. That we\u2019d get nothing if we were tagged \u201clow priority\u201d and proper care would only be doled out to people on the \u201chigh priority\u201d list. No, we weren\u2019t told that. If we had been told first we would not have been so quick to jump onto their operating tables and then the students the teaching hospitals get paid to train would not be able to meet their credentialing quotas in order to get certified.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 It is women who have surgery most, women who are traditionally targeted with this kind of abuse, discrediting, and oppression when the perpetrators are confronted with dissent. Women make easy targets as a whole, are easily bullied into silence, too afraid to \u201cmake waves\u201d, too afraid to challenge \u201cauthority figures\u201d. The climate changes dramatically when we show we are NOT going to be one of the \u201cgood ones\u201d who do exactly as we are told, pay the debts run up on us without question, and die on schedule, ignorant, with our mouths shut tight.<\/span><\/p>\n

4.) THE PSYCHOLOGICAL BATTERING BEGINS:<\/em><\/strong><\/span> If we can\u2019t be manipulated to co-operate fully then we must be broken down. The doctors want easy victims. They want to orchestrate the facade of their choosing without interference. They do not want questions or accountability, don\u2019t want their goals thwarted. It is ALL about them. The victims are in their way and have to be neutralized somehow or another. In medical school they are programmed to flip responsibility for the injuries they\u2019ve caused off onto their victims: \u201cYOU are the liar, YOU are crazy, YOU are deficient…\u201d Labeling YOU first, loudly, let\u2019s them off the hook and deflects attention elsewhere rather than where it truly belongs. If someone has to be \u201cthe crazy one\u201d then they are going to make sure that label gets stuck onto YOU, not them. So begins the loud character assassinations, labeling, victim shaming, and so on.<\/span><\/p>\n

We are called: hypochondriacs, malingerers, liars, attention-seekers, drug-seekers, laxative-abusers, and so on into infinity. And they will make a record of it to support their cause.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Doctor Games<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0 This is a tough one. Who wants to believe the people we trust with our very lives when we are at our lowest point are not always at the pinnacle of honesty and integrity? That, once we become ill or injured, regardless of whether it is related to a malpractice event or not, we will be systematically mined for all that can be extracted?<\/span><\/p>\n

Milk The Cow<\/span> <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 A predatory game where the doctor already knows what the actual problem is, or at least suspects it, but feigns ignorance and layers on expensive, painful, and dangerous testing that starts at the far end of the possible causes and works s-l-o-w-l-y forward. It can be extended almost indefinitely by adding on a series of referrals to other doctors to spread the wealth around as far as possible, ensuring an equal reward returned from those doctors for the consideration. This game\u2019s purpose is to extract as much money from the health insurer and\/or the target as possible before offering a correct diagnosis and treatment\u2013if it ever comes at all. Won\u2019t sick and suffering people do just about anything, go anywhere, pay anything for even a ghost of a chance for relief? Especially if deliberately left untreated? This unconscionable behavior is a virtual gold mine for those indulging in it. The medical syndicate has access to \u201casset tracking\u201d services, know exactly what, and how much, we are \u201cworth\u201d, financially, and can be plundered for.<\/span><\/p>\n

Selective Blindness<\/span> <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Usually reserved for victims of medical malpractice to stonewall past the Statute Of Limitations and\/or Statute Of Repose or for a chronic, progressive disease or injury that is expensive to treat properly that the health insurer doesn\u2019t want acknowledged in order to skip out on paying for it. \u201cWe don\u2019t SEE anything, and without a diagnosis we can\u2019t offer treatment.\u201d\u00a0 \u201cWe just have no idea what could be wrong.\u201d Doctors are programmed to say \u201cwe\u201d instead of \u201cI\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n

Nothing seen is nothing offered; nothing offered is nothing spent on care.<\/span><\/p>\n

If they went to medical school and were allowed to graduate, they DO know.<\/span><\/p>\n

Gaslighting<\/span> <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cYour symptoms don\u2019t fit any pain pattern I know of, your perception is off, nobody else is having the problems you claim you are having, maybe you are a hypochondriac or a drug-seeker or an attention seeker? In any case, your symptoms are not even possible. You just think your symptoms are happening; it is all in your head\u201d. And so on into infinity. You could come in holding your head in your hands and they\u2019d tell you it wasn\u2019t happening. This game is designed to make us doubt ourselves to the point we give in and accept their false version of the truth about what happened to us. This term comes from a vintage movie called \u201cGaslight\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n

Threatening<\/span> <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cIf you want to keep your only child you will stop talking about this issue\u2013now!\u201d \u201cYour husband has XXX illness and is seeing my friend Dr. X, right? I suppose he would like to continue to receive care from Dr. X…?\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Character Assassination<\/span> <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

This is where friends, spouses, relatives and even neighbors are contacted and told lies about the target\u2019s medical situation with the intent, and hope, of sowing strife and causing them to question what the target is saying.<\/span><\/p>\n

New Best Friends <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

This comes from the adage \u201ckeep your friends close and your enemies closer\u201d. All of a sudden the person targeted becomes very sought after by people in the immediate environment who never once made an attempt at closer contact before. The nurse who lives across the street starts visiting often and pelts the target with questions at every contact, flips through the calendar on the wall, picks up mail from to table to see who the sender is, races to the house when company arrives and pelts them with questions, questions absences…then rockets the information gathered to their handler(s).<\/span><\/p>\n

False Evidence\/Erect A Facade<\/span> <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

The wrong tests for the true and known condition are ordered and performed\u2013and all naturally come back negative. They present this as \u201cproof\u201d the target is malingering or use it to stonewall for time. Then on to the next wrong test.<\/span><\/p>\n

Or worse, they order the right tests for the true condition then present a false result stating the opposite as \u201cproof\u201d the actual condition they have chosen not to respond to for whatever reason doesn\u2019t exist. And what doesn\u2019t exist cannot be treated. This will be dragged out to the length of their intended purpose for the target, which can include death, deliberately untreated.<\/span><\/p>\n

The \u201cProve It\u201d Game<\/span> <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

This game is particularly difficult to deal with because the medical syndicate holds all the cards. They write and hold the medical record. They control care offerings and diagnosis information. They decide which tests and interventions to offer and perform. They also layer on a set of abuses of a kind and in a manner that are difficult, if not impossible, to document\u2013especially when we don\u2019t see it coming and cannot prepare for it. We\u2019ll be given an appointment for a day the staff knows the doctor is never in then turn us away, giggling behind their hands. How can we prove it wasn\u2019t a mistake and not an abuse designed to insult us and waste our time?<\/span><\/p>\n

The Truth OR \u201cThe Right Answer\u201d<\/span><\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

This game is also particularly difficult to navigate because no matter how we answer their questions about our medical condition that we are asked\u2013pertaining to the malpractice event that has caused it–it is going to put us in a place we don\u2019t want to be. We answer truthfully because we know without full information the symptoms we describe cannot be addressed properly and the source considered correctly. The problem is, we are not allowed to talk about our malpractice event and are expected to parrot the false information the system has tried to program us with that better fits their cover-up needs. Some of us refuse to do that. And that ignites anger\u2013how dare we disobey? They don\u2019t want the truth, they want \u201cthe right answer\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n

Gang-Stalking<\/span> <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Gang-stalking is reserved for their persistent injury victims who refuse to be programmed and bullied into compliance. The goal is to make themselves appear omnipresent, layer on a veil of potential menacing that could turn into action at any time, and try to make us believe we are losing touch with reality\u2013with the two additional bonuses of making ourselves appear unbalanced to the ones around us when we talk about it and putting us in a position where we destroy our own credibility. These attacks are subtle. They will do things, or hire people to do things, to us that border on the ridiculous\u2013so ridiculous that in the telling we will make ourselves appear unbalanced.<\/span><\/p>\n

It will be nearly always be things clearly noticeable only to the person targeted, things that go right up to the edge of criminal assault but stop before crossing that line so that we cannot justify involving the police\u2013which wouldn\u2019t do any good anyhow because there is seldom, if ever, any concrete evidence. And the events can easily be, and nearly always are, written off to alternative causes by the police and those around us\u2013thus fulfilling their agenda for them. We can\u2019t win this game in any satisfying way: if we don\u2019t talk about what is going on we suffer the attacks alone. If we do talk about it we help their cause by making ourselves look like lunatics and destroy our own credibility. Rather than go into the workings of typical gang-stalking here I\u2019ll post citations to study.<\/span><\/p>\n

Accusations Of Non-Compliance<\/span> <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

This is a relatively new tool the medical syndicate has added to its war chest: prescribe a dangerous drug, an invasive procedure, or something too expensive for the target to accept then when the target refused to purchase or cooperate, they claim \u201cnon-compliance\u201d. It is a doctor\u2019s place to advise, not dictate. But New Medicine has other ideas.<\/span><\/p>\n

There is a blogspot on the internet where doctors were actually talking about the possibility of health insurers SUING policyholders for non-compliance as a breach of contract, because, buried in some contracts is an ugly secret that could become a lucrative goldmine if the ones who wrote it into these contracts dared to apply it to its full potential: the wording might vary but the gist is: \u201cthe policyholder agrees to do whatever one of their plan doctors tell them to do, without quibble\u201d. If we don\u2019t want to take the risks of the possible side-effects of a particular drug, or undergo the pain of an invasive procedure, or accept a surgery we question the value of, or if we just can\u2019t accept our portion of the cost\u2013too bad. The doctor has made his\/her decision and compliance is expected. The theory is if a policyholder doesn\u2019t comply with blind obedience and his\/her condition worsens, whether it can be attributed to the non-compliance issue or not, the contract has been breached\u2013and costs for care from the point of the non-compliance incident is considered a recoverable expenses for the insurance company. Our signature made a contract. When we signed we agreed to every word in that contract, even if we didn\u2019t read it before signing or understand what it all meant in real life.<\/span><\/p>\n

Create False Hope Then Dash It<\/span> <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

When we present more than one symptom, instead of putting them altogether and offering treatment based upon a correct diagnosis, they\u2019ll isolate each symptom as if it stood alone and ask us to choose ONE symptom and say they will focus intervention on that one only\u2013and then don\u2019t.<\/span><\/p>\n

Substitute An Alternative (false) \u201cDiagnosis\u201d That The Symptoms And Treatment Matches<\/span><\/p>\n

Replace the truth with anything that even kind-of matches up and offer treatment for that.<\/span><\/p>\n

Citations:<\/span> <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

http:\/\/www.stopgangstalking.org\/<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

http:\/\/www.urbandictionary.com\/define.php?term=gang+stalking<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

https:\/\/gangstalkingworld.wordpress.com\/2008\/01\/03\/gang-stalking-techniques\/<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

https:\/\/targetedindividuals.wordpress.com\/2008\/08\/28\/gang-stalking-techniques\/<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

Dayton Daily News<\/span>,<\/em><\/strong> October 7, 1997, page 8-A, \u201cThree malpractice settlements involving patients who died could wreck the career of a physician in private practice, setting off reviews by \u201cpeer committees\u201d, and malpractice insurance underwriters and causing high premiums.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Trauma and Recovery<\/strong><\/em><\/span> (book) by Judith Lewis Herman, M.D., \u201cIn order to escape accountability for his crimes, the perpetrator does everything in his power to promote forgetting. Secrecy and silence are the perpetrator\u2019s first line of defense. If secrecy fails, the perpetrator attacks the credibility of his victim. If he cannot silence her absolutely, he tried to make sure no one listens. To this end, he marshals an impressive array of arguments, from the most blatant denial to the most sophisticated and elegant rationalization. After every atrocity one can expect to hear the same predictable apologies: it never happened; the victim brought it upon herself; and in any case it is time to forget the past and move on. The more powerful the perpetrator, the greater is his prerogative to name and define reality, and the more completely his arguments prevail.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Lancaster Eagle-Gazette,<\/em><\/strong><\/span> August 27, 1993, Letter To The Editor \u201cDoctor\u2019s Letter Gets Immediate Response\u201d by Martha E. Douds, RN, BSN, QUOTE:<\/span><\/p>\n

What is particularly frustrating for me is the lack of physicians who have the courage to speak out when they see that a patient has been seriously injured as a result of medical negligence. It seems that the path of least resistance prevails and eyes are closed and lips are sealed, instead of doing what is ethically correct. Thus, they become part of the problem instead of the solution.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

The Columbus Dispatch,<\/em><\/strong><\/span> 1-10-1996 \u201cHMOs Offer Perverse Incentives To Physicians To Skimp On Care<\/em><\/strong>\u201d by Fromma Harrop QUOTE: \u201cHMOs monetary rewards for keeping patients away from expensive specialists, USHealthcare also penalizes internists 50 cents for every dollar one of their patients spends in an emergency room.\u201d \u201cInsurance companies fill up the politicians campaign chests. In turn, politicians make sure that nothing happens in Washington to jeopardize the insurers\u2019 license to print money\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

The New England Journal Of Medicine,<\/em><\/strong><\/span> 12-21-1995, “Extreme Risk\u2013-The New Corporate Proposition For Physicians,” BY David U. Himmelstein, MD and Stephanie Woolhammer, MD, MPH; QUOTE: \u201cFor a growing number of physicians, income is tethered to conduct that furthers corporate profitability.\u201d \u201cEnter plans that tie doctors\u2019 incomes to curtailing service.\u201d \u201cRisk sharing\u2013what might be called fee-for-non-referral care\u2013is the mirror image and ethical equivalent of these banned practices. In both instances, secrecy increases the ethical taint.\u201d \u201cNow a handful will make tens of millions as investors in risk-assuming groups, and some will boost their incomes by suppressing the use of services\u2013an ever more difficult proposition as norms ratchet down. Many more, if their practice styles for their patients\u2019 illnesses are too costly, will become unemployable…\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cThis system pressures doctors to exploit patients\u2019 trust for financial gain. We can influence patients choices among health plans, and we know their health status and care-seeking behavior\u2013the optimal data for risk selection.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cWe can already glimpse the next phase. As fee-for-service medicine withers, risk selection by \u00adHMOs become a zero-sum game, presaging fierce competition among doctors to avoid sick patients. Already the chief of a university hospital reportedly has admonished faculty\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201c[We can] no longer tolerate patients with complicated and expensive-to-treat conditions being encouraged to transfer to our group.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

https:\/\/www.psychopathfree.com\/articles\/why-do-psychopaths-put-us-on-the-defense.146\/<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Medical Record Tampering<\/span> <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cThe best con artists never leave anyone feeling taken. None of their victims ever knows there\u2019s been a crime,\u201d page 357 of \u201cYou Came Back\u201d<\/strong><\/em><\/span> by Christopher Coake<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 It became clear who, and what, I was really dealing with the day I asked to borrow my x-ray file from the hospital where my injury(s) occurred so I could hand-carry it to an appointment out of town. The staff was very interested in where I was going, who I was going to see, and I wouldn\u2019t tell them\u2013not that it would have made any difference if I did because what I didn\u2019t know back then was there is a country-wide dictate that it was strictly hands-off injury cases like mine and nobody would be allowed to intervene unless I was referred there by the surgeon of record. I had wrongly assumed, in my early trust and ignorance, that since the locals \u201cjust had no idea what could be wrong\u201d and\/or \u201cdidn\u2019t want to get involved\u201d I could possibly get a clean and ethical response out of town, out of state, maybe out of the country if necessary.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 I have a college-level education in photography. At home, when I took the films out to examine them what I saw horrified me: I had two sets of CT Scans sheets. Both sets had runs of manipulated images at the same set-points then picked up clean again when it got past the area of liability: the damaged area inside my body. I didn\u2019t know yet what was being concealed, only that it was. But I wanted to get other opinions\u2013so I consulted people I knew socially who were educated in photography…and then asked two FBI agents to look at my films. All saw the same tampering I saw; the FBI agents told me not to return these films to the hospital, to keep them and put them in a safe place–and to tell others with my particular iatrogenic injury to do the same \u201cbecause they are solid evidence of a crime\u201d. (but what good is solid evidence if there is no clean place to take it for prosecution?)<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 That was when I understood I was in bigger trouble than I had first thought. What does one DO with a betrayal of this magnitude?<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Later, an out-of-town x-ray technician, who had been injured at the same surgery I was, told me hospitals (at that time) kept two sets of x-ray films\u2013one set is the manipulated ones with the areas of liability concealed through under or over exposure, masking or dodging and has the patient\u2019s name on the envelope. This is the only set patients would be allowed to access, look at, and borrow. The other set is the clean set. This clean set doesn\u2019t have the patient\u2019s name on its envelope, however, it only has the patient\u2019s assigned number on it and \u201cFor Doctors Only\u201d written in big letters. When a doctor wanted to look at a patient\u2019s x-ray file it had to be done by using the assigned patient number. This is the file we will never be given access to.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Film is film<\/strong><\/em><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Masking was the tampering method of choice. When developing the runs of CT scan films the technician will expose the whole sheet for just a few seconds to lay down a faint image then turns off the light source.\u00a0 A ready-made, cut-to-fit, strip of cardboard is placed across the length of the run of images to be tampered with, then the light source is turned back on and the sheet of film is exposed for the rest of the correct time under the light to lay down clean images in the rest of the run. The finished product will read clearly in the other images but will be too faint to read across the ones that have been masked. That is only half of the con; the second half comes with the written report. The one writing the report will state something like this: \u201cnormal in the VISUALIZED portions\u201d Are they lying? No. It is the manipulated images that contain the damaged areas\u2013the ones too light, or too dark to \u201cvisualize\u201d clearly. Get it?<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Flat films are usually over-exposed for the manipulated file, will be too dark to see anything clearly. This is how it was back when I was injured in 1991.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Today, however, x-ray imaging has gone digital and is stored in their computers. Good luck getting access to those clean images. Digital images can be \u201cphoto-shopped\u201d to present anything the medical syndicate wishes them to present. The clean written reports can be \u201cedited\u201d before printing out, or being uploaded to the patient\u2019s on-line\/internet file.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 If you scroll down to the bottom of a lab report or a radiology report you will find the word \u201cEdited\u2013Final\u201d if it has been scrutinized and the incriminating portions removed or changed.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0 An ultrasound technician can adjust the angle of the hand-held portion to contaminate the actual image and make it look like something else, something the syndicate dictates and prefers.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Written reports, back when I was first injured and hospitals kept a paper file on patients (in addition to a microfiche and a computer file that was contained within its own system only) the written reports for the paper files were carefully worded in a \u201cspecial language\u201d whereby medical professionals could relay vital information to one another about what actually appeared in the x-ray films or lab specimens, etc. while at the same time concealing it from the patient of record. This is going to be a tough one to get across but I am going to try; once you understand how it works you can use it to decipher your own written reports:<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 This tampering method has a name: Hegelian Dialectic Antithesis. In this method, no equals yes and yes equals no. Plus, those writing the dirty reports for the paper file are very SPECIFIC about what they \u201cdidn\u2019t see\/note\/identify\u201d and EXACTLY where they \u201cdidn\u2019t see\/note\/identify it\u201d. The perpetrators of this dirty-work bank on the hope that most people are not familiar with Hegel and would not recognize the clear patterns of this \u201cspecial language\u201d for what it really is and just pass over it\u2013just like I did until I knew better.<\/span><\/p>\n

Examples (from my own medical record):<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cNo thrombus seen in the left ventricle,\u201d TRANSLATION: there is a blood clot in the heart\u2019s left ventricle.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cNo abnormal calcifications noted in the left lobe,\u201d \u00a0TRANSLATION: there are abnormal calcifications in the left lobe of the liver.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cNo free air seen under either hemidiaphragm,\u201d \u00a0TRANSLATION: there is free air under both hemidiaphragms.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 I have examined other people\u2019s paper files and saw the same tampering methodology. I saw it in one person\u2019s military medical record.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Today, with the medical record stored in the computer databases, they simply edit before presenting it in any form to the patient, edit out the information the medical syndicate wants to conceal. The separate healthcare systems have an agreement to help conceal each other\u2019s criminal activity and patient harm so it makes no difference where we go trying to get a clean service.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 One local hospital with a church\/religious affiliation is no more honest and clean in its dealings with the public than the others. Its doctors and staff perform all the same cover-up protocols, verbal abuses, records-tampering methodologies and so on with the same cold lack of respect for the law and the people it sells its services to.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 The tampering method it uses on specific components of lab results the medical syndicate wants to conceal is called \u201ctransposing\u201d\u2013the staff scrambles the blood and\/or urine values for specific lab results for a particular patient in a standardized pattern only they have the key to. Or they will simply eliminate the value for a particular result in the hope the patient will pass over it as insignificant.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 One of my associates had this experience: in the ER, late at night when it was virtually empty, an honest doctor came up to her and said: \u201cfollow me\u2013I want to show you something\u201d and took her to the desk area, called up her CLEAN computer-stored medical file and let her read it. It read NOTHING like the sanitized paper file copies she had been given by that hospital.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 I have an example in my medical record where the emergency room staff cut apart my lab sheet and substituted someone else\u2019s normal results\u2013then ran it through their copier instead of giving me the clean computer printout. But the one who patched this paper together did a very poor job of lining things up. Words were cut off by half, the patch was laid onto the sheet crooked.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 A nurse, who was injured at laparoscopic gallbladder surgery back when it was new, showed me her surgery consent form, said it was NOT the form she had signed; this one allowed a trainee to perform her surgery. She said she would never sign a paper like that. I looked at her signature and it was crooked, floating well above the signature line. They had clearly transferred her signature from the form she had actually signed to a different one of their choosing, that allowed something she didn\u2019t agree to nor want. She and I had two FBI agents inspect the form and they told us how the transfer was performed: the one doing the tampering cuts a window in a blank sheet of paper that exposes only the signature on the original form then runs it through the copy machine to align with the signature area on the form it is to be transferred to\u2013which doesn\u2019t always come out in perfect alignment\u2013like what appeared on this nurse\u2019s form. This is why I advise people to sign in any color but black and get a copy on the spot, don\u2019t leave without it, don\u2019t take \u201cno\u201d for an answer..<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 If someone is going to try to run a scam they should at least take the time to do it right, make it look believable.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 My experience with the video of my botched surgery went like this: I was given a copy that had been edited; it takes up after surgery is well underway and doesn\u2019t reflect the detail noted in the written operative report. The Medical Board, after I had made a complaint, also asked for, and was given, a copy of the surgery video\u2013unedited, the staff claimed. They showed it to me, just the VHS cassette itself, not the actual video\u2013it was labeled \u201cBird Watching In North America\u201d. Apparently, to thwart their injury victims from somehow getting hold of the unedited version, decided a good way to keep that from happening is to label these videos with anything but their victim\u2019s name or other identifying information and keep the \u201ckey\u201d of what video belongs to which victim separate. Clever monsters…<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Citations:<\/span> <\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Journal Of Endodontics<\/em><\/strong><\/span>, May 2008, Vol. 34, Issue 5, Pages 530-536<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0http:\/\/www.jendodon.com\/article\/S0099-2399(08)00088-5\/abstract<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

Abstract:\u00a0 Digital radiography has become an indispensable diagnostic tool in dentistry today. To improve vision and diagnosis, dental x-ray software allows image enhancement (eg, adjusting color, density, sharpness, brightness, or contrast). Exporting digital radiographs to a file format compatible with commercial graphic software increases chances that information can be altered, added, or removed in an unethical manner. Dental radiographs are easily duplicated, stored, or distributed in digital format. It is difficult to guarantee the authenticity of digital images, which is especially important in insurance or juridic cases. Image-enhancement features applied to digital radiographs allow mishandling or potential abuse. This has been illustrated by several recently published studies. A standard authentication procedure for digital radiographs is needed. A number of manipulated radiographic images are presented to show concerns about security, reliability, and the potential for fraud. Anti-tampering techniques and methods of detecting manipulations in digital medical images are discussed.<\/span><\/p>\n

https:\/\/ampedsoftware.com\/authenticate.html<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

PMC<\/em><\/strong><\/span>, March 28, 2007, https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pmc\/articles\/PMC3043827\/ <\/a>\u00a0By Wu, Chang, Chen, Wang, Kuo, Moon, and Chen, \u201cTamper Detection And Recovery For Medical Images Using Near Loss-Less Information Hiding Technique,\u201d QUOTE: \u201cDigital medical images are very easy to be modified for illegal purposes. For example, microcalcification in mammography is an important diagnostic clue, and it can be wiped off intentionally for insurance purposes or added intentionally into a normal mammography. In this paper, we proposed two methods to tamper detection and recovery for a medical image.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

ABC News, PrimeTime Live<\/em><\/strong><\/span> (transcript), 1-14-1998, \u201cSound Advice,\u201d QUOTE: Diane Sawyer (voice over): \u201cAnd it\u2019s not just obstetrical ultrasound. Every year, millions of ultrasound scans are performed on other organs like hearts and arteries. To show you how much skill matters, we asked this well-trained ultrasound sonographer to take an image of an artery, a clear one, with no blockage that could cause stroke. But it\u2019s very sensitive technology. Look what happens when one knob is turned incorrectly or the probe is held at slightly the wrong angle. Suddenly, that clear artery looks completely blocked when it\u2019s not\u2013a mistake which could lead to unnecessary and risky testing or surgery. Look again. The correct image and the incorrect one. And compare this good image of a liver and kidney with this murky one which could cause the doctors who review the scans to miss disease. (on camera) So since the skill of the sonographer is crucial, you probably think that all the tens of thousands of people doing ultrasounds are highly trained and certified. But you\u2019d be wrong…\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

http:\/\/hmohardball.com\/HMO%20Rigs%20Patients.pdf<\/span><\/p>\n

From A Lawyer<\/em><\/strong><\/span> (gotten for me through from one of their on-line subscription services), From A Lawyer (gotten for me through from one of their on-line subscription services), Author Unknown, QUOTE: \u201cA Note pf caution on video documentation: \u201cDo not give a copy to your patient. If you make videos for teaching, avoid identifying information other than the subject of interest, e.g. \u201cLaparoscopic Splenectomy\u201d. Do not write the date of the procedure or the patient\u2019s gender, race, name, address, or hospital identification number. Remember, an unedited tape of a procedure shown before a jury may make you appear as though you are shaky, awkward, and\u00a0 tenuous as a surgeon no matter how good a technical endoscopist you are.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Prairie Law<\/em><\/strong><\/span>, Subject: Re: Doctoring Of Medical Records, \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0Dear Dr. Kennedy, \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

With all due respect, I am sure that you believe your statements regarding records. But, in fact the experiences of medical professionals who are not physicians would prove you wrong. Most nurses are requested to change their documentation after “an untoward event”. I have personal experience with just such an event with a highly reputable university medical center. The radiology dept. where I worked for several years indeed shredded films when “lawsuits” were pending. Please try to listen to what the facts are that are being presented on this forum. You need to have some perspective of what plaintiffs actually are up against as you face them from the witness box. The power of the hospital, insurer, and you far exceeds their weapons in their search for justice. \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0XXXX R.N. LNCC<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Electronic Medical Records<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 When electronic medical record storage was being sold to the public back in the 1990s it was framed like this: \u201cif you live in one state and have an accident in another state any doctor anywhere can access your compete medical file and lab results, x-rays, etc. from any location you happen to be in order to provide the best care possible.\u201d Sounds great, right? And for that single use, it IS great. But it also has another use: tracking people, particularly medical malpractice victims.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 It used to be possible for a person injured by a doctor in his\/her own community to travel out of town or out of state to get a correct diagnosis and access the care being wantonly withheld at home. Not anymore. We could come in with a clean slate before the widespread use of electronic medical records but the electronic medical record follows us everywhere now.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 New Medicine\u2019s \u201ceat what you kill\u201d protocol works best when medical records are stored in a centralized computer database\u2013it prevents patient escape and thwarts strays wandering, enables unity in the presentation.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 And don\u2019t think for a minute that different medical systems won\u2019t unify to help each other when it comes to concealing each others\u2019 malpractice events. If one system does it for another system they can count on the favor returned for help concealing the malpractice events their doctors have caused.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Hospitals have had electronic medical records for a long time already but they were kept within their own system. Or linked within a community, called a C.H.I.N. (Community Health Information Network) Government and other vested interests wanted all these individual networks linked into one huge database\u2013and they got it. (called: H.I.E.– Health Information Exchange)<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Life insurance companies always kept a database on health records. One large company is the Medical Information Bureau located in Braintree, Massachusetts.<\/span><\/p>\n

http:\/\/www.mib.com\/facts_about_mib.html<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

Citations:<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cThey Know Your Secrets,\u201d<\/strong><\/em><\/span> 20\/20 9-30-94, \u00a0(transcript #1439), QUOTE: \u201cWith the advent of computer technology, more and more medical information is being transferred from doctor and hospital files into centralized computer data bases. The centralization of data does help to hold down costs and it does make it easier for health professionals to treat patients, but it also makes it easier for outsiders to tap into that very same data.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

https:\/\/www.healthit.gov\/providers-professionals\/health-information-exchange\/what-hie<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Referral To Psychiatrists Or Psychologists<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 A word of warning: once injured by a doctor and we begin questioning the \u201ccare\u201d we are (or most likely aren\u2019t) receiving, the standardized cover-up program dictates referral to a psychiatrist or some other such hand-selected \u201cmental health professional\u201d who has proven blind obedience and loyalty to the \u201cclub\u201d and its rules. If we are so foolish as to accept such a referral we need to keep our back to the wall at all times because that so-called professional will never be working for our best-interests. They have one purpose: to ferret out our weak points then use them to disable us psychologically, dig out as much \u201cdirt\u201d on us as can be extracted for the medical syndicate to hold over our heads as they see fit, and to advise us to blindly obey and behave along the lines of the medical syndicate\u2019s comfort.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 They will also offer to prescribe anti-depressants, tranquilizers, and other such drugs to reduce or neutralize our natural, normal (and unwelcome) response to being abused by the medical syndicate.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 These drugs can be harmful to certain disease processes, especially since a correct diagnosis is being deliberately withheld. There is no way any outsider can have enough information to protect themselves from wrong drugs and contraindicated treatments.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 There is also the diabolical intention to make a permanent, false-and-insulting, record of our having\u201cmental health issues\u201d to be utilized to discredit us if, in the unlikely event, that our medical malpractice case ever makes it into a courtroom.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 It will also be utilized to advantage by every medical professional we seek care from forever after. An example is being asked \u201cwhat could I do to make you really angry?\u201d and if we answer truthfully \u201ccall me a liar about my medical issues\u201d we will be purposefully, and viciously, called a liar every time we raise a specific complaint about a symptom directly related to our doctor\u00ad caused injury. We don\u2019t have to answer every question we are asked. Especially when asked by people with questionable intent.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 One injury victim\u2019s weak point was her appearance; once the psychiatrist learned this he would masterfully hammer her, viciously, with that topic at every visit and she would phone me afterward in tears. It never occurred to her that she was being deliberately abused and to just stop seeing this monster.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 A custom-tailored abuse program will be created from the information we trustingly give them and it will be used by every contact we have with the \u201cclub\u201d forever after in the attempt to try to break us down. It\u2019ll be entered into our computer files and at the ready for instant reference to all who seek to utilize it against us. (the same applies to charted allergens; hospital staff \u201cforgets\u201d we are deathly allergic to a specific drug…understand?)<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 One, seemingly innocent, question we are routinely asked is: \u201cwhat can I do to make you really angry?\u201d Do not answer this question, or instead answer with something that isn\u2019t true and doesn\u2019t matter, because if we tell them the truth that answer will be spread across the whole system and will be used as a tool to abuse us with every place we go forever after.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Disgusting cowards band together in order to gain the ability to commit acts they\u2019d never have the courage to commit on their own: women, children, the poor, the elderly, prisoners and such disenfranchised segments of society are easy targets, cannot fight back or protect themselves from predation on a level playing field.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Blutkitt
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/span>Blutkitt is a German word meaning \u201cblood cement\u201d<\/span><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

(Click here to continue on to Part Three<\/a>)<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Taking Lives (Part Two) Teaching Hospitals and Resident Training \u00a0\u00a0 Most, if not all, hospitals today are teaching hospitals. Some […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-1145","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"yoast_head":"\nTaking Lives (Pt 2) - R. Cameron Bryce<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/taking-lives-pt-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Taking Lives (Pt 2) - R. Cameron Bryce\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Taking Lives (Part Two) Teaching Hospitals and Resident Training \u00a0\u00a0 Most, if not all, hospitals today are teaching hospitals. Some […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/taking-lives-pt-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"R. Cameron Bryce\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-07-14T21:31:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"62 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/taking-lives-pt-2\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/taking-lives-pt-2\/\",\"name\":\"Taking Lives (Pt 2) - R. Cameron Bryce\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-07-13T19:34:18+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-14T21:31:57+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/taking-lives-pt-2\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/taking-lives-pt-2\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/taking-lives-pt-2\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Taking Lives (Pt 2)\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/\",\"name\":\"R. Cameron Bryce\",\"description\":\"Official Author Site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Taking Lives (Pt 2) - R. Cameron Bryce","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/taking-lives-pt-2\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Taking Lives (Pt 2) - R. Cameron Bryce","og_description":"Taking Lives (Part Two) Teaching Hospitals and Resident Training \u00a0\u00a0 Most, if not all, hospitals today are teaching hospitals. Some […]","og_url":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/taking-lives-pt-2\/","og_site_name":"R. Cameron Bryce","article_modified_time":"2018-07-14T21:31:57+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"62 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/taking-lives-pt-2\/","url":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/taking-lives-pt-2\/","name":"Taking Lives (Pt 2) - R. Cameron Bryce","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-07-13T19:34:18+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-14T21:31:57+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/taking-lives-pt-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/taking-lives-pt-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/taking-lives-pt-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Taking Lives (Pt 2)"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/","name":"R. Cameron Bryce","description":"Official Author Site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1145","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1145"}],"version-history":[{"count":18,"href":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1145\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1810,"href":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1145\/revisions\/1810"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/brycepublications.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1145"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}